World Chess (CHSS) Competitors

Cirata (LON:WAND) and World Chess (LON:CHSS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Is WAND or CHSS more profitable?

Cirata has a net margin of 0.00% compared to World Chess' net margin of -180.38%. Cirata's return on equity of -231.71% beat World Chess' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cirata	N/A	-231.71%	-76.89%
World Chess	-180.38%	-416.59%	-39.20%

Which has higher earnings & valuation, WAND or CHSS?

World Chess has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cirata. World Chess is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cirata, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cirata	£6.85M	0.00	-£45.17M	-£0.54	N/A
World Chess	£2.81M	7.37	-£5.08M	-£0.51	-4.91

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in WAND or CHSS?

31.0% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.6% of Cirata shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 99.0% of World Chess shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Does the media favor WAND or CHSS?

In the previous week, World Chess had 5 more articles in the media than Cirata. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for World Chess and 0 mentions for Cirata. World Chess' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Cirata's score of 0.00 indicating that World Chess is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Cirata	Neutral
World Chess	Neutral

Summary

World Chess beats Cirata on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.