Goodwin (GDWN) Competitors

Goodwin has a beta of 0.655, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spirax-Sarco Engineering has a beta of 1.147, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Spirax-Sarco Engineering has higher revenue and earnings than Goodwin. Spirax-Sarco Engineering is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodwin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Goodwin has a net margin of 15.93% compared to Spirax-Sarco Engineering's net margin of 9.60%. Goodwin's return on equity of 33.12% beat Spirax-Sarco Engineering's return on equity.

5.1% of Goodwin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.9% of Spirax-Sarco Engineering shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Goodwin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Spirax-Sarco Engineering shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Goodwin pays an annual dividend of GBX 206.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Spirax-Sarco Engineering pays an annual dividend of GBX 166.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Goodwin pays out 39.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Spirax-Sarco Engineering pays out 75.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Spirax-Sarco Engineering has a consensus price target of GBX 8,012.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.06%. Given Spirax-Sarco Engineering's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Spirax-Sarco Engineering is more favorable than Goodwin.

In the previous week, Goodwin had 6 more articles in the media than Spirax-Sarco Engineering. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Goodwin and 4 mentions for Spirax-Sarco Engineering. Spirax-Sarco Engineering's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Goodwin's score of 0.22 indicating that Spirax-Sarco Engineering is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Rotork presently has a consensus price target of GBX 433.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.95%. Given Rotork's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rotork is more favorable than Goodwin.

Rotork has higher revenue and earnings than Goodwin. Rotork is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodwin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Goodwin has a net margin of 15.93% compared to Rotork's net margin of 15.75%. Goodwin's return on equity of 33.12% beat Rotork's return on equity.

Rotork has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goodwin has a beta of 0.655, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Rotork pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Goodwin pays an annual dividend of GBX 206.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Rotork pays out 58.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Goodwin pays out 39.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

59.2% of Rotork shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Goodwin shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Rotork shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Goodwin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Rotork had 6 more articles in the media than Goodwin. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Rotork and 10 mentions for Goodwin. Rotork's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Goodwin's score of 0.22 indicating that Rotork is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Goodwin pays an annual dividend of GBX 206.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Bodycote pays an annual dividend of GBX 23 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Goodwin pays out 39.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bodycote pays out 68.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Goodwin has a beta of 0.655, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bodycote has a beta of 1.352, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Bodycote has a consensus target price of GBX 875.83, indicating a potential downside of 4.02%. Given Bodycote's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bodycote is more favorable than Goodwin.

In the previous week, Goodwin had 1 more articles in the media than Bodycote. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Goodwin and 9 mentions for Bodycote. Bodycote's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Goodwin's score of 0.22 indicating that Bodycote is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Bodycote has higher revenue and earnings than Goodwin. Bodycote is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodwin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

5.1% of Goodwin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.8% of Bodycote shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Goodwin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Bodycote shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Goodwin has a net margin of 15.93% compared to Bodycote's net margin of 7.87%. Goodwin's return on equity of 33.12% beat Bodycote's return on equity.

Goodwin has a beta of 0.655, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ITM Power has a beta of 2.891, meaning that its stock price is 189% more volatile than the broader market.

Goodwin has a net margin of 15.93% compared to ITM Power's net margin of -108.00%. Goodwin's return on equity of 33.12% beat ITM Power's return on equity.

5.1% of Goodwin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of ITM Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Goodwin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of ITM Power shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ITM Power has a consensus target price of GBX 5,062.50, indicating a potential upside of 4,409.38%. Given ITM Power's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ITM Power is more favorable than Goodwin.

In the previous week, Goodwin had 4 more articles in the media than ITM Power. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Goodwin and 6 mentions for ITM Power. ITM Power's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Goodwin's score of 0.22 indicating that ITM Power is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Goodwin has higher revenue and earnings than ITM Power. ITM Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodwin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.