Free Trial

IG Design Group (IGR) Competitors

IG Design Group logo
GBX 71 -1.40 (-1.93%)
As of 05/15/2026 12:39 PM Eastern

IGR vs. CTR, GRX, IRR, CHI, and MHN

Should you buy IG Design Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares IG Design Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with IG Design Group include Charles Taylor (CTR), GreenX Metals (GRX), IronRidge Resources (IRR), CT UK High Income Trust (CHI), and Menhaden Resource Efficiency (MHN). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does IG Design Group compare to Charles Taylor?

IG Design Group (LON:IGR) and Charles Taylor (LON:CTR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

IG Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than Charles Taylor. IG Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles Taylor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IG Design Group£709.36M0.10£29.18M-£262.40N/A
Charles Taylor£281.84M0.00N/A-£5.40N/A

IG Design Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 150, suggesting a potential upside of 111.27%. Given IG Design Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe IG Design Group is more favorable than Charles Taylor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IG Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Charles Taylor
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Charles Taylor has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IG Design Group's net margin of -23.77%. Charles Taylor's return on equity of 0.00% beat IG Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IG Design Group-23.77% -43.73% 2.85%
Charles Taylor N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, IG Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Charles Taylor'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
IG Design Group Neutral
Charles Taylor Neutral

21.5% of IG Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of IG Design Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

IG Design Group beats Charles Taylor on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does IG Design Group compare to GreenX Metals?

IG Design Group (LON:IGR) and GreenX Metals (LON:GRX) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

IG Design Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 150, suggesting a potential upside of 111.27%. Given IG Design Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe IG Design Group is more favorable than GreenX Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IG Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
GreenX Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

IG Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than GreenX Metals. GreenX Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IG Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IG Design Group£709.36M0.10£29.18M-£262.40N/A
GreenX Metals£244.87K607.10-£9.45M-£4.27N/A

IG Design Group has a beta of 0.703, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GreenX Metals has a beta of 0.982, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

21.5% of IG Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of GreenX Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of IG Design Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of GreenX Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, GreenX Metals had 1 more articles in the media than IG Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for GreenX Metals and 0 mentions for IG Design Group. IG Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GreenX Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
IG Design Group Neutral
GreenX Metals Neutral

IG Design Group has a net margin of -23.77% compared to GreenX Metals' net margin of -989.60%. IG Design Group's return on equity of -43.73% beat GreenX Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IG Design Group-23.77% -43.73% 2.85%
GreenX Metals -989.60%-113.12%-14.69%

Summary

IG Design Group beats GreenX Metals on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does IG Design Group compare to IronRidge Resources?

IG Design Group (LON:IGR) and IronRidge Resources (LON:IRR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, IG Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled IronRidge Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
IG Design Group Neutral
IronRidge Resources Neutral

21.5% of IG Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of IG Design Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

IronRidge Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IG Design Group's net margin of -23.77%. IronRidge Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat IG Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IG Design Group-23.77% -43.73% 2.85%
IronRidge Resources N/A N/A N/A

IG Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than IronRidge Resources. IG Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IronRidge Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IG Design Group£709.36M0.10£29.18M-£262.40N/A
IronRidge Resources£56.06K0.00N/A-£0.60N/A

IG Design Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 150, suggesting a potential upside of 111.27%. Given IG Design Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe IG Design Group is more favorable than IronRidge Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IG Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
IronRidge Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

IG Design Group beats IronRidge Resources on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does IG Design Group compare to CT UK High Income Trust?

IG Design Group (LON:IGR) and CT UK High Income Trust (LON:CHI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

21.5% of IG Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of CT UK High Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of IG Design Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT UK High Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

IG Design Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 150, indicating a potential upside of 111.27%. Given IG Design Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe IG Design Group is more favorable than CT UK High Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IG Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CT UK High Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

IG Design Group has a beta of 0.703, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT UK High Income Trust has a beta of 0.444, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, IG Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT UK High Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
IG Design Group Neutral
CT UK High Income Trust Neutral

IG Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than CT UK High Income Trust. IG Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT UK High Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IG Design Group£709.36M0.10£29.18M-£262.40N/A
CT UK High Income Trust£17.18M7.28£11.22M£14.477.12

CT UK High Income Trust has a net margin of 128.77% compared to IG Design Group's net margin of -23.77%. CT UK High Income Trust's return on equity of 13.90% beat IG Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IG Design Group-23.77% -43.73% 2.85%
CT UK High Income Trust 128.77%13.90%6.32%

Summary

IG Design Group beats CT UK High Income Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does IG Design Group compare to Menhaden Resource Efficiency?

Menhaden Resource Efficiency (LON:MHN) and IG Design Group (LON:IGR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

IG Design Group has a consensus target price of GBX 150, indicating a potential upside of 111.27%. Given IG Design Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe IG Design Group is more favorable than Menhaden Resource Efficiency.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Menhaden Resource Efficiency
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
IG Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

IG Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than Menhaden Resource Efficiency. IG Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Menhaden Resource Efficiency, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Menhaden Resource Efficiency£2.24M53.81£16.15M£20.497.47
IG Design Group£709.36M0.10£29.18M-£262.40N/A

In the previous week, Menhaden Resource Efficiency's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled IG Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Menhaden Resource Efficiency Neutral
IG Design Group Neutral

31.3% of Menhaden Resource Efficiency shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.5% of IG Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.0% of Menhaden Resource Efficiency shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of IG Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Menhaden Resource Efficiency has a net margin of 97.04% compared to IG Design Group's net margin of -23.77%. Menhaden Resource Efficiency's return on equity of 20.90% beat IG Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Menhaden Resource Efficiency97.04% 20.90% N/A
IG Design Group -23.77%-43.73%2.85%

Summary

Menhaden Resource Efficiency beats IG Design Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get IG Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IGR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IGR vs. The Competition

MetricIG Design GroupSpecialty Retail IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£70.53M£4.12B£4.22B£2.60B
Dividend Yield7.29%4.46%3.62%6.15%
P/E Ratio-0.2716.7877.37365.91
Price / Sales0.1025.08328.0388,030.08
Price / Cash1.6314.6030.8627.89
Price / Book0.189.913.167.74
Net Income£29.18M£141.85M£247.50M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.05%-2.98%-0.06%0.21%
1 Month Performance26.79%-3.55%0.11%1.56%
1 Year Performance13.60%-5.82%1.32%77.95%

IG Design Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IGR
IG Design Group
1.9928 of 5 stars
GBX 71
-1.9%
GBX 150
+111.3%
+13.2%£70.53M£709.36MN/A3,092
CTR
Charles Taylor
N/AN/AN/AN/A£269.53M£281.84MN/A3,086
GRX
GreenX Metals
N/AGBX 48.65
+2.4%
N/A+25.0%£151.46M£244.87KN/AN/A
IRR
IronRidge Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£134.83M£56.06KN/AN/A
CHI
CT UK High Income Trust
N/AGBX 104
+1.5%
N/A+0.5%£126.31M£17.18M7.19N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:IGR) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners