Go Pro
→ Bezos… DOOMED (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free SDG Stock Alerts

Sanderson Design Group (SDG) Competitors

Sanderson Design Group logo
GBX 75 -1.50 (-1.96%)
As of 12:18 PM Eastern
Compare

SDG vs. CRST, GLE, SPR, UPGS, and LIKE

Should you buy Sanderson Design Group stock or one of its competitors? Sanderson Design Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Crest Nicholson (CRST), MJ Gleeson (GLE), Springfield Properties (SPR), UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), and Likewise Group (LIKE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Crest Nicholson?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Crest Nicholson had 11 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Crest Nicholson and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Crest Nicholson's score of -0.37 indicating that Sanderson Design Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
Crest Nicholson Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of -5.44%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
Crest Nicholson -5.44%-4.32%0.16%

Crest Nicholson has a consensus price target of GBX 104.86, suggesting a potential upside of 80.48%. Given Crest Nicholson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Crest Nicholson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crest Nicholson pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crest Nicholson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sanderson Design Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crest Nicholson. Crest Nicholson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.54£4.43M£2.8726.13
Crest Nicholson£558.90M0.27-£26.61M£8.406.92

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.316, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Crest Nicholson beats Sanderson Design Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to MJ Gleeson?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.6% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
MJ Gleeson 3.76%4.67%4.73%

MJ Gleeson has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 19.23%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
MJ Gleeson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. MJ Gleeson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.54£4.43M£2.8726.13
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.40£20.04M£24.5310.60

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.621, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MJ Gleeson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled MJ Gleeson'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
MJ Gleeson Neutral

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Sanderson Design Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Springfield Properties?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
Springfield Properties 5.03%8.30%3.53%

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Springfield Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. Springfield Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.54£4.43M£2.8726.13
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.43£7.57M£11.378.98

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Springfield Properties and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Sanderson Design Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
Springfield Properties Positive

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.072, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Springfield Properties beats Sanderson Design Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to UP Global Sourcing?

UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UP Global Sourcing7.71% 29.55% 9.19%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, UP Global Sourcing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
UP Global Sourcing Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.54£4.43M£2.8726.13

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Sanderson Design Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Likewise Group?

Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

5.3% of Likewise Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Likewise Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Likewise Group pays out 114.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Likewise Group's net margin of 0.54%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Likewise Group0.54% 2.10% 1.18%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

In the previous week, Likewise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Sanderson Design Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Likewise Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Likewise Group Positive
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Likewise Group has a beta of 1.086, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Likewise Group. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Likewise Group£163.10M0.55£978.91K£0.34105.88
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.54£4.43M£2.8726.13

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Likewise Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sanderson Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SDG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SDG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SDG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSanderson Design GroupHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£54.20M£5.41B£13.00B£2.91B
Dividend Yield1.92%3.55%50.94%6.18%
P/E Ratio26.1313.0446.24367.42
Price / Sales0.5459.8188.2683,891.79
Price / Cash5.639.3028.9027.89
Price / Book0.622.485.826.75
Net Income£4.43M£267.93M£445.07M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.32%1.13%-0.59%5.57%
1 Month Performance-1.64%0.64%-1.91%2.30%
1 Year Performance56.25%-4.44%-3.38%21.81%

Sanderson Design Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 75
-2.0%		N/A+47.0%£54.20M£99.48M26.13600
CRST
Crest Nicholson
4.8354 of 5 stars		GBX 66.50
flat		GBX 108.86
+63.7%		-61.7%£170.94M£558.90M7.92778
GLE
MJ Gleeson
2.9587 of 5 stars		GBX 274.50
+0.5%		GBX 310
+12.9%		-22.9%£160.13M£381.06M11.19743
SPR
Springfield Properties
N/AGBX 110.85
-0.1%		N/A+9.1%£132.38M£282.91M9.75636
UPGS
UP Global Sourcing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£107.17M£156.05M857.14370

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SDG) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump’s “new Petrodollar” exposed
Trump has reportedly secured control over 65 billion barrels across 17 Venezuelan oil fields, more than the en...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk says UBI is coming. I say it's already here.
Elon Musk says AI could make money irrelevant by 2036. One income program already exists today, funded not by ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three companies about to leapfrog Nvidia [And transform the entire industry]
AI data centers have a power problem nobody likes to talk about. A single rack of computers can now use more e...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Before Anthropic becomes impossible to ignore...
Riot Platforms just struck a 20-year, 191-megawatt data-center agreement tied to Anthropic, reportedly worth 9...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Man Who Called SpaceX Rise Says Elon’s NEW Project is Even Bigger
James Altucher called the rise of Nvidia, Apple, and SpaceX years before the crowd. Now he says he has uncover...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Half the market is standing on a trapdoor
Nearly half the value of the US stock market now sits in AI stocks - the most concentrated the market has been...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
A New Approach to Retirement Income That Needs Less Capital
The secret to retiring without a million-dollar nest egg. I'm talking about generating enough monthly inco...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel