Do analysts recommend AVG or CGS?

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Avingtrans 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AVG or CGS?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Avingtrans is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avingtrans £155.49M 1.31 £3.46M £21.10 28.74 Castings £175.35M 0.83 £16.81M £11.04 30.25

Is AVG or CGS more profitable?

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Avingtrans 4.54% 6.13% 2.06% Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09%

Do analysts recommend RNO or CGS?

Castings has a consensus target price of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Renold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Renold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, RNO or CGS?

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Castings. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Renold £245.10M 0.66 £19.85M £6.60 12.39 Castings £175.35M 0.83 £16.81M £11.04 30.25

Is RNO or CGS more profitable?

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Renold 6.16% 25.68% 6.89% Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09%

Do analysts rate LOAD or CGS?

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Crestchic. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Crestchic 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, LOAD or CGS?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Crestchic £34.97M 0.00 £4.86M £0.17 N/A Castings £175.35M 0.83 £16.81M £11.04 30.25

Is LOAD or CGS more profitable?

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Crestchic -4.95% 18.18% 8.17% Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09%

Do analysts rate CGS or MPAC?

Castings presently has a consensus target price of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Mpac Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, CGS or MPAC?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Castings £175.35M 0.83 £16.81M £11.04 30.25 Mpac Group £174.10M 0.42 £8.86M -£31.80 N/A

Is CGS or MPAC more profitable?

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Mpac Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09% Mpac Group -5.46% -12.67% 4.06%

Does the media refer more to CGS or MPAC?

In the previous week, Mpac Group had 3 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Mpac Group and 3 mentions for Castings. Castings' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Mpac Group's score of 1.11 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Castings 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mpac Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate CGS or CPH2?

Castings currently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Clean Power Hydrogen. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Clean Power Hydrogen 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to CGS or CPH2?

In the previous week, Castings had 1 more articles in the media than Clean Power Hydrogen. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Castings and 2 mentions for Clean Power Hydrogen. Castings' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Clean Power Hydrogen's score of -0.17 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Castings 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Clean Power Hydrogen 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Castings (CGS) Competitors

GBX 334 +6.00 (+1.83%)

As of 11:53 AM Eastern

Compare

CGS vs. AVG, RNO, LOAD, MPAC, and CPH2

Should you buy Castings stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Castings with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Castings include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Crestchic (LOAD), Mpac Group (MPAC), and Clean Power Hydrogen (CPH2). These companies are all part of the "specialty industrial machinery" industry.

How does Castings compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.505, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.6859107, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avingtrans	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Castings pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Avingtrans is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.31	£3.46M	£21.10	28.74
Castings	£175.35M	0.83	£16.81M	£11.04	30.25

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.1% of Avingtrans shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Castings had 3 more articles in the media than Avingtrans. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Avingtrans. Castings' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Avingtrans' score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans	Neutral
Castings	Positive

Summary

Castings beats Avingtrans on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Renold?

Renold (LON:RNO) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

48.7% of Renold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Renold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Renold has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.6859107, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Castings. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Renold	£245.10M	0.66	£19.85M	£6.60	12.39
Castings	£175.35M	0.83	£16.81M	£11.04	30.25

Renold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Renold pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Castings pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Renold	6.16%	25.68%	6.89%
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%

In the previous week, Castings had 3 more articles in the media than Renold. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Renold. Castings' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Renold's score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Renold	Neutral
Castings	Positive

Castings has a consensus target price of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Renold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Renold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Castings beats Renold on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Crestchic?

Crestchic (LON:LOAD) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Crestchic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Crestchic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crestchic	-4.95%	18.18%	8.17%
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%

Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.6859107, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Castings had 3 more articles in the media than Crestchic. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Crestchic. Castings' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Crestchic's score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Crestchic	Neutral
Castings	Positive

Crestchic pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Crestchic pays out 1,176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Castings pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Castings is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

73.3% of Crestchic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.5% of Crestchic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crestchic	£34.97M	0.00	£4.86M	£0.17	N/A
Castings	£175.35M	0.83	£16.81M	£11.04	30.25

Summary

Castings beats Crestchic on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Mpac Group?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Castings has a beta of 0.6859107, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.473, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings presently has a consensus target price of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Mpac Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£175.35M	0.83	£16.81M	£11.04	30.25
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.42	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A

46.6% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%

In the previous week, Mpac Group had 3 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Mpac Group and 3 mentions for Castings. Castings' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Mpac Group's score of 1.11 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Castings	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mpac Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Castings beats Mpac Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Clean Power Hydrogen (LON:CPH2) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Castings has a beta of 0.6859107, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Power Hydrogen has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

46.6% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Power Hydrogen. Clean Power Hydrogen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£175.35M	0.83	£16.81M	£11.04	30.25
Clean Power Hydrogen	£4K	17,068.44	-£4.83M	-£5.47	N/A

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Clean Power Hydrogen's net margin of -387,225.00%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Clean Power Hydrogen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%
Clean Power Hydrogen	-387,225.00%	-203.60%	-14.63%

Castings currently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 16.77%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Clean Power Hydrogen.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Clean Power Hydrogen	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Castings had 1 more articles in the media than Clean Power Hydrogen. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Castings and 2 mentions for Clean Power Hydrogen. Castings' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Clean Power Hydrogen's score of -0.17 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Castings	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Clean Power Hydrogen	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Castings beats Clean Power Hydrogen on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Castings News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Castings	Specialty Industrial Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£145.21M	£7.22B	£9.74B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	5.58%	2.63%	3.55%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	30.25	15.05	25.73	365.72
Price / Sales	0.83	39,120.13	4,867.97	86,253.69
Price / Cash	5.96	9.33	27.93	27.85
Price / Book	1.09	2.63	4.61	7.92
Net Income	£16.81M	£299.51M	£793.53M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	2.45%	1.21%	-0.07%	-0.87%
1 Month Performance	27.48%	-0.44%	0.18%	-0.76%
1 Year Performance	15.17%	27.87%	25.08%	70.67%

Castings Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CGS Castings	3.3858 of 5 stars	GBX 334 +1.8%	GBX 390 +16.8%	+20.6%	£145.21M	£175.35M	30.25	1,251	Earnings Report
AVG Avingtrans	N/A	GBX 630 +0.4%	N/A	+47.6%	£211.82M	£155.49M	29.86	732
RNO Renold	N/A	GBX 81.80 flat	N/A	+0.7%	£162.96M	£245.10M	12.39	1,824
LOAD Crestchic	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£121.14M	£34.97M	2,347.06	N/A
MPAC Mpac Group	N/A	GBX 244.30 +4.0%	N/A	-41.8%	£73.47M	£174.10M	N/A	500	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGS) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Castings (CGS) Competitors