Free Trial

Victoria (VCP) Competitors

Victoria logo
GBX 42.85 +2.90 (+7.25%)
As of 12:22 PM Eastern

VCP vs. UPGS, CFX, LIKE, SDG, and ULTP

Should you buy Victoria stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Victoria with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Victoria include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Colefax Group (CFX), Likewise Group (LIKE), Sanderson Design Group (SDG), and Ultimate Products (ULTP). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.

How does Victoria compare to UP Global Sourcing?

UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

UP Global Sourcing has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victoria, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A
Victoria£1.08B0.05-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02

32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat UP Global Sourcing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UP Global Sourcing7.71% 29.55% 9.19%
Victoria -21.45%67.51%1.75%

UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.457, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Victoria had 1 more articles in the media than UP Global Sourcing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victoria and 0 mentions for UP Global Sourcing. UP Global Sourcing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Victoria'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
UP Global Sourcing Neutral
Victoria Neutral

Victoria has a consensus price target of GBX 170, indicating a potential upside of 296.76%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Victoria is more favorable than UP Global Sourcing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UP Global Sourcing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

UP Global Sourcing and Victoria tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Colefax Group?

Colefax Group (LON:CFX) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Colefax Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 870, suggesting a potential downside of 37.95%. Victoria has a consensus price target of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 296.76%. Given Victoria's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Victoria is more favorable than Colefax Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Colefax Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Colefax Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colefax Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Colefax Group£116.16M0.62£5.49M£121.7011.52
Victoria£1.08B0.05-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02

Colefax Group has a beta of 0.211, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.457, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Colefax Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Colefax Group6.13% 20.89% 6.87%
Victoria -21.45%67.51%1.75%

In the previous week, Colefax Group and Colefax Group both had 1 articles in the media. Colefax Group's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Victoria's score of 0.00 indicating that Colefax Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Colefax Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Victoria
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

29.1% of Colefax Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.8% of Colefax Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Colefax Group beats Victoria on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Likewise Group?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Victoria and Victoria both had 1 articles in the media. Likewise Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Victoria's score of 0.00 indicating that Likewise Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Victoria
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Likewise Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

15.2% of Victoria shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by institutional investors. 40.9% of Victoria shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Likewise Group has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-21.45% 67.51% 1.75%
Likewise Group 0.54%2.10%1.18%

Likewise Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.08B0.05-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02
Likewise Group£163.10M0.38£978.91K£0.3473.85

Victoria presently has a consensus target price of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 296.76%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Likewise Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Likewise Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Victoria has a beta of 0.457, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Likewise Group has a beta of 1.092, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Victoria beats Likewise Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-21.45% 67.51% 1.75%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

Sanderson Design Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.08B0.05-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.55£4.43M£2.8726.20

Victoria has a beta of 0.457, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.626, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

15.2% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Victoria presently has a consensus target price of GBX 170, indicating a potential upside of 296.76%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Victoria is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Victoria had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victoria and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victoria Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Summary

Victoria beats Sanderson Design Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Ultimate Products?

Ultimate Products (LON:ULTP) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Ultimate Products has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Ultimate Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ultimate Products2.69% 8.41% 9.97%
Victoria -21.45%67.51%1.75%

Ultimate Products has a beta of 0.617, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.457, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Ultimate Products has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultimate Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ultimate Products£145.10M0.25£10.32M£4.509.73
Victoria£1.08B0.05-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02

Ultimate Products currently has a consensus target price of GBX 80, suggesting a potential upside of 82.65%. Victoria has a consensus target price of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 296.76%. Given Victoria's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Ultimate Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ultimate Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Victoria had 1 more articles in the media than Ultimate Products. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victoria and 0 mentions for Ultimate Products. Ultimate Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Victoria'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ultimate Products Neutral
Victoria Neutral

17.2% of Ultimate Products shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.3% of Ultimate Products shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ultimate Products beats Victoria on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Victoria News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VCP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VCP vs. The Competition

MetricVictoriaFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£49.43M£587.26M£3.89B£2.71B
Dividend Yield2.05%3.14%3.47%6.16%
P/E Ratio0.0210.7677.85366.28
Price / Sales0.0537.24307.6086,890.05
Price / Cash6.5211.5430.7927.85
Price / Book-2.221.333.277.71
Net Income-£107.43M£12.18M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance14.26%-3.05%-1.10%-0.75%
1 Month Performance35.38%-4.32%0.49%1.84%
1 Year Performance-39.91%-12.83%0.26%71.71%

Victoria Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VCP
Victoria
2.2159 of 5 stars
GBX 42.85
+7.3%
GBX 170
+296.8%
-38.7%£49.43M£1.08B0.026,750
UPGS
UP Global Sourcing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£107.17M£156.05M857.14370
CFX
Colefax Group
1.3131 of 5 stars
GBX 1,380
+1.5%
GBX 870
-37.0%
+76.1%£71.29M£116.16M11.3455,900
LIKE
Likewise Group
N/AGBX 27.47
-0.1%
N/A+11.1%£68.47M£163.10M80.79455
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 75
+0.7%
N/A+65.6%£54.20M£99.48M26.13600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:VCP) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners