Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free SDG Stock Alerts

Sanderson Design Group (SDG) Competitors

Sanderson Design Group logo
GBX 76.70 -0.30 (-0.39%)
As of 08/14/2026 12:36 PM Eastern
Compare

SDG vs. CRST, GLE, SPR, UPGS, and LIKE

Should you buy Sanderson Design Group stock or one of its competitors? Sanderson Design Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Crest Nicholson (CRST), MJ Gleeson (GLE), Springfield Properties (SPR), UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), and Likewise Group (LIKE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Crest Nicholson?

Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.334, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of -5.44%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crest Nicholson-5.44% -4.32% 0.16%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crest Nicholson. Crest Nicholson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crest Nicholson£558.90M0.33-£26.61M£8.408.54
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.56£4.43M£2.8726.72

In the previous week, Crest Nicholson had 11 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Crest Nicholson and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Crest Nicholson's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Sanderson Design Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Crest Nicholson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crest Nicholson Positive
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Crest Nicholson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 108.86, suggesting a potential upside of 51.82%. Given Crest Nicholson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crest Nicholson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Crest Nicholson pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crest Nicholson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

61.0% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crest Nicholson beats Sanderson Design Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to MJ Gleeson?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson3.76% 4.67% 4.73%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. MJ Gleeson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.42£20.04M£24.5311.21
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.56£4.43M£2.8726.72

42.6% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 12.73%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MJ Gleeson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson had 2 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MJ Gleeson and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Sanderson Design Group's score of 0.00 indicating that MJ Gleeson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson Positive
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.621, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MJ Gleeson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Sanderson Design Group on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Springfield Properties?

Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Springfield Properties Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.072, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Springfield Properties5.03% 8.30% 3.53%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

Springfield Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. Springfield Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.46£7.57M£11.379.50
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.56£4.43M£2.8726.72

Summary

Springfield Properties beats Sanderson Design Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
UP Global Sourcing 7.71%29.55%9.19%

In the previous week, Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled UP Global Sourcing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
UP Global Sourcing Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.56£4.43M£2.8726.72
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Sanderson Design Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Likewise Group?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Likewise Group had 3 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Likewise Group and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Likewise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Sanderson Design Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Likewise Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
Likewise Group Positive

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Likewise Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Likewise Group pays out 114.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sanderson Design Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Likewise Group. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.56£4.43M£2.8726.72
Likewise Group£163.10M0.45£978.91K£0.3486.03

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Likewise Group has a beta of 1.086, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Likewise Group's net margin of 0.54%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
Likewise Group 0.54%2.10%1.18%

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Likewise Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Likewise Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sanderson Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SDG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SDG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SDG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSanderson Design GroupHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£55.43M£5.51B£13.19B£2.88B
Dividend Yield1.92%3.48%54.81%6.11%
P/E Ratio26.7230.2646.95368.68
Price / Sales0.5663.2690.5783,339.32
Price / Cash5.639.6726.4027.89
Price / Book0.643.884.337.18
Net Income£4.43M£273.19M£444.06M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.66%-0.10%-0.42%0.91%
1 Month Performance0.39%2.67%1.54%2.94%
1 Year Performance39.45%-1.91%0.71%64.32%

Sanderson Design Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 76.70
-0.4%		N/A+47.4%£55.43M£99.48M26.72600
CRST
Crest Nicholson
4.9597 of 5 stars		GBX 63.36
-1.9%		GBX 109.57
+72.9%		-59.9%£162.68M£558.90M7.54778
GLE
MJ Gleeson
3.5824 of 5 stars		GBX 276
-1.1%		GBX 310
+12.3%		-23.6%£161.01M£381.06M11.25743
SPR
Springfield Properties
N/AGBX 103
+3.5%		N/A+8.1%£123.01M£282.91M9.06636
UPGS
UP Global Sourcing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£107.17M£156.05M857.14370

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SDG) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel