Go Pro

Trisura Group (TSU) Competitors

Trisura Group logo
C$45.62 -0.71 (-1.53%)
As of 03:37 PM Eastern

TSU vs. ONEX, ELF, CWB, GLXY, and BITF

Should you buy Trisura Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Trisura Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Trisura Group include Onex (ONEX), E-L Financial (ELF), Canadian Western Bank (CWB), Galaxy Digital (GLXY), and Bitfarms (BITF). These companies are all part of the "financial services" sector.

How does Trisura Group compare to Onex?

Onex (TSE:ONEX) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

Onex has a beta of 0.734391, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.554705, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Onex has a net margin of 96.42% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 4.72%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat Onex's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Onex96.42% 6.52% 4.04%
Trisura Group 4.72%16.65%2.18%

Onex presently has a consensus target price of C$150.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.67%. Trisura Group has a consensus target price of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Onex's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Onex is more favorable than Trisura Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Onex
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Onex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trisura Group. Onex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OnexC$873M9.66C$441.34MC$8.2813.35
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.43C$111.69MC$3.1014.75

36.7% of Onex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.0% of Onex shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Onex had 2 more articles in the media than Trisura Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Onex and 0 mentions for Trisura Group. Onex's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Trisura Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Onex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Onex Neutral
Trisura Group Neutral

Onex pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Onex pays out 3.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Onex beats Trisura Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to E-L Financial?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and E-L Financial (TSE:ELF) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk and profitability.

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.554705, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, E-L Financial has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, E-L Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Trisura Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for E-L Financial and 0 mentions for Trisura Group. E-L Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Trisura Group's score of 0.00 indicating that E-L Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group Neutral
E-L Financial Positive

46.0% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of E-L Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 57.8% of E-L Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

E-L Financial has a net margin of 43.93% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 4.72%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat E-L Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group4.72% 16.65% 2.18%
E-L Financial 43.93%13.43%4.52%

Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. E-L Financial pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. E-L Financial pays out 4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Trisura Group currently has a consensus target price of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than E-L Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
E-L Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

E-L Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. E-L Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.43C$111.69MC$3.1014.75
E-L FinancialC$2.70B2.17C$1.84BC$3.295.15

Summary

E-L Financial beats Trisura Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Canadian Western Bank?

Canadian Western Bank (TSE:CWB) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

Trisura Group has a consensus price target of C$56.66, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Canadian Western Bank.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Canadian Western Bank
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

30.6% of Canadian Western Bank shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Canadian Western Bank shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Canadian Western Bank pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share. Trisura Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Canadian Western Bank pays out 45.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trisura Group pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trisura Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Canadian Western Bank has a net margin of 25.04% compared to Trisura Group's net margin of 4.72%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat Canadian Western Bank's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canadian Western Bank25.04% 7.07% 0.73%
Trisura Group 4.72%16.65%2.18%

Canadian Western Bank has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.554705, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Canadian Western Bank's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trisura Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Canadian Western Bank Neutral
Trisura Group Neutral

Canadian Western Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Canadian Western Bank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canadian Western BankC$1.99B0.00C$296.99MC$3.07N/A
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.43C$111.69MC$3.1014.75

Summary

Trisura Group beats Canadian Western Bank on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Galaxy Digital?

Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) and Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Trisura Group has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Galaxy Digital's net margin of 0.57%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 18.71% beat Trisura Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galaxy Digital0.57% 18.71% N/A
Trisura Group 4.72%16.65%2.18%

Galaxy Digital has higher revenue and earnings than Trisura Group. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.43C$111.69MC$3.1014.75

56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of Trisura Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Galaxy Digital had 3 more articles in the media than Trisura Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Galaxy Digital and 0 mentions for Trisura Group. Galaxy Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trisura Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Galaxy Digital Neutral
Trisura Group Neutral

Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trisura Group has a beta of 0.554705, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Trisura Group has a consensus target price of C$56.66, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Galaxy Digital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Galaxy Digital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Summary

Trisura Group beats Galaxy Digital on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trisura Group compare to Bitfarms?

Trisura Group (TSE:TSU) and Bitfarms (TSE:BITF) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Trisura Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trisura Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trisura GroupC$888.08M2.43C$111.69MC$3.1014.75
BitfarmsC$229.28M21.67-C$110.66M-C$0.52N/A

In the previous week, Trisura Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bitfarms'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trisura Group Neutral
Bitfarms Neutral

Trisura Group has a beta of 0.554705, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bitfarms has a beta of 3.414688, meaning that its stock price is 241% more volatile than the broader market.

Trisura Group currently has a consensus price target of C$56.66, suggesting a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Trisura Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trisura Group is more favorable than Bitfarms.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trisura Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Bitfarms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

46.0% of Trisura Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Trisura Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Bitfarms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trisura Group has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -160.41%. Trisura Group's return on equity of 16.65% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trisura Group4.72% 16.65% 2.18%
Bitfarms -160.41%-56.78%-10.66%

Summary

Trisura Group beats Bitfarms on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trisura Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSU vs. The Competition

MetricTrisura GroupInsurance IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$2.16BC$3.08BC$6.17BC$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/A1.89%5.22%6.17%
P/E Ratio14.755.2529.5936.15
Price / Sales2.43314.281,149.9610.03
Price / Cash5.462.0488.7482.29
Price / Book2.291.556.684.45
Net IncomeC$111.69MC$474.99MC$1.13BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance3.02%0.82%0.43%0.42%
1 Month Performance8.06%2.66%1.60%0.57%
1 Year Performance2.05%48.24%17.29%33.94%

Trisura Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSU
Trisura Group
N/AC$45.71
-1.3%
C$56.66
+23.9%
+5.2%C$2.16BC$888.08M14.759,700
ONEX
Onex
3.8214 of 5 stars
C$106.06
flat
C$150.00
+41.4%
-0.8%C$8.09BC$873M12.81492
ELF
E-L Financial
N/AC$16.95
flat
N/A+7.9%C$5.87BC$2.70B5.15300
CWB
Canadian Western Bank
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.48BC$1.99B18.452,454
GLXY
Galaxy Digital
N/AC$28.26
flat
N/AN/AC$5.39BC$43.76BN/A434

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:TSU) was last updated on 7/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners