Do analysts rate SDG or HEAD?

Headlam Group has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Sanderson Design Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Headlam Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts prefer HEAD or CHH?

Headlam Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Churchill China. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Headlam Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Churchill China 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor HEAD or CHH?

In the previous week, Headlam Group and Headlam Group both had 1 articles in the media. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Headlam Group's score of -0.77 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Headlam Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Churchill China 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer HEAD or PMP?

Headlam Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Portmeirion Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Headlam Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Portmeirion Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor HEAD or PMP?

In the previous week, Headlam Group and Headlam Group both had 1 articles in the media. Portmeirion Group's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Headlam Group's score of -0.77 indicating that Portmeirion Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Headlam Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Portmeirion Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate HEAD or JLH?

Headlam Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than John Lewis of Hungerford. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Headlam Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 John Lewis of Hungerford 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, HEAD or JLH?

John Lewis of Hungerford has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Headlam Group £498.70M 0.01 -£12.12M -£102.00 N/A John Lewis of Hungerford £11.14M 0.00 N/A N/A N/A

Headlam Group (HEAD) Competitors

GBX 8 -3.60 (-31.03%)

As of 12:00 PM Eastern

Compare

HEAD vs. SDG, ULTP, CHH, PMP, and JLH

Should you buy Headlam Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Headlam Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Headlam Group include Sanderson Design Group (SDG), Ultimate Products (ULTP), Churchill China (CHH), Portmeirion Group (PMP), and John Lewis of Hungerford (JLH). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.

How does Headlam Group compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Sanderson Design Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Headlam Group. Headlam Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group	£99.48M	0.57	£4.43M	£2.87	27.53
Headlam Group	£498.70M	0.01	-£12.12M	-£102.00	N/A

Headlam Group has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sanderson Design Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Headlam Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.582, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Headlam Group has a beta of 0.844, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Headlam Group had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Headlam Group and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Headlam Group's score of -0.77 indicating that Sanderson Design Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group	Very Positive
Headlam Group	Negative

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -16.42%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group	2.16%	3.09%	5.54%
Headlam Group	-16.42%	-61.90%	-1.18%

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.0% of Headlam Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Headlam Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Headlam Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headlam Group compare to Ultimate Products?

Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) and Ultimate Products (LON:ULTP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Headlam Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Ultimate Products has a consensus target price of GBX 80, indicating a potential upside of 60.00%. Given Headlam Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Ultimate Products.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Headlam Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ultimate Products	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Ultimate Products has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group. Headlam Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultimate Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Headlam Group	£498.70M	0.01	-£12.12M	-£102.00	N/A
Ultimate Products	£145.10M	0.29	£10.32M	£4.50	11.11

In the previous week, Headlam Group had 1 more articles in the media than Ultimate Products. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Headlam Group and 0 mentions for Ultimate Products. Ultimate Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Headlam Group's score of -0.77 indicating that Ultimate Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Headlam Group	Negative
Ultimate Products	Neutral

Ultimate Products has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -16.42%. Ultimate Products' return on equity of 8.41% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Headlam Group	-16.42%	-61.90%	-1.18%
Ultimate Products	2.69%	8.41%	9.97%

Headlam Group has a beta of 0.844, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ultimate Products has a beta of 0.586, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

48.0% of Headlam Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Ultimate Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Headlam Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.3% of Ultimate Products shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ultimate Products beats Headlam Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headlam Group compare to Churchill China?

Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Churchill China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group. Headlam Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Headlam Group	£498.70M	0.01	-£12.12M	-£102.00	N/A
Churchill China	£76.28M	0.50	£7.84M	£39.70	8.82

48.0% of Headlam Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.4% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Headlam Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Headlam Group and Headlam Group both had 1 articles in the media. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Headlam Group's score of -0.77 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Headlam Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Churchill China	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Headlam Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Churchill China.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Headlam Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Churchill China	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Headlam Group has a beta of 0.844, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has a net margin of 5.72% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -16.42%. Churchill China's return on equity of 7.14% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Headlam Group	-16.42%	-61.90%	-1.18%
Churchill China	5.72%	7.14%	8.74%

Summary

Churchill China beats Headlam Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headlam Group compare to Portmeirion Group?

Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) and Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Headlam Group and Headlam Group both had 1 articles in the media. Portmeirion Group's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Headlam Group's score of -0.77 indicating that Portmeirion Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Headlam Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Portmeirion Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Headlam Group has a beta of 0.844, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.447, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Headlam Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Portmeirion Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Headlam Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Portmeirion Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Portmeirion Group has a net margin of -6.86% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -16.42%. Portmeirion Group's return on equity of -12.61% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Headlam Group	-16.42%	-61.90%	-1.18%
Portmeirion Group	-6.86%	-12.61%	1.87%

Portmeirion Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headlam Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Headlam Group	£498.70M	0.01	-£12.12M	-£102.00	N/A
Portmeirion Group	£91.06M	0.29	-£10.98M	-£45.30	N/A

48.0% of Headlam Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Headlam Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Portmeirion Group beats Headlam Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Headlam Group compare to John Lewis of Hungerford?

Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) and John Lewis of Hungerford (LON:JLH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

John Lewis of Hungerford has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Headlam Group	£498.70M	0.01	-£12.12M	-£102.00	N/A
John Lewis of Hungerford	£11.14M	0.00	N/A	N/A	N/A

48.0% of Headlam Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of John Lewis of Hungerford shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Headlam Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 63.6% of John Lewis of Hungerford shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

John Lewis of Hungerford has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -16.42%. John Lewis of Hungerford's return on equity of -8.16% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Headlam Group	-16.42%	-61.90%	-1.18%
John Lewis of Hungerford	-0.71%	-8.16%	1.40%

Headlam Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 1,150.00%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than John Lewis of Hungerford.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Headlam Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
John Lewis of Hungerford	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Headlam Group has a beta of 0.844, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Lewis of Hungerford has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Headlam Group had 1 more articles in the media than John Lewis of Hungerford. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Headlam Group and 0 mentions for John Lewis of Hungerford. John Lewis of Hungerford's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Headlam Group's score of -0.77 indicating that John Lewis of Hungerford is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Headlam Group	Negative
John Lewis of Hungerford	Neutral

Summary

Headlam Group and John Lewis of Hungerford tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Headlam Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HEAD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Headlam Group	Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry	Cyclical Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£6.42M	£598.30M	£3.91B	£2.77B
Dividend Yield	5.04%	3.08%	3.48%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	-0.08	11.95	77.46	368.16
Price / Sales	0.01	41.46	341.15	84,554.80
Price / Cash	8.03	11.54	30.84	27.89
Price / Book	0.03	1.39	3.59	7.53
Net Income	-£12.12M	£12.18M	£249.12M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-58.12%	-2.28%	0.70%	5.85%
1 Month Performance	-60.40%	-1.30%	6.28%	4.48%
1 Year Performance	-90.77%	-11.19%	4.55%	62.28%

Headlam Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HEAD Headlam Group	1.6918 of 5 stars	GBX 8 -31.0%	GBX 100 +1,150.0%	-86.7%	£6.42M	£498.70M	N/A	2,338	Gap Up High Trading Volume
SDG Sanderson Design Group	N/A	GBX 78.38 +1.1%	N/A	+50.2%	£56.64M	£99.48M	27.31	600	Positive News
ULTP Ultimate Products	3.8892 of 5 stars	GBX 45.82 -1.5%	GBX 80 +74.6%	-18.5%	£38.23M	£145.10M	10.18	361	Gap Up
CHH Churchill China	N/A	GBX 335.10 -1.4%	N/A	-40.9%	£36.85M	£76.28M	8.44	1,500	News Coverage
PMP Portmeirion Group	N/A	GBX 54 +1.9%	N/A	-60.5%	£27.51M	£91.06M	N/A	802

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HEAD) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Headlam Group (HEAD) Competitors

HEAD vs. SDG, ULTP, CHH, PMP, and JLH

How does Headlam Group compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Summary

How does Headlam Group compare to Ultimate Products?

Summary

How does Headlam Group compare to Churchill China?

Summary

How does Headlam Group compare to Portmeirion Group?

Summary

How does Headlam Group compare to John Lewis of Hungerford?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

HEAD vs. The Competition

Headlam Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Headlam Group (HEAD) Competitors

HEAD vs. SDG, ULTP, CHH, PMP, and JLH

How does Headlam Group compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SDG or HEAD?

Do analysts rate SDG or HEAD?

Which has more risk & volatility, SDG or HEAD?

Does the media prefer SDG or HEAD?

Is SDG or HEAD more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SDG or HEAD?

Summary

How does Headlam Group compare to Ultimate Products?

Do analysts rate HEAD or ULTP?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, HEAD or ULTP?

Does the media favor HEAD or ULTP?

Is HEAD or ULTP more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HEAD or ULTP?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of HEAD or ULTP?

Summary

How does Headlam Group compare to Churchill China?

Which has better valuation and earnings, HEAD or CHH?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HEAD or CHH?

Does the media favor HEAD or CHH?

Do analysts prefer HEAD or CHH?

Which has more risk and volatility, HEAD or CHH?

Is HEAD or CHH more profitable?

Summary

How does Headlam Group compare to Portmeirion Group?

Does the media favor HEAD or PMP?

Which has more risk & volatility, HEAD or PMP?

Do analysts prefer HEAD or PMP?

Is HEAD or PMP more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, HEAD or PMP?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in HEAD or PMP?

Summary

How does Headlam Group compare to John Lewis of Hungerford?

Which has better earnings & valuation, HEAD or JLH?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in HEAD or JLH?

Is HEAD or JLH more profitable?

Do analysts rate HEAD or JLH?

Which has more volatility & risk, HEAD or JLH?

Does the media prefer HEAD or JLH?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

HEAD vs. The Competition

Headlam Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools