Go Pro
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free CYN Stock Alerts

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (CYN) Competitors

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income logo
GBX 404.11 +5.11 (+1.28%)
As of 11:32 AM Eastern
Compare

CYN vs. FEML, JETG, JEDT, BRGE, and FSG

Should you buy CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income stock or one of its competitors? CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's main competitors and comparable companies include Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEML), JPMorgan European Growth & Income (JETG), JPMorgan European Discovery (JEDT), BlackRock Greater Europe (BRGE), and Foresight Group (FSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Fidelity Emerging Markets?

Fidelity Emerging Markets (LON:FEML) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Fidelity Emerging Markets has higher revenue and earnings than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. Fidelity Emerging Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Emerging Markets£323.44M1.81£130.04M£494.003.03
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.14£8.67M£127.753.16

Fidelity Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 26.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Fidelity Emerging Markets pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

11.2% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fidelity Emerging Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Emerging Markets Neutral
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a net margin of 135.63% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Fidelity Emerging Markets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Emerging Markets135.63% 42.72% 2.59%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.698, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity Emerging Markets beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to JPMorgan European Growth & Income?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and JPMorgan European Growth & Income (LON:JETG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

JPMorgan European Growth & Income has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat JPMorgan European Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
JPMorgan European Growth & Income N/A N/A N/A

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. JPMorgan European Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan European Growth & Income pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan European Growth & Income. JPMorgan European Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.14£8.67M£127.753.16
JPMorgan European Growth & Income£82.99M0.00N/A£108.70N/A

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan European Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral
JPMorgan European Growth & Income Neutral

Summary

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income and JPMorgan European Growth & Income tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to JPMorgan European Discovery?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and JPMorgan European Discovery (LON:JEDT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

JPMorgan European Discovery has higher revenue and earnings than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan European Discovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.14£8.67M£127.753.16
JPMorgan European Discovery£114.63M4.97£97.08M£116.875.42

0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of JPMorgan European Discovery shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of JPMorgan European Discovery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. JPMorgan European Discovery pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan European Discovery pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan European Discovery'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral
JPMorgan European Discovery Neutral

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan European Discovery has a beta of 1.328, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan European Discovery has a net margin of 100.99% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat JPMorgan European Discovery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
JPMorgan European Discovery 100.99%19.15%3.09%

Summary

JPMorgan European Discovery beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to BlackRock Greater Europe?

BlackRock Greater Europe (LON:BRGE) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

BlackRock Greater Europe has a net margin of 11.20% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat BlackRock Greater Europe's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Greater Europe11.20% 0.16% 10.60%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

BlackRock Greater Europe pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. BlackRock Greater Europe pays out 289.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

5.4% of BlackRock Greater Europe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of BlackRock Greater Europe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackRock Greater Europe has a beta of 1.139, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Greater Europe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Greater Europe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Greater Europe£2.60M214.61£89.41M£2.47250.20
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.14£8.67M£127.753.16

In the previous week, BlackRock Greater Europe's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Greater Europe Neutral
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral

Summary

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income beats BlackRock Greater Europe on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Foresight Group?

Foresight Group (LON:FSG) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Foresight Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 554, indicating a potential upside of 11.02%. Given Foresight Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Foresight Group is more favorable than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Foresight Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Foresight Group has a beta of 0.604, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.1871496, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Foresight Group had 5 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Foresight Group and 0 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. Foresight Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Foresight Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foresight Group Positive
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral

Foresight Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Foresight Group pays out 65.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Foresight Group has higher revenue and earnings than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foresight Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight Group£164.92M3.33£25.54M£37.8013.20
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M2.14£8.67M£127.753.16

43.0% of Foresight Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.8% of Foresight Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Foresight Group has a net margin of 25.91% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Foresight Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight Group25.91% 46.72% 15.09%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

Summary

Foresight Group beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CYN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CYN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS Natural Resources Growth and IncomeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£146.18M£5.64B£14.04B£2.87B
Dividend Yield7.09%7.39%5.87%6.10%
P/E Ratio3.1637.9429.20368.48
Price / Sales2.141,225.50514.0783,441.59
Price / Cash21.8748.2830.4227.89
Price / Book1.933.742.857.11
Net Income£8.67M£416.54M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.35%0.51%0.83%0.65%
1 Month Performance18.85%1.47%1.77%3.12%
1 Year Performance84.52%6.61%12.02%64.68%

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CYN
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
N/AGBX 404.11
+1.3%		N/A+82.2%£146.18M£68.45M3.1640
FEML
Fidelity Emerging Markets
N/AGBX 1,478
+0.3%		N/A+73.3%£576.91M£323.44M2.99N/A
JETG
JPMorgan European Growth & Income
N/AN/AN/AN/A£570.77M£82.99M3.34N/A
JEDT
JPMorgan European Discovery
N/AGBX 634
+0.6%		N/A+8.9%£570.26M£114.63M5.42N/A
BRGE
BlackRock Greater Europe
N/AGBX 617
-0.2%		N/A+7.5%£556.87M£2.60M249.80N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CYN) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel