Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free CJ Stock Alerts

Cardinal Energy (CJ) Competitors

Cardinal Energy logo
C$11.49 -0.21 (-1.79%)
As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

CJ vs. CPG, ERF, ATH, PEY, and BTE

Should you buy Cardinal Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cardinal Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cardinal Energy include Crescent Point Energy (CPG), Enerplus (ERF), Athabasca Oil (ATH), Peyto Exploration & Development (PEY), and Baytex Energy (BTE). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Crescent Point Energy?

Crescent Point Energy (TSE:CPG) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.46 per share. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Crescent Point Energy pays out 93.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.84, suggesting that its stock price is 184% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.201434, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Cardinal Energy has a consensus target price of C$12.63, suggesting a potential upside of 9.88%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Crescent Point Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Point Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Cardinal Energy has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Crescent Point Energy's net margin of -1.65%. Crescent Point Energy's return on equity of 3.31% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Point Energy-1.65% 3.31% 2.86%
Cardinal Energy 2.09%1.14%8.80%

47.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Crescent Point Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Point EnergyC$3.51B0.00C$215.70MC$0.49N/A
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.63C$103.21MC$0.06191.50

In the previous week, Crescent Point Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cardinal Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crescent Point Energy Neutral
Cardinal Energy Neutral

Summary

Cardinal Energy beats Crescent Point Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Enerplus?

Enerplus (TSE:ERF) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Enerplus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cardinal Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Enerplus Neutral
Cardinal Energy Neutral

Enerplus has a beta of 2.64, indicating that its share price is 164% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.201434, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Enerplus pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Enerplus pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Cardinal Energy has a consensus price target of C$12.63, indicating a potential upside of 9.88%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Enerplus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enerplus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Enerplus has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnerplusC$1.48B0.00C$384.73MC$2.44N/A
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.63C$103.21MC$0.06191.50

67.9% of Enerplus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Enerplus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enerplus has a net margin of 26.04% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 2.09%. Enerplus' return on equity of 32.27% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enerplus26.04% 32.27% 15.25%
Cardinal Energy 2.09%1.14%8.80%

Summary

Enerplus beats Cardinal Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Athabasca Oil?

Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) and Athabasca Oil (TSE:ATH) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Cardinal Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$12.63, suggesting a potential upside of 9.88%. Athabasca Oil has a consensus price target of C$11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 4.93%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Athabasca Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Athabasca Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Athabasca Oil has a net margin of 16.25% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 2.09%. Athabasca Oil's return on equity of 12.23% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cardinal Energy2.09% 1.14% 8.80%
Athabasca Oil 16.25%12.23%9.71%

In the previous week, Athabasca Oil had 3 more articles in the media than Cardinal Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Athabasca Oil and 0 mentions for Cardinal Energy. Cardinal Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Athabasca Oil'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cardinal Energy Neutral
Athabasca Oil Neutral

Athabasca Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Athabasca Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.63C$103.21MC$0.06191.50
Athabasca OilC$1.39B3.81C$221.88MC$0.4524.36

13.7% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Athabasca Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.201434, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Athabasca Oil has a beta of -0.194923, meaning that its share price is 119% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Athabasca Oil beats Cardinal Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Peyto Exploration & Development?

Peyto Exploration & Development (TSE:PEY) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Peyto Exploration & Development pays an annual dividend of C$1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Peyto Exploration & Development pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Peyto Exploration & Development has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Energy. Peyto Exploration & Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peyto Exploration & DevelopmentC$1.21B4.44C$293.72MC$2.3111.31
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.63C$103.21MC$0.06191.50

Peyto Exploration & Development has a beta of -0.504508, suggesting that its share price is 150% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.201434, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

29.5% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Peyto Exploration & Development shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Peyto Exploration & Development presently has a consensus price target of C$26.64, suggesting a potential upside of 1.96%. Cardinal Energy has a consensus price target of C$12.63, suggesting a potential upside of 9.88%. Given Cardinal Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cardinal Energy is more favorable than Peyto Exploration & Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peyto Exploration & Development
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, Peyto Exploration & Development had 3 more articles in the media than Cardinal Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Peyto Exploration & Development and 0 mentions for Cardinal Energy. Peyto Exploration & Development's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Cardinal Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Peyto Exploration & Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Peyto Exploration & Development Positive
Cardinal Energy Neutral

Peyto Exploration & Development has a net margin of 40.47% compared to Cardinal Energy's net margin of 2.09%. Peyto Exploration & Development's return on equity of 16.78% beat Cardinal Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peyto Exploration & Development40.47% 16.78% 6.40%
Cardinal Energy 2.09%1.14%8.80%

Summary

Peyto Exploration & Development beats Cardinal Energy on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Energy compare to Baytex Energy?

Baytex Energy (TSE:BTE) and Cardinal Energy (TSE:CJ) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Cardinal Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baytex Energy. Baytex Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baytex EnergyC$1.68B2.58-C$347.90M-C$0.96N/A
Cardinal EnergyC$555.11M3.63C$103.21MC$0.06191.50

Baytex Energy has a beta of 0.41014, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cardinal Energy has a beta of 0.201434, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

27.7% of Baytex Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baytex Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Cardinal Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baytex Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.94%. Cardinal Energy has a consensus target price of C$12.63, indicating a potential upside of 9.88%. Given Baytex Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Baytex Energy is more favorable than Cardinal Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baytex Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Cardinal Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, Baytex Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Cardinal Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Baytex Energy and 0 mentions for Cardinal Energy. Baytex Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Cardinal Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Baytex Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baytex Energy Positive
Cardinal Energy Neutral

Baytex Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Cardinal Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Baytex Energy pays out -7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cardinal Energy pays out 1,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Cardinal Energy has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Baytex Energy's net margin of -83.88%. Cardinal Energy's return on equity of 1.14% beat Baytex Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baytex Energy-83.88% -23.15% -0.08%
Cardinal Energy 2.09%1.14%8.80%

Summary

Cardinal Energy beats Baytex Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cardinal Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CJ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CJ vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCardinal EnergyOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.05BC$2.06BC$10.39BC$12.48B
Dividend Yield6.15%7.60%11.37%6.19%
P/E Ratio191.5032.0819.8336.95
Price / Sales3.631,219.98388.939.44
Price / Cash280.7785.5336.9982.29
Price / Book2.092.334.144.39
Net IncomeC$103.21MC$82.07MC$4.25BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance6.69%2.93%1.41%0.61%
1 Month Performance6.39%5.48%3.01%1.06%
1 Year Performance58.48%37.75%29.33%30.89%

Cardinal Energy Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CJ
Cardinal Energy
1.234 of 5 stars		C$11.49
-1.8%		C$12.63
+9.9%		+58.0%C$2.05BC$555.11M191.50180
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$7.24BC$3.51B23.92777
ERF
Enerplus
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.47BC$1.48B10.98404
ATH
Athabasca Oil
1.7328 of 5 stars		C$10.84
+0.8%		C$11.50
+6.1%		+87.4%C$5.25BC$1.39B24.09170
PEY
Peyto Exploration & Development
2.8793 of 5 stars		C$24.78
+2.0%		C$26.64
+7.5%		+34.3%C$5.08BC$1.21B10.7353

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CJ) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three oil giants buried the same discovery for 50 years
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel