Frontera Energy (FEC) Competitors

Parex Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Frontera Energy. Frontera Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parex Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Parex Resources and Parex Resources both had 1 articles in the media. Parex Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.55 indicating that Parex Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Parex Resources has a beta of 0.1946, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.379534, meaning that its stock price is 138% less volatile than the broader market.

Parex Resources has a net margin of 19.59% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Parex Resources' return on equity of 9.34% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Parex Resources pays an annual dividend of C$1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Parex Resources pays out 60.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Frontera Energy pays out -0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

53.3% of Parex Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Parex Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Parex Resources currently has a consensus target price of C$25.10, suggesting a potential upside of 6.40%. Given Parex Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Parex Resources is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

29.7% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Frontera Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vermilion Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$19.13, suggesting a potential upside of 20.36%. Given Vermilion Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.22899, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.379534, suggesting that its share price is 138% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vermilion Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Frontera Energy. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Vermilion Energy and 1 mentions for Frontera Energy. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.55 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Vermilion Energy pays out -9.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Frontera Energy pays out -0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Frontera Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontera Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vermilion Energy has a net margin of -44.92% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Vermilion Energy's return on equity of -33.68% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Kelt Exploration has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Kelt Exploration's return on equity of 3.96% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Kelt Exploration has a consensus price target of C$11.42, suggesting a potential upside of 13.04%. Given Kelt Exploration's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kelt Exploration is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

In the previous week, Frontera Energy and Frontera Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Kelt Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.55 indicating that Kelt Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.379534, suggesting that its stock price is 138% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kelt Exploration has a beta of -0.221311, suggesting that its stock price is 122% less volatile than the broader market.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kelt Exploration. Frontera Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kelt Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3.5% of Frontera Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.1% of Kelt Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of Kelt Exploration shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cardinal Energy has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Cardinal Energy's return on equity of 1.14% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

3.5% of Frontera Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Frontera Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Cardinal Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Frontera Energy and 0 mentions for Cardinal Energy. Frontera Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Cardinal Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Frontera Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cardinal Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Frontera Energy. Frontera Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Frontera Energy pays out -0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Cardinal Energy has a consensus price target of C$12.63, suggesting a potential upside of 9.88%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.379534, meaning that its share price is 138% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.201434, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.