Go Pro

Mpac Group (MPAC) Competitors

Mpac Group logo
GBX 350 +7.50 (+2.19%)
As of 03:25 AM Eastern

MPAC vs. AVG, RNO, CGS, LOAD, and XSG

Should you buy Mpac Group stock or one of its competitors? Mpac Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Castings (CGS), Crestchic (LOAD), and Xeros Technology Group (XSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Mpac Group compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mpac Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans Neutral
Mpac Group Neutral

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.6% of Avingtrans shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Avingtrans4.54% 6.13% 2.06%
Mpac Group -5.46%-12.67%4.06%

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans£155.49M1.75£3.46M£21.1034.83
Mpac Group£174.10M0.60£8.86M-£31.80N/A

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.566, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Avingtrans beats Mpac Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Renold?

Renold (LON:RNO) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Renold6.16% 25.68% 6.89%
Mpac Group -5.46%-12.67%4.06%

48.7% of Renold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Renold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Renold has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Renold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mpac Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Renold Neutral
Mpac Group Neutral

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Renold£245.10M0.66£19.85M£6.6012.39
Mpac Group£174.10M0.60£8.86M-£31.80N/A

Summary

Renold beats Mpac Group on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Castings?

Castings (LON:CGS) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Castings has a beta of 0.437, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Castings4.36% 5.98% 7.09%
Mpac Group -5.46%-12.67%4.06%

Castings has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Castings£173.23M0.78£16.81M£17.2517.91
Mpac Group£174.10M0.60£8.86M-£31.80N/A

46.1% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Castings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Castings currently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 26.21%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Castings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mpac Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mpac Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Castings Neutral
Mpac Group Neutral

Summary

Castings beats Mpac Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Crestchic?

Crestchic (LON:LOAD) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crestchic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crestchic£34.97M0.00£4.86M£0.17N/A
Mpac Group£174.10M0.60£8.86M-£31.80N/A

In the previous week, Crestchic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mpac Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crestchic Neutral
Mpac Group Neutral

73.3% of Crestchic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.5% of Crestchic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crestchic has a net margin of -4.95% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crestchic-4.95% 18.18% 8.17%
Mpac Group -5.46%-12.67%4.06%

Summary

Crestchic beats Mpac Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Xeros Technology Group?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Xeros Technology Group (LON:XSG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

29.0% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Xeros Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Xeros Technology Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mpac Group has a net margin of -5.46% compared to Xeros Technology Group's net margin of -1,411.16%. Mpac Group's return on equity of -12.67% beat Xeros Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mpac Group-5.46% -12.67% 4.06%
Xeros Technology Group -1,411.16%-101.58%-50.82%

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xeros Technology Group has a beta of 2.357, meaning that its stock price is 136% more volatile than the broader market.

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Xeros Technology Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xeros Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group£174.10M0.60£8.86M-£31.80N/A
Xeros Technology Group£242K40.42-£6.18M-£0.62N/A

In the previous week, Xeros Technology Group had 2 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Xeros Technology Group and 0 mentions for Mpac Group. Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Xeros Technology Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group Neutral
Xeros Technology Group Neutral

Summary

Mpac Group beats Xeros Technology Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mpac Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPAC vs. The Competition

MetricMpac GroupMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£105.26M£11.45B£10.47B£2.91B
Dividend Yield1.48%2.23%97.15%6.22%
P/E Ratio-11.0120.7726.00366.77
Price / Sales0.6065.93387.4784,130.05
Price / Cash5.4923.3924.2027.89
Price / Book1.064.384.996.57
Net Income£8.86M£365.71M£612.25M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.19%1.25%0.98%12.86%
1 Month Performance6.87%-0.77%-2.19%1.43%
1 Year Performance27.27%10.57%9.30%21.57%

Mpac Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPAC
Mpac Group
N/AGBX 350
+2.2%
N/A+25.6%£105.26M£174.10MN/A500
AVG
Avingtrans
N/AGBX 736.92
+0.3%
N/A+60.3%£272.15M£155.49M34.93732
RNO
Renold
N/AGBX 81.80
flat
N/A+1.5%£162.96M£245.10M12.391,824
CGS
Castings
N/AGBX 308
+2.7%
GBX 390
+26.6%
+13.6%£130.43M£173.23M17.861,251
LOAD
Crestchic
N/AN/AN/AN/A£121.14M£34.97M2,347.06N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MPAC) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners