Go Pro

Frontera Energy (FEC) Competitors

Frontera Energy logo
C$8.49 +0.03 (+0.35%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

FEC vs. CJ, KEL, TNZ, AAV, and BIR

Should you buy Frontera Energy stock or one of its competitors? Frontera Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Cardinal Energy (CJ), Kelt Exploration (KEL), Tenaz Energy (TNZ), Advantage Energy (AAV), and Birchcliff Energy (BIR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Frontera Energy compare to Cardinal Energy?

Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Cardinal Energy has a consensus price target of C$12.63, suggesting a potential upside of 10.26%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontera Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Cardinal Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Frontera Energy. Frontera Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontera EnergyC$1.01B0.59C$63.72M-C$14.91N/A
Cardinal EnergyC$659.63M3.05C$103.21MC$0.3532.71

Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Frontera Energy pays out -0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cardinal Energy pays out 205.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

3.4% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.362905, indicating that its share price is 136% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.186199, indicating that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Cardinal Energy has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Cardinal Energy's return on equity of 6.96% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontera Energy-147.46% -120.46% 3.95%
Cardinal Energy 10.69%6.96%8.80%

In the previous week, Frontera Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cardinal Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontera Energy Neutral
Cardinal Energy Neutral

Summary

Cardinal Energy beats Frontera Energy on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frontera Energy compare to Kelt Exploration?

Kelt Exploration (TSE:KEL) and Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

22.5% of Kelt Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of Kelt Exploration shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kelt Exploration. Frontera Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kelt Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kelt ExplorationC$644.44M3.01C$55.90MC$0.2735.33
Frontera EnergyC$1.01B0.59C$63.72M-C$14.91N/A

Kelt Exploration currently has a consensus price target of C$11.42, indicating a potential upside of 19.67%. Given Kelt Exploration's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kelt Exploration is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kelt Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Frontera Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Kelt Exploration had 3 more articles in the media than Frontera Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kelt Exploration and 0 mentions for Frontera Energy. Kelt Exploration's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Kelt Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kelt Exploration Positive
Frontera Energy Neutral

Kelt Exploration has a net margin of 9.66% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Kelt Exploration's return on equity of 4.95% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kelt Exploration9.66% 4.95% 4.72%
Frontera Energy -147.46%-120.46%3.95%

Kelt Exploration has a beta of -0.240178, indicating that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.362905, indicating that its stock price is 136% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kelt Exploration beats Frontera Energy on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frontera Energy compare to Tenaz Energy?

Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) and Tenaz Energy (TSE:TNZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.362905, indicating that its share price is 136% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tenaz Energy has a beta of 0.889941, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Tenaz Energy. Frontera Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tenaz Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontera EnergyC$1.01B0.59C$63.72M-C$14.91N/A
Tenaz EnergyC$506.50M3.58C$1.88MC$3.7414.63

Tenaz Energy has a consensus price target of C$79.00, suggesting a potential upside of 44.37%. Given Tenaz Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tenaz Energy is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontera Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tenaz Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Tenaz Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Frontera Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tenaz Energy and 0 mentions for Frontera Energy. Tenaz Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Tenaz Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontera Energy Neutral
Tenaz Energy Positive

3.4% of Frontera Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.0% of Tenaz Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Tenaz Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tenaz Energy has a net margin of 22.09% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Tenaz Energy's return on equity of 29.50% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontera Energy-147.46% -120.46% 3.95%
Tenaz Energy 22.09%29.50%-2.17%

Summary

Tenaz Energy beats Frontera Energy on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frontera Energy compare to Advantage Energy?

Advantage Energy (TSE:AAV) and Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

Advantage Energy has a beta of -0.528672, suggesting that its stock price is 153% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.362905, suggesting that its stock price is 136% less volatile than the broader market.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Advantage Energy. Frontera Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advantage Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Advantage EnergyC$730.85M2.53C$45.34MC$0.4922.57
Frontera EnergyC$1.01B0.59C$63.72M-C$14.91N/A

In the previous week, Advantage Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Frontera Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Advantage Energy and 0 mentions for Frontera Energy. Advantage Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Advantage Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Advantage Energy Positive
Frontera Energy Neutral

Advantage Energy has a net margin of 12.02% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Advantage Energy's return on equity of 4.91% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Advantage Energy12.02% 4.91% 3.86%
Frontera Energy -147.46%-120.46%3.95%

42.6% of Advantage Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Advantage Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Advantage Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$14.17, suggesting a potential upside of 28.09%. Given Advantage Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Advantage Energy is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Advantage Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Frontera Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Advantage Energy beats Frontera Energy on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frontera Energy compare to Birchcliff Energy?

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) and Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

26.7% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Birchcliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Birchcliff Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 35.63%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Frontera Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birchcliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Frontera Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Birchcliff Energy has a beta of -0.566462, suggesting that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.362905, suggesting that its stock price is 136% less volatile than the broader market.

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Birchcliff Energy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Frontera Energy pays out -0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy. Frontera Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birchcliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff EnergyC$740.14M2.37C$15.45MC$0.2525.56
Frontera EnergyC$1.01B0.59C$63.72M-C$14.91N/A

In the previous week, Birchcliff Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Frontera Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Birchcliff Energy and 0 mentions for Frontera Energy. Birchcliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Birchcliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Birchcliff Energy Positive
Frontera Energy Neutral

Birchcliff Energy has a net margin of 9.59% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Birchcliff Energy's return on equity of 3.07% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birchcliff Energy9.59% 3.07% 1.82%
Frontera Energy -147.46%-120.46%3.95%

Summary

Birchcliff Energy beats Frontera Energy on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Frontera Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FEC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FEC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FEC vs. The Competition

MetricFrontera EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$591.57MC$11.14BC$9.73BC$12.54B
Dividend Yield2.98%11.34%11.58%6.20%
P/E Ratio-0.5716.2720.0730.69
Price / Sales0.59480.34392.789.75
Price / Cash3.4539.7136.0882.29
Price / Book1.033.152.974.64
Net IncomeC$63.72MC$5.27BC$4.32BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance4.81%3.25%3.58%0.94%
1 Month Performance-5.35%4.32%4.37%3.90%
1 Year Performance39.64%35.30%38.78%36.05%

Frontera Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FEC
Frontera Energy
N/AC$8.49
+0.4%
N/A+33.2%C$591.57MC$1.01BN/A1,107
CJ
Cardinal Energy
1.5459 of 5 stars
C$11.21
+2.5%
C$12.63
+12.6%
+59.4%C$1.97BC$659.63M32.03180
KEL
Kelt Exploration
2.8979 of 5 stars
C$9.56
+0.8%
C$11.42
+19.4%
+39.9%C$1.94BC$538.69M43.4530,000
TNZ
Tenaz Energy
4.2487 of 5 stars
C$56.70
+4.7%
C$79.00
+39.3%
+186.4%C$1.88BC$406.64M8.4215
AAV
Advantage Energy
4.1767 of 5 stars
C$10.94
+1.3%
C$14.17
+29.5%
+6.1%C$1.83BC$730.85M22.3383

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FEC) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners