Go Pro

Mpac Group (MPAC) Competitors

Mpac Group logo
GBX 275.01 +0.01 (+0.00%)
As of 07/7/2026 12:31 PM Eastern

MPAC vs. AVG, RNO, CGS, LOAD, and CPH2

Should you buy Mpac Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mpac Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mpac Group include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Castings (CGS), Crestchic (LOAD), and Clean Power Hydrogen (CPH2). These companies are all part of the "specialty industrial machinery" industry.

How does Mpac Group compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.1% of Avingtrans shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mpac Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans Neutral
Mpac Group Neutral

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans£155.49M1.38£3.46M£21.1030.33
Mpac Group£174.10M0.48£8.86M-£31.80N/A

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Avingtrans4.54% 6.13% 2.06%
Mpac Group -5.46%-12.67%4.06%

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.552, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.453, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Avingtrans beats Mpac Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Renold?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Renold (LON:RNO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Renold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group Neutral
Renold Neutral

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.453, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renold has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

29.9% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Renold shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Renold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mpac Group-5.46% -12.67% 4.06%
Renold 6.16%25.68%6.89%

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group£174.10M0.48£8.86M-£31.80N/A
Renold£245.10M0.66£19.85M£6.6012.39

Summary

Renold beats Mpac Group on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Castings?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.453, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.438, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Castings had 1 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Mpac Group. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Mpac Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group Neutral
Castings Positive

29.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mpac Group-5.46% -12.67% 4.06%
Castings 4.36%5.98%7.09%

Castings has a consensus target price of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 15.20%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mpac Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Castings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Castings has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group£174.10M0.48£8.86M-£31.80N/A
Castings£173.23M0.85£16.81M£17.2519.62

Summary

Castings beats Mpac Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Crestchic?

Crestchic (LON:LOAD) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Crestchic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mpac Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crestchic Neutral
Mpac Group Neutral

73.3% of Crestchic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 20.5% of Crestchic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.453, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crestchic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crestchic£34.97M0.00£4.86M£0.17N/A
Mpac Group£174.10M0.48£8.86M-£31.80N/A

Crestchic has a net margin of -4.95% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crestchic-4.95% 18.18% 8.17%
Mpac Group -5.46%-12.67%4.06%

Summary

Crestchic beats Mpac Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

Clean Power Hydrogen (LON:CPH2) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

0.3% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Clean Power Hydrogen has a beta of 0.329, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.453, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Clean Power Hydrogen had 5 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Clean Power Hydrogen and 0 mentions for Mpac Group. Clean Power Hydrogen's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Mpac Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Clean Power Hydrogen is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clean Power Hydrogen Positive
Mpac Group Neutral

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Power Hydrogen. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Power Hydrogen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Power Hydrogen£4K1,672.96-£4.83M-£5.47N/A
Mpac Group£174.10M0.48£8.86M-£31.80N/A

Mpac Group has a net margin of -5.46% compared to Clean Power Hydrogen's net margin of -387,225.00%. Mpac Group's return on equity of -12.67% beat Clean Power Hydrogen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clean Power Hydrogen-387,225.00% -105.50% -14.63%
Mpac Group -5.46%-12.67%4.06%

Summary

Mpac Group beats Clean Power Hydrogen on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mpac Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPAC vs. The Competition

MetricMpac GroupSpecialty Industrial Machinery IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£82.70M£7.56B£9.70B£2.98B
Dividend Yield1.48%2.66%3.52%6.14%
P/E Ratio-8.6514.3726.89369.20
Price / Sales0.4839,105.254,742.0685,877.35
Price / Cash5.499.3327.6027.87
Price / Book0.832.604.547.77
Net Income£8.86M£299.51M£791.21M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.51%-0.63%0.03%0.14%
1 Month Performance30.96%-0.83%0.48%-0.37%
1 Year Performance-1.78%23.16%17.64%62.90%

Mpac Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPAC
Mpac Group
N/AGBX 275.01
+0.0%
N/A-1.4%£82.70M£174.10MN/A500
AVG
Avingtrans
N/AGBX 624.13
-0.9%
N/A+51.5%£209.84M£155.49M29.58732
RNO
Renold
N/AGBX 81.80
flat
N/A+2.0%£162.96M£245.10M12.391,824
CGS
Castings
3.2511 of 5 stars
GBX 330
-1.2%
GBX 390
+18.2%
+10.3%£143.47M£175.35M29.891,251
LOAD
Crestchic
N/AN/AN/AN/A£121.14M£34.97M2,347.06N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MPAC) was last updated on 7/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners