Sanderson Design Group (SDG) Competitors

GBX 64.15 -0.35 (-0.54%)

As of 05/15/2026 12:06 PM Eastern

SDG vs. UPGS, CFX, LIKE, HEAD, and VCP

Should you buy Sanderson Design Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sanderson Design Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sanderson Design Group include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Colefax Group (CFX), Likewise Group (LIKE), Headlam Group (HEAD), and Victoria (VCP). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to UP Global Sourcing?

UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.581, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UP Global Sourcing	£156.05M	0.00	£12.03M	£0.14	N/A
Sanderson Design Group	£99.48M	0.47	£4.43M	£2.87	22.35

In the previous week, UP Global Sourcing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
UP Global Sourcing	Neutral
Sanderson Design Group	Neutral

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UP Global Sourcing	7.71%	29.55%	9.19%
Sanderson Design Group	2.16%	3.09%	5.54%

UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Sanderson Design Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Colefax Group?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Colefax Group (LON:CFX) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.1% of Colefax Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.8% of Colefax Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.581, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colefax Group has a beta of 0.211, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Colefax Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. Colefax Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group	£99.48M	0.47	£4.43M	£2.87	22.35
Colefax Group	£116.16M	0.56	£5.49M	£121.70	10.44

In the previous week, Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Colefax Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group	Neutral
Colefax Group	Neutral

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.16%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 20.89% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group	2.16%	3.09%	5.54%
Colefax Group	6.13%	20.89%	6.87%

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Colefax Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Colefax Group pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Colefax Group has a consensus target price of GBX 870, suggesting a potential downside of 31.50%. Given Colefax Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Colefax Group is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sanderson Design Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Colefax Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Colefax Group beats Sanderson Design Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Likewise Group?

Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Likewise Group has a beta of 1.001, suggesting that its share price is 0% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.581, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Likewise Group. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Likewise Group	£163.10M	0.37	£978.91K	£0.34	71.62
Sanderson Design Group	£99.48M	0.47	£4.43M	£2.87	22.35

In the previous week, Likewise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Likewise Group	Neutral
Sanderson Design Group	Neutral

Likewise Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Likewise Group pays out 114.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

5.2% of Likewise Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.2% of Likewise Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Likewise Group's net margin of 0.54%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Likewise Group	0.54%	2.10%	1.18%
Sanderson Design Group	2.16%	3.09%	5.54%

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Likewise Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Headlam Group?

Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Headlam Group has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.581, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Headlam Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 131.48%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Headlam Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Sanderson Design Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group. Headlam Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Headlam Group	£498.70M	0.07	-£12.12M	-£102.00	N/A
Sanderson Design Group	£99.48M	0.47	£4.43M	£2.87	22.35

In the previous week, Headlam Group had 2 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Headlam Group and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Headlam Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Headlam Group	Neutral
Sanderson Design Group	Neutral

49.3% of Headlam Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Headlam Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -16.42%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Headlam Group	-16.42%	-61.90%	-1.18%
Sanderson Design Group	2.16%	3.09%	5.54%

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Headlam Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Victoria?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Victoria has a consensus target price of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 342.71%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Victoria is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sanderson Design Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Victoria	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Victoria had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victoria and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Victoria'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group	Neutral
Victoria	Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.581, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.242, suggesting that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group	2.16%	3.09%	5.54%
Victoria	-21.45%	67.51%	1.75%

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Victoria shares are held by institutional investors. 8.3% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 40.9% of Victoria shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sanderson Design Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group	£99.48M	0.47	£4.43M	£2.87	22.35
Victoria	£1.08B	0.04	-£107.43M	£2.78 thousand	0.01

Summary

Victoria beats Sanderson Design Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sanderson Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SDG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Sanderson Design Group	Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry	Cyclical Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£48.42M	£559.29M	£4.22B	£2.60B
Dividend Yield	2.24%	3.18%	3.62%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	22.35	16.41	77.37	365.91
Price / Sales	0.47	35.55	328.03	88,030.08
Price / Cash	5.63	11.54	30.86	27.89
Price / Book	0.53	1.28	3.16	7.74
Net Income	£4.43M	£12.18M	£247.50M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.71%	-0.44%	-0.06%	0.21%
1 Month Performance	11.76%	2.68%	0.11%	1.56%
1 Year Performance	45.80%	-5.26%	1.32%	77.95%

Sanderson Design Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SDG Sanderson Design Group	N/A	GBX 64.15 -0.5%	N/A	+45.8%	£48.42M	£99.48M	22.35	600	Gap Up
UPGS UP Global Sourcing	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£107.17M	£156.05M	857.14	370	Gap Up
CFX Colefax Group	N/A	GBX 1,350 +1.5%	GBX 870 -35.6%	+58.1%	£69.74M	£116.16M	11.09	55,900
LIKE Likewise Group	N/A	GBX 24.06 -1.8%	N/A	+25.1%	£59.97M	£163.10M	70.76	455
HEAD Headlam Group	1.5785 of 5 stars	GBX 51.80 +2.0%	GBX 100 +93.1%	-53.0%	£41.59M	£498.70M	N/A	2,338	Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SDG) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sanderson Design Group (SDG) Competitors

SDG vs. UPGS, CFX, LIKE, HEAD, and VCP

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Summary

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Colefax Group?

Summary

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Likewise Group?

Summary

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Headlam Group?

Summary

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Victoria?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

SDG vs. The Competition

Sanderson Design Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Sanderson Design Group (SDG) Competitors

SDG vs. UPGS, CFX, LIKE, HEAD, and VCP

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in UPGS or SDG?

Which has more risk & volatility, UPGS or SDG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, UPGS or SDG?

Does the media prefer UPGS or SDG?

Is UPGS or SDG more profitable?

Is UPGS or SDG a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Colefax Group?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in SDG or CFX?

Which has more volatility and risk, SDG or CFX?

Which has better earnings & valuation, SDG or CFX?

Does the media refer more to SDG or CFX?

Is SDG or CFX more profitable?

Is SDG or CFX a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend SDG or CFX?

Summary

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Likewise Group?

Which has more risk & volatility, LIKE or SDG?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LIKE or SDG?

Does the media refer more to LIKE or SDG?

Is LIKE or SDG a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LIKE or SDG?

Is LIKE or SDG more profitable?

Summary

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Headlam Group?

Which has more risk & volatility, HEAD or SDG?

Do analysts recommend HEAD or SDG?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HEAD or SDG?

Does the media favor HEAD or SDG?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of HEAD or SDG?

Is HEAD or SDG more profitable?

Summary

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Victoria?

Do analysts rate SDG or VCP?

Does the media refer more to SDG or VCP?

Which has more volatility & risk, SDG or VCP?

Is SDG or VCP more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SDG or VCP?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SDG or VCP?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

SDG vs. The Competition

Sanderson Design Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools