Free Trial

ProCook Group (PROC) Competitors

ProCook Group logo
GBX 40.40 -0.80 (-1.94%)
As of 03:18 AM Eastern

PROC vs. FDL, MOTR, STU, CAMB, and TPT

Should you buy ProCook Group stock or one of its competitors? ProCook Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Findel (FDL), Motorpoint Group (MOTR), Studio Retail Group (STU), Cambria Automobiles (CAMB), and Topps Tiles (TPT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty retail" industry.

How does ProCook Group compare to Findel?

Findel (LON:FDL) and ProCook Group (LON:PROC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

ProCook Group has a consensus target price of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 47.62%. Given ProCook Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ProCook Group is more favorable than Findel.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Findel
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

3.1% of ProCook Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Findel. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Findel. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Findel's score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Findel Neutral
ProCook Group Positive

ProCook Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Findel. Findel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Findel£506.81M0.00N/A£27.00N/A
ProCook Group£85.49M0.53£610.00K£1.3231.82

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Findel's net margin of 0.00%. ProCook Group's return on equity of 16.45% beat Findel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FindelN/A N/A N/A
ProCook Group 1.85%16.45%3.37%

Summary

ProCook Group beats Findel on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProCook Group compare to Motorpoint Group?

Motorpoint Group (LON:MOTR) and ProCook Group (LON:PROC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends and media sentiment.

7.3% of Motorpoint Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of ProCook Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.2% of Motorpoint Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Motorpoint Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Motorpoint Group. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Motorpoint Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Motorpoint Group Neutral
ProCook Group Positive

ProCook Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Motorpoint Group. Motorpoint Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Motorpoint Group£1.27B0.09-£7.88M£6.6021.52
ProCook Group£85.49M0.53£610.00K£1.3231.82

Motorpoint Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 19.72%. ProCook Group has a consensus target price of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 47.62%. Given ProCook Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ProCook Group is more favorable than Motorpoint Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Motorpoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Motorpoint Group has a beta of 0.829, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProCook Group has a beta of 0.729, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Motorpoint Group's net margin of 0.44%. Motorpoint Group's return on equity of 22.27% beat ProCook Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Motorpoint Group0.44% 22.27% 0.42%
ProCook Group 1.85%16.45%3.37%

Summary

ProCook Group beats Motorpoint Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProCook Group compare to Studio Retail Group?

ProCook Group (LON:PROC) and Studio Retail Group (LON:STU) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

ProCook Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Studio Retail Group. Studio Retail Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProCook Group£85.49M0.53£610.00K£1.3231.82
Studio Retail Group£586.13M0.00N/A£28.30N/A

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Studio Retail Group's net margin of 0.00%. ProCook Group's return on equity of 16.45% beat Studio Retail Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProCook Group1.85% 16.45% 3.37%
Studio Retail Group N/A N/A N/A

ProCook Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 47.62%. Given ProCook Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe ProCook Group is more favorable than Studio Retail Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Studio Retail Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Studio Retail Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Studio Retail Group. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Studio Retail Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ProCook Group Positive
Studio Retail Group Neutral

3.1% of ProCook Group shares are held by institutional investors. 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ProCook Group beats Studio Retail Group on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProCook Group compare to Cambria Automobiles?

ProCook Group (LON:PROC) and Cambria Automobiles (LON:CAMB) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, ProCook Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cambria Automobiles. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ProCook Group and 0 mentions for Cambria Automobiles. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Cambria Automobiles' score of 0.00 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ProCook Group Positive
Cambria Automobiles Neutral

ProCook Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 47.62%. Given ProCook Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe ProCook Group is more favorable than Cambria Automobiles.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cambria Automobiles
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Cambria Automobiles' net margin of 0.00%. ProCook Group's return on equity of 16.45% beat Cambria Automobiles' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProCook Group1.85% 16.45% 3.37%
Cambria Automobiles N/A N/A N/A

3.1% of ProCook Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ProCook Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cambria Automobiles. Cambria Automobiles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProCook Group£85.49M0.53£610.00K£1.3231.82
Cambria Automobiles£475.68M0.00N/A£10.90N/A

Summary

ProCook Group beats Cambria Automobiles on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProCook Group compare to Topps Tiles?

Topps Tiles (LON:TPT) and ProCook Group (LON:PROC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

ProCook Group has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Topps Tiles' net margin of 1.74%. Topps Tiles' return on equity of 89.58% beat ProCook Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Topps Tiles1.74% 89.58% 3.06%
ProCook Group 1.85%16.45%3.37%

In the previous week, Topps Tiles had 5 more articles in the media than ProCook Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Topps Tiles and 1 mentions for ProCook Group. ProCook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Topps Tiles' score of 0.47 indicating that ProCook Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Topps Tiles
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ProCook Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Topps Tiles currently has a consensus price target of GBX 33, suggesting a potential downside of 3.51%. ProCook Group has a consensus price target of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 47.62%. Given ProCook Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ProCook Group is more favorable than Topps Tiles.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Topps Tiles
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
ProCook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Topps Tiles has a beta of 0.868, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProCook Group has a beta of 0.729, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

ProCook Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Topps Tiles. Topps Tiles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProCook Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Topps Tiles£295.45M0.23£529.29K£2.5813.26
ProCook Group£85.49M0.53£610.00K£1.3231.82

22.1% of Topps Tiles shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of ProCook Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Topps Tiles shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of ProCook Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ProCook Group beats Topps Tiles on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ProCook Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PROC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PROC vs. The Competition

MetricProCook GroupSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£43.27M£10.44B£12.34B£2.81B
Dividend Yield3.43%234.83%73.13%6.25%
P/E Ratio30.6124.6444.76368.23
Price / Sales0.5116.8487.4588,523.94
Price / Cash9.1712.8728.2227.89
Price / Book5.225.543.966.91
Net Income£610.00K£440.44M£443.78M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-9.82%0.19%-0.17%-0.57%
1 Month Performance-18.57%-3.98%-4.69%-1.12%
1 Year Performance14.22%-5.59%-6.24%23.04%

ProCook Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PROC
ProCook Group
3.2951 of 5 stars
GBX 40.40
-1.9%
GBX 62
+53.5%
+14.3%£43.27M£85.49M30.61578
FDL
Findel
N/AN/AN/AN/A£201.41M£506.81M8.631,871
MOTR
Motorpoint Group
N/AGBX 140.50
flat
GBX 170
+21.0%
-7.8%£111.88M£1.27B21.29693
STU
Studio Retail Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£100.07M£586.13M4.061,610
CAMB
Cambria Automobiles
N/AN/AN/AN/A£82.50M£475.68M7.571,014

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PROC) was last updated on 10/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners