Go Pro

Castings (CGS) Competitors

Castings logo
GBX 306.84 -5.16 (-1.65%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:30 PM Eastern

CGS vs. AVG, RNO, LOAD, MPAC, and XSG

Should you buy Castings stock or one of its competitors? Castings's main competitors and comparable companies include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Crestchic (LOAD), Mpac Group (MPAC), and Xeros Technology Group (XSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Castings compare to Avingtrans?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Avingtrans (LON:AVG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Castings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castings£173.23M0.77£16.81M£17.2517.79
Avingtrans£155.49M1.73£3.46M£21.1034.54

Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Castings pays out 106.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Castings had 5 more articles in the media than Avingtrans. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Avingtrans. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Avingtrans' score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castings Neutral
Avingtrans Neutral

46.3% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Avingtrans shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Avingtrans shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Castings currently has a consensus target price of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 27.10%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Castings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Avingtrans
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Castings has a beta of 0.432, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avingtrans has a beta of 0.565, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castings4.36% 5.98% 7.09%
Avingtrans 4.54%6.13%2.06%

Summary

Castings beats Avingtrans on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Renold?

Renold (LON:RNO) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Renold has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.432, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Renold6.16% 25.68% 6.89%
Castings 4.36%5.98%7.09%

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Castings. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Renold£245.10M0.66£19.85M£6.6012.39
Castings£173.23M0.77£16.81M£17.2517.79

In the previous week, Castings had 5 more articles in the media than Renold. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Renold. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Renold's score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Renold Neutral
Castings Neutral

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 27.10%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Renold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Renold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Castings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Renold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Renold pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Castings pays out 106.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

48.7% of Renold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.3% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Renold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Castings beats Renold on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Crestchic?

Crestchic (LON:LOAD) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.432, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crestchic-4.95% 18.18% 8.17%
Castings 4.36%5.98%7.09%

Crestchic pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Crestchic pays out 1,176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Castings pays out 106.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Castings is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crestchic£34.97M0.00£4.86M£0.17N/A
Castings£173.23M0.77£16.81M£17.2517.79

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 27.10%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Crestchic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crestchic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Castings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

73.3% of Crestchic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.3% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. 20.5% of Crestchic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Castings had 5 more articles in the media than Crestchic. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Crestchic. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Crestchic's score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crestchic Neutral
Castings Neutral

Summary

Castings beats Crestchic on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Mpac Group?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mpac Group-5.46% -12.67% 4.06%
Castings 4.36%5.98%7.09%

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.466, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.432, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group£174.10M0.58£8.86M-£31.80N/A
Castings£173.23M0.77£16.81M£17.2517.79

In the previous week, Castings had 5 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Mpac Group. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Mpac Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group Neutral
Castings Neutral

29.0% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.3% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Castings has a consensus target price of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 27.10%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mpac Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Castings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Castings beats Mpac Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Xeros Technology Group?

Xeros Technology Group (LON:XSG) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Xeros Technology Group has a beta of 2.351, meaning that its stock price is 135% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.432, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 27.10%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Xeros Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Xeros Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Castings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Xeros Technology Group's net margin of -1,411.16%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Xeros Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Xeros Technology Group-1,411.16% -101.58% -50.82%
Castings 4.36%5.98%7.09%

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Xeros Technology Group. Xeros Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xeros Technology Group£242K53.42-£6.18M-£0.62N/A
Castings£173.23M0.77£16.81M£17.2517.79

In the previous week, Castings had 4 more articles in the media than Xeros Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Castings and 1 mentions for Xeros Technology Group. Xeros Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Castings' score of 0.22 indicating that Xeros Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Xeros Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Castings
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

2.6% of Xeros Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.3% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Xeros Technology Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Castings beats Xeros Technology Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Castings News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGS vs. The Competition

MetricCastingsMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£131.73M£11.49B£10.69B£2.54B
Dividend Yield6.07%2.18%97.12%6.17%
P/E Ratio17.7921.0126.69367.57
Price / Sales0.7765.96328.8083,481.74
Price / Cash5.9623.4224.4727.89
Price / Book1.004.134.497.19
Net Income£16.81M£358.84M£612.35M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.02%-0.54%-1.41%0.30%
1 Month Performance-5.88%0.91%2.54%3.31%
1 Year Performance17.56%11.67%12.36%22.13%

Castings Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGS
Castings
3.9371 of 5 stars
GBX 306.84
-1.7%
GBX 390
+27.1%
+17.6%£131.73M£173.23M17.791,251
AVG
Avingtrans
N/AGBX 729
+1.3%
N/A+66.4%£269.23M£155.49M34.55732
RNO
Renold
N/AGBX 81.80
flat
N/A+1.5%£162.96M£245.10M12.391,824
LOAD
Crestchic
N/AN/AN/AN/A£121.14M£34.97M2,347.06N/A
MPAC
Mpac Group
N/AGBX 332.50
+0.8%
N/A+2.5%£99.24M£174.10MN/A500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CGS) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners