Which has better valuation and earnings, AVG or RNO?

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avingtrans £155.49M 1.41 £3.46M £21.10 30.81 Renold £245.10M 0.66 £19.85M £6.60 12.39

Is AVG or RNO more profitable?

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Avingtrans' net margin of 4.54%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Avingtrans' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Avingtrans 4.54% 6.13% 2.06% Renold 6.16% 25.68% 6.89%

Do analysts recommend CGS or AVG?

Castings presently has a consensus price target of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Avingtrans 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CGS or AVG?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Castings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Castings £175.35M 0.67 £16.81M £11.04 24.37 Avingtrans £155.49M 1.41 £3.46M £21.10 30.81

Is CGS or AVG more profitable?

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 2.75%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Castings 2.75% 3.83% 7.09% Avingtrans 4.54% 6.13% 2.06%

Which has better earnings and valuation, AVG or MPAC?

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avingtrans £155.49M 1.41 £3.46M £21.10 30.81 Mpac Group £174.10M 0.44 £8.86M -£31.80 N/A

Is AVG or MPAC more profitable?

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Mpac Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Avingtrans 4.54% 6.13% 2.06% Mpac Group -5.46% -12.67% 4.06%

Avingtrans (AVG) Competitors

GBX 650 -10.00 (-1.52%)

As of 12:12 PM Eastern

Compare

AVG vs. MGAM, RNO, LOAD, CGS, and MPAC

Should you buy Avingtrans stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Avingtrans with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Avingtrans include Morgan Advanced Materials (MGAM), Renold (RNO), Crestchic (LOAD), Castings (CGS), and Mpac Group (MPAC). These companies are all part of the "specialty industrial machinery" industry.

How does Avingtrans compare to Morgan Advanced Materials?

Morgan Advanced Materials (LON:MGAM) and Avingtrans (LON:AVG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Morgan Advanced Materials presently has a consensus target price of GBX 235, suggesting a potential upside of 3.98%. Given Morgan Advanced Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Morgan Advanced Materials is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Morgan Advanced Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Avingtrans	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Morgan Advanced Materials' net margin of 2.12%. Morgan Advanced Materials' return on equity of 6.66% beat Avingtrans' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Morgan Advanced Materials	2.12%	6.66%	8.24%
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%

In the previous week, Morgan Advanced Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Avingtrans'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Morgan Advanced Materials	Neutral
Avingtrans	Neutral

Morgan Advanced Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Morgan Advanced Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Advanced Materials	£996.60M	0.63	£68.49M	£7.50	30.13
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.41	£3.46M	£21.10	30.81

Morgan Advanced Materials pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Morgan Advanced Materials pays out 162.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

83.7% of Morgan Advanced Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Morgan Advanced Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Morgan Advanced Materials has a beta of 1.213, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Morgan Advanced Materials beats Avingtrans on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Avingtrans compare to Renold?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Renold (LON:RNO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Renold shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Renold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Renold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Renold pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Renold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans	Neutral
Renold	Neutral

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Avingtrans' net margin of 4.54%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Avingtrans' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%
Renold	6.16%	25.68%	6.89%

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.41	£3.46M	£21.10	30.81
Renold	£245.10M	0.66	£19.85M	£6.60	12.39

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renold has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Renold beats Avingtrans on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Avingtrans compare to Crestchic?

Crestchic (LON:LOAD) and Avingtrans (LON:AVG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Crestchic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Avingtrans'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Crestchic	Neutral
Avingtrans	Neutral

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Avingtrans' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crestchic	-4.95%	18.18%	8.17%
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%

Crestchic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Avingtrans. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crestchic	£34.97M	0.00	£4.86M	£0.17	N/A
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.41	£3.46M	£21.10	30.81

Crestchic pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Crestchic pays out 1,176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avingtrans is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

73.3% of Crestchic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. 20.5% of Crestchic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crestchic beats Avingtrans on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Avingtrans compare to Castings?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Avingtrans (LON:AVG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Castings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£175.35M	0.67	£16.81M	£11.04	24.37
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.41	£3.46M	£21.10	30.81

Castings presently has a consensus price target of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Avingtrans	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Castings pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

46.8% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Avingtrans shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Castings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Castings had 1 more articles in the media than Avingtrans. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Avingtrans. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Avingtrans'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Castings	Neutral
Avingtrans	Neutral

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 2.75%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	2.75%	3.83%	7.09%
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%

Castings has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Castings beats Avingtrans on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Avingtrans compare to Mpac Group?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.41	£3.46M	£21.10	30.81
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.44	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mpac Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans	Neutral
Mpac Group	Neutral

Summary

Avingtrans beats Mpac Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Avingtrans News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AVG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AVG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Avingtrans	Specialty Industrial Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£218.54M	£7.61B	£9.52B	£2.81B
Dividend Yield	0.76%	2.64%	3.55%	6.08%
P/E Ratio	30.81	16.34	25.81	365.45
Price / Sales	1.41	33,766.19	4,846.32	87,990.19
Price / Cash	5.09	9.33	27.88	27.89
Price / Book	1.94	2.64	4.99	7.75
Net Income	£3.46M	£299.51M	£792.76M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-1.49%	1.54%	1.92%	1.40%
1 Month Performance	6.06%	4.06%	3.55%	4.10%
1 Year Performance	58.07%	34.74%	32.43%	69.73%

Avingtrans Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AVG Avingtrans	N/A	GBX 650 -1.5%	N/A	+70.9%	£218.54M	£155.49M	30.81	732
MGAM Morgan Advanced Materials	2.3082 of 5 stars	GBX 222.50 +1.4%	GBX 235 +5.6%	+5.8%	£606.73M	£996.60M	29.67	8,694	Gap Up
RNO Renold	N/A	GBX 81.80 flat	N/A	+13.0%	£162.96M	£245.10M	12.39	1,824
LOAD Crestchic	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£121.14M	£34.97M	2,347.06	N/A
CGS Castings	3.4856 of 5 stars	GBX 262 -0.8%	GBX 335 +27.9%	-4.3%	£114.78M	£175.35M	23.73	1,251

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:AVG) was last updated on 5/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Avingtrans (AVG) Competitors

AVG vs. MGAM, RNO, LOAD, CGS, and MPAC

How does Avingtrans compare to Morgan Advanced Materials?

Summary

How does Avingtrans compare to Renold?

Summary

How does Avingtrans compare to Crestchic?

Summary

How does Avingtrans compare to Castings?

Summary

How does Avingtrans compare to Mpac Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AVG vs. The Competition

Avingtrans Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Avingtrans (AVG) Competitors

AVG vs. MGAM, RNO, LOAD, CGS, and MPAC

How does Avingtrans compare to Morgan Advanced Materials?

Do analysts prefer MGAM or AVG?

Is MGAM or AVG more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MGAM or AVG?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MGAM or AVG?

Is MGAM or AVG a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MGAM or AVG?

Which has more risk and volatility, MGAM or AVG?

Summary

How does Avingtrans compare to Renold?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in AVG or RNO?

Is AVG or RNO a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor AVG or RNO?

Is AVG or RNO more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AVG or RNO?

Which has more risk and volatility, AVG or RNO?

Summary

How does Avingtrans compare to Crestchic?

Which has more risk and volatility, LOAD or AVG?

Does the media favor LOAD or AVG?

Is LOAD or AVG more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, LOAD or AVG?

Is LOAD or AVG a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LOAD or AVG?

Summary

How does Avingtrans compare to Castings?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CGS or AVG?

Do analysts recommend CGS or AVG?

Is CGS or AVG a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CGS or AVG?

Does the media prefer CGS or AVG?

Is CGS or AVG more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, CGS or AVG?

Summary

How does Avingtrans compare to Mpac Group?

Is AVG or MPAC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AVG or MPAC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, AVG or MPAC?

Which has more risk & volatility, AVG or MPAC?

Does the media prefer AVG or MPAC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AVG vs. The Competition

Avingtrans Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools