Free Trial
→ Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow! (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free SDG Stock Alerts

Sanderson Design Group (SDG) Competitors

Sanderson Design Group logo
GBX 72 -4.00 (-5.26%)
As of 11:40 AM Eastern
Compare

SDG vs. CRST, GLE, LIKE, SPR, and UPGS

Should you buy Sanderson Design Group stock or one of its competitors? Sanderson Design Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Crest Nicholson (CRST), MJ Gleeson (GLE), Likewise Group (LIKE), Springfield Properties (SPR), and UP Global Sourcing (UPGS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Crest Nicholson?

Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crest Nicholson. Crest Nicholson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crest Nicholson£558.90M0.30-£26.61M£8.407.70
Sanderson Design Group£102.54M0.54£4.43M£3.9019.56

61.0% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Crest Nicholson pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crest Nicholson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Crest Nicholson currently has a consensus target price of GBX 99, indicating a potential upside of 53.01%. Given Crest Nicholson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crest Nicholson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Crest Nicholson had 2 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Crest Nicholson and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Crest Nicholson's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Sanderson Design Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Crest Nicholson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crest Nicholson Positive
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.83% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of -5.44%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 4.12% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crest Nicholson-5.44% -4.32% 0.16%
Sanderson Design Group 2.83%4.12%5.54%

Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.296, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.623, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Crest Nicholson beats Sanderson Design Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to MJ Gleeson?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

42.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus target price of GBX 252.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.99%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MJ Gleeson
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. MJ Gleeson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson£410.03M0.37£20.04M-£3.32N/A
Sanderson Design Group£102.54M0.54£4.43M£3.9019.56

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson had 4 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for MJ Gleeson and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Sanderson Design Group's score of 0.00 indicating that MJ Gleeson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.83% compared to MJ Gleeson's net margin of -0.47%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 4.12% beat MJ Gleeson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson-0.47% -0.64% 4.73%
Sanderson Design Group 2.83%4.12%5.54%

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.624, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.623, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. MJ Gleeson pays out -331.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MJ Gleeson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Sanderson Design Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Likewise Group?

Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Likewise Group had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Likewise Group and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Likewise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Sanderson Design Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Likewise Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Likewise Group Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Likewise Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Likewise Group pays out 73.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Likewise Group. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Likewise Group£175.06M0.96£978.91K£0.5682.14
Sanderson Design Group£102.54M0.54£4.43M£3.9019.56

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.83% compared to Likewise Group's net margin of 0.84%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 4.12% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Likewise Group0.84% 3.23% 1.18%
Sanderson Design Group 2.83%4.12%5.54%

Likewise Group has a beta of 1.165, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.623, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

5.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of Likewise Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Likewise Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to Springfield Properties?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Springfield Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. Springfield Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£102.54M0.54£4.43M£3.9019.56
Springfield Properties£243.70M0.55£7.57M£7.4615.01

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.83%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 5.37% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.83% 4.12% 5.54%
Springfield Properties 3.87%5.37%3.53%

12.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.5% of Springfield Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 8.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.623, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.068, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Springfield Properties and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Springfield Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
Springfield Properties Neutral

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Sanderson Design Group pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Springfield Properties pays out 26.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Springfield Properties beats Sanderson Design Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sanderson Design Group compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£102.54M0.54£4.43M£3.9019.56
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 2.83%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.83% 4.12% 5.54%
UP Global Sourcing 7.71%29.55%9.19%

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.623, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Sanderson Design Group pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

12.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled UP Global Sourcing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
UP Global Sourcing Neutral

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Sanderson Design Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sanderson Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SDG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SDG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SDG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSanderson Design GroupHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£52.03M£5.70B£13.00B£2.84B
Dividend Yield1.97%3.25%3.10%5.12%
P/E Ratio18.4617.2126.1223.41
Price / Sales0.510.901.714.99
Price / Cash5.639.7815.6520.23
Price / Book0.602.473.502.47
Net Income£4.43M£265.25M£444.25M£5.88B
7 Day Performance-2.17%-2.36%-1.35%-0.08%
1 Month Performance-6.49%2.97%0.49%-1.12%
1 Year Performance62.71%0.84%-1.96%7.08%

Sanderson Design Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 72
-5.3%		N/A+64.4%£52.03M£102.54M18.46600
CRST
Crest Nicholson
4.8667 of 5 stars		GBX 66.38
+4.2%		GBX 99
+49.2%		-60.6%£170.44M£558.90M7.90778
GLE
MJ Gleeson
1.4601 of 5 stars		GBX 287
-0.2%		GBX 252.50
-12.0%		-26.1%£167.42M£410.03MN/A743
LIKE
Likewise Group
N/AGBX 45
-2.6%		N/A+64.3%£164.35M£175.06M80.36455
SPR
Springfield Properties
N/AGBX 114.50
+0.9%		N/A-5.1%£136.76M£243.70M15.35636

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SDG) was last updated on 11/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Why I'm selling my Snapback Indicator for just $7
For Black Friday, Base Camp Trading's Thomas Wood is offering lifetime access to his proprietary Snapback Indi...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s EO to send this $5 stock ripping higher…?
President Trump's December executive order declared space a national security and economic priority, fueling a...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Withdrawal You'll Never See on Your Statement
A proposal circulating in Washington, dubbed the Mar-a-Lago Accord, calls for tariffs and currency pressure to...
Bishop Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Today's free pick (on me)
Elon Musk doesn't own the chip inside every Tesla, Starlink dish, and AI satellite - he licenses it from one l...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal called it the "$64 trillion question": is a stock market crash on the way? Weiss Ratin...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your free book is about to disappear
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The investigation Porter spent tens of thousands to document
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Uranium Mine Flood That Sparked a 2006 Price Surge Returns
In 2006, a flooded mine at Cigar Lake sent uranium prices from the $50 range to $136 in eight months. This pa...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel