Go Pro
→ Washington Is Broke—Could YOUR Savings Be Next? (From Priority Gold) (Ad)tc pixel Free PMP Stock Alerts

Portmeirion Group (PMP) Competitors

Portmeirion Group logo
GBX 51 -1.00 (-1.92%)
As of 10:28 AM Eastern
Compare

PMP vs. UPGS, VCP, CFX, SDG, and CHH

Should you buy Portmeirion Group stock or one of its competitors? Portmeirion Group's main competitors and comparable companies include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Victoria (VCP), Colefax Group (CFX), Sanderson Design Group (SDG), and Churchill China (CHH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to UP Global Sourcing?

UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) and Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Portmeirion Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Global Sourcing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UP Global Sourcing£156.05M0.00£12.03M£0.14N/A
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.28-£10.98M-£45.30N/A

In the previous week, UP Global Sourcing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Portmeirion Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
UP Global Sourcing Neutral
Portmeirion Group Neutral

UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Portmeirion Group's net margin of -6.86%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UP Global Sourcing7.71% 29.55% 9.19%
Portmeirion Group -6.86%-12.61%1.87%

Summary

UP Global Sourcing beats Portmeirion Group on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to Victoria?

Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk and dividends.

Portmeirion Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victoria, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.28-£10.98M-£45.30N/A
Victoria£1.05B0.06-£107.43M-£284.12N/A

0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Victoria shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Victoria shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Portmeirion Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 96.08%. Victoria has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 75.44%. Given Portmeirion Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Portmeirion Group is more favorable than Victoria.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portmeirion Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Portmeirion Group has a net margin of -6.86% compared to Victoria's net margin of -31.11%. Victoria's return on equity of 61.64% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portmeirion Group-6.86% -12.61% 1.87%
Victoria -31.11%61.64%1.75%

In the previous week, Portmeirion Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Victoria'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portmeirion Group Neutral
Victoria Neutral

Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.431, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Portmeirion Group and Victoria tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to Colefax Group?

Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) and Colefax Group (LON:CFX) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Colefax Group has higher revenue and earnings than Portmeirion Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Colefax Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.28-£10.98M-£45.30N/A
Colefax Group£115.92M0.57£5.49M£140.709.35

Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Colefax Group has a beta of 0.173, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Colefax Group has a net margin of 6.69% compared to Portmeirion Group's net margin of -6.86%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 22.35% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portmeirion Group-6.86% -12.61% 1.87%
Colefax Group 6.69%22.35%6.87%

0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.1% of Colefax Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.3% of Colefax Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Portmeirion Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Colefax Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portmeirion Group Neutral
Colefax Group Neutral

Summary

Colefax Group beats Portmeirion Group on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Portmeirion Group's net margin of -6.86%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
Portmeirion Group -6.86%-12.61%1.87%

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.586, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Portmeirion Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
Portmeirion Group Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than Portmeirion Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.55£4.43M£2.8726.48
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.28-£10.98M-£45.30N/A

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Portmeirion Group on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portmeirion Group compare to Churchill China?

Churchill China (LON:CHH) and Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Churchill China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Portmeirion Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Churchill China£76.28M0.54£7.84M£39.709.49
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.28-£10.98M-£45.30N/A

Churchill China has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Portmeirion Group's net margin of -6.86%. Churchill China's return on equity of 6.05% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Churchill China4.96% 6.05% 8.74%
Portmeirion Group -6.86%-12.61%1.87%

In the previous week, Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Portmeirion Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Churchill China Positive
Portmeirion Group Neutral

9.3% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Portmeirion Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Churchill China beats Portmeirion Group on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Portmeirion Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PMP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PMP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPortmeirion GroupHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£25.88M£5.23B£12.46B£2.87B
Dividend Yield3.40%3.52%58.24%6.26%
P/E Ratio-1.1312.7144.45366.50
Price / Sales0.2864.1893.7690,135.39
Price / Cash12.959.1228.5527.89
Price / Book0.132.754.036.34
Net Income-£10.98M£270.86M£445.74M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.77%-0.77%-1.09%-0.16%
1 Month Performance0.74%-3.03%-4.75%-0.47%
1 Year Performance-61.83%-7.72%-7.06%20.13%

Portmeirion Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PMP
Portmeirion Group
N/AGBX 51
-1.9%		GBX 100
+96.1%		-60.6%£25.88M£91.06MN/A802
UPGS
UP Global Sourcing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£107.17M£156.05M857.14370
VCP
Victoria
N/AGBX 58.90
+3.5%		GBX 100
+69.8%		-20.2%£68.17M£1.05BN/A6,750
CFX
Colefax Group
N/AGBX 1,330
-4.0%		N/A+57.7%£66.49M£115.92M9.4555,900
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 75.06
-1.9%		N/A+54.0%£54.24M£99.48M26.15600

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PMP) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
“This is the Perfect Tech Stock”
Jeff Brown, the tech investor who identified Nvidia in 2016 before its 37,000% run, has flagged a new AI compa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
What Is A Roth Conversion, And How Do I Set One Up?
A Roth conversion moves money from a traditional IRA or employer plan into a Roth IRA, triggering income tax t...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk says UBI is coming. I say it's already here.
Elon Musk says AI could make money irrelevant by 2036. One income program already exists today, funded not by ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel