Free Trial

Freehold Royalties (FRU) Competitors

Freehold Royalties logo
C$17.31 -0.29 (-1.65%)
As of 05/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

FRU vs. SCR, PSK, MEG, CPG, and ATH

Should you buy Freehold Royalties stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Freehold Royalties with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Freehold Royalties include Strathcona Resources (SCR), PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), MEG Energy (MEG), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), and Athabasca Oil (ATH). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Strathcona Resources?

Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) and Strathcona Resources (TSE:SCR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 29.84% compared to Strathcona Resources' net margin of 20.18%. Strathcona Resources' return on equity of 13.89% beat Freehold Royalties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freehold Royalties29.84% 8.81% 10.42%
Strathcona Resources 20.18%13.89%6.81%

Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strathcona Resources has a beta of 2.614012, meaning that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

14.2% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 91.3% of Strathcona Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Strathcona Resources pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Freehold Royalties pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Strathcona Resources pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Freehold Royalties currently has a consensus price target of C$17.03, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. Strathcona Resources has a consensus price target of C$39.14, indicating a potential downside of 12.96%. Given Freehold Royalties' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than Strathcona Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Strathcona Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Strathcona Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Strathcona Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freehold RoyaltiesC$300.21M9.45C$132.34MC$0.5432.06
Strathcona ResourcesC$4.14B2.33C$370.36MC$3.4712.96

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 1 more articles in the media than Strathcona Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for Strathcona Resources. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Strathcona Resources' score of 0.20 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freehold Royalties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Strathcona Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Strathcona Resources beats Freehold Royalties on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) and PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.568175, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

14.2% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PrairieSky Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Freehold Royalties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrairieSky Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freehold RoyaltiesC$300.21M9.45C$132.34MC$0.5432.06
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$483.90M16.31C$214.83MC$0.8639.49

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than PrairieSky Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 0 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat PrairieSky Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Freehold Royalties Neutral
PrairieSky Royalty Neutral

Freehold Royalties currently has a consensus price target of C$17.03, suggesting a potential downside of 1.61%. PrairieSky Royalty has a consensus price target of C$32.25, suggesting a potential downside of 5.04%. Given Freehold Royalties' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than PrairieSky Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 42.81% compared to Freehold Royalties' net margin of 29.84%. Freehold Royalties' return on equity of 8.81% beat PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freehold Royalties29.84% 8.81% 10.42%
PrairieSky Royalty 42.81%7.89%5.99%

Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Freehold Royalties pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 121.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty beats Freehold Royalties on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to MEG Energy?

MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) and Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

MEG Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. MEG Energy pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Freehold Royalties pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

MEG Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.36%. Freehold Royalties has a consensus target price of C$17.03, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. Given Freehold Royalties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than MEG Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MEG Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

46.2% of MEG Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.2% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 1 more articles in the media than MEG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for MEG Energy. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat MEG Energy's score of -0.10 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MEG Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Freehold Royalties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 29.84% compared to MEG Energy's net margin of 12.56%. MEG Energy's return on equity of 11.73% beat Freehold Royalties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MEG Energy12.56% 11.73% 8.96%
Freehold Royalties 29.84%8.81%10.42%

MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MEG EnergyC$4.63B1.70C$487.47MC$2.1114.64
Freehold RoyaltiesC$300.21M9.45C$132.34MC$0.5432.06

Summary

Freehold Royalties beats MEG Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) and Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 2 more articles in the media than Crescent Point Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 0 mentions for Crescent Point Energy. Freehold Royalties' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Crescent Point Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Freehold Royalties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crescent Point Energy Neutral
Freehold Royalties Neutral

Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, indicating that its share price is 184% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Freehold Royalties pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Freehold Royalties pays out 200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A
Freehold RoyaltiesC$300.21M9.45C$132.34MC$0.5432.06

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 29.84% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Freehold Royalties' return on equity of 8.81% beat Crescent Point Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Point Energy-1.65% 3.31% 2.86%
Freehold Royalties 29.84%8.81%10.42%

Freehold Royalties has a consensus price target of C$17.03, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Freehold Royalties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.2% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Freehold Royalties beats Crescent Point Energy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freehold Royalties compare to Athabasca Oil?

Freehold Royalties (TSE:FRU) and Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Freehold Royalties. Athabasca Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freehold Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freehold RoyaltiesC$300.21M9.45C$132.34MC$0.5432.06
Athabasca OilC$1.39B3.95C$221.88MC$0.4525.20

Freehold Royalties presently has a consensus target price of C$17.03, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. Athabasca Oil has a consensus target price of C$10.38, indicating a potential downside of 8.51%. Given Freehold Royalties' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Freehold Royalties is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freehold Royalties
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Athabasca Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Freehold Royalties had 1 more articles in the media than Athabasca Oil. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Freehold Royalties and 1 mentions for Athabasca Oil. Athabasca Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Freehold Royalties' score of 0.37 indicating that Athabasca Oil is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freehold Royalties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Athabasca Oil
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Freehold Royalties has a beta of 0.591607, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Athabasca Oil has a beta of 0.123957, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

14.2% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Athabasca Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Freehold Royalties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Freehold Royalties has a net margin of 29.84% compared to Athabasca Oil's net margin of 16.25%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 12.23% beat Freehold Royalties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freehold Royalties29.84% 8.81% 10.42%
Athabasca Oil 16.25%12.23%9.71%

Summary

Freehold Royalties beats Athabasca Oil on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Freehold Royalties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRU vs. The Competition

MetricFreehold RoyaltiesOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.84BC$2.09BC$10.58BC$12.16B
Dividend Yield6.14%7.52%10.23%6.20%
P/E Ratio32.0631.7921.0937.64
Price / Sales9.453,169.56947.8311.68
Price / Cash1,983.7585.5438.7482.29
Price / Book2.853.634.654.50
Net IncomeC$132.34MC$82.07MC$4.24BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.13%-2.38%-0.58%2.48%
1 Month Performance-0.23%1.12%2.15%1.47%
1 Year Performance37.71%56.09%53.84%53.55%

Freehold Royalties Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRU
Freehold Royalties
1.8621 of 5 stars
C$17.31
-1.6%
C$17.03
-1.6%
+38.9%C$2.84BC$300.21M32.06N/A
SCR
Strathcona Resources
1.9812 of 5 stars
C$47.37
+0.1%
C$39.14
-17.4%
+56.4%C$10.15BC$4.14B13.65193
PSK
PrairieSky Royalty
1.0948 of 5 stars
C$34.74
+0.1%
C$32.25
-7.2%
+47.1%C$8.07BC$483.90M40.4065
MEG
MEG Energy
1.2353 of 5 stars
C$30.89
+0.7%
C$28.00
-9.4%
+25.0%C$7.86BC$4.63B14.64449
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FRU) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners