Go Pro
→ MILLIONAIRE MASTERCLASS INVITE: Altucher (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free CJ Stock Alerts

Cardinal Energy (CJ) Competitors

Cardinal Energy logo
C$11.97 +0.02 (+0.17%)
As of 09/23/2026 04:24 PM Eastern
Compare

CJ vs. PSK, MEG, CPG, TVE, and VRN

Should you buy Cardinal Energy stock or one of its competitors? Cardinal Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), MEG Energy (MEG), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), Tamarack Valley Energy (TVE), and Veren (VRN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

76.3% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 44.86% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 10.69%. PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity of 9.48% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PrairieSky Royalty44.86% 9.48% 5.99%
Cardinal Energy 10.69%6.96%8.80%

PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.730224, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.185508, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 101.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cardinal Energy pays out 205.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

PrairieSky Royalty presently has a consensus price target of C$34.42, suggesting a potential upside of 1.40%. Cardinal Energy has a consensus price target of C$13.13, suggesting a potential upside of 9.65%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than PrairieSky Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

PrairieSky Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cardinal Energy. PrairieSky Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$538.30M14.66C$214.83MC$1.0432.63
Cardinal EnergyC$659.63M3.19C$103.21MC$0.3534.20

In the previous week, Cardinal Energy had 1 more articles in the media than PrairieSky Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cardinal Energy and 0 mentions for PrairieSky Royalty. Cardinal Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat PrairieSky Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Cardinal Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PrairieSky Royalty Neutral
Cardinal Energy Positive

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty and Cardinal Energy tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to MEG Energy?

Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) and MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.185508, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. MEG Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Cardinal Energy pays out 205.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MEG Energy pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cardinal EnergyC$659.63M3.19C$103.21MC$0.3534.20
MEG EnergyC$4.63B1.70C$487.47MC$2.1114.64

In the previous week, Cardinal Energy had 1 more articles in the media than MEG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cardinal Energy and 0 mentions for MEG Energy. Cardinal Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat MEG Energy's score of 0.69 indicating that Cardinal Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cardinal Energy Positive
MEG Energy Positive

13.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.2% of MEG Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MEG Energy has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 10.69%. MEG Energy's return on equity of 9.39% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cardinal Energy10.69% 6.96% 8.80%
MEG Energy 13.76%9.39%8.96%

Cardinal Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$13.13, indicating a potential upside of 9.65%. MEG Energy has a consensus price target of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than MEG Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
MEG Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Summary

Cardinal Energy beats MEG Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) and Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Cardinal Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$13.13, indicating a potential upside of 9.65%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Crescent Point Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Cardinal Energy has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Cardinal Energy's return on equity of 6.96% beat Crescent Point Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cardinal Energy10.69% 6.96% 8.80%
Crescent Point Energy -1.65%3.31%2.86%

13.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Cardinal Energy pays out 205.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cardinal EnergyC$659.63M3.19C$103.21MC$0.3534.20
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A

In the previous week, Cardinal Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Crescent Point Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cardinal Energy and 0 mentions for Crescent Point Energy. Cardinal Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Crescent Point Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Cardinal Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cardinal Energy Positive
Crescent Point Energy Neutral

Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.185508, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, suggesting that its share price is 184% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cardinal Energy beats Crescent Point Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Tamarack Valley Energy?

Tamarack Valley Energy (TSE:TVE) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

34.4% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Tamarack Valley Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tamarack Valley Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$13.93, indicating a potential upside of 7.25%. Cardinal Energy has a consensus price target of C$13.13, indicating a potential upside of 9.65%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Tamarack Valley Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tamarack Valley Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Tamarack Valley Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Cardinal Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tamarack Valley Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tamarack Valley EnergyC$1.85B3.33C$208.06MC$0.07185.57
Cardinal EnergyC$659.63M3.19C$103.21MC$0.3534.20

In the previous week, Tamarack Valley Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Cardinal Energy. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Tamarack Valley Energy and 1 mentions for Cardinal Energy. Tamarack Valley Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Cardinal Energy's score of 1.37 indicating that Tamarack Valley Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tamarack Valley Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Cardinal Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Tamarack Valley Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Tamarack Valley Energy pays out 225.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cardinal Energy pays out 205.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cardinal Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cardinal Energy has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Tamarack Valley Energy's net margin of 1.50%. Cardinal Energy's return on equity of 6.96% beat Tamarack Valley Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tamarack Valley Energy1.50% 1.34% 6.55%
Cardinal Energy 10.69%6.96%8.80%

Tamarack Valley Energy has a beta of 0.262524, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.185508, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cardinal Energy beats Tamarack Valley Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Veren?

Veren (TSE:VRN) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Cardinal Energy has a consensus price target of C$13.13, indicating a potential upside of 9.65%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Veren.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Veren
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Veren has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Veren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VerenC$3.83B0.00C$1.07BC$1.76N/A
Cardinal EnergyC$659.63M3.19C$103.21MC$0.3534.20

Cardinal Energy has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Veren's net margin of 6.19%. Cardinal Energy's return on equity of 6.96% beat Veren's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Veren6.19% 4.01% N/A
Cardinal Energy 10.69%6.96%8.80%

13.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cardinal Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Veren. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cardinal Energy and 0 mentions for Veren. Cardinal Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Veren's score of 0.21 indicating that Cardinal Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Veren Neutral
Cardinal Energy Positive

Summary

Cardinal Energy beats Veren on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cardinal Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CJ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CJ vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCardinal EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.10BC$11.25BC$9.82BC$12.84B
Dividend Yield6.03%10.20%10.66%6.27%
P/E Ratio34.2017.6420.6840.36
Price / Sales3.19626.58511.849.35
Price / Cash280.7739.8636.1582.29
Price / Book2.164.434.004.69
Net IncomeC$103.21MC$5.28BC$4.35BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-4.47%-1.99%-1.82%0.01%
1 Month Performance0.17%-0.15%-0.41%-2.14%
1 Year Performance50.38%29.07%30.21%20.17%

Cardinal Energy Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CJ
Cardinal Energy
2.6484 of 5 stars		C$11.97
+0.2%		C$13.13
+9.6%		+51.5%C$2.10BC$659.63M34.20177
PSK
PrairieSky Royalty
N/AC$36.79
+2.2%		C$34.42
-6.5%		+33.6%C$8.55BC$538.30M35.3865
MEG
MEG Energy
1.3603 of 5 stars		C$30.89
+0.7%		C$28.00
-9.4%		+9.2%C$7.86BC$4.63B14.64449
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777
TVE
Tamarack Valley Energy
3.0385 of 5 stars		C$14.05
+3.2%		C$13.93
-0.8%		+116.1%C$6.67BC$1.85B200.71N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CJ) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to get a stake in Anthropic — before the IPO
Anthropic, the maker of Claude AI, has reportedly filed for an IPO that could arrive as early as October. Its ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Shocking new footage just released
Gerardo Del Real is calling it the Third Convergence Event, a new catalyst hitting the uranium market that he ...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
If you keep cash in a U.S. bank account… read this NOW
Since 2020, U.S. banks have been required to keep zero percent of deposits on hand, lending out nearly every d...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
On October 7th, your “safest” assets are at risk
Jeff Brown called Nvidia's rise of over 27,000 percent and warned in early 2024 that inflation would outlast W...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
While SpaceX Gets the Spotlight, FJET Is Building What Comes Next!
Starfighters Space (NYSE: FJET) operates the world's only commercial fleet of flight-ready Mach 2+ F-104 Starf...
Trading Wire | Sponsoredtc pixel