Do analysts recommend TET or PRQ?

Petrus Resources has a consensus price target of C$2.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Petrus Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than Paramount Resources TEC. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Paramount Resources TEC 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Petrus Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TET or PRQ?

Petrus Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Paramount Resources TEC. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Paramount Resources TEC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Petrus Resources C$108.40M 2.44 C$43.04M -C$0.02 N/A

Which has better earnings & valuation, LGN or PRQ?

Petrus Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Logan Energy. Petrus Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Logan Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Logan Energy C$229.76M 3.43 C$19.98M C$0.06 19.00 Petrus Resources C$108.40M 2.44 C$43.04M -C$0.02 N/A

Do analysts rate FEC or PRQ?

Petrus Resources has a consensus price target of C$2.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Petrus Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than Frontera Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Frontera Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Petrus Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate SNM or PRQ?

Petrus Resources has a consensus price target of C$2.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Petrus Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than ShaMaran Petroleum. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ShaMaran Petroleum 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Petrus Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, IPO or PRQ?

Petrus Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than InPlay Oil. Petrus Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InPlay Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio InPlay Oil C$373.38M 1.30 C$18.77M -C$0.45 N/A Petrus Resources C$108.40M 2.44 C$43.04M -C$0.02 N/A

Petrus Resources (PRQ) Competitors

C$1.77 -0.02 (-1.12%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

PRQ vs. TET, LGN, FEC, SNM, and IPO

Should you buy Petrus Resources stock or one of its competitors? Petrus Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Paramount Resources TEC (TET), Logan Energy (LGN), Frontera Energy (FEC), ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM), and InPlay Oil (IPO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Petrus Resources compare to Paramount Resources TEC?

Paramount Resources TEC (TSE:TET) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Petrus Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Paramount Resources TEC.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Paramount Resources TEC	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Petrus Resources	C$108.40M	2.44	C$43.04M	-C$0.02	N/A

0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Paramount Resources TEC has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petrus Resources' net margin of -1.99%. Paramount Resources TEC's return on equity of 0.00% beat Petrus Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Paramount Resources TEC	N/A	N/A	N/A
Petrus Resources	-1.99%	-0.66%	1.66%

Petrus Resources has a consensus price target of C$2.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Petrus Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than Paramount Resources TEC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Paramount Resources TEC	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Petrus Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Paramount Resources TEC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petrus Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Paramount Resources TEC	Neutral
Petrus Resources	Neutral

Summary

Petrus Resources beats Paramount Resources TEC on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petrus Resources compare to Logan Energy?

Logan Energy (CVE:LGN) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Petrus Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Logan Energy. Petrus Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Logan Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Logan Energy	C$229.76M	3.43	C$19.98M	C$0.06	19.00
Petrus Resources	C$108.40M	2.44	C$43.04M	-C$0.02	N/A

Logan Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$1.38, suggesting a potential upside of 21.05%. Petrus Resources has a consensus price target of C$2.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Petrus Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than Logan Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Logan Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.40
Petrus Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

3.1% of Logan Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.9% of Logan Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Logan Energy has a net margin of 18.40% compared to Petrus Resources' net margin of -1.99%. Logan Energy's return on equity of 11.28% beat Petrus Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Logan Energy	18.40%	11.28%	0.29%
Petrus Resources	-1.99%	-0.66%	1.66%

In the previous week, Logan Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petrus Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Logan Energy	Neutral
Petrus Resources	Neutral

Logan Energy has a beta of -0.049683, indicating that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrus Resources has a beta of 0.262689, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Logan Energy beats Petrus Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petrus Resources compare to Frontera Energy?

Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

3.3% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Petrus Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Frontera Energy's score of -0.80 indicating that Petrus Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Frontera Energy	Negative
Petrus Resources	Neutral

Petrus Resources has a net margin of -1.99% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -119.59%. Petrus Resources' return on equity of -0.66% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Frontera Energy	-119.59%	-94.31%	3.95%
Petrus Resources	-1.99%	-0.66%	1.66%

Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Petrus Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Frontera Energy pays out -1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Petrus Resources pays out -600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Petrus Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Frontera Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Petrus Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.362905, suggesting that its share price is 136% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrus Resources has a beta of 0.262689, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Petrus Resources. Petrus Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontera Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Frontera Energy	C$1.01B	0.60	C$63.72M	-C$8.65	N/A
Petrus Resources	C$108.40M	2.44	C$43.04M	-C$0.02	N/A

Summary

Petrus Resources beats Frontera Energy on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petrus Resources compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

ShaMaran Petroleum (CVE:SNM) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

ShaMaran Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Petrus Resources. Petrus Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ShaMaran Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ShaMaran Petroleum	C$157.02M	3.67	C$51.66M	C$0.02	12.50
Petrus Resources	C$108.40M	2.44	C$43.04M	-C$0.02	N/A

1.8% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ShaMaran Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petrus Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ShaMaran Petroleum	Neutral
Petrus Resources	Neutral

ShaMaran Petroleum has a beta of 1.835381, suggesting that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrus Resources has a beta of 0.262689, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

ShaMaran Petroleum has a net margin of 28.64% compared to Petrus Resources' net margin of -1.99%. ShaMaran Petroleum's return on equity of 18.59% beat Petrus Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ShaMaran Petroleum	28.64%	18.59%	2.76%
Petrus Resources	-1.99%	-0.66%	1.66%

Petrus Resources has a consensus price target of C$2.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Petrus Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than ShaMaran Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ShaMaran Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Petrus Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

ShaMaran Petroleum beats Petrus Resources on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petrus Resources compare to InPlay Oil?

InPlay Oil (TSE:IPO) and Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

2.2% of InPlay Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Petrus Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 25.3% of InPlay Oil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of Petrus Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petrus Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than InPlay Oil. Petrus Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InPlay Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
InPlay Oil	C$373.38M	1.30	C$18.77M	-C$0.45	N/A
Petrus Resources	C$108.40M	2.44	C$43.04M	-C$0.02	N/A

In the previous week, InPlay Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petrus Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
InPlay Oil	Neutral
Petrus Resources	Neutral

InPlay Oil has a beta of 0.349574, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrus Resources has a beta of 0.262689, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

InPlay Oil currently has a consensus price target of C$18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 4.23%. Petrus Resources has a consensus price target of C$2.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Petrus Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Petrus Resources is more favorable than InPlay Oil.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
InPlay Oil	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Petrus Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

InPlay Oil pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Petrus Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. InPlay Oil pays out -240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Petrus Resources pays out -600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Petrus Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Petrus Resources has a net margin of -1.99% compared to InPlay Oil's net margin of -4.07%. Petrus Resources' return on equity of -0.66% beat InPlay Oil's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
InPlay Oil	-4.07%	-3.81%	4.44%
Petrus Resources	-1.99%	-0.66%	1.66%

Summary

Petrus Resources beats InPlay Oil on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Petrus Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PRQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PRQ vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Petrus Resources	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$264.99M	C$11.36B	C$9.95B	C$12.42B
Dividend Yield	6.70%	11.22%	11.49%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	-88.50	18.50	21.65	39.48
Price / Sales	2.44	522.49	428.59	10.10
Price / Cash	29.08	39.59	35.98	82.29
Price / Book	0.81	4.49	4.07	4.72
Net Income	C$43.04M	C$5.27B	C$4.33B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-2.21%	0.79%	0.80%	-0.88%
1 Month Performance	2.31%	5.50%	5.22%	4.67%
1 Year Performance	19.59%	34.35%	36.12%	29.07%

Petrus Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PRQ Petrus Resources	N/A	C$1.77 -1.1%	C$2.40 +35.6%	+20.9%	C$264.99M	C$108.40M	N/A	17
TET Paramount Resources TEC	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$782.03M	N/A	N/A	147,000	High Trading Volume
LGN Logan Energy	2.4482 of 5 stars	C$1.11 -1.8%	C$1.38 +24.3%	+42.7%	C$767.70M	C$229.76M	18.50	N/A	Gap Up
FEC Frontera Energy	N/A	C$8.50 -4.4%	N/A	+41.4%	C$592.26M	C$1.01B	N/A	1,107
SNM ShaMaran Petroleum	N/A	C$0.20 flat	N/A	-7.0%	C$575.70M	C$157.02M	12.50	3,530	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PRQ) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Petrus Resources (PRQ) Competitors

PRQ vs. TET, LGN, FEC, SNM, and IPO

How does Petrus Resources compare to Paramount Resources TEC?

Summary

How does Petrus Resources compare to Logan Energy?

Summary

How does Petrus Resources compare to Frontera Energy?

Summary

How does Petrus Resources compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

Summary

How does Petrus Resources compare to InPlay Oil?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PRQ vs. The Competition

Petrus Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Petrus Resources (PRQ) Competitors

PRQ vs. TET, LGN, FEC, SNM, and IPO

How does Petrus Resources compare to Paramount Resources TEC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TET or PRQ?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in TET or PRQ?

Is TET or PRQ more profitable?

Do analysts recommend TET or PRQ?

Does the media favor TET or PRQ?

Summary

How does Petrus Resources compare to Logan Energy?

Which has better earnings & valuation, LGN or PRQ?

Do analysts prefer LGN or PRQ?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LGN or PRQ?

Is LGN or PRQ more profitable?

Does the media favor LGN or PRQ?

Which has more volatility and risk, LGN or PRQ?

Summary

How does Petrus Resources compare to Frontera Energy?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FEC or PRQ?

Does the media refer more to FEC or PRQ?

Is FEC or PRQ more profitable?

Is FEC or PRQ a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate FEC or PRQ?

Which has more risk and volatility, FEC or PRQ?

Which has better valuation and earnings, FEC or PRQ?

Summary

How does Petrus Resources compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SNM or PRQ?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SNM or PRQ?

Does the media prefer SNM or PRQ?

Which has more risk and volatility, SNM or PRQ?

Is SNM or PRQ more profitable?

Do analysts rate SNM or PRQ?

Summary

How does Petrus Resources compare to InPlay Oil?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in IPO or PRQ?

Which has better earnings and valuation, IPO or PRQ?

Does the media favor IPO or PRQ?

Which has more risk and volatility, IPO or PRQ?

Do analysts prefer IPO or PRQ?

Is IPO or PRQ a better dividend stock?

Is IPO or PRQ more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PRQ vs. The Competition

Petrus Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools