Do analysts recommend AVG or CGS?

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Avingtrans 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AVG or CGS?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Castings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avingtrans £155.49M 1.47 £3.46M £21.10 32.23 Castings £173.23M 0.83 £16.81M £17.25 19.13

Is AVG or CGS more profitable?

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Avingtrans 4.54% 6.13% 2.06% Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09%

Do analysts prefer CGS or RNO?

Castings presently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Renold. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Renold 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CGS or RNO?

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Castings. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Castings £173.23M 0.83 £16.81M £17.25 19.13 Renold £245.10M 0.66 £19.85M £6.60 12.39

Is CGS or RNO more profitable?

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09% Renold 6.16% 25.68% 6.89%

Do analysts rate LOAD or CGS?

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Crestchic. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Crestchic 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, LOAD or CGS?

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Crestchic £34.97M 0.00 £4.86M £0.17 N/A Castings £173.23M 0.83 £16.81M £17.25 19.13

Is LOAD or CGS more profitable?

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Castings' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Crestchic -4.95% 18.18% 8.17% Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09%

Do analysts recommend CGS or MPAC?

Castings currently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Mpac Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CGS or MPAC?

Castings has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Castings £173.23M 0.83 £16.81M £17.25 19.13 Mpac Group £174.10M 0.54 £8.86M -£31.80 N/A

Is CGS or MPAC more profitable?

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Mpac Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Castings 4.36% 5.98% 7.09% Mpac Group -5.46% -12.67% 4.06%

Do analysts recommend CGS or CPH2?

Castings presently has a consensus target price of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Clean Power Hydrogen. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Clean Power Hydrogen 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Castings (CGS) Competitors

GBX 330 +1.00 (+0.30%)

As of 07/13/2026 11:53 AM Eastern

Compare

CGS vs. AVG, RNO, LOAD, MPAC, and CPH2

Should you buy Castings stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Castings with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Castings include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Crestchic (LOAD), Mpac Group (MPAC), and Clean Power Hydrogen (CPH2). These companies are all part of the "specialty industrial machinery" industry.

How does Castings compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. 15.1% of Avingtrans shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avingtrans	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Castings pays out 106.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Castings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.47	£3.46M	£21.10	32.23
Castings	£173.23M	0.83	£16.81M	£17.25	19.13

In the previous week, Avingtrans had 3 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Avingtrans and 0 mentions for Castings. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans	Neutral
Castings	Neutral

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.552, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.438, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Avingtrans beats Castings on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Renold?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Renold (LON:RNO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Renold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Castings pays out 106.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Renold pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

46.6% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Renold shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Renold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Castings. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£173.23M	0.83	£16.81M	£17.25	19.13
Renold	£245.10M	0.66	£19.85M	£6.60	12.39

Castings presently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Renold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Renold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Renold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Castings	Neutral
Renold	Neutral

Castings has a beta of 0.438, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renold has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Castings' net margin of 4.36%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%
Renold	6.16%	25.68%	6.89%

Summary

Castings and Renold tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Crestchic?

Crestchic (LON:LOAD) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Crestchic pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Crestchic pays out 1,176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Castings pays out 106.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Castings is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Crestchic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Castings'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Crestchic	Neutral
Castings	Neutral

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Castings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crestchic	-4.95%	18.18%	8.17%
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%

73.3% of Crestchic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.5% of Crestchic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crestchic	£34.97M	0.00	£4.86M	£0.17	N/A
Castings	£173.23M	0.83	£16.81M	£17.25	19.13

Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.438, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Crestchic.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Crestchic	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Castings beats Crestchic on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Mpac Group?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Castings currently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Mpac Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Castings has a beta of 0.438, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.453, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£173.23M	0.83	£16.81M	£17.25	19.13
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.54	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A

46.6% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mpac Group had 2 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mpac Group and 0 mentions for Castings. Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Mpac Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Castings	Neutral
Mpac Group	Neutral

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%

Summary

Castings beats Mpac Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Castings compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Clean Power Hydrogen (LON:CPH2) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Castings presently has a consensus target price of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 18.18%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Clean Power Hydrogen.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Clean Power Hydrogen	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Clean Power Hydrogen had 3 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Clean Power Hydrogen and 0 mentions for Castings. Clean Power Hydrogen's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Clean Power Hydrogen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Castings	Neutral
Clean Power Hydrogen	Positive

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Clean Power Hydrogen's net margin of -387,225.00%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Clean Power Hydrogen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castings	4.36%	5.98%	7.09%
Clean Power Hydrogen	-387,225.00%	-77.92%	-14.63%

46.6% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Power Hydrogen. Clean Power Hydrogen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castings	£173.23M	0.83	£16.81M	£17.25	19.13
Clean Power Hydrogen	N/A	N/A	-£4.83M	-£1.80	N/A

Castings has a beta of 0.438, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Power Hydrogen has a beta of 0.329, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Castings beats Clean Power Hydrogen on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Castings News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Castings	Specialty Industrial Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£143.47M	£7.56B	£9.48B	£2.85B
Dividend Yield	5.57%	2.67%	3.54%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	19.13	14.59	26.74	368.21
Price / Sales	0.83	312.80	2,079.44	84,612.73
Price / Cash	5.96	9.33	27.28	27.87
Price / Book	1.07	2.55	4.46	7.49
Net Income	£16.81M	£299.51M	£791.21M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	1.23%	-0.95%	-0.79%	-0.19%
1 Month Performance	2.48%	0.44%	0.16%	-0.99%
1 Year Performance	5.00%	19.73%	15.23%	61.68%

Castings Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CGS Castings	2.1237 of 5 stars	GBX 330 +0.3%	GBX 390 +18.2%	+6.5%	£143.47M	£173.23M	19.13	1,251	High Trading Volume
AVG Avingtrans	N/A	GBX 640 flat	N/A	+61.2%	£215.18M	£155.49M	30.33	732
RNO Renold	N/A	GBX 81.80 flat	N/A	+1.7%	£162.96M	£245.10M	12.39	1,824
LOAD Crestchic	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£121.14M	£34.97M	2,347.06	N/A
MPAC Mpac Group	N/A	GBX 290 +1.8%	N/A	+9.9%	£87.21M	£174.10M	N/A	500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGS) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Castings (CGS) Competitors