Go Pro

Angling Direct (ANG) Competitors

Angling Direct logo
GBX 47 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:03 PM Eastern

ANG vs. STU, MOTR, CAMB, TPT, and PROC

Should you buy Angling Direct stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Angling Direct with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Angling Direct include Studio Retail Group (STU), Motorpoint Group (MOTR), Cambria Automobiles (CAMB), Topps Tiles (TPT), and ProCook Group (PROC). These companies are all part of the "specialty retail" industry.

How does Angling Direct compare to Studio Retail Group?

Studio Retail Group (LON:STU) and Angling Direct (LON:ANG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

21.6% of Angling Direct shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Angling Direct shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Angling Direct has a consensus target price of GBX 78, indicating a potential upside of 65.96%. Given Angling Direct's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Angling Direct is more favorable than Studio Retail Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Studio Retail Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Angling Direct
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Angling Direct has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Studio Retail Group. Studio Retail Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Angling Direct, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Studio Retail Group£586.13M0.00N/A£28.30N/A
Angling Direct£103.90M0.33£1.64M£2.7816.91

In the previous week, Studio Retail Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Angling Direct'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Studio Retail Group Neutral
Angling Direct Neutral

Angling Direct has a net margin of 1.99% compared to Studio Retail Group's net margin of 0.00%. Angling Direct's return on equity of 5.06% beat Studio Retail Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Studio Retail GroupN/A N/A N/A
Angling Direct 1.99%5.06%1.80%

Summary

Angling Direct beats Studio Retail Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Angling Direct compare to Motorpoint Group?

Angling Direct (LON:ANG) and Motorpoint Group (LON:MOTR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Angling Direct has a beta of 0.642, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Motorpoint Group has a beta of 0.828, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Angling Direct presently has a consensus price target of GBX 78, suggesting a potential upside of 65.96%. Motorpoint Group has a consensus price target of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 39.34%. Given Angling Direct's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Angling Direct is more favorable than Motorpoint Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Angling Direct
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Motorpoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

21.6% of Angling Direct shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.3% of Motorpoint Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Angling Direct shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.2% of Motorpoint Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Angling Direct has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Motorpoint Group. Angling Direct is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Motorpoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Angling Direct£103.90M0.33£1.64M£2.7816.91
Motorpoint Group£1.27B0.08-£7.88M£6.6018.48

In the previous week, Motorpoint Group had 1 more articles in the media than Angling Direct. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Motorpoint Group and 0 mentions for Angling Direct. Motorpoint Group's average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Angling Direct's score of 0.00 indicating that Motorpoint Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Angling Direct Neutral
Motorpoint Group Very Positive

Angling Direct has a net margin of 1.99% compared to Motorpoint Group's net margin of 0.44%. Motorpoint Group's return on equity of 22.27% beat Angling Direct's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Angling Direct1.99% 5.06% 1.80%
Motorpoint Group 0.44%22.27%0.42%

Summary

Motorpoint Group beats Angling Direct on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Angling Direct compare to Cambria Automobiles?

Cambria Automobiles (LON:CAMB) and Angling Direct (LON:ANG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Angling Direct has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cambria Automobiles. Cambria Automobiles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Angling Direct, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cambria Automobiles£475.68M0.00N/A£10.90N/A
Angling Direct£103.90M0.33£1.64M£2.7816.91

In the previous week, Cambria Automobiles' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Angling Direct'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cambria Automobiles Neutral
Angling Direct Neutral

Angling Direct has a net margin of 1.99% compared to Cambria Automobiles' net margin of 0.00%. Angling Direct's return on equity of 5.06% beat Cambria Automobiles' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cambria AutomobilesN/A N/A N/A
Angling Direct 1.99%5.06%1.80%

21.6% of Angling Direct shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Angling Direct shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Angling Direct has a consensus target price of GBX 78, suggesting a potential upside of 65.96%. Given Angling Direct's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Angling Direct is more favorable than Cambria Automobiles.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cambria Automobiles
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Angling Direct
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Angling Direct beats Cambria Automobiles on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Angling Direct compare to Topps Tiles?

Angling Direct (LON:ANG) and Topps Tiles (LON:TPT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Angling Direct has a net margin of 1.99% compared to Topps Tiles' net margin of 1.74%. Topps Tiles' return on equity of 89.58% beat Angling Direct's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Angling Direct1.99% 5.06% 1.80%
Topps Tiles 1.74%89.58%3.06%

Angling Direct has a beta of 0.642, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Topps Tiles has a beta of 0.877, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Angling Direct currently has a consensus target price of GBX 78, indicating a potential upside of 65.96%. Topps Tiles has a consensus target price of GBX 51.50, indicating a potential upside of 42.66%. Given Angling Direct's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Angling Direct is more favorable than Topps Tiles.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Angling Direct
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Topps Tiles
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Angling Direct has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Topps Tiles. Topps Tiles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Angling Direct, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Angling Direct£103.90M0.33£1.64M£2.7816.91
Topps Tiles£295.45M0.24£529.29K£2.5813.99

21.6% of Angling Direct shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.1% of Topps Tiles shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Angling Direct shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Topps Tiles shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Angling Direct's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Topps Tiles'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Angling Direct Neutral
Topps Tiles Neutral

Summary

Angling Direct beats Topps Tiles on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Angling Direct compare to ProCook Group?

ProCook Group (LON:PROC) and Angling Direct (LON:ANG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Angling Direct has higher revenue and earnings than ProCook Group. Angling Direct is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProCook Group£85.49M0.64£610.00K£1.3239.39
Angling Direct£103.90M0.33£1.64M£2.7816.91

ProCook Group has a beta of 0.724, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Angling Direct has a beta of 0.642, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Angling Direct. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Angling Direct. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Angling Direct's score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ProCook Group Positive
Angling Direct Neutral

3.1% of ProCook Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.6% of Angling Direct shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of ProCook Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.5% of Angling Direct shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Angling Direct has a net margin of 1.99% compared to ProCook Group's net margin of 1.85%. ProCook Group's return on equity of 16.45% beat Angling Direct's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProCook Group1.85% 16.45% 3.37%
Angling Direct 1.99%5.06%1.80%

ProCook Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 19.23%. Angling Direct has a consensus price target of GBX 78, indicating a potential upside of 65.96%. Given Angling Direct's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Angling Direct is more favorable than ProCook Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Angling Direct
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

ProCook Group beats Angling Direct on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Angling Direct News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ANG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ANG vs. The Competition

MetricAngling DirectSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£34.10M£11.80B£13.38B£2.86B
Dividend YieldN/A94.09%52.78%6.13%
P/E Ratio16.9131.6148.24368.57
Price / Sales0.3318.3787.4983,546.92
Price / Cash1.1313.7726.4327.89
Price / Book0.906.054.577.14
Net Income£1.64M£439.42M£444.55M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.02%1.99%1.26%1.00%
1 Month Performance-5.98%3.58%1.45%0.67%
1 Year PerformanceN/A6.02%3.39%74.90%

Angling Direct Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ANG
Angling Direct
N/AGBX 47
flat
GBX 78
+66.0%
+4.0%£34.10M£103.90M16.91447
STU
Studio Retail Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£100.07M£586.13M4.061,610
MOTR
Motorpoint Group
4.5616 of 5 stars
GBX 120
-3.6%
GBX 170
+41.7%
-34.4%£95.96M£1.27B18.18693
CAMB
Cambria Automobiles
N/AN/AN/AN/A£82.50M£475.68M7.571,014
TPT
Topps Tiles
N/AGBX 35.50
+1.1%
GBX 51.50
+45.1%
-5.0%£69.51M£295.45M13.761,744

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ANG) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners