Go Pro

Mpac Group (MPAC) Competitors

Mpac Group logo
GBX 340 +5.00 (+1.49%)
As of 12:10 PM Eastern

MPAC vs. AVG, RNO, CGS, LOAD, and PHE

Should you buy Mpac Group stock or one of its competitors? Mpac Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Castings (CGS), Crestchic (LOAD), and PowerHouse Energy Group (PHE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Mpac Group compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.566, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -4.61%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Avingtrans4.54% 6.13% 2.06%
Mpac Group -4.61%-10.45%4.06%

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans£155.49M1.72£3.46M£21.1034.36
Mpac Group£172.40M0.59£8.86M-£31.80N/A

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 13.6% of Avingtrans shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Avingtrans had 10 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Avingtrans and 0 mentions for Mpac Group. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Mpac Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans Neutral
Mpac Group Neutral

Summary

Avingtrans beats Mpac Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Renold?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Renold (LON:RNO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renold has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -4.61%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mpac Group-4.61% -10.45% 4.06%
Renold 6.16%25.68%6.89%

29.0% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Renold shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Renold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Renold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group Neutral
Renold Neutral

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group£172.40M0.59£8.86M-£31.80N/A
Renold£245.10M0.66£19.85M£6.6012.39

Summary

Renold beats Mpac Group on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Castings?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.437, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

29.0% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Castings shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Castings shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Castings has a consensus target price of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 39.29%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mpac Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Castings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Castings has a net margin of 4.36% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -4.61%. Castings' return on equity of 5.98% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mpac Group-4.61% -10.45% 4.06%
Castings 4.36%5.98%7.09%

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group£172.40M0.59£8.86M-£31.80N/A
Castings£173.23M0.70£16.81M£17.2516.23

In the previous week, Castings had 1 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Castings and 0 mentions for Mpac Group. Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Castings'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group Neutral
Castings Neutral

Summary

Castings beats Mpac Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Crestchic?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Crestchic (LON:LOAD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Mpac Group has a net margin of -4.61% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mpac Group-4.61% -10.45% 4.06%
Crestchic -4.95%18.18%8.17%

In the previous week, Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Crestchic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group Neutral
Crestchic Neutral

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crestchic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group£172.40M0.59£8.86M-£31.80N/A
Crestchic£34.97M0.00£4.86M£0.17N/A

29.0% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Crestchic shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.5% of Crestchic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Crestchic beats Mpac Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to PowerHouse Energy Group?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

29.0% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Mpac Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PowerHouse Energy Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group Neutral
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral

Mpac Group has a net margin of -4.61% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -167.64%. Mpac Group's return on equity of -10.45% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mpac Group-4.61% -10.45% 4.06%
PowerHouse Energy Group -167.64%-44.36%-17.45%

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than PowerHouse Energy Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PowerHouse Energy Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group£172.40M0.59£8.86M-£31.80N/A
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.72-£2.22M-£0.07N/A

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.712, meaning that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mpac Group beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mpac Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MPAC vs. The Competition

MetricMpac GroupMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£102.25M£11.32B£10.25B£2.80B
Dividend Yield1.48%2.32%96.75%6.18%
P/E Ratio-10.6921.4525.48366.17
Price / Sales0.5962.48274.1689,425.29
Price / Cash5.4922.8923.8227.89
Price / Book1.034.304.816.83
Net Income£8.86M£380.78M£616.94M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.84%-0.35%-0.90%-0.75%
1 Month Performance1.19%-1.96%-1.84%16.84%
1 Year Performance11.11%6.69%3.16%16.40%

Mpac Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MPAC
Mpac Group
N/AGBX 340
+1.5%
N/A+4.1%£102.25M£172.40MN/A500
AVG
Avingtrans
N/AGBX 726.81
+0.2%
N/A+48.0%£268.42M£155.49M34.45732
RNO
Renold
N/AGBX 81.80
flat
N/A+1.0%£162.96M£245.10M12.391,824
CGS
Castings
3.5916 of 5 stars
GBX 290
+0.7%
GBX 390
+34.5%
+4.4%£126.08M£173.23M16.811,251
LOAD
Crestchic
N/AN/AN/AN/A£121.14M£34.97M2,347.06N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MPAC) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners