Go Pro
→ The energy story near the Grand Canyon (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free SDG Stock Alerts

Sanderson Design Group (SDG) Competitors

Sanderson Design Group logo
GBX 75.50 +1.00 (+1.34%)
As of 06:39 AM Eastern
Compare

SDG vs. UPGS, LIKE, CFX, VCP, and ULTP

Should you buy Sanderson Design Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sanderson Design Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sanderson Design Group include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Likewise Group (LIKE), Colefax Group (CFX), Victoria (VCP), and Ultimate Products (ULTP). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.55£4.43M£2.8726.31
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.2% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled UP Global Sourcing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
UP Global Sourcing Neutral

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
UP Global Sourcing 7.71%29.55%9.19%

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Sanderson Design Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Likewise Group?

Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Likewise Group has a beta of 1.094, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Likewise Group. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Likewise Group£163.10M0.46£978.91K£0.3488.82
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.55£4.43M£2.8726.31

5.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Likewise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Likewise Group Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Likewise Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Likewise Group pays out 114.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Likewise Group's net margin of 0.54%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Likewise Group0.54% 2.10% 1.18%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Likewise Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Colefax Group?

Colefax Group (LON:CFX) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Colefax Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Colefax Group pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Colefax Group has a beta of 0.203, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 20.89% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Colefax Group6.13% 20.89% 6.87%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

Colefax Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. Colefax Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Colefax Group£116.16M0.64£5.49M£121.7011.74
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.55£4.43M£2.8726.31

29.1% of Colefax Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.8% of Colefax Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Colefax Group had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Colefax Group and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Colefax Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Colefax Group Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Colefax Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 870, indicating a potential downside of 39.08%. Given Colefax Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Colefax Group is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Colefax Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Colefax Group beats Sanderson Design Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Victoria?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and risk.

15.2% of Victoria shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 40.9% of Victoria shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-21.45% 67.51% 1.75%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

Victoria has a beta of 0.457, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victoria Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.08B0.06-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.55£4.43M£2.8726.31

Victoria currently has a consensus target price of GBX 170, indicating a potential upside of 193.10%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Victoria and Sanderson Design Group tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Ultimate Products?

Ultimate Products (LON:ULTP) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Ultimate Products has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. Ultimate Products' return on equity of 8.41% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ultimate Products2.69% 8.41% 9.97%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

In the previous week, Ultimate Products had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ultimate Products and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Ultimate Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ultimate Products Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Ultimate Products has a beta of 0.572, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Ultimate Products currently has a consensus price target of GBX 80, suggesting a potential upside of 81.41%. Given Ultimate Products' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ultimate Products is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ultimate Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Ultimate Products has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. Ultimate Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ultimate Products£145.10M0.25£10.32M£4.509.80
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.55£4.43M£2.8726.31

17.2% of Ultimate Products shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 43.3% of Ultimate Products shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ultimate Products pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Ultimate Products pays out 82.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Ultimate Products beats Sanderson Design Group on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sanderson Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SDG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SDG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSanderson Design GroupFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£54.56M£618.32M£3.85B£2.79B
Dividend Yield2.08%3.09%3.49%6.15%
P/E Ratio26.3111.8778.69366.62
Price / Sales0.5539.21336.4586,455.95
Price / Cash5.6311.5430.8127.87
Price / Book0.631.413.507.77
Net Income£4.43M£12.18M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance7.86%0.86%0.18%0.49%
1 Month Performance-1.95%0.03%-0.85%-1.37%
1 Year Performance44.15%-9.77%-1.39%65.15%

Sanderson Design Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 75.50
+1.3%		N/A+39.9%£54.56M£99.48M26.31600
UPGS
UP Global Sourcing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£107.17M£156.05M857.14370
LIKE
Likewise Group
N/AGBX 30.21
-2.5%		N/A+25.6%£75.30M£163.10M88.85455
CFX
Colefax Group
0.7008 of 5 stars		GBX 1,422
+0.5%		GBX 870
-38.8%		+80.0%£73.46M£116.16M11.6855,900
VCP
Victoria
N/AGBX 49
flat		GBX 170
+246.9%		-18.1%£56.52M£1.08B0.026,750

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SDG) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
What Happens to Your Assets If You Die Without a Will?
Without a will, your state's intestacy laws decide how your assets are divided — a rigid formula that ignores ...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Urgent exposé on the "Mar-a-Lago Trade"
Dr. David Eifrig, former Goldman Sachs VP and Senior Partner at Stansberry Research, has released an urgent ex...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Greatest Hedge Fund Manager of All Time: Get Out of Stocks
Ray Dalio - who has made more money for clients than any hedge fund manager in history - is warning of a histo...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The pre-flight check for options traders
Pilots never skip their pre-flight checklist - and neither should options traders. The Smart Trade Options Che...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold to $4,900—Here’s the Real Play
Gold is hitting new highs, fueled by tariffs and record central bank demand - 710 tonnes per quarter. JPMorgan...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Is Quietly Doubling Down on This Bizarre Asset
Yahoo Finance reports this technology 'May Unlock $400 Trillion' - and Bloomberg calls it 'unavoidable.' Elon ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel