Go Pro

Victoria (VCP) Competitors

Victoria logo
GBX 59.37 +1.37 (+2.37%)
As of 03:53 AM Eastern

VCP vs. UPGS, LIKE, CFX, SDG, and ULTP

Should you buy Victoria stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Victoria with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Victoria include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Likewise Group (LIKE), Colefax Group (CFX), Sanderson Design Group (SDG), and Ultimate Products (ULTP). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.

How does Victoria compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and dividends.

Victoria presently has a consensus price target of GBX 170, indicating a potential upside of 186.32%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than UP Global Sourcing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
UP Global Sourcing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled UP Global Sourcing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victoria Neutral
UP Global Sourcing Neutral

Victoria has a beta of 0.457, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

UP Global Sourcing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victoria, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.08B0.06-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat UP Global Sourcing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-21.45% 67.51% 1.75%
UP Global Sourcing 7.71%29.55%9.19%

15.2% of Victoria shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are held by institutional investors. 40.9% of Victoria shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Victoria on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Likewise Group?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

15.2% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of Likewise Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.2% of Likewise Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Likewise Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.08B0.06-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02
Likewise Group£163.10M0.46£978.91K£0.3487.65

In the previous week, Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Likewise Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victoria Neutral
Likewise Group Neutral

Victoria has a beta of 0.457, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Likewise Group has a beta of 1.094, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Likewise Group has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-21.45% 67.51% 1.75%
Likewise Group 0.54%2.10%1.18%

Victoria presently has a consensus price target of GBX 170, indicating a potential upside of 186.32%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Likewise Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Likewise Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Victoria beats Likewise Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Colefax Group?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Colefax Group (LON:CFX) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Colefax Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-21.45% 67.51% 1.75%
Colefax Group 6.13%20.89%6.87%

Victoria currently has a consensus target price of GBX 170, indicating a potential upside of 186.32%. Colefax Group has a consensus target price of GBX 870, indicating a potential downside of 37.86%. Given Victoria's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Colefax Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Colefax Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

15.2% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.1% of Colefax Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.8% of Colefax Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Victoria has a beta of 0.457, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colefax Group has a beta of 0.203, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Colefax Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colefax Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.08B0.06-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02
Colefax Group£116.16M0.62£5.49M£121.7011.50

In the previous week, Colefax Group had 1 more articles in the media than Victoria. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Colefax Group and 0 mentions for Victoria. Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Colefax Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victoria Neutral
Colefax Group Neutral

Summary

Colefax Group beats Victoria on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Victoria has a consensus target price of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 186.32%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Sanderson Design Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanderson Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
Victoria -21.45%67.51%1.75%

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.2% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sanderson Design Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.54£4.43M£2.8725.96
Victoria£1.08B0.06-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02

In the previous week, Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Victoria'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
Victoria Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.457, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sanderson Design Group and Victoria tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Ultimate Products?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Ultimate Products (LON:ULTP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

15.2% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Ultimate Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.3% of Ultimate Products shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ultimate Products has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Ultimate Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-21.45% 67.51% 1.75%
Ultimate Products 2.69%8.41%9.97%

Ultimate Products has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultimate Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.08B0.06-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02
Ultimate Products£145.10M0.25£10.32M£4.509.80

In the previous week, Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ultimate Products'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victoria Neutral
Ultimate Products Neutral

Victoria currently has a consensus target price of GBX 170, indicating a potential upside of 186.32%. Ultimate Products has a consensus target price of GBX 80, indicating a potential upside of 81.41%. Given Victoria's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Ultimate Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ultimate Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Victoria has a beta of 0.457, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ultimate Products has a beta of 0.572, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ultimate Products beats Victoria on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Victoria News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VCP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VCP vs. The Competition

MetricVictoriaFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£68.49M£619.03M£3.85B£2.78B
Dividend Yield2.05%3.09%3.49%6.15%
P/E Ratio0.0211.8478.89366.70
Price / Sales0.0639.05324.5586,376.23
Price / Cash6.5211.5430.8127.87
Price / Book-3.081.413.507.75
Net Income-£107.43M£12.18M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance18.75%0.94%0.15%0.47%
1 Month Performance58.33%0.13%-0.87%-1.43%
1 Year Performance-15.66%-9.84%-1.37%65.26%

Victoria Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VCP
Victoria
N/AGBX 59.37
+2.4%
GBX 170
+186.3%
-18.1%£68.49M£1.08B0.026,750
UPGS
UP Global Sourcing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£107.17M£156.05M857.14370
LIKE
Likewise Group
N/AGBX 30.33
+0.4%
N/A+25.6%£75.60M£163.10M89.21455
CFX
Colefax Group
0.7008 of 5 stars
GBX 1,422
flat
GBX 870
-38.8%
+80.0%£70.73M£116.16M11.6855,900
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 70
-4.1%
N/A+39.9%£53.11M£99.48M24.39600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:VCP) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners