Free Trial

Wall Financial (WFC) Competitors

Wall Financial logo
C$18.70 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026 03:42 PM Eastern

WFC vs. HIVE, VBNK, WED, CFW, and PTS

Should you buy Wall Financial stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Wall Financial with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Wall Financial include HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), VersaBank (VBNK), Westaim (WED), Calfrac Well Services (CFW), and Points.com (PTS). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Wall Financial compare to HIVE Digital Technologies?

HIVE Digital Technologies (CVE:HIVE) and Wall Financial (TSE:WFC) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Wall Financial had 3 more articles in the media than HIVE Digital Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Wall Financial and 0 mentions for HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Wall Financial's score of 0.67 indicating that HIVE Digital Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
HIVE Digital Technologies Positive
Wall Financial Positive

Wall Financial has a net margin of 18.59% compared to HIVE Digital Technologies' net margin of -28.29%. Wall Financial's return on equity of 16.54% beat HIVE Digital Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HIVE Digital Technologies-28.29% -13.39% -8.78%
Wall Financial 18.59%16.54%4.20%

Wall Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HIVE Digital Technologies. HIVE Digital Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wall Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HIVE Digital TechnologiesC$257.14M4.04-C$13.38M-C$0.77N/A
Wall FinancialC$179.24M3.33C$24.83MC$1.0417.98

HIVE Digital Technologies has a beta of 2.339164, meaning that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wall Financial has a beta of 1.05787, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

15.2% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Wall Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of HIVE Digital Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 69.7% of Wall Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Wall Financial beats HIVE Digital Technologies on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wall Financial compare to VersaBank?

Wall Financial (TSE:WFC) and VersaBank (TSE:VBNK) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

0.0% of Wall Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of VersaBank shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.7% of Wall Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 38.8% of VersaBank shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Wall Financial had 3 more articles in the media than VersaBank. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Wall Financial and 0 mentions for VersaBank. Wall Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat VersaBank's score of 0.00 indicating that Wall Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wall Financial Positive
VersaBank Neutral

Wall Financial has a net margin of 18.59% compared to VersaBank's net margin of 9.34%. Wall Financial's return on equity of 16.54% beat VersaBank's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wall Financial18.59% 16.54% 4.20%
VersaBank 9.34%5.64%1.10%

VersaBank has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Wall Financial. Wall Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VersaBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wall FinancialC$179.24M3.33C$24.83MC$1.0417.98
VersaBankC$141.48M6.42C$49.54MC$0.9430.00

Wall Financial has a beta of 1.05787, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, VersaBank has a beta of 1.720188, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Wall Financial beats VersaBank on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wall Financial compare to Westaim?

Wall Financial (TSE:WFC) and Westaim (CVE:WED) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Wall Financial had 2 more articles in the media than Westaim. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Wall Financial and 1 mentions for Westaim. Wall Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Westaim's score of 0.00 indicating that Wall Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wall Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Westaim
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

0.0% of Wall Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Westaim shares are held by institutional investors. 69.7% of Wall Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.3% of Westaim shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wall Financial has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Westaim's net margin of -67.85%. Wall Financial's return on equity of 16.54% beat Westaim's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wall Financial18.59% 16.54% 4.20%
Westaim -67.85%-9.69%7.60%

Wall Financial has a beta of 1.05787, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Westaim has a beta of -0.168602, indicating that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

Wall Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Westaim. Westaim is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wall Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wall FinancialC$179.24M3.33C$24.83MC$1.0417.98
WestaimC$84.96M9.09C$4.52M-C$1.91N/A

Summary

Wall Financial beats Westaim on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wall Financial compare to Calfrac Well Services?

Wall Financial (TSE:WFC) and Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Wall Financial has a beta of 1.05787, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calfrac Well Services has a beta of -0.442482, suggesting that its share price is 144% less volatile than the broader market.

Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Wall Financial. Calfrac Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wall Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wall FinancialC$179.24M3.33C$24.83MC$1.0417.98
Calfrac Well ServicesC$1.32B0.51C$27.97MC$0.4614.52

0.0% of Wall Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.0% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by institutional investors. 69.7% of Wall Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Wall Financial has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Calfrac Well Services' net margin of 3.29%. Wall Financial's return on equity of 16.54% beat Calfrac Well Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wall Financial18.59% 16.54% 4.20%
Calfrac Well Services 3.29%6.49%6.32%

Calfrac Well Services has a consensus target price of C$7.75, indicating a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Calfrac Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Calfrac Well Services is more favorable than Wall Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wall Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Calfrac Well Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 3 more articles in the media than Wall Financial. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 3 mentions for Wall Financial. Wall Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Calfrac Well Services' score of -0.32 indicating that Wall Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wall Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Calfrac Well Services
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Wall Financial and Calfrac Well Services tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wall Financial compare to Points.com?

Points.com (TSE:PTS) and Wall Financial (TSE:WFC) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Wall Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Points.com. Points.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wall Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Points.comC$432.40M0.00C$2.84MC$0.19N/A
Wall FinancialC$179.24M3.33C$24.83MC$1.0417.98

Wall Financial has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Points.com's net margin of 0.00%. Wall Financial's return on equity of 16.54% beat Points.com's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Points.comN/A N/A N/A
Wall Financial 18.59%16.54%4.20%

0.0% of Wall Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 69.7% of Wall Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Wall Financial had 3 more articles in the media than Points.com. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Wall Financial and 0 mentions for Points.com. Wall Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Points.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Wall Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Points.com Neutral
Wall Financial Positive

Summary

Wall Financial beats Points.com on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wall Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WFC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WFC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WFC vs. The Competition

MetricWall FinancialReal Estate IndustryReal Estate SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$596.36MC$3.62BC$2.04BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield5.41%3.49%7.28%6.19%
P/E Ratio17.983.8230.1036.94
Price / Sales3.33133.45380.9810.45
Price / Cash31.2592.6068.0382.29
Price / Book2.770.601.344.47
Net IncomeC$24.83M-C$122.40M-C$124.57MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance1.63%-0.36%0.61%0.65%
1 Month Performance14.51%-3.92%-0.36%-0.08%
1 Year Performance21.43%-0.77%0.37%41.90%

Wall Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WFC
Wall Financial
N/AC$18.70
flat
N/A+21.4%C$596.36MC$179.24M17.98238,000
HIVE
HIVE Digital Technologies
N/AC$4.10
flat
N/A+58.3%C$1.04BC$257.14MN/A20
VBNK
VersaBank
N/AC$28.20
flat
N/A+89.3%C$907.93MC$141.48M30.00100
WED
Westaim
N/AC$23.28
flat
N/A-28.5%C$772.59MC$84.96MN/A3,240
CFW
Calfrac Well Services
3.1442 of 5 stars
C$6.68
flat
C$7.75
+16.0%
+90.9%C$671.15MC$1.32B14.52730

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:WFC) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners