Go Pro
→ The national debt just passed $39 trillion (From US Gold Bureau) (Ad)tc pixel Free 0GFE Stock Alerts

Embracer Group AB (publ) (0GFE) Competitors

Embracer Group AB (publ) logo
GBX 83.94 +4.02 (+5.03%)
As of 12:39 PM Eastern
Compare

0GFE vs. CCPA, CCPC, CCP, FDEV, and MVR

Should you buy Embracer Group AB (publ) stock or one of its competitors? Embracer Group AB (publ)'s main competitors and comparable companies include Celtic (CCPA), Celtic (CCPC), Celtic (CCP), Frontier Developments (FDEV), and Napster Group (MVR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Embracer Group AB (publ) compare to Celtic?

Celtic (LON:CCPA) and Embracer Group AB (publ) (LON:0GFE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Celtic has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Embracer Group AB (publ)'s net margin of -56.77%. Celtic's return on equity of 6.79% beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celtic9.12% 6.79% 2.20%
Embracer Group AB (publ) -56.77%-37.17%-6.65%

Celtic has a beta of 0.011, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Embracer Group AB (publ) has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Celtic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Embracer Group AB (publ)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celtic Neutral
Embracer Group AB (publ) Neutral

4.3% of Celtic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.8% of Celtic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 38.0% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celtic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Embracer Group AB (publ). Embracer Group AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celtic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celtic£119.54M1.74£13.44M£14.1015.54
Embracer Group AB (publ)£39.83B0.00-£22.61B-£4.15N/A

Summary

Celtic beats Embracer Group AB (publ) on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Embracer Group AB (publ) compare to Celtic?

Celtic (LON:CCPC) and Embracer Group AB (publ) (LON:0GFE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Celtic has a beta of 0.013, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Embracer Group AB (publ) has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Celtic has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Embracer Group AB (publ)'s net margin of -56.77%. Celtic's return on equity of 6.79% beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celtic9.12% 6.79% 2.20%
Embracer Group AB (publ) -56.77%-37.17%-6.65%

36.5% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. 87.9% of Celtic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.0% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Celtic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Embracer Group AB (publ)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celtic Neutral
Embracer Group AB (publ) Neutral

Celtic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Embracer Group AB (publ). Embracer Group AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celtic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celtic£119.54M1.65£5.82M£29.0415.57
Embracer Group AB (publ)£39.83B0.00-£22.61B-£4.15N/A

Summary

Celtic beats Embracer Group AB (publ) on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Embracer Group AB (publ) compare to Celtic?

Embracer Group AB (publ) (LON:0GFE) and Celtic (LON:CCP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Celtic has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Embracer Group AB (publ)'s net margin of -56.77%. Celtic's return on equity of 6.79% beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Embracer Group AB (publ)-56.77% -37.17% -6.65%
Celtic 9.12%6.79%2.20%

In the previous week, Embracer Group AB (publ)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Celtic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Embracer Group AB (publ) Neutral
Celtic Neutral

Celtic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Embracer Group AB (publ). Embracer Group AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celtic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Embracer Group AB (publ)£39.83B0.00-£22.61B-£4.15N/A
Celtic£119.54M1.47£11.82M£8.3922.05

Celtic has a consensus price target of GBX 212, indicating a potential upside of 14.59%. Given Celtic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Celtic is more favorable than Embracer Group AB (publ).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Embracer Group AB (publ)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Celtic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Embracer Group AB (publ) has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celtic has a beta of 0.011, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

36.5% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.0% of Celtic shares are held by institutional investors. 38.0% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.8% of Celtic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Celtic beats Embracer Group AB (publ) on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Embracer Group AB (publ) compare to Frontier Developments?

Frontier Developments (LON:FDEV) and Embracer Group AB (publ) (LON:0GFE) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Frontier Developments has a beta of 0.03, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Embracer Group AB (publ) has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Frontier Developments has a net margin of 26.03% compared to Embracer Group AB (publ)'s net margin of -56.77%. Frontier Developments' return on equity of 27.12% beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Developments26.03% 27.12% -4.87%
Embracer Group AB (publ) -56.77%-37.17%-6.65%

In the previous week, Frontier Developments had 14 more articles in the media than Embracer Group AB (publ). MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Frontier Developments and 0 mentions for Embracer Group AB (publ). Frontier Developments' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Frontier Developments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Developments Positive
Embracer Group AB (publ) Neutral

10.0% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.1% of Frontier Developments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.0% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Frontier Developments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Embracer Group AB (publ). Embracer Group AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Developments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Developments£104.80M1.80-£21.36M£49.8010.90
Embracer Group AB (publ)£39.83B0.00-£22.61B-£4.15N/A

Frontier Developments presently has a consensus target price of GBX 618.75, suggesting a potential upside of 13.95%. Given Frontier Developments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Frontier Developments is more favorable than Embracer Group AB (publ).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontier Developments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Embracer Group AB (publ)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Frontier Developments beats Embracer Group AB (publ) on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Embracer Group AB (publ) compare to Napster Group?

Napster Group (LON:MVR) and Embracer Group AB (publ) (LON:0GFE) are both small-cap entertainment industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Napster Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Embracer Group AB (publ)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Napster Group Neutral
Embracer Group AB (publ) Neutral

Napster Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Embracer Group AB (publ)'s net margin of -56.77%. Napster Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Embracer Group AB (publ)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Napster GroupN/A N/A N/A
Embracer Group AB (publ) -56.77%-37.17%-6.65%

36.5% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are held by institutional investors. 38.0% of Embracer Group AB (publ) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Napster Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Embracer Group AB (publ). Embracer Group AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Napster Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Napster Group£256.47K0.00N/A-£1.20N/A
Embracer Group AB (publ)£39.83B0.00-£22.61B-£4.15N/A

Summary

Napster Group beats Embracer Group AB (publ) on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Embracer Group AB (publ) News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for 0GFE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding 0GFE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

0GFE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricEmbracer Group AB (publ)Entertainment IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£73.99M£10.56B£33.60B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A3.89%5.34%6.25%
P/E Ratio-20.2326.19232.09367.03
Price / Sales0.00112.1661.8889,972.82
Price / Cash0.0735.9520.8427.89
Price / Book0.026.8111.586.30
Net Income-£22.61B£74.90M£1.10B£5.89B
7 Day Performance12.58%0.74%-0.46%-1.13%
1 Month Performance10.56%-0.61%-1.60%-0.61%
1 Year Performance-4.19%-10.66%-7.51%19.59%

Embracer Group AB (publ) Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
0GFE
Embracer Group AB (publ)
N/AGBX 83.94
+5.0%		N/A-8.8%£73.99M£39.83BN/A10,844
CCPA
Celtic
N/AGBX 219
-0.9%		N/AN/A£208.27M£119.54M15.54942
CCPC
Celtic
N/AGBX 452
flat		N/AN/A£197.07M£119.54M15.57942
CCP
Celtic
1.7743 of 5 stars		GBX 184.70
+1.2%		GBX 212
+14.8%		+8.8%£175.72M£119.54M22.01465
FDEV
Frontier Developments
2.2453 of 5 stars		GBX 446
+0.1%		GBX 618.75
+38.7%		+37.3%£154.91M£102.94M8.96915

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:0GFE) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The national debt just passed $39 trillion
The U.S. national debt just topped $39 trillion, up nearly $3 trillion in a single year and on pace to hit $40...
US Gold Bureau | Sponsoredtc pixel
“This is the Perfect Tech Stock”
Jeff Brown, the tech investor who identified Nvidia in 2016 before its 37,000% run, has flagged a new AI compa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock and Vanguard already own THIS
Institutions own roughly 88 percent of an overlooked American oil and natural gas company. BlackRock holds 32 ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold majors have a big problem
Newmont spent 15 billion dollars acquiring Newcrest in 2023, the largest deal in gold mining history. Yet prod...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
My next big call (under $1)
My track record speaks for itself... KDA: 17,556%. PRE: 3,900%. OCEAN: 2,650%. Every single one was called ...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel