Mpac Group (MPAC) Competitors

GBX 256.55 +1.55 (+0.61%)

As of 12:22 PM Eastern

MPAC vs. AVG, RNO, LOAD, CGS, and CPH2

Should you buy Mpac Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mpac Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mpac Group include Avingtrans (AVG), Renold (RNO), Crestchic (LOAD), Castings (CGS), and Clean Power Hydrogen (CPH2). These companies are all part of the "specialty industrial machinery" industry.

How does Mpac Group compare to Avingtrans?

Avingtrans (LON:AVG) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avingtrans	£155.49M	1.42	£3.46M	£21.10	31.18
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.44	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avingtrans	4.54%	6.13%	2.06%
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%

In the previous week, Mpac Group had 1 more articles in the media than Avingtrans. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mpac Group and 0 mentions for Avingtrans. Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Avingtrans' score of 0.00 indicating that Mpac Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Avingtrans	Neutral
Mpac Group	Positive

Summary

Avingtrans beats Mpac Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Renold?

Renold (LON:RNO) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Renold	£245.10M	0.66	£19.85M	£6.60	12.39
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.44	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Renold	6.16%	25.68%	6.89%
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%

48.7% of Renold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Renold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mpac Group had 1 more articles in the media than Renold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mpac Group and 0 mentions for Renold. Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Renold's score of 0.00 indicating that Mpac Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Renold	Neutral
Mpac Group	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Renold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Mpac Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Renold has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Renold beats Mpac Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Crestchic?

Crestchic (LON:LOAD) and Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Crestchic has a net margin of -4.95% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crestchic	-4.95%	18.18%	8.17%
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%

In the previous week, Mpac Group had 1 more articles in the media than Crestchic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mpac Group and 0 mentions for Crestchic. Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Crestchic's score of 0.00 indicating that Mpac Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Crestchic	Neutral
Mpac Group	Positive

Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mpac Group has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Crestchic. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crestchic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crestchic	£34.97M	0.00	£4.86M	£0.17	N/A
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.44	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A

73.3% of Crestchic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.5% of Crestchic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Crestchic beats Mpac Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Castings?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Castings (LON:CGS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Castings has a consensus target price of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 28.35%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Castings is more favorable than Mpac Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mpac Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Castings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.361, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Mpac Group. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Castings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.44	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A
Castings	£175.35M	0.65	£16.81M	£11.04	23.64

Castings has a net margin of 2.75% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Castings' return on equity of 3.83% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%
Castings	2.75%	3.83%	7.09%

In the previous week, Castings had 3 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Castings and 1 mentions for Mpac Group. Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Castings' score of 0.00 indicating that Mpac Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Castings	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

29.7% of Mpac Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Castings shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Castings beats Mpac Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mpac Group compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

Mpac Group (LON:MPAC) and Clean Power Hydrogen (LON:CPH2) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Mpac Group has a net margin of -5.46% compared to Clean Power Hydrogen's net margin of -387,225.00%. Mpac Group's return on equity of -12.67% beat Clean Power Hydrogen's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mpac Group	-5.46%	-12.67%	4.06%
Clean Power Hydrogen	-387,225.00%	-203.60%	-14.63%

In the previous week, Mpac Group had 1 more articles in the media than Clean Power Hydrogen. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mpac Group and 0 mentions for Clean Power Hydrogen. Mpac Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Clean Power Hydrogen's score of 0.00 indicating that Mpac Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mpac Group	Positive
Clean Power Hydrogen	Neutral

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Power Hydrogen has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

29.7% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Power Hydrogen. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Power Hydrogen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mpac Group	£174.10M	0.44	£8.86M	-£31.80	N/A
Clean Power Hydrogen	£4K	11,734.55	-£4.83M	-£5.47	N/A

Summary

Mpac Group beats Clean Power Hydrogen on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mpac Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MPAC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Mpac Group	Specialty Industrial Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£76.69M	£6.87B	£9.17B	£2.90B
Dividend Yield	1.48%	2.68%	3.59%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	-8.07	16.31	24.88	365.16
Price / Sales	0.44	27,054.46	4,167.35	87,648.92
Price / Cash	5.49	9.33	27.46	27.89
Price / Book	0.77	2.55	4.79	7.62
Net Income	£8.86M	£299.51M	£794.35M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.55%	-2.02%	-1.66%	0.11%
1 Month Performance	-3.73%	0.13%	-0.07%	0.27%
1 Year Performance	-35.54%	35.83%	33.09%	83.47%

Mpac Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count
MPAC Mpac Group	N/A	GBX 256.55 +0.6%	N/A	-36.5%	£76.69M	£174.10M	N/A	500
AVG Avingtrans	N/A	GBX 654 -0.9%	N/A	+72.0%	£219.89M	£155.49M	31.00	732
RNO Renold	N/A	GBX 81.80 flat	N/A	+53.2%	£162.96M	£245.10M	12.39	1,824
LOAD Crestchic	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£121.14M	£34.97M	2,347.06	N/A
CGS Castings	3.3979 of 5 stars	GBX 267 +0.4%	GBX 335 +25.5%	+4.0%	£116.08M	£175.35M	24.18	1,251

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MPAC) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mpac Group (MPAC) Competitors

MPAC vs. AVG, RNO, LOAD, CGS, and CPH2

How does Mpac Group compare to Avingtrans?

Summary

How does Mpac Group compare to Renold?

Summary

How does Mpac Group compare to Crestchic?

Summary

How does Mpac Group compare to Castings?

Summary

How does Mpac Group compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPAC vs. The Competition

Mpac Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Mpac Group (MPAC) Competitors

MPAC vs. AVG, RNO, LOAD, CGS, and CPH2

How does Mpac Group compare to Avingtrans?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AVG or MPAC?

Which has more risk & volatility, AVG or MPAC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AVG or MPAC?

Is AVG or MPAC more profitable?

Does the media prefer AVG or MPAC?

Summary

How does Mpac Group compare to Renold?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, RNO or MPAC?

Is RNO or MPAC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of RNO or MPAC?

Does the media prefer RNO or MPAC?

Do analysts recommend RNO or MPAC?

Which has more volatility & risk, RNO or MPAC?

Summary

How does Mpac Group compare to Crestchic?

Is LOAD or MPAC more profitable?

Does the media prefer LOAD or MPAC?

Which has more risk and volatility, LOAD or MPAC?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LOAD or MPAC?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LOAD or MPAC?

Summary

How does Mpac Group compare to Castings?

Do analysts prefer MPAC or CGS?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPAC or CGS?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MPAC or CGS?

Is MPAC or CGS more profitable?

Does the media favor MPAC or CGS?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MPAC or CGS?

Summary

How does Mpac Group compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

Is MPAC or CPH2 more profitable?

Does the media favor MPAC or CPH2?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPAC or CPH2?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MPAC or CPH2?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MPAC or CPH2?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPAC vs. The Competition

Mpac Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools