Go Pro

ProCook Group (PROC) Competitors

ProCook Group logo
GBX 49.26 -1.25 (-2.47%)
As of 05:09 AM Eastern

PROC vs. FDL, STU, MOTR, CAMB, and TPT

Should you buy ProCook Group stock or one of its competitors? ProCook Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Findel (FDL), Studio Retail Group (STU), Motorpoint Group (MOTR), Cambria Automobiles (CAMB), and Topps Tiles (TPT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty retail" industry.

How does ProCook Group compare to Findel?

Findel (LON:FDL) and ProCook Group (LON:PROC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Findel. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Findel. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Findel's score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Findel Neutral
ProCook Group Neutral

ProCook Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Findel. Findel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Findel£506.81M0.00N/A£27.00N/A
ProCook Group£85.49M0.64£610.00K£1.3238.64

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Findel's net margin of 0.00%. ProCook Group's return on equity of 16.45% beat Findel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FindelN/A N/A N/A
ProCook Group 1.85%16.45%3.37%

ProCook Group has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 21.57%. Given ProCook Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ProCook Group is more favorable than Findel.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Findel
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

3.1% of ProCook Group shares are held by institutional investors. 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ProCook Group beats Findel on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProCook Group compare to Studio Retail Group?

Studio Retail Group (LON:STU) and ProCook Group (LON:PROC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and risk.

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Studio Retail Group's net margin of 0.00%. ProCook Group's return on equity of 16.45% beat Studio Retail Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Studio Retail GroupN/A N/A N/A
ProCook Group 1.85%16.45%3.37%

ProCook Group has a consensus target price of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 21.57%. Given ProCook Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ProCook Group is more favorable than Studio Retail Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Studio Retail Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

ProCook Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Studio Retail Group. Studio Retail Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Studio Retail Group£586.13M0.00N/A£28.30N/A
ProCook Group£85.49M0.64£610.00K£1.3238.64

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Studio Retail Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Studio Retail Group. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Studio Retail Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Studio Retail Group Neutral
ProCook Group Neutral

3.1% of ProCook Group shares are held by institutional investors. 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ProCook Group beats Studio Retail Group on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProCook Group compare to Motorpoint Group?

Motorpoint Group (LON:MOTR) and ProCook Group (LON:PROC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Motorpoint Group's net margin of 0.44%. Motorpoint Group's return on equity of 22.27% beat ProCook Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Motorpoint Group0.44% 22.27% 0.42%
ProCook Group 1.85%16.45%3.37%

ProCook Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Motorpoint Group. Motorpoint Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Motorpoint Group£1.27B0.08-£7.88M£6.6018.94
ProCook Group£85.49M0.64£610.00K£1.3238.64

Motorpoint Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 36.00%. ProCook Group has a consensus price target of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 21.57%. Given Motorpoint Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Motorpoint Group is more favorable than ProCook Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Motorpoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Motorpoint Group and Motorpoint Group both had 1 articles in the media. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Motorpoint Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Motorpoint Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ProCook Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Motorpoint Group has a beta of 0.825, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProCook Group has a beta of 0.724, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

7.3% of Motorpoint Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of ProCook Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.2% of Motorpoint Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ProCook Group beats Motorpoint Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProCook Group compare to Cambria Automobiles?

ProCook Group (LON:PROC) and Cambria Automobiles (LON:CAMB) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

ProCook Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cambria Automobiles. Cambria Automobiles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProCook Group£85.49M0.64£610.00K£1.3238.64
Cambria Automobiles£475.68M0.00N/A£10.90N/A

3.1% of ProCook Group shares are held by institutional investors. 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Cambria Automobiles' net margin of 0.00%. ProCook Group's return on equity of 16.45% beat Cambria Automobiles' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProCook Group1.85% 16.45% 3.37%
Cambria Automobiles N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cambria Automobiles. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Cambria Automobiles. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Cambria Automobiles' score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ProCook Group Neutral
Cambria Automobiles Neutral

ProCook Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 21.57%. Given ProCook Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ProCook Group is more favorable than Cambria Automobiles.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cambria Automobiles
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

ProCook Group beats Cambria Automobiles on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProCook Group compare to Topps Tiles?

ProCook Group (LON:PROC) and Topps Tiles (LON:TPT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

ProCook Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 21.57%. Topps Tiles has a consensus price target of GBX 51.50, indicating a potential upside of 44.18%. Given Topps Tiles' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Topps Tiles is more favorable than ProCook Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Topps Tiles
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

ProCook Group has a beta of 0.724, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Topps Tiles has a beta of 0.867, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

ProCook Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Topps Tiles. Topps Tiles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProCook Group£85.49M0.64£610.00K£1.3238.64
Topps Tiles£295.45M0.24£529.29K£2.5813.84

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Topps Tiles' net margin of 1.74%. Topps Tiles' return on equity of 89.58% beat ProCook Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProCook Group1.85% 16.45% 3.37%
Topps Tiles 1.74%89.58%3.06%

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Topps Tiles. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Topps Tiles. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Topps Tiles' score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ProCook Group Neutral
Topps Tiles Neutral

3.1% of ProCook Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.1% of Topps Tiles shares are held by institutional investors. 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Topps Tiles shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ProCook Group beats Topps Tiles on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ProCook Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PROC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PROC vs. The Competition

MetricProCook GroupSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£54.62M£11.54B£13.22B£2.93B
Dividend Yield3.43%115.27%55.69%6.17%
P/E Ratio38.6426.2046.71367.39
Price / Sales0.6418.8693.0083,465.45
Price / Cash9.1713.6329.1127.89
Price / Book6.595.676.037.12
Net Income£610.00K£438.66M£445.73M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-7.19%-1.38%-0.13%0.92%
1 Month Performance3.03%1.68%2.23%3.33%
1 Year Performance15.91%-3.97%-1.82%22.15%

ProCook Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PROC
ProCook Group
3.1923 of 5 stars
GBX 49.26
-2.5%
GBX 62
+25.9%
+23.2%£52.76M£85.49M37.31578
FDL
Findel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£201.41M£506.81M8.631,871
STU
Studio Retail Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£100.07M£586.13M4.061,610
MOTR
Motorpoint Group
3.6512 of 5 stars
GBX 124
-2.4%
GBX 170
+37.1%
-27.3%£98.74M£1.27B18.79693
CAMB
Cambria Automobiles
N/AN/AN/AN/A£82.50M£475.68M7.571,014

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PROC) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners