Go Pro
→ They're not buying gold. They're buying this. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free CYN Stock Alerts

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (CYN) Competitors

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income logo
GBX 399 -7.00 (-1.72%)
As of 12:00 PM Eastern
Compare

CYN vs. GCP, BRSC, HFEL, IPO, and AAS

Should you buy CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income stock or one of its competitors? CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's main competitors and comparable companies include GCP Infrastructure Investments (GCP), BlackRock Smaller Companies (BRSC), Henderson Far East Income (HFEL), IP Group (IPO), and abrdn Asia Focus (AAS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to GCP Infrastructure Investments?

GCP Infrastructure Investments (LON:GCP) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, GCP Infrastructure Investments had 1 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for GCP Infrastructure Investments and 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat GCP Infrastructure Investments' score of 0.53 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GCP Infrastructure Investments
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

GCP Infrastructure Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. GCP Infrastructure Investments pays out 168.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

35.4% of GCP Infrastructure Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of GCP Infrastructure Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

GCP Infrastructure Investments has a beta of 0.848, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

GCP Infrastructure Investments has a net margin of 47.02% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat GCP Infrastructure Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GCP Infrastructure Investments47.02% 4.17% 0.89%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

GCP Infrastructure Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GCP Infrastructure Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GCP Infrastructure Investments£38.32M16.29£15.58M£4.1519.81
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.27£8.67M£127.753.12

Summary

GCP Infrastructure Investments beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to BlackRock Smaller Companies?

BlackRock Smaller Companies (LON:BRSC) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

BlackRock Smaller Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Smaller Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Smaller Companies£61.45M10.28£120.17M£29.009.07
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.27£8.67M£127.753.12

BlackRock Smaller Companies has a net margin of 89.65% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat BlackRock Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Smaller Companies89.65% 10.11% -2.39%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

In the previous week, BlackRock Smaller Companies had 11 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for BlackRock Smaller Companies and 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. BlackRock Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's score of 1.54 indicating that BlackRock Smaller Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Smaller Companies
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

11.5% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackRock Smaller Companies has a beta of 1.331, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. BlackRock Smaller Companies pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

BlackRock Smaller Companies beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Henderson Far East Income?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and Henderson Far East Income (LON:HFEL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Henderson Far East Income has a beta of 0.518, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Henderson Far East Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Henderson Far East Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.27£8.67M£127.753.12
Henderson Far East Income£139.58M4.58-£10.33M£72.123.79

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Henderson Far East Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Henderson Far East Income pays out 34.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income both had 1 articles in the media. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Henderson Far East Income's score of 1.25 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Henderson Far East Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Henderson Far East Income has a net margin of 92.44% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Henderson Far East Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
Henderson Far East Income 92.44%28.74%-0.81%

0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Henderson Far East Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Henderson Far East Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income and Henderson Far East Income tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to IP Group?

IP Group (LON:IPO) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

30.8% of IP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of IP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, IP Group had 4 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for IP Group and 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat IP Group's score of 0.25 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
IP Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

IP Group has a net margin of 321.64% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat IP Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IP Group321.64% 14.25% -10.50%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

IP Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 114.50, indicating a potential upside of 54.73%. Given IP Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe IP Group is more favorable than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IP Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

IP Group has a beta of 1.272, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has higher revenue and earnings than IP Group. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IP Group£39.20M16.68-£209.94M£7.1010.42
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.27£8.67M£127.753.12

Summary

IP Group beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to abrdn Asia Focus?

abrdn Asia Focus (LON:AAS) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

abrdn Asia Focus has a net margin of 102.94% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat abrdn Asia Focus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia Focus102.94% 19.85% 2.79%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

abrdn Asia Focus pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. abrdn Asia Focus pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

2.9% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn Asia Focus has a beta of 0.708, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

abrdn Asia Focus has higher revenue and earnings than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia Focus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia Focus£115.75M5.49£36.71M£77.496.04
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.27£8.67M£127.753.12

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia Focus. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income and 0 mentions for abrdn Asia Focus. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat abrdn Asia Focus' score of 0.00 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia Focus Neutral
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Very Positive

Summary

abrdn Asia Focus beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CYN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CYN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CYN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS Natural Resources Growth and IncomeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£155.44M£5.15B£13.32B£2.80B
Dividend Yield6.94%7.55%6.03%6.18%
P/E Ratio3.1229.4024.49366.17
Price / Sales2.271,256.39505.8889,425.29
Price / Cash21.8747.7747.4527.89
Price / Book1.913.492.706.83
Net Income£8.67M£417.69M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.55%-0.74%-1.04%-0.75%
1 Month Performance-5.23%5.22%1.00%16.84%
1 Year Performance29.57%3.31%8.15%16.40%

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CYN
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
N/AGBX 399
-1.7%		N/A+32.2%£155.44M£68.45M3.1240
GCP
GCP Infrastructure Investments
N/AGBX 85
+0.7%		N/A+14.5%£645.46M£38.32M20.481,950
BRSC
BlackRock Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 267.17
+1.2%		N/A-80.1%£641.82M£61.45M9.21N/A
HFEL
Henderson Far East Income
N/AGBX 273
+0.6%		N/A+12.9%£638.97M£139.58M3.79N/A
IPO
IP Group
4.6289 of 5 stars		GBX 72
flat		GBX 114.50
+59.0%		+39.5%£636.07M£39.20M10.1495

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CYN) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
MILLIONAIRE MASTERCLASS INVITE: Altucher
James Altucher says Elon Musk is preparing an unprecedented project set to surface on December 8th. Altuche...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end of AI data centers coming?
Marc Chaikin's Power Gauge system flagged Micron before it soared 970 percent, Celestica before a 6,600 percen...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
The investigation Porter spent tens of thousands to document
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for October 31st
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
They're not buying gold. They're buying this.
Bank of America raised its stake in a small gold company by 139%. Jane Street increased its position by 159%, ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel