Volta Finance (VTA) Competitors

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Volta Finance. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 1 mentions for Volta Finance. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Volta Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

8.3% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Volta Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a net margin of 97.56% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 43.97% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Volta Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Volta Finance pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volta Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a beta of 1.182, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Private Equity Opportunities. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volta Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share. Volta Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities pays out 4,250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Volta Finance pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Volta Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Volta Finance had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Private Equity Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Volta Finance and 0 mentions for abrdn Private Equity Opportunities. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Volta Finance'saverage media sentiment score.

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities has a net margin of 76.01% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' return on equity of 5.18% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

72.2% of abrdn Private Equity Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Volta Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of abrdn Private Equity Opportunities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, indicating that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment had 3 more articles in the media than Volta Finance. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ruffer Investment and 1 mentions for Volta Finance. Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Volta Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Ruffer Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

41.8% of Volta Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volta Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Volta Finance pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.427, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Ruffer Investment has a net margin of 121.50% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. Ruffer Investment's return on equity of 10.00% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. Volta Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Oakley Capital Investments has a net margin of 74.95% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. Oakley Capital Investments' return on equity of 4.15% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Oakley Capital Investments. Volta Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oakley Capital Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volta Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Oakley Capital Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Volta Finance pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oakley Capital Investments pays out 6.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Volta Finance had 1 more articles in the media than Oakley Capital Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Volta Finance and 0 mentions for Oakley Capital Investments. Oakley Capital Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Volta Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Oakley Capital Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

41.8% of Volta Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.6% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oakley Capital Investments has a beta of 0.469, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.