Go Pro

Petrus Resources (PRQ) Competitors

Petrus Resources logo
C$1.81 +0.04 (+2.26%)
As of 01:08 PM Eastern

PRQ vs. SGY, OBE, TET, LGN, and SNM

Should you buy Petrus Resources stock or one of its competitors? Petrus Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Surge Energy (SGY), Obsidian Energy (OBE), Paramount Resources TEC (TET), Logan Energy (LGN), and ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Petrus Resources compare to Surge Energy?

Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) and Surge Energy (TSE:SGY) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Petrus Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Surge Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Surge Energy pays out 118.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Surge Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Surge Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Petrus Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Surge Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Petrus Resources and 1 mentions for Surge Energy. Surge Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Petrus Resources' score of 0.25 indicating that Surge Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Petrus Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Surge Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Petrus Resources presently has a consensus target price of C$2.40, suggesting a potential upside of 32.60%. Surge Energy has a consensus target price of C$13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 25.95%. Given Petrus Resources' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than Surge Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petrus Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Surge Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Petrus Resources has a beta of 0.262689, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Surge Energy has a beta of -0.422889, indicating that its share price is 142% less volatile than the broader market.

Surge Energy has a net margin of 8.01% compared to Petrus Resources' net margin of -0.95%. Surge Energy's return on equity of 6.18% beat Petrus Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petrus Resources-0.95% -0.27% 1.66%
Surge Energy 8.01%6.18%2.75%

Petrus Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Surge Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petrus ResourcesC$91.82M2.93C$43.04MN/AN/A
Surge EnergyC$644.44M1.64-C$80.33MC$0.4423.91

Summary

Petrus Resources and Surge Energy tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petrus Resources compare to Obsidian Energy?

Obsidian Energy (TSE:OBE) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Obsidian Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Petrus Resources.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Obsidian EnergyC$610.90M1.60C$116.66MC$0.4234.88
Petrus ResourcesC$91.82M2.93C$43.04MN/AN/A

In the previous week, Obsidian Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Petrus Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Obsidian Energy and 4 mentions for Petrus Resources. Obsidian Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Petrus Resources' score of 0.25 indicating that Obsidian Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Obsidian Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Petrus Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

8.7% of Obsidian Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Obsidian Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$14.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.44%. Petrus Resources has a consensus target price of C$2.40, suggesting a potential upside of 32.60%. Given Petrus Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than Obsidian Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Obsidian Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Petrus Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Obsidian Energy has a beta of -0.32292, suggesting that its stock price is 132% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrus Resources has a beta of 0.262689, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Obsidian Energy has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Petrus Resources' net margin of -0.95%. Obsidian Energy's return on equity of 2.00% beat Petrus Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Obsidian Energy4.96% 2.00% 4.88%
Petrus Resources -0.95%-0.27%1.66%

Summary

Obsidian Energy beats Petrus Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petrus Resources compare to Paramount Resources TEC?

Paramount Resources TEC (TSE:TET) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Petrus Resources has a consensus target price of C$2.40, indicating a potential upside of 32.60%. Given Petrus Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than Paramount Resources TEC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Paramount Resources TEC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Petrus Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petrus Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Paramount Resources TEC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Paramount Resources TECN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Petrus ResourcesC$91.82M2.93C$43.04MN/AN/A

Paramount Resources TEC has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petrus Resources' net margin of -0.95%. Paramount Resources TEC's return on equity of 0.00% beat Petrus Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Paramount Resources TECN/A N/A N/A
Petrus Resources -0.95%-0.27%1.66%

In the previous week, Petrus Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Paramount Resources TEC. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Petrus Resources and 0 mentions for Paramount Resources TEC. Paramount Resources TEC's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Petrus Resources' score of 0.25 indicating that Paramount Resources TEC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Paramount Resources TEC Positive
Petrus Resources Neutral

Summary

Petrus Resources beats Paramount Resources TEC on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petrus Resources compare to Logan Energy?

Logan Energy (CVE:LGN) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Logan Energy has a net margin of 15.75% compared to Petrus Resources' net margin of -0.95%. Logan Energy's return on equity of 8.84% beat Petrus Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Logan Energy15.75% 8.84% 0.29%
Petrus Resources -0.95%-0.27%1.66%

Petrus Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Logan Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Logan EnergyC$189.00M3.55C$19.98MC$0.0424.25
Petrus ResourcesC$91.82M2.93C$43.04MN/AN/A

Logan Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$1.38, indicating a potential upside of 42.27%. Petrus Resources has a consensus price target of C$2.40, indicating a potential upside of 32.60%. Given Logan Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Logan Energy is more favorable than Petrus Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Logan Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.40
Petrus Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Petrus Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Logan Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Petrus Resources and 1 mentions for Logan Energy. Logan Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Petrus Resources' score of 0.25 indicating that Logan Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Logan Energy Positive
Petrus Resources Neutral

Logan Energy has a beta of -0.049683, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrus Resources has a beta of 0.262689, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

3.1% of Logan Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Logan Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Logan Energy beats Petrus Resources on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petrus Resources compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

ShaMaran Petroleum (CVE:SNM) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Petrus Resources has a consensus target price of C$2.40, suggesting a potential upside of 32.60%. Given Petrus Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than ShaMaran Petroleum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ShaMaran Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Petrus Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

ShaMaran Petroleum has a beta of 1.835381, indicating that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrus Resources has a beta of 0.262689, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

ShaMaran Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Petrus Resources.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ShaMaran PetroleumC$157.02M3.67C$51.66MC$0.0212.50
Petrus ResourcesC$91.82M2.93C$43.04MN/AN/A

ShaMaran Petroleum has a net margin of 28.64% compared to Petrus Resources' net margin of -0.95%. ShaMaran Petroleum's return on equity of 18.59% beat Petrus Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ShaMaran Petroleum28.64% 18.59% 2.76%
Petrus Resources -0.95%-0.27%1.66%

1.8% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Petrus Resources had 2 more articles in the media than ShaMaran Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Petrus Resources and 2 mentions for ShaMaran Petroleum. Petrus Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat ShaMaran Petroleum's score of 0.17 indicating that Petrus Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ShaMaran Petroleum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Petrus Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

ShaMaran Petroleum beats Petrus Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Petrus Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PRQ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PRQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PRQ vs. The Competition

MetricPetrus ResourcesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$268.76MC$11.03BC$9.64BC$12.62B
Dividend Yield6.74%11.40%11.64%6.20%
P/E Ratio23.2516.4917.7235.09
Price / Sales2.93451.35370.149.77
Price / Cash29.0839.3935.7982.29
Price / Book0.804.383.994.62
Net IncomeC$43.04MC$5.27BC$4.32BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance6.47%2.32%2.48%2.72%
1 Month Performance6.47%4.97%4.69%3.28%
1 Year Performance23.97%35.39%38.28%36.65%

Petrus Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PRQ
Petrus Resources
4.0725 of 5 stars
C$1.81
+2.3%
C$2.40
+32.6%
+19.6%C$268.76MC$91.82M23.2517
SGY
Surge Energy
4.5611 of 5 stars
C$9.99
-2.1%
C$13.25
+32.6%
+43.7%C$1.00BC$644.44M22.7093
OBE
Obsidian Energy
3.0676 of 5 stars
C$13.87
+3.0%
C$14.00
+0.9%
+82.8%C$926.20MC$610.90M33.02190
TET
Paramount Resources TEC
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$782.03MN/AN/A147,000
LGN
Logan Energy
2.6803 of 5 stars
C$0.93
+1.1%
C$1.35
+45.2%
+37.0%C$643.17MC$189.00M23.25N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PRQ) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners