Free Trial

Trisura Group (TSU) Competitors

Trisura Group logo
C$42.09 -1.06 (-2.46%)
As of 02:52 PM Eastern

TSU vs. DFY, ELF, CWB, GLXY, and SII

Should you be buying Trisura Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Trisura Group include Definity Financial (DFY), E-L Financial (ELF), Canadian Western Bank (CWB), Galaxy Digital (GLXY), and Sprott (SII). These companies are all part of the "financial services" sector.

How does Trisura Group compare to Definity Financial?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and Definity Financial (TSE:DFY) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Definity Financial has a beta of 0.0392, indicating that its share price is 96% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Definity Financial pays an annual dividend of C$0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Trisura Group pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Definity Financial pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Trisura Group presently has a consensus price target of C$56.57, indicating a potential upside of 34.41%. Definity Financial has a consensus price target of C$79.91, indicating a potential upside of 16.71%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Definity Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Definity Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Definity Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Trisura Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Definity Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$867.95M2.32C$111.69MC$2.9314.37
Definity FinancialC$4.87B1.68C$542.33MC$3.5119.51

Definity Financial has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 5.51%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.30% beat Definity Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group5.51% 16.30% 2.18%
Definity Financial 8.58%11.01%4.81%

44.3% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.6% of Definity Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Definity Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Definity Financial had 7 more articles in the media than Trisura Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Definity Financial and 2 mentions for Trisura Group. Definity Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Trisura Group's score of 0.54 indicating that Definity Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Definity Financial
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Definity Financial beats Trisura Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to E-L Financial?

E-L Financial (TSE:ELF) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

E-L Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. E-L Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
E-L FinancialC$2.87B2.13C$1.84BC$3.445.15
Trisura GroupC$867.95M2.32C$111.69MC$2.9314.37

E-L Financial has a beta of 1.303527, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

E-L Financial pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. E-L Financial pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trisura Group pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Trisura Group has a consensus target price of C$56.57, indicating a potential upside of 34.41%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than E-L Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
E-L Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

4.2% of E-L Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.3% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. 57.8% of E-L Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

E-L Financial has a net margin of 48.88% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 5.51%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.30% beat E-L Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
E-L Financial48.88% 14.46% 4.52%
Trisura Group 5.51%16.30%2.18%

In the previous week, Trisura Group had 1 more articles in the media than E-L Financial. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trisura Group and 1 mentions for E-L Financial. E-L Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Trisura Group's score of 0.54 indicating that E-L Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
E-L Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Trisura Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

E-L Financial and Trisura Group tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Canadian Western Bank?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and Canadian Western Bank (TSE:CWB) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

44.3% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.6% of Canadian Western Bank shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Canadian Western Bank shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Canadian Western Bank has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Canadian Western Bank pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share. Trisura Group pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Canadian Western Bank pays out 45.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trisura Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Canadian Western Bank has a net margin of 25.04% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 5.51%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.30% beat Canadian Western Bank's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group5.51% 16.30% 2.18%
Canadian Western Bank 25.04%7.07%0.73%

Trisura Group currently has a consensus target price of C$56.57, indicating a potential upside of 34.41%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Canadian Western Bank.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Canadian Western Bank
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Trisura Group had 2 more articles in the media than Canadian Western Bank. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trisura Group and 0 mentions for Canadian Western Bank. Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Canadian Western Bank's score of 0.00 indicating that Trisura Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group Positive
Canadian Western Bank Neutral

Canadian Western Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Canadian Western Bank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$867.95M2.32C$111.69MC$2.9314.37
Canadian Western BankC$1.99B0.00C$296.99MC$3.07N/A

Summary

Trisura Group beats Canadian Western Bank on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Galaxy Digital?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Trisura Group has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Galaxy Digital's net margin of 0.74%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 27.63% beat Trisura Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group5.51% 16.30% 2.18%
Galaxy Digital 0.74%27.63%N/A

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

44.3% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trisura Group presently has a consensus target price of C$56.57, suggesting a potential upside of 34.41%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Galaxy Digital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Galaxy Digital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Galaxy Digital has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$867.95M2.32C$111.69MC$2.9314.37
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A

In the previous week, Trisura Group and Trisura Group both had 2 articles in the media. Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Galaxy Digital's score of -0.69 indicating that Trisura Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Galaxy Digital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

Trisura Group beats Galaxy Digital on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Sprott?

Sprott (TSE:SII) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and media sentiment.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of C$1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Sprott pays out 49.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trisura Group pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Sprott has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 5.51%. Sprott's return on equity of 24.78% beat Trisura Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sprott22.41% 24.78% 10.25%
Trisura Group 5.51%16.30%2.18%

30.1% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.3% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. 17.7% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trisura Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Trisura Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SprottC$268.78M18.53C$32.26MC$2.6174.02
Trisura GroupC$867.95M2.32C$111.69MC$2.9314.37

Sprott has a beta of 1.560976, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.418507, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Sprott presently has a consensus target price of C$211.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.22%. Trisura Group has a consensus target price of C$56.57, suggesting a potential upside of 34.41%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Sprott.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sprott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

In the previous week, Sprott had 8 more articles in the media than Trisura Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Sprott and 2 mentions for Trisura Group. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Trisura Group's score of 0.54 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sprott
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Trisura Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Sprott beats Trisura Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trisura Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSU vs. The Competition

MetricTrisura GroupInsurance IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.01BC$2.99BC$5.69BC$11.85B
Dividend YieldN/A1.98%5.26%6.24%
P/E Ratio14.375.0815.9924.79
Price / Sales2.32310.781,001.0614.20
Price / Cash5.462.0489.2482.42
Price / Book2.161.494.414.66
Net IncomeC$111.69MC$474.99MC$1.15BC$299.62M
1 Month Performance-7.88%2.54%3.07%3.53%
1 Year Performance11.85%56.30%23.03%58.54%

Trisura Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSU
Trisura Group
3.5438 of 5 stars
C$42.09
-2.5%
C$56.57
+34.4%
+15.8%C$2.01BC$867.95M14.379,700
DFY
Definity Financial
2.5364 of 5 stars
C$66.79
+0.4%
C$79.20
+18.6%
-5.9%C$8.01BC$4.87B19.033,442
ELF
E-L Financial
N/AC$17.45
+2.9%
N/A-98.7%C$6.04BC$2.87B5.07300
CWB
Canadian Western Bank
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.48BC$1.99B18.452,454
GLXY
Galaxy Digital
N/AC$28.26
flat
N/AN/AC$5.39BC$43.76BN/A434

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:TSU) was last updated on 5/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners