Go Pro

Baker Steel Resources (BSRT) Competitors

GBX 123.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/10/2026 11:55 AM Eastern

BSRT vs. JEMI, NAS, POLN, GRID, and JCH

Should you buy Baker Steel Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Baker Steel Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Baker Steel Resources include JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts (JEMI), North Atlantic Smaller Cos (NAS), Pollen Street Group (POLN), Gresham House Energy Storage (GRID), and JPMorgan Claverhouse (JCH). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Baker Steel Resources compare to JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts?

Baker Steel Resources (LON:BSRT) and JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts (LON:JEMI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk and valuation.

2.8% of Baker Steel Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.9% of JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Baker Steel Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts has a net margin of 94.77% compared to Baker Steel Resources' net margin of -5,766.38%. Baker Steel Resources' return on equity of 39.24% beat JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Steel Resources-5,766.38% 39.24% N/A
JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts 94.77%24.31%N/A

Baker Steel Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts. Baker Steel Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Steel Resources£51.21M2.54£110.05M£47.372.61
JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts£121.23M4.40£24.43M£43.694.72

In the previous week, Baker Steel Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts' score of -0.55 indicating that Baker Steel Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baker Steel Resources Neutral
JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts Negative

Baker Steel Resources has a beta of 1.0456297, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts has a beta of 1.0864186, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts beats Baker Steel Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Steel Resources compare to North Atlantic Smaller Cos?

Baker Steel Resources (LON:BSRT) and North Atlantic Smaller Cos (LON:NAS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Baker Steel Resources has a beta of 1.0456297, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North Atlantic Smaller Cos has a beta of 0.9547999, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Steel Resources has higher revenue and earnings than North Atlantic Smaller Cos. Baker Steel Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North Atlantic Smaller Cos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Steel Resources£51.21M2.54£110.05M£47.372.61
North Atlantic Smaller Cos£31.67M16.90£87.97M£22.2818.94

North Atlantic Smaller Cos has a net margin of 73.06% compared to Baker Steel Resources' net margin of -5,766.38%. Baker Steel Resources' return on equity of 39.24% beat North Atlantic Smaller Cos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Steel Resources-5,766.38% 39.24% N/A
North Atlantic Smaller Cos 73.06%3.99%0.24%

In the previous week, Baker Steel Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled North Atlantic Smaller Cos'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baker Steel Resources Neutral
North Atlantic Smaller Cos Neutral

2.8% of Baker Steel Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.6% of North Atlantic Smaller Cos shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Baker Steel Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.3% of North Atlantic Smaller Cos shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North Atlantic Smaller Cos beats Baker Steel Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Steel Resources compare to Pollen Street Group?

Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) and Baker Steel Resources (LON:BSRT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Pollen Street Group has a net margin of 53.91% compared to Baker Steel Resources' net margin of -5,766.38%. Baker Steel Resources' return on equity of 39.24% beat Pollen Street Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pollen Street Group53.91% 9.58% 5.32%
Baker Steel Resources -5,766.38%39.24%N/A

In the previous week, Pollen Street Group had 1 more articles in the media than Baker Steel Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pollen Street Group and 0 mentions for Baker Steel Resources. Baker Steel Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Pollen Street Group's score of -0.91 indicating that Baker Steel Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pollen Street Group Negative
Baker Steel Resources Neutral

Baker Steel Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pollen Street Group. Baker Steel Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pollen Street Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pollen Street Group£118.52M4.28£44.86M£93.709.10
Baker Steel Resources£51.21M2.54£110.05M£47.372.61

Pollen Street Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,088.67, suggesting a potential upside of 27.63%. Given Pollen Street Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pollen Street Group is more favorable than Baker Steel Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pollen Street Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Baker Steel Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Pollen Street Group has a beta of 0.016, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Steel Resources has a beta of 1.0456297, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

26.8% of Pollen Street Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.8% of Baker Steel Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 19.3% of Pollen Street Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Baker Steel Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pollen Street Group beats Baker Steel Resources on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Steel Resources compare to Gresham House Energy Storage?

Baker Steel Resources (LON:BSRT) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Baker Steel Resources' net margin of -5,766.38%. Baker Steel Resources' return on equity of 39.24% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Steel Resources-5,766.38% 39.24% N/A
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

Baker Steel Resources has a beta of 1.0456297, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.015994927, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

2.8% of Baker Steel Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Baker Steel Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus target price of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 9.57%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Baker Steel Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Steel Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Baker Steel Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Baker Steel Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Steel Resources£51.21M2.54£110.05M£47.372.61
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.62-£196.22M£4.1022.93

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Baker Steel Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Gresham House Energy Storage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baker Steel Resources Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage Positive

Summary

Gresham House Energy Storage beats Baker Steel Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Steel Resources compare to JPMorgan Claverhouse?

Baker Steel Resources (LON:BSRT) and JPMorgan Claverhouse (LON:JCH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk and analyst recommendations.

2.8% of Baker Steel Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of JPMorgan Claverhouse shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Baker Steel Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Claverhouse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baker Steel Resources has a beta of 1.0456297, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Claverhouse has a beta of 0.9992454, indicating that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Steel Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan Claverhouse. Baker Steel Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Claverhouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Steel Resources£51.21M2.54£110.05M£47.372.61
JPMorgan Claverhouse£111.53M4.62£57.79M£200.584.72

In the previous week, JPMorgan Claverhouse had 1 more articles in the media than Baker Steel Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan Claverhouse and 0 mentions for Baker Steel Resources. Baker Steel Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Claverhouse'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baker Steel Resources Neutral
JPMorgan Claverhouse Neutral

JPMorgan Claverhouse has a net margin of 96.27% compared to Baker Steel Resources' net margin of -5,766.38%. Baker Steel Resources' return on equity of 39.24% beat JPMorgan Claverhouse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Steel Resources-5,766.38% 39.24% N/A
JPMorgan Claverhouse 96.27%23.65%8.21%

Summary

JPMorgan Claverhouse beats Baker Steel Resources on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baker Steel Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BSRT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BSRT vs. The Competition

MetricBaker Steel ResourcesAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£130.03M£2.55B£6.22B£3.02B
Dividend YieldN/A6.01%5.24%6.17%
P/E Ratio2.6162.0129.82368.17
Price / Sales2.541,849.931,425.5584,564.79
Price / CashN/A60.3388.6427.87
Price / Book1.601.406.597.68
Net Income£110.05M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.98%-0.18%-0.30%-0.60%
1 Month Performance-2.29%0.55%0.52%-1.04%
1 Year Performance93.48%7.97%15.62%61.81%

Baker Steel Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BSRT
Baker Steel Resources
N/AGBX 123.50
flat
N/A+93.5%£130.03M£51.21M2.61N/A
JEMI
JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts
N/AGBX 206
+1.5%
N/A+38.0%£533.05M£121.23M4.72N/A
NAS
North Atlantic Smaller Cos
N/AGBX 415
-1.9%
N/A+7.1%£526.53M£31.67M18.63N/A
POLN
Pollen Street Group
3.3778 of 5 stars
GBX 880
+1.1%
GBX 1,088.67
+23.7%
+7.7%£523.18M£118.52M9.3984
GRID
Gresham House Energy Storage
1.5252 of 5 stars
GBX 90.24
+0.0%
GBX 85
-5.8%
+20.5%£514.43M£25.94M22.01N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BSRT) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners