Which has better valuation & earnings, FRU or MEG?

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Freehold Royalties C$322.23M 8.75 C$132.34M C$0.85 20.22 MEG Energy C$4.63B 1.70 C$487.47M C$2.11 14.64

Does the media favor FRU or MEG?

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than MEG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for MEG Energy. MEG Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.59 indicating that MEG Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Freehold Royalties 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MEG Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PSK or FRU?

PrairieSky Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Freehold Royalties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrairieSky Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PrairieSky Royalty C$538.30M 15.05 C$214.83M C$1.04 33.52 Freehold Royalties C$322.23M 8.75 C$132.34M C$0.85 20.22

Does the media prefer PSK or FRU?

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than PrairieSky Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty. PrairieSky Royalty's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.59 indicating that PrairieSky Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PrairieSky Royalty 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Freehold Royalties 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer FRU or CPG?

Freehold Royalties currently has a consensus target price of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 0.92%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Freehold Royalties. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Freehold Royalties 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.17 Crescent Point Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media prefer TVE or FRU?

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 1 more articles in the media than Tamarack Valley Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 2 mentions for Tamarack Valley Energy. Tamarack Valley Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.59 indicating that Tamarack Valley Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Tamarack Valley Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Freehold Royalties 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Freehold Royalties (FRU) Competitors

C$17.19 +0.07 (+0.41%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

FRU vs. SCR, MEG, PSK, CPG, and TVE

Should you buy Freehold Royalties stock or one of its competitors? Freehold Royalties's main competitors and comparable companies include Strathcona Resources (SCR), MEG Energy (MEG), PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), and Tamarack Valley Energy (TVE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Strathcona Resources?

Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) and Strathcona Resources (TSE:SCR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 3 more articles in the media than Strathcona Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 0 mentions for Strathcona Resources. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Strathcona Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Freehold Royalties	Positive
Strathcona Resources	Neutral

Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Strathcona Resources pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Freehold Royalties pays out 127.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Strathcona Resources pays out 30.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.586238, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strathcona Resources has a beta of 2.614012, suggesting that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

Strathcona Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Strathcona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Freehold Royalties	C$322.23M	8.75	C$132.34M	C$0.85	20.22
Strathcona Resources	C$4.72B	1.96	C$370.36M	C$3.94	10.98

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 43.54% compared to Strathcona Resources' net margin of 19.41%. Strathcona Resources' return on equity of 17.02% beat Freehold Royalties' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Freehold Royalties	43.54%	13.88%	10.42%
Strathcona Resources	19.41%	17.02%	6.81%

Freehold Royalties currently has a consensus target price of C$17.03, indicating a potential downside of 0.92%. Strathcona Resources has a consensus target price of C$43.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.58%. Given Strathcona Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Strathcona Resources is more favorable than Freehold Royalties.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Freehold Royalties	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Strathcona Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

14.9% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.3% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Strathcona Resources beats Freehold Royalties on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to MEG Energy?

Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) and MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

14.9% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.2% of MEG Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Freehold Royalties currently has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 0.92%. MEG Energy has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Freehold Royalties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than MEG Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Freehold Royalties	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
MEG Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 43.54% compared to MEG Energy's net margin of 13.76%. Freehold Royalties' return on equity of 13.88% beat MEG Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Freehold Royalties	43.54%	13.88%	10.42%
MEG Energy	13.76%	9.39%	8.96%

Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.586238, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. MEG Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Freehold Royalties pays out 127.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MEG Energy pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than MEG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for MEG Energy. MEG Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.59 indicating that MEG Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Freehold Royalties	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MEG Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Freehold Royalties	C$322.23M	8.75	C$132.34M	C$0.85	20.22
MEG Energy	C$4.63B	1.70	C$487.47M	C$2.11	14.64

Summary

Freehold Royalties beats MEG Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) and Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than PrairieSky Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty. PrairieSky Royalty's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.59 indicating that PrairieSky Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PrairieSky Royalty	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Freehold Royalties	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PrairieSky Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Freehold Royalties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrairieSky Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PrairieSky Royalty	C$538.30M	15.05	C$214.83M	C$1.04	33.52
Freehold Royalties	C$322.23M	8.75	C$132.34M	C$0.85	20.22

PrairieSky Royalty currently has a consensus price target of C$34.42, suggesting a potential downside of 1.27%. Freehold Royalties has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 0.92%. Given Freehold Royalties' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than PrairieSky Royalty.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PrairieSky Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Freehold Royalties	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.734948, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.586238, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

72.7% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.9% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 101.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Freehold Royalties pays out 127.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 44.86% compared to Freehold Royalties' net margin of 43.54%. Freehold Royalties' return on equity of 13.88% beat PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PrairieSky Royalty	44.86%	9.48%	5.99%
Freehold Royalties	43.54%	13.88%	10.42%

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty beats Freehold Royalties on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) and Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.586238, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, suggesting that its stock price is 184% more volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Freehold Royalties	C$322.23M	8.75	C$132.34M	C$0.85	20.22
Crescent Point Energy	C$3.51B	0.00	C$215.70M	C$0.49	N/A

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 43.54% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Freehold Royalties' return on equity of 13.88% beat Crescent Point Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Freehold Royalties	43.54%	13.88%	10.42%
Crescent Point Energy	-1.65%	3.31%	2.86%

Freehold Royalties currently has a consensus target price of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 0.92%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Freehold Royalties.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Freehold Royalties	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Crescent Point Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 3 more articles in the media than Crescent Point Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 0 mentions for Crescent Point Energy. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Crescent Point Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Freehold Royalties	Positive
Crescent Point Energy	Neutral

Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Freehold Royalties pays out 127.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

14.9% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Freehold Royalties beats Crescent Point Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Tamarack Valley Energy (TSE:TVE) and Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Tamarack Valley Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Tamarack Valley Energy pays out 225.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Freehold Royalties pays out 127.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Freehold Royalties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tamarack Valley Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$13.38, suggesting a potential upside of 1.17%. Freehold Royalties has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 0.92%. Given Tamarack Valley Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Tamarack Valley Energy is more favorable than Freehold Royalties.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tamarack Valley Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Freehold Royalties	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 1 more articles in the media than Tamarack Valley Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 2 mentions for Tamarack Valley Energy. Tamarack Valley Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.59 indicating that Tamarack Valley Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tamarack Valley Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Freehold Royalties	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Tamarack Valley Energy has a beta of 0.315643, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.586238, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Tamarack Valley Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Freehold Royalties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tamarack Valley Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tamarack Valley Energy	C$1.85B	3.40	C$208.06M	C$0.07	188.86
Freehold Royalties	C$322.23M	8.75	C$132.34M	C$0.85	20.22

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 43.54% compared to Tamarack Valley Energy's net margin of 1.50%. Freehold Royalties' return on equity of 13.88% beat Tamarack Valley Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tamarack Valley Energy	1.50%	1.34%	6.55%
Freehold Royalties	43.54%	13.88%	10.42%

35.5% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.9% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Tamarack Valley Energy and Freehold Royalties tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Freehold Royalties News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FRU vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Freehold Royalties	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$2.82B	C$11.14B	C$9.73B	C$12.54B
Dividend Yield	6.30%	11.34%	11.58%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	20.22	16.27	20.07	30.69
Price / Sales	8.75	480.34	392.78	9.75
Price / Cash	1,983.75	39.71	36.08	82.29
Price / Book	2.77	3.15	2.97	4.64
Net Income	C$132.34M	C$5.27B	C$4.32B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	1.60%	3.25%	3.58%	0.94%
1 Month Performance	4.95%	4.32%	4.37%	3.90%
1 Year Performance	28.86%	35.30%	38.78%	36.05%

Freehold Royalties Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FRU Freehold Royalties	1.286 of 5 stars	C$17.19 +0.4%	C$17.03 -0.9%	+29.9%	C$2.82B	C$322.23M	20.22	N/A	Dividend Announcement
SCR Strathcona Resources	N/A	C$38.66 -2.9%	C$43.00 +11.2%	+17.8%	C$8.28B	C$4.14B	11.14	193	Positive News Gap Down
MEG MEG Energy	1.4255 of 5 stars	C$30.89 +0.7%	C$28.00 -9.4%	+16.3%	C$7.86B	C$4.63B	14.64	449	News Coverage High Trading Volume
PSK PrairieSky Royalty	2.7847 of 5 stars	C$33.60 -1.1%	C$34.42 +2.4%	+47.1%	C$7.81B	C$538.30M	32.31	65
CPG Crescent Point Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$7.24B	C$3.51B	23.92	777

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FRU) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Freehold Royalties (FRU) Competitors

FRU vs. SCR, MEG, PSK, CPG, and TVE

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Strathcona Resources?

Summary

How does Freehold Royalties compare to MEG Energy?

Summary

How does Freehold Royalties compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

Summary

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Summary

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FRU vs. The Competition

Freehold Royalties Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Freehold Royalties (FRU) Competitors

FRU vs. SCR, MEG, PSK, CPG, and TVE

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Strathcona Resources?

Does the media prefer FRU or SCR?

Is FRU or SCR a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, FRU or SCR?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FRU or SCR?

Is FRU or SCR more profitable?

Do analysts rate FRU or SCR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FRU or SCR?

Summary

How does Freehold Royalties compare to MEG Energy?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FRU or MEG?

Do analysts rate FRU or MEG?

Is FRU or MEG more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, FRU or MEG?

Is FRU or MEG a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor FRU or MEG?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FRU or MEG?

Summary

How does Freehold Royalties compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

Does the media prefer PSK or FRU?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PSK or FRU?

Do analysts prefer PSK or FRU?

Which has more risk and volatility, PSK or FRU?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PSK or FRU?

Is PSK or FRU a better dividend stock?

Is PSK or FRU more profitable?

Summary

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Which has more risk & volatility, FRU or CPG?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FRU or CPG?

Is FRU or CPG more profitable?

Do analysts prefer FRU or CPG?

Does the media favor FRU or CPG?

Is FRU or CPG a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FRU or CPG?

Summary

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Is TVE or FRU a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend TVE or FRU?

Does the media prefer TVE or FRU?

Which has more risk and volatility, TVE or FRU?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TVE or FRU?

Is TVE or FRU more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in TVE or FRU?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FRU vs. The Competition

Freehold Royalties Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools