Free Trial

Portmeirion Group (PMP) Competitors

Portmeirion Group logo
GBX 53.80 +1.31 (+2.49%)
As of 06/5/2026 12:41 PM Eastern

PMP vs. VCP, ULTP, CHH, HEAD, and JLH

Should you buy Portmeirion Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Portmeirion Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Portmeirion Group include Victoria (VCP), Ultimate Products (ULTP), Churchill China (CHH), Headlam Group (HEAD), and John Lewis of Hungerford (JLH). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to Victoria?

Victoria (LON:VCP) and Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Portmeirion Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Victoria. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victoria, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victoria£1.08B0.04-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.01
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.08-£10.98M-£45.30N/A

Victoria presently has a consensus price target of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 325.53%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Victoria is more favorable than Portmeirion Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Portmeirion Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

15.3% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.9% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Portmeirion Group had 1 more articles in the media than Victoria. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portmeirion Group and 1 mentions for Victoria. Victoria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Portmeirion Group's score of -0.07 indicating that Victoria is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Victoria
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Portmeirion Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Victoria has a beta of 0.457, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.4359271, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Portmeirion Group has a net margin of -6.86% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victoria-21.45% 67.51% 1.75%
Portmeirion Group -6.86%-12.61%1.87%

Summary

Victoria beats Portmeirion Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to Ultimate Products?

Ultimate Products (LON:ULTP) and Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Ultimate Products has a beta of 0.617, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.4359271, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Portmeirion Group had 2 more articles in the media than Ultimate Products. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portmeirion Group and 0 mentions for Ultimate Products. Ultimate Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Portmeirion Group's score of -0.07 indicating that Ultimate Products is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ultimate Products Neutral
Portmeirion Group Neutral

Ultimate Products has higher revenue and earnings than Portmeirion Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultimate Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ultimate Products£145.10M0.25£10.32M£4.509.82
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.08-£10.98M-£45.30N/A

Ultimate Products currently has a consensus price target of GBX 80, indicating a potential upside of 81.00%. Given Ultimate Products' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ultimate Products is more favorable than Portmeirion Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ultimate Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Portmeirion Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Ultimate Products has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Portmeirion Group's net margin of -6.86%. Ultimate Products' return on equity of 8.41% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ultimate Products2.69% 8.41% 9.97%
Portmeirion Group -6.86%-12.61%1.87%

17.8% of Ultimate Products shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by institutional investors. 43.3% of Ultimate Products shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ultimate Products beats Portmeirion Group on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to Churchill China?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

11.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.3% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Churchill China has a net margin of 5.72% compared to Portmeirion Group's net margin of -6.86%. Churchill China's return on equity of 7.14% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill China5.72% 7.14% 8.74%
Portmeirion Group -6.86%-12.61%1.87%

In the previous week, Portmeirion Group had 1 more articles in the media than Churchill China. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portmeirion Group and 1 mentions for Churchill China. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Portmeirion Group's score of -0.07 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Churchill China
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Portmeirion Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Churchill China has a beta of 0.818, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.4359271, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Portmeirion Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China£76.28M0.48£7.84M£39.708.31
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.08-£10.98M-£45.30N/A

Summary

Churchill China beats Portmeirion Group on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to Headlam Group?

Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) and Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Portmeirion Group has a net margin of -6.86% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -16.42%. Portmeirion Group's return on equity of -12.61% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Headlam Group-16.42% -61.90% -1.18%
Portmeirion Group -6.86%-12.61%1.87%

In the previous week, Portmeirion Group had 1 more articles in the media than Headlam Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portmeirion Group and 1 mentions for Headlam Group. Headlam Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Portmeirion Group's score of -0.07 indicating that Headlam Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Headlam Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Portmeirion Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Headlam Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 247.22%. Given Headlam Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Headlam Group is more favorable than Portmeirion Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Headlam Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Portmeirion Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

49.3% of Headlam Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Headlam Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Portmeirion Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Headlam Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Headlam Group£498.70M0.05-£12.12M-£102.00N/A
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.08-£10.98M-£45.30N/A

Headlam Group has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.4359271, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Portmeirion Group beats Headlam Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to John Lewis of Hungerford?

Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) and John Lewis of Hungerford (LON:JLH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of John Lewis of Hungerford shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.6% of John Lewis of Hungerford shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

John Lewis of Hungerford has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Portmeirion Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.08-£10.98M-£45.30N/A
John Lewis of Hungerford£11.14M0.00N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Portmeirion Group had 2 more articles in the media than John Lewis of Hungerford. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portmeirion Group and 0 mentions for John Lewis of Hungerford. John Lewis of Hungerford's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Portmeirion Group's score of -0.07 indicating that John Lewis of Hungerford is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portmeirion Group Neutral
John Lewis of Hungerford Neutral

John Lewis of Hungerford has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Portmeirion Group's net margin of -6.86%. John Lewis of Hungerford's return on equity of -8.16% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portmeirion Group-6.86% -12.61% 1.87%
John Lewis of Hungerford -0.71%-8.16%1.40%

Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.4359271, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Lewis of Hungerford has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

John Lewis of Hungerford beats Portmeirion Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Portmeirion Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PMP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PMP vs. The Competition

MetricPortmeirion GroupFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.42M£592.88M£3.91B£2.79B
Dividend Yield3.40%3.12%3.47%6.12%
P/E Ratio-1.1911.3576.70365.23
Price / Sales0.0837.66325.6587,121.98
Price / Cash12.9511.5430.8627.85
Price / Book0.141.343.267.68
Net Income-£10.98M£12.18M£247.47M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-45.07%-4.01%-0.75%-0.50%
1 Month Performance-42.76%-3.71%1.43%2.10%
1 Year Performance-63.16%-11.49%0.44%72.87%

Portmeirion Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PMP
Portmeirion Group
N/AGBX 53.81
+2.5%
N/A-63.6%£7.42M£91.06MN/A802
VCP
Victoria
2.3801 of 5 stars
GBX 37.50
+1.5%
GBX 170
+353.3%
-33.0%£43.26M£1.08B0.016,750
ULTP
Ultimate Products
N/AGBX 45.60
-1.1%
GBX 80
+75.4%
-40.8%£38.05M£145.10M10.13361
CHH
Churchill China
N/AGBX 340
-2.9%
N/A-52.9%£37.39M£76.28M8.561,500
HEAD
Headlam Group
1.5994 of 5 stars
GBX 31.80
-3.3%
GBX 100
+214.5%
-71.1%£25.53M£498.70MN/A2,338

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PMP) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners