Go Pro

Volta Finance (VTA) Competitors

Volta Finance logo
GBX 5.96 +0.01 (+0.17%)
As of 09:59 AM Eastern

VTA vs. PHI, VEIL, RICA, OCI, and POLR

Should you buy Volta Finance stock or one of its competitors? Volta Finance's main competitors and comparable companies include Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (PHI), Vietnam Enterprise (VEIL), Ruffer Investment (RICA), Oakley Capital Investments (OCI), and Polar Capital (POLR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Volta Finance compare to Pacific Horizon Investment Trust?

Volta Finance (LON:VTA) and Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volta Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Volta Finance£6.26B0.03£4.50B£1.234.85
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M3.58£26.66M£288.483.87

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a net margin of 97.19% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 34.20% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Volta Finance-1.13% -0.26% 10.35%
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust 97.19%34.20%3.98%

41.8% of Volta Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a beta of 1.194, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Volta Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pacific Horizon Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Volta Finance Neutral
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust Neutral

Volta Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Volta Finance pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats Volta Finance on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Volta Finance compare to Vietnam Enterprise?

Vietnam Enterprise (LON:VEIL) and Volta Finance (LON:VTA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Vietnam Enterprise has a net margin of 96.37% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. Vietnam Enterprise's return on equity of 19.70% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vietnam Enterprise96.37% 19.70% -7.53%
Volta Finance -1.13%-0.26%10.35%

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Vietnam Enterprise. Vietnam Enterprise is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volta Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vietnam Enterprise£369.38M2.39-£4.24M£208.003.44
Volta Finance£6.26B0.03£4.50B£1.234.85

37.0% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Volta Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vietnam Enterprise has a beta of 0.555, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vietnam Enterprise's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Volta Finance'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vietnam Enterprise Neutral
Volta Finance Neutral

Summary

Volta Finance beats Vietnam Enterprise on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Volta Finance compare to Ruffer Investment?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and Volta Finance (LON:VTA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

7.6% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Volta Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Ruffer Investment has a net margin of 62.53% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. Ruffer Investment's return on equity of 4.37% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment62.53% 4.37% 0.45%
Volta Finance -1.13%-0.26%10.35%

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Volta Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Volta Finance pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. Volta Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£91.91M9.49£8.78M£28.3510.50
Volta Finance£6.26B0.03£4.50B£1.234.85

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Volta Finance. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ruffer Investment and 0 mentions for Volta Finance. Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Volta Finance'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment Neutral
Volta Finance Neutral

Summary

Ruffer Investment beats Volta Finance on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Volta Finance compare to Oakley Capital Investments?

Oakley Capital Investments (LON:OCI) and Volta Finance (LON:VTA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Oakley Capital Investments had 5 more articles in the media than Volta Finance. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oakley Capital Investments and 0 mentions for Volta Finance. Oakley Capital Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Volta Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Oakley Capital Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oakley Capital Investments Neutral
Volta Finance Neutral

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Oakley Capital Investments. Volta Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oakley Capital Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oakley Capital Investments£66.57M12.80£88.03M£34.0015.24
Volta Finance£6.26B0.03£4.50B£1.234.85

Oakley Capital Investments has a beta of 0.469, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, indicating that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Oakley Capital Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Volta Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Oakley Capital Investments pays out 6.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Volta Finance pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

25.6% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Volta Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 13.0% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oakley Capital Investments has a net margin of 74.73% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. Oakley Capital Investments' return on equity of 4.67% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oakley Capital Investments74.73% 4.67% 4.33%
Volta Finance -1.13%-0.26%10.35%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oakley Capital Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Volta Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Oakley Capital Investments beats Volta Finance on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Volta Finance compare to Polar Capital?

Polar Capital (LON:POLR) and Volta Finance (LON:VTA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Volta Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital. Volta Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital£264.30M3.04£41.05M£59.2014.41
Volta Finance£6.26B0.03£4.50B£1.234.85

Polar Capital presently has a consensus target price of GBX 995, indicating a potential upside of 16.66%. Given Polar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Polar Capital is more favorable than Volta Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Volta Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Polar Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Volta Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Polar Capital pays out 77.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Volta Finance pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Volta Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Polar Capital has a net margin of 21.43% compared to Volta Finance's net margin of -1.13%. Polar Capital's return on equity of 42.37% beat Volta Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital21.43% 42.37% 14.85%
Volta Finance -1.13%-0.26%10.35%

In the previous week, Polar Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Volta Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Positive
Volta Finance Neutral

32.0% of Polar Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Volta Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of Polar Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Volta Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital has a beta of 0.912, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volta Finance has a beta of 0.306, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Polar Capital beats Volta Finance on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Volta Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VTA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VTA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VTA vs. The Competition

MetricVolta FinanceCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£218.02M£5.58B£13.81B£2.90B
Dividend Yield9.21%7.39%5.89%6.14%
P/E Ratio4.8537.4527.89367.86
Price / Sales0.031,278.70523.2083,482.27
Price / Cash0.0148.2238.3127.89
Price / Book0.012.132.187.17
Net Income£4.50B£416.48M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.67%-0.21%-0.30%0.36%
1 Month Performance-1.32%1.20%1.55%3.08%
1 Year Performance-12.61%8.30%11.88%22.79%

Volta Finance Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VTA
Volta Finance
N/AGBX 5.96
+0.2%
N/A-13.0%£218.02M£6.26B4.85N/A
PHI
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,125.42
+1.2%
N/A+64.9%£877.59M£243.03M3.9018,800
VEIL
Vietnam Enterprise
N/AGBX 709
-0.4%
N/A-4.5%£876.95M£369.38M3.41N/A
RICA
Ruffer Investment
N/AGBX 298.36
+0.1%
N/A+4.8%£874.37M£91.91M10.52N/A
OCI
Oakley Capital Investments
1.5476 of 5 stars
GBX 526
-0.8%
N/A-6.5%£865.03M£66.57M15.47N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:VTA) was last updated on 8/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners