Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free CYN Stock Alerts

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (CYN) Competitors

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income logo
GBX 356 +16.00 (+4.71%)
As of 11:54 AM Eastern
Compare

CYN vs. WIX, CNIC, SST, YOU, and SLP

Should you buy CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income include Wickes Group (WIX), CentralNic Group (CNIC), Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos (SST), YouGov (YOU), and Sylvania Platinum (SLP). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Wickes Group?

Wickes Group (LON:WIX) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk and earnings.

58.6% of Wickes Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Wickes Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wickes Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Wickes Group pays out 66.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Wickes Group had 4 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Wickes Group and 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Wickes Group's score of 0.55 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wickes Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Wickes Group has a beta of 0.851, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 0.642, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Wickes Group has a net margin of 2.35% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Wickes Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wickes Group2.35% 29.52% 3.77%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

Wickes Group has higher revenue and earnings than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wickes Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wickes Group£1.64B0.26£29.25M£16.4011.74
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.88£8.67M£127.752.79

Wickes Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 251.67, suggesting a potential upside of 30.67%. Given Wickes Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Wickes Group is more favorable than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wickes Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Wickes Group beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to CentralNic Group?

CentralNic Group (LON:CNIC) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CentralNic Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CentralNic Group£790.04M0.00-£3.18MN/AN/A
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.88£8.67M£127.752.79

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income had 1 more articles in the media than CentralNic Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income and 0 mentions for CentralNic Group. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat CentralNic Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CentralNic Group Neutral
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Positive

CentralNic Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

50.8% of CentralNic Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. 23.9% of CentralNic Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CentralNic Group has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 0.642, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

CentralNic Group has a net margin of 0.05% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat CentralNic Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CentralNic Group0.05% 0.26% 3.89%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

Summary

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income beats CentralNic Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos (LON:SST) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income had 1 more articles in the media than Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income and 0 mentions for Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos' score of 0.00 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Positive
Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos Neutral

Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.88£8.67M£127.752.79
Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos-£11.48M-25.27£60.88M-£12.03N/A

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 0.642, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos has a beta of 0.35540748, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos pays out -24.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos has a net margin of -30.11% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos -30.11%-3.68%8.03%

0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income beats Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to YouGov?

YouGov (LON:YOU) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than YouGov. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than YouGov, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
YouGov£392M0.73-£2.30M£10.4023.35
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.88£8.67M£127.752.79

YouGov has a beta of 1.453, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 0.642, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, YouGov had 8 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for YouGov and 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat YouGov's score of 0.26 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
YouGov
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

44.1% of YouGov shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. 13.6% of YouGov shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

YouGov has a net margin of 3.11% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat YouGov's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
YouGov3.11% 6.46% 4.89%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

YouGov presently has a consensus target price of GBX 416, suggesting a potential upside of 71.33%. Given YouGov's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe YouGov is more favorable than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
YouGov
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

YouGov pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. YouGov pays out 88.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

YouGov beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Sylvania Platinum?

Sylvania Platinum (LON:SLP) and CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sylvania Platinum. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sylvania Platinum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sylvania Platinum£156.52M1.41£8.54M£13.936.10
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.88£8.67M£127.752.79

Sylvania Platinum currently has a consensus price target of GBX 174.50, indicating a potential upside of 105.29%. Given Sylvania Platinum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sylvania Platinum is more favorable than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sylvania Platinum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Sylvania Platinum pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Sylvania Platinum pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Sylvania Platinum has a beta of 1.7602932, indicating that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 0.642, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

17.0% of Sylvania Platinum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Sylvania Platinum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income had 1 more articles in the media than Sylvania Platinum. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income and 0 mentions for Sylvania Platinum. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Sylvania Platinum's score of 0.00 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sylvania Platinum Neutral
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Positive

Sylvania Platinum has a net margin of 23.16% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Sylvania Platinum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sylvania Platinum23.16% 14.10% 1.69%
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income -974.80%51.26%-4.86%

Summary

Sylvania Platinum beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CYN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CYN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CYN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS Natural Resources Growth and IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£128.91M£2.45B£6.12B£2.79B
Dividend Yield8.32%6.02%5.24%6.16%
P/E Ratio2.7961.7429.56368.25
Price / Sales1.881,786.721,139.1784,392.87
Price / Cash21.8760.5088.7427.89
Price / Book1.701.316.677.59
Net Income£8.67M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.51%-0.46%-0.18%0.05%
1 Month Performance-0.56%-0.28%-0.06%-0.66%
1 Year Performance69.52%7.05%14.57%62.48%

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CYN
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
N/AGBX 356
+4.7%		N/A+65.0%£128.91M£68.45M2.7940
WIX
Wickes Group
4.5889 of 5 stars		GBX 187.20
+1.0%		GBX 246.67
+31.8%		-16.5%£407.69M£1.64B11.415,930
CNIC
CentralNic Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£339.82M£790.04MN/A100
SST
Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos
N/AGBX 271
+1.5%		N/A-13.9%£297.75M-£11.48MN/A320
YOU
YouGov
4.7175 of 5 stars		GBX 243.97
+3.0%		GBX 411
+68.5%		-23.7%£277.43M£392M23.461,820

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CYN) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s new "tollbooth"
The SpaceX IPO was valued at $1.75 trillion. But one analyst says fighting over those shares may be the wrong ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel