Free Trial
→ Read now. Do not delete. You’ve been warned. (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CJ Stock Alerts

Cardinal Energy (CJ) Competitors

Cardinal Energy logo
C$11.60 -0.34 (-2.85%)
As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

CJ vs. PSK, MEG, CPG, ATH, and ERF

Should you buy Cardinal Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cardinal Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cardinal Energy include PrairieSky Royalty (PSK), MEG Energy (MEG), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), Athabasca Oil (ATH), and Enerplus (ERF). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to PrairieSky Royalty?

PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and risk.

PrairieSky Royalty has a beta of 0.754992, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.17172, meaning that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

71.2% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of PrairieSky Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PrairieSky Royalty has a net margin of 42.81% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 2.09%. PrairieSky Royalty's return on equity of 7.89% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PrairieSky Royalty42.81% 7.89% 5.99%
Cardinal Energy 2.09%1.14%8.80%

PrairieSky Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. PrairieSky Royalty pays out 121.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

PrairieSky Royalty currently has a consensus target price of C$32.25, suggesting a potential downside of 5.15%. Cardinal Energy has a consensus target price of C$12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.45%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than PrairieSky Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PrairieSky Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, PrairieSky Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cardinal Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PrairieSky Royalty Neutral
Cardinal Energy Neutral

PrairieSky Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cardinal Energy. PrairieSky Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PrairieSky RoyaltyC$483.90M16.33C$214.83MC$0.8639.53
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.66C$103.21MC$0.06193.33

Summary

PrairieSky Royalty beats Cardinal Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to MEG Energy?

MEG Energy (TSE:MEG) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

46.2% of MEG Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of MEG Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MEG Energy has a beta of 0.446509, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.17172, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

MEG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. MEG Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MEG EnergyC$4.63B1.70C$487.47MC$2.1114.64
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.66C$103.21MC$0.06193.33

MEG Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Cardinal Energy has a consensus price target of C$12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.45%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than MEG Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MEG Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

MEG Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. MEG Energy pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

MEG Energy has a net margin of 12.56% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 2.09%. MEG Energy's return on equity of 11.73% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MEG Energy12.56% 11.73% 8.96%
Cardinal Energy 2.09%1.14%8.80%

In the previous week, MEG Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Cardinal Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MEG Energy and 0 mentions for Cardinal Energy. MEG Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Cardinal Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that MEG Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MEG Energy Positive
Cardinal Energy Neutral

Summary

MEG Energy beats Cardinal Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) and Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.17172, suggesting that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, suggesting that its stock price is 184% more volatile than the broader market.

Cardinal Energy has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Crescent Point Energy's return on equity of 3.31% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cardinal Energy2.09% 1.14% 8.80%
Crescent Point Energy -1.65%3.31%2.86%

In the previous week, Cardinal Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Crescent Point Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cardinal Energy Neutral
Crescent Point Energy Neutral

Cardinal Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.45%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Crescent Point Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

12.0% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.66C$103.21MC$0.06193.33
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A

Summary

Cardinal Energy beats Crescent Point Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Athabasca Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Athabasca OilC$1.39B3.93C$221.88MC$0.4525.07
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.66C$103.21MC$0.06193.33

Athabasca Oil currently has a consensus target price of C$10.89, indicating a potential downside of 3.43%. Cardinal Energy has a consensus target price of C$12.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.45%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Athabasca Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, Athabasca Oil had 3 more articles in the media than Cardinal Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Athabasca Oil and 0 mentions for Cardinal Energy. Athabasca Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.09 beat Cardinal Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Athabasca Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Athabasca Oil Neutral
Cardinal Energy Neutral

Athabasca Oil has a net margin of 16.25% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 2.09%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 12.23% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Athabasca Oil16.25% 12.23% 9.71%
Cardinal Energy 2.09%1.14%8.80%

38.9% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Athabasca Oil has a beta of -0.224035, meaning that its stock price is 122% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.17172, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Athabasca Oil beats Cardinal Energy on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Enerplus?

Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) and Enerplus (TSE:ERF) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.17172, suggesting that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerplus has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cardinal Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Enerplus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cardinal Energy Neutral
Enerplus Neutral

Enerplus has a net margin of 26.04% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 2.09%. Enerplus' return on equity of 32.27% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cardinal Energy2.09% 1.14% 8.80%
Enerplus 26.04%32.27%15.25%

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.66C$103.21MC$0.06193.33
EnerplusC$1.48B0.00C$384.73MC$2.44N/A

Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Enerplus pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enerplus pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Cardinal Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.45%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Enerplus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Enerplus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

12.0% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Enerplus shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Enerplus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enerplus beats Cardinal Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cardinal Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CJ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CJ vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCardinal EnergyOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.03BC$1.97BC$10.39BC$12.89B
Dividend Yield6.03%7.55%10.42%6.20%
P/E Ratio193.3332.0020.3337.12
Price / Sales3.662,484.75762.5610.45
Price / Cash280.7785.5337.2782.29
Price / Book2.112.404.254.47
Net IncomeC$103.21MC$82.07MC$4.24BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.61%-0.86%-0.28%0.89%
1 Month Performance-6.75%-3.69%-2.86%-1.07%
1 Year Performance67.15%40.70%37.45%41.92%

Cardinal Energy Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CJ
Cardinal Energy
1.6385 of 5 stars		C$11.60
-2.8%		C$12.00
+3.4%		+67.1%C$2.03BC$555.11M193.33180
PSK
PrairieSky Royalty
1.2605 of 5 stars		C$34.50
-0.3%		C$32.25
-6.5%		+40.0%C$8.02BC$483.90M40.1265
MEG
MEG Energy
3.3094 of 5 stars		C$30.89
+0.7%		C$28.00
-9.4%		+18.4%C$7.86BC$4.63B14.64449
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777
ATH
Athabasca Oil
2.0088 of 5 stars		C$11.33
-3.9%		C$10.89
-3.9%		+85.5%C$5.48BC$1.39B25.18170

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CJ) was last updated on 6/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
How to play the Biggest IPO in stock market history!
SpaceX is eyeing a near-$2 trillion IPO valuation, and retail investors are already lining up - but early insi...
InvestPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
BUY THIS: Claim a backdoor stake in SpaceX
There may be a way to claim pre-IPO exposure to SpaceX before it ever hits public markets - using a simple tra...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
The S-1 disclosure Wall Street is racing to trace
When SpaceX filed its S-1, the SEC required full disclosure of costs - and power consumption for 1 million GPU...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX is set to go public as soon as June 11, with OpenAI and Anthropic likely to follow. Whitney Tilson - Ha...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel