Go Pro
→ Why This Small AI Company Holds 150 Patents (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free CML Stock Alerts

CML Microsystems (CML) Competitors

CML Microsystems logo
GBX 281 -1.50 (-0.53%)
As of 10:19 AM Eastern
Compare

CML vs. ENSI, FST, PVCS, VDTK, and AWE

Should you buy CML Microsystems stock or one of its competitors? CML Microsystems's main competitors and comparable companies include EnSilica (ENSI), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) (PVCS), EARNZ (VDTK), and Alphawave IP Group (AWE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductors" industry.

How does CML Microsystems compare to EnSilica?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and EnSilica (LON:ENSI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EnSilica. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EnSilica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.29£2.05M-£0.33N/A
EnSilica£21.64M4.87-£221.97K-£2.34N/A

15.9% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of EnSilica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
EnSilica -9.36%-9.80%1.78%

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.273, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnSilica has a beta of 0.912, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems and CML Microsystems both had 1 articles in the media. EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat CML Microsystems' score of 0.67 indicating that EnSilica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
EnSilica
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Frontier Smart Technologies Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Frontier Smart Technologies Group N/A N/A N/A

15.9% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Smart Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.29£2.05M-£0.33N/A
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Frontier Smart Technologies Group. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Positive
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Frontier Smart Technologies Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) (LON:PVCS) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

15.9% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L). CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Positive
PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) Neutral

CML Microsystems has higher revenue and earnings than PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L). CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.29£2.05M-£0.33N/A
PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)N/AN/AN/A£13.80N/A

Summary

CML Microsystems beats PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L) on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to EARNZ?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and EARNZ (LON:VDTK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.273, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EARNZ has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

CML Microsystems has higher revenue and earnings than EARNZ. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EARNZ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.29£2.05M-£0.33N/A
EARNZ£181.04K0.00-£2.21M-£0.01N/A

EARNZ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of -0.26%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat EARNZ's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
EARNZ N/A -125.99%-49.09%

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than EARNZ. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for EARNZ. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat EARNZ's score of 0.00 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Positive
EARNZ Neutral

15.9% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of EARNZ shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 53.3% of EARNZ shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EARNZ on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Alphawave IP Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

15.9% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.273, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of -0.26% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -13.82%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of -0.11% beat Alphawave IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems-0.26% -0.11% 1.87%
Alphawave IP Group -13.82%-8.87%-3.94%

In the previous week, CML Microsystems had 1 more articles in the media than Alphawave IP Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CML Microsystems and 0 mentions for Alphawave IP Group. CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Alphawave IP Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Positive
Alphawave IP Group Neutral

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alphawave IP Group. CML Microsystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alphawave IP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£20.45M2.29£2.05M-£0.33N/A
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Alphawave IP Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CML Microsystems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CML vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCML MicrosystemsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£47.06M£109.69B£30.12B£2.88B
Dividend Yield4.25%1.65%2.75%6.25%
P/E Ratio-851.5280.1577.05366.69
Price / Sales2.2988.64590.6689,824.16
Price / Cash3.4562.1348.0127.89
Price / Book0.8910.197.806.34
Net Income£2.05M£2.05B£704.48M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.10%-0.70%-0.48%0.11%
1 Month Performance-11.28%-4.96%-2.69%0.09%
1 Year Performance6.36%77.02%176.70%19.43%

CML Microsystems Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 281
-0.5%		GBX 223
-20.6%		+6.0%£47.06M£20.45MN/A139
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 74.62
-1.8%		N/A+117.6%£100.17M£21.64MN/A168
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
PVCS
PV Crystalox Solar plc (PVCS.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.41MN/A2.40N/A
VDTK
EARNZ
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.15M£181.04KN/A11

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CML) was last updated on 9/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Shocking new footage just released
Gerardo Del Real is calling it the Third Convergence Event, a new catalyst hitting the uranium market that he ...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War WARNING: Something Just Changed
A powerful Middle Eastern government is reportedly asking Trump for U.S. military help against Iran backed for...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
$747 million in one quarter - with a 60% cash-flow target
The company posted $747 million in net income last quarter and plans to return at least 60% of 2026 free cash ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why I went to Mount Rushmore
A small miner just hit on gold in the hills surrounding Mount Rushmore, thanks to a breakthrough new technolog...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump goes "all-in" on Grand Canyon energy breakthrough
A drilling crew near the Grand Canyon uncovered a clean energy well producing nearly eight times the output of...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel