Do analysts rate AVG or CGS?

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Avingtrans 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AVG or CGS?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Castings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avingtrans £155.49M 1.42 £3.46M £21.10 31.04 Castings £175.35M 0.67 £16.81M £11.04 24.37

Is AVG or CGS more profitable?

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 2.75%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Avingtrans 4.54% 6.13% 2.06% Castings 2.75% 3.83% 7.09%

Does the media prefer AVG or CGS?

In the previous week, Avingtrans and Avingtrans both had 1 articles in the media. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Avingtrans 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Castings 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate CGS or RNO?

Castings presently has a consensus target price of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Renold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Renold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CGS or RNO?

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Castings. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Castings £175.35M 0.67 £16.81M £11.04 24.37 Renold £245.10M 0.66 £19.85M £6.60 12.39

Is CGS or RNO more profitable?

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Castings' net margin of 2.75%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Castings 2.75% 3.83% 7.09% Renold 6.16% 25.68% 6.89%

Do analysts rate CGS or LOAD?

Castings currently has a consensus target price of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Crestchic. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Crestchic 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CGS or LOAD?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Castings £175.35M 0.67 £16.81M £11.04 24.37 Crestchic £34.97M 0.00 £4.86M £0.17 N/A

Is CGS or LOAD more profitable?

Castings has a net margin of 2.75% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Castings 2.75% 3.83% 7.09% Crestchic -4.95% 18.18% 8.17%

Do analysts prefer CGS or MPAC?

Castings presently has a consensus price target of GBX 335, indicating a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Mpac Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CGS or MPAC?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Castings £175.35M 0.67 £16.81M £11.04 24.37 Mpac Group £174.10M 0.46 £8.86M -£31.80 N/A

Is CGS or MPAC more profitable?

Castings has a net margin of 2.75% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 3.83% beat Mpac Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Castings 2.75% 3.83% 7.09% Mpac Group -5.46% -12.67% 4.06%

Do analysts recommend CGS or CPH2?

Castings currently has a consensus target price of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Clean Power Hydrogen. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Clean Power Hydrogen 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media prefer CGS or CPH2?

In the previous week, Castings and Castings both had 1 articles in the media. Clean Power Hydrogen's average media sentiment score of 0.03 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Clean Power Hydrogen is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Castings 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Clean Power Hydrogen 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Castings (CGS) Competitors

GBX 269 +1.00 (+0.37%)

As of 11:58 AM Eastern

Compare

CGS vs. AVG, RNO, LOAD, MPAC, and CPH2

Should you buy Castings stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Castings with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Castings include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Crestchic (LOAD), Mpac Group (MPAC), and Clean Power Hydrogen (CPH2). These companies are all part of the "specialty industrial machinery" industry.

How does Castings compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Castings pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Avingtrans and Avingtrans both had 1 articles in the media. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Castings	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avingtrans	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 2.75%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%
Castings	2.75%	3.83%	7.09%

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Castings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.42	£3.46M	£21.10	31.04
Castings	£175.35M	0.67	£16.81M	£11.04	24.37

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.433, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Avingtrans beats Castings on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Renold?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Renold (LON:RNO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Renold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Castings pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Renold pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Castings' net margin of 2.75%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	2.75%	3.83%	7.09%
Renold	6.16%	25.68%	6.89%

46.8% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Renold shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Castings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Renold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Castings presently has a consensus target price of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Renold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Renold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Castings has a beta of 0.433, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renold has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Castings. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£175.35M	0.67	£16.81M	£11.04	24.37
Renold	£245.10M	0.66	£19.85M	£6.60	12.39

In the previous week, Castings had 1 more articles in the media than Renold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Renold. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Renold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Castings	Neutral
Renold	Neutral

Summary

Castings beats Renold on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Crestchic?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Crestchic (LON:LOAD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Castings currently has a consensus target price of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Crestchic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Crestchic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Castings has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has a net margin of 2.75% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	2.75%	3.83%	7.09%
Crestchic	-4.95%	18.18%	8.17%

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£175.35M	0.67	£16.81M	£11.04	24.37
Crestchic	£34.97M	0.00	£4.86M	£0.17	N/A

In the previous week, Castings had 1 more articles in the media than Crestchic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Crestchic. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Crestchic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Castings	Neutral
Crestchic	Neutral

Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Crestchic pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Castings pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crestchic pays out 1,176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Castings is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

46.8% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Crestchic shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.5% of Crestchic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Castings beats Crestchic on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Mpac Group?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

46.8% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Castings has a net margin of 2.75% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 3.83% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	2.75%	3.83%	7.09%
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%

In the previous week, Castings had 1 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Mpac Group. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mpac Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Castings	Neutral
Mpac Group	Neutral

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£175.35M	0.67	£16.81M	£11.04	24.37
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.46	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A

Castings has a beta of 0.433, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings presently has a consensus price target of GBX 335, indicating a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Mpac Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Castings beats Mpac Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Clean Power Hydrogen (LON:CPH2) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Power Hydrogen. Clean Power Hydrogen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£175.35M	0.67	£16.81M	£11.04	24.37
Clean Power Hydrogen	£4K	17,068.44	-£4.83M	-£5.47	N/A

Castings currently has a consensus target price of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 24.54%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Clean Power Hydrogen.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Clean Power Hydrogen	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Castings has a beta of 0.433, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Power Hydrogen has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Castings and Castings both had 1 articles in the media. Clean Power Hydrogen's average media sentiment score of 0.03 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Clean Power Hydrogen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Castings	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Clean Power Hydrogen	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Castings has a net margin of 2.75% compared to Clean Power Hydrogen's net margin of -387,225.00%. Castings' return on equity of 3.83% beat Clean Power Hydrogen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	2.75%	3.83%	7.09%
Clean Power Hydrogen	-387,225.00%	-203.60%	-14.63%

46.8% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Castings beats Clean Power Hydrogen on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Castings News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Castings	Specialty Industrial Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£116.95M	£7.67B	£9.58B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	6.81%	2.63%	3.54%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	24.37	14.90	25.08	364.74
Price / Sales	0.67	39,155.13	5,129.22	87,565.33
Price / Cash	5.96	9.33	28.20	27.85
Price / Book	0.88	2.66	5.08	7.71
Net Income	£16.81M	£299.51M	£794.09M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.37%	1.52%	0.41%	0.07%
1 Month Performance	0.37%	4.21%	2.27%	3.26%
1 Year Performance	3.07%	34.31%	30.49%	75.52%

Castings Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CGS Castings	3.3581 of 5 stars	GBX 269 +0.4%	GBX 335 +24.5%	-2.5%	£116.95M	£175.35M	24.37	1,251	News Coverage
AVG Avingtrans	N/A	GBX 650 -1.5%	N/A	+67.1%	£218.54M	£155.49M	30.81	732
RNO Renold	N/A	GBX 81.80 flat	N/A	+12.1%	£162.96M	£245.10M	12.39	1,824
LOAD Crestchic	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£121.14M	£34.97M	2,347.06	N/A
MPAC Mpac Group	N/A	GBX 257.16 -0.1%	N/A	-38.4%	£77.34M	£174.10M	N/A	500	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGS) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Castings (CGS) Competitors