Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Is Waiting! Get MarketBeat All Access Today
Lock In $149
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

CML Microsystems (CML) Competitors

CML Microsystems logo
GBX 305 +27.50 (+9.91%)
As of 12:26 PM Eastern

CML vs. ENSI, FST, SND, AWE, and BLTG

Should you buy CML Microsystems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CML Microsystems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CML Microsystems include EnSilica (ENSI), Frontier Smart Technologies Group (FST), Sondrel (SND), Alphawave IP Group (AWE), and Blancco Technology Group (BLTG). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does CML Microsystems compare to EnSilica?

EnSilica (LON:ENSI) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, EnSilica's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CML Microsystems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
EnSilica Neutral
CML Microsystems Neutral

0.8% of EnSilica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.6% of EnSilica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EnSilica has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

CML Microsystems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EnSilica. EnSilica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnSilica£21.64M5.56-£221.97K-£2.34N/A
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to EnSilica's net margin of -9.36%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat EnSilica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnSilica-9.36% -9.80% 1.78%
CML Microsystems 5.77%2.29%1.87%

Summary

CML Microsystems beats EnSilica on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Frontier Smart Technologies Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Frontier Smart Technologies Group (LON:FST) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frontier Smart Technologies Group. Frontier Smart Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90
Frontier Smart Technologies Group£38.88M0.00N/A-£4.20N/A

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frontier Smart Technologies Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Frontier Smart Technologies Group Neutral

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Frontier Smart Technologies Group's net margin of 0.00%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Frontier Smart Technologies Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems5.77% 2.29% 1.87%
Frontier Smart Technologies Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Frontier Smart Technologies Group on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Sondrel?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Sondrel (LON:SND) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Sondrel pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. CML Microsystems pays out 154.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sondrel pays out -12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Sondrel's net margin of -228.31%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Sondrel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems5.77% 2.29% 1.87%
Sondrel -228.31%N/A -52.53%

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Sondrel shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.8% of Sondrel shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has higher revenue and earnings than Sondrel. Sondrel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90
Sondrel£9.43M0.00-£21.52M-£0.25N/A

In the previous week, CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sondrel'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Sondrel Neutral

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Sondrel on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Alphawave IP Group?

CML Microsystems (LON:CML) and Alphawave IP Group (LON:AWE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

CML Microsystems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Alphawave IP Group's net margin of -54.65%. CML Microsystems' return on equity of 2.29% beat Alphawave IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CML Microsystems5.77% 2.29% 1.87%
Alphawave IP Group -54.65%-41.83%-3.94%

CML Microsystems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alphawave IP Group. Alphawave IP Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90
Alphawave IP Group£319.58M4.59-£99.26M-£22.99N/A

17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.1% of Alphawave IP Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphawave IP Group has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alphawave IP Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CML Microsystems Neutral
Alphawave IP Group Neutral

Summary

CML Microsystems beats Alphawave IP Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CML Microsystems compare to Blancco Technology Group?

Blancco Technology Group (LON:BLTG) and CML Microsystems (LON:CML) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Blancco Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than CML Microsystems. Blancco Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CML Microsystems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blancco Technology Group£44.15M0.00£2.75M£0.04N/A
CML Microsystems£19.55M2.60£2.05M£7.1142.90

Blancco Technology Group has a net margin of 6.22% compared to CML Microsystems' net margin of 5.77%. Blancco Technology Group's return on equity of 3.52% beat CML Microsystems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blancco Technology Group6.22% 3.52% 2.17%
CML Microsystems 5.77%2.29%1.87%

Blancco Technology Group has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CML Microsystems has a beta of 0.123, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Blancco Technology Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. CML Microsystems pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Blancco Technology Group pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CML Microsystems pays out 154.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CML Microsystems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, CML Microsystems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Blancco Technology Group's score of -0.55 indicating that CML Microsystems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blancco Technology Group Negative
CML Microsystems Neutral

84.0% of Blancco Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Blancco Technology Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of CML Microsystems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Blancco Technology Group beats CML Microsystems on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CML Microsystems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CML vs. The Competition

MetricCML MicrosystemsSemiconductors IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£50.81M£2.34B£38.83B£2.79B
Dividend Yield3.86%1.53%3.22%6.16%
P/E Ratio42.9023.79168.94365.60
Price / Sales2.60541.72626.7587,567.26
Price / Cash3.457.4946.5927.89
Price / Book0.964.5410.357.61
Net Income£2.05M-£32.65M£1.06B£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.69%-1.58%0.54%-0.03%
1 Month Performance29.79%15.38%5.06%1.05%
1 Year Performance16.86%67.88%168.52%85.15%

CML Microsystems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CML
CML Microsystems
N/AGBX 305
+9.9%
GBX 223
-26.9%
+5.8%£50.81M£19.55M42.90139
ENSI
EnSilica
N/AGBX 121.41
-1.3%
N/A+216.8%£143.11M£21.64MN/A168
FST
Frontier Smart Technologies Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£11.43M£38.88MN/AN/A
SND
Sondrel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.37M£9.43MN/A330
AWE
Alphawave IP Group
N/AGBX 185
flat
N/A+29.4%£1.47B£319.58MN/A829

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CML) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners