Free Trial

Freehold Royalties (FRU) Competitors

Freehold Royalties logo
C$17.90 +0.12 (+0.67%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

FRU vs. SCR, PSK, MEG, CPG, and ATH

Should you be buying Freehold Royalties stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Freehold Royalties include Strathcona Resources (SCR), PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), MEG Energy (MEG), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), and Athabasca Oil (ATH). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Strathcona Resources?

Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) and Strathcona Resources (TSE:SCR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 29.28% compared to Strathcona Resources' net margin of 22.62%. Strathcona Resources' return on equity of 15.77% beat Freehold Royalties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freehold Royalties29.28% 8.82% 10.42%
Strathcona Resources 22.62%15.77%6.81%

14.3% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.3% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Strathcona Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Strathcona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freehold RoyaltiesC$313.46M9.36C$132.34MC$0.5631.96
Strathcona ResourcesC$4.19B2.35C$370.36MC$4.2510.81

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 1 more articles in the media than Strathcona Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 2 mentions for Strathcona Resources. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Strathcona Resources' score of 0.34 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freehold Royalties
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Strathcona Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Freehold Royalties presently has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. Strathcona Resources has a consensus price target of C$39.14, suggesting a potential downside of 14.80%. Given Freehold Royalties' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than Strathcona Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Strathcona Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Strathcona Resources pays an annual dividend of C$1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Freehold Royalties pays out 192.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Strathcona Resources pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Strathcona Resources has a beta of 2.614012, indicating that its share price is 161% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Strathcona Resources beats Freehold Royalties on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) and Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

71.2% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 42.81% compared to Freehold Royalties' net margin of 29.28%. Freehold Royalties' return on equity of 8.82% beat PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PrairieSky Royalty42.81% 7.89% 5.99%
Freehold Royalties 29.28%8.82%10.42%

In the previous week, PrairieSky Royalty had 1 more articles in the media than Freehold Royalties. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty and 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties. PrairieSky Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.75 indicating that PrairieSky Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PrairieSky Royalty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Freehold Royalties
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PrairieSky Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Freehold Royalties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrairieSky Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$483.90M16.55C$214.83MC$0.8640.07
Freehold RoyaltiesC$313.46M9.36C$132.34MC$0.5631.96

PrairieSky Royalty presently has a consensus price target of C$32.25, suggesting a potential downside of 6.41%. Freehold Royalties has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Freehold Royalties' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than PrairieSky Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.568175, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 121.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Freehold Royalties pays out 192.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty beats Freehold Royalties on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to MEG Energy?

Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) and MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

14.3% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.2% of MEG Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 29.28% compared to MEG Energy's net margin of 12.56%. MEG Energy's return on equity of 11.73% beat Freehold Royalties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freehold Royalties29.28% 8.82% 10.42%
MEG Energy 12.56%11.73%8.96%

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than MEG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for MEG Energy. MEG Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.75 indicating that MEG Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freehold Royalties
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MEG Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freehold RoyaltiesC$313.46M9.36C$132.34MC$0.5631.96
MEG EnergyC$4.63B1.70C$487.47MC$2.1114.64

Freehold Royalties presently has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. MEG Energy has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Freehold Royalties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than MEG Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
MEG Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. MEG Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Freehold Royalties pays out 192.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MEG Energy pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Freehold Royalties beats MEG Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) and Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Freehold Royalties pays out 192.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Freehold Royalties has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Freehold Royalties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 29.28% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Freehold Royalties' return on equity of 8.82% beat Crescent Point Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Point Energy-1.65% 3.31% 2.86%
Freehold Royalties 29.28%8.82%10.42%

Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, suggesting that its stock price is 184% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 3 more articles in the media than Crescent Point Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 0 mentions for Crescent Point Energy. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Crescent Point Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crescent Point Energy Neutral
Freehold Royalties Positive

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A
Freehold RoyaltiesC$313.46M9.36C$132.34MC$0.5631.96

Summary

Freehold Royalties beats Crescent Point Energy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Athabasca Oil?

Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) and Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

38.3% of Athabasca Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Athabasca Oil presently has a consensus price target of C$10.29, suggesting a potential downside of 15.09%. Freehold Royalties has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Freehold Royalties' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Athabasca Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 29.28% compared to Athabasca Oil's net margin of 18.29%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 13.86% beat Freehold Royalties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Athabasca Oil18.29% 13.86% 9.71%
Freehold Royalties 29.28%8.82%10.42%

Athabasca Oil has a beta of -0.025589, suggesting that its share price is 103% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than Athabasca Oil. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for Athabasca Oil. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Athabasca Oil's score of 0.10 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Athabasca Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Freehold Royalties
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Athabasca Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Athabasca OilC$1.36B4.27C$221.88MC$0.4924.73
Freehold RoyaltiesC$313.46M9.36C$132.34MC$0.5631.96

Summary

Freehold Royalties beats Athabasca Oil on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Freehold Royalties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRU vs. The Competition

MetricFreehold RoyaltiesOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.93BC$2.07BC$10.78BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield6.04%7.55%10.18%6.22%
P/E Ratio31.9616.2015.6823.83
Price / Sales9.363,481.171,019.7913.46
Price / Cash1,983.7585.5437.4082.69
Price / Book2.942.494.444.48
Net IncomeC$132.34MC$82.07MC$4.24BC$300.68M
7 Day Performance1.02%1.33%1.70%0.12%
1 Month Performance4.99%5.34%5.31%2.88%
1 Year Performance60.97%74.03%66.02%57.78%

Freehold Royalties Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRU
Freehold Royalties
1.744 of 5 stars
C$17.90
+0.7%
C$17.03
-4.9%
N/AC$2.93BC$313.46M31.96N/A
SCR
Strathcona Resources
2.0021 of 5 stars
C$44.69
+4.7%
C$39.14
-12.4%
N/AC$9.57BC$4.19B10.52193
PSK
PrairieSky Royalty
2.5108 of 5 stars
C$34.35
+0.1%
C$32.25
-6.1%
N/AC$7.98BC$483.90M39.9465
MEG
MEG Energy
1.6016 of 5 stars
C$30.89
+0.7%
C$28.00
-9.4%
N/AC$7.86BC$4.63B14.64449
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FRU) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners