Go Pro

Victoria (VCP) Competitors

Victoria logo
GBX 54 -2.55 (-4.51%)
As of 04:49 AM Eastern

VCP vs. GLE, CRST, SPR, LIKE, and UPGS

Should you buy Victoria stock or one of its competitors? Victoria's main competitors and comparable companies include MJ Gleeson (GLE), Crest Nicholson (CRST), Springfield Properties (SPR), Likewise Group (LIKE), and UP Global Sourcing (UPGS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Victoria compare to MJ Gleeson?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Victoria's net margin of -31.11%. Victoria's return on equity of 61.64% beat MJ Gleeson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson-0.47% -0.64% 4.73%
Victoria -31.11%61.64%1.75%

MJ Gleeson has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.38£20.04M£24.5310.22
Victoria£1.05B0.06-£107.43M-£284.12N/A

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.624, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.431, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

42.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Victoria shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Victoria shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus target price of GBX 252.50, indicating a potential upside of 0.73%. Victoria has a consensus target price of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 69.78%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than MJ Gleeson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MJ Gleeson
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson had 11 more articles in the media than Victoria. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for MJ Gleeson and 1 mentions for Victoria. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 0.01 beat Victoria's score of 0.00 indicating that MJ Gleeson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Victoria
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Victoria on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Crest Nicholson?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Victoria and Victoria both had 1 articles in the media. Crest Nicholson's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Victoria's score of 0.00 indicating that Crest Nicholson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Victoria
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Crest Nicholson
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Crest Nicholson has a net margin of -5.44% compared to Victoria's net margin of -31.11%. Victoria's return on equity of 61.64% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-31.11% 61.64% 1.75%
Crest Nicholson -5.44%-4.32%0.16%

13.6% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.0% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crest Nicholson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crest Nicholson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.05B0.06-£107.43M-£284.12N/A
Crest Nicholson£558.90M0.26-£26.61M£8.406.86

Victoria has a beta of 0.431, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.321, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Victoria presently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 69.78%. Crest Nicholson has a consensus target price of GBX 102.86, indicating a potential upside of 78.57%. Given Crest Nicholson's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than Victoria.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Crest Nicholson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

Crest Nicholson beats Victoria on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Springfield Properties?

Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.072, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.431, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 5 more articles in the media than Victoria. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Springfield Properties and 1 mentions for Victoria. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Victoria's score of 0.00 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Springfield Properties
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Victoria
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Victoria has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 69.78%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Springfield Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Springfield Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Victoria's net margin of -31.11%. Victoria's return on equity of 61.64% beat Springfield Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Springfield Properties3.87% 5.37% 3.53%
Victoria -31.11%61.64%1.75%

Springfield Properties has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Springfield Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.50£7.57M£11.3710.44
Victoria£1.05B0.06-£107.43M-£284.12N/A

7.5% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Springfield Properties beats Victoria on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to Likewise Group?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Likewise Group (LON:LIKE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Victoria currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 69.78%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Victoria is more favorable than Likewise Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Likewise Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Likewise Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Likewise Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.05B0.06-£107.43M-£284.12N/A
Likewise Group£163.10M0.78£978.91K£0.34102.94

In the previous week, Victoria and Victoria both had 1 articles in the media. Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Likewise Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Victoria
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Likewise Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Victoria has a beta of 0.431, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Likewise Group has a beta of 1.082, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

13.6% of Victoria shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of Likewise Group shares are held by institutional investors. 41.0% of Victoria shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Likewise Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Likewise Group has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Victoria's net margin of -31.11%. Victoria's return on equity of 61.64% beat Likewise Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-31.11% 61.64% 1.75%
Likewise Group 0.54%2.10%1.18%

Summary

Victoria beats Likewise Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victoria compare to UP Global Sourcing?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

13.6% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.0% of Victoria shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Victoria had 1 more articles in the media than UP Global Sourcing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victoria and 0 mentions for UP Global Sourcing. Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled UP Global Sourcing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victoria Neutral
UP Global Sourcing Neutral

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Victoria's net margin of -31.11%. Victoria's return on equity of 61.64% beat UP Global Sourcing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-31.11% 61.64% 1.75%
UP Global Sourcing 7.71%29.55%9.19%

UP Global Sourcing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Global Sourcing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.05B0.06-£107.43M-£284.12N/A
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A

Victoria has a beta of 0.431, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Victoria currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 69.78%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than UP Global Sourcing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
UP Global Sourcing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Victoria on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Victoria News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VCP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VCP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VCP vs. The Competition

MetricVictoriaHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£68.17M£5.13B£12.47B£2.90B
Dividend Yield2.05%3.44%61.19%6.23%
P/E Ratio-0.2112.6644.31366.87
Price / Sales0.0659.2393.6190,321.11
Price / Cash6.529.0918.3927.89
Price / Book-3.052.694.026.36
Net Income-£107.43M£272.21M£444.45M£5.89B
7 Day Performance7.09%0.13%-0.30%1.16%
1 Month Performance8.07%-3.07%-5.06%0.11%
1 Year Performance-13.38%-7.90%-7.66%19.52%

Victoria Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VCP
Victoria
2.4383 of 5 stars
GBX 54
-4.5%
GBX 100
+85.2%
-14.5%£62.50M£1.05BN/A6,750
GLE
MJ Gleeson
2.2059 of 5 stars
GBX 257
flat
GBX 255
-0.8%
-34.5%£149.92M£381.06M10.48743
CRST
Crest Nicholson
4.9271 of 5 stars
GBX 58.30
flat
GBX 102.86
+76.4%
-63.9%£149.69M£558.90M6.94778
SPR
Springfield Properties
N/AGBX 112.50
-0.4%
N/A+19.4%£134.45M£282.91M9.89636
LIKE
Likewise Group
N/AGBX 33.70
flat
N/A+30.3%£123.08M£163.10M99.12455

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:VCP) was last updated on 9/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners