Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (CYN) Competitors

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income logo
GBX 371 -7.00 (-1.85%)
As of 12:12 PM Eastern
Compare

CYN vs. WIX, CNIC, SST, SLP, and YOU

Should you buy CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income include Wickes Group (WIX), CentralNic Group (CNIC), Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos (SST), Sylvania Platinum (SLP), and YouGov (YOU). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Wickes Group?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and Wickes Group (LON:WIX) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Wickes Group has a consensus price target of GBX 249.17, suggesting a potential upside of 41.89%. Given Wickes Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Wickes Group is more favorable than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Wickes Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Wickes Group had 1 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wickes Group and 0 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. Wickes Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Wickes Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral
Wickes Group Positive

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Wickes Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wickes Group pays out 66.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

3.4% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.4% of Wickes Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Wickes Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.2420248, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wickes Group has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Wickes Group has a net margin of 2.35% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Wickes Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
Wickes Group 2.35%29.52%3.77%

Wickes Group has higher revenue and earnings than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wickes Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.97£8.67M£127.752.90
Wickes Group£1.64B0.24£29.25M£16.4010.71

Summary

Wickes Group beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to CentralNic Group?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and CentralNic Group (LON:CNIC) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CentralNic Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral
CentralNic Group Neutral

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CentralNic Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.97£8.67M£127.752.90
CentralNic Group£790.04M0.00-£3.18MN/AN/A

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.2420248, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CentralNic Group has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. CentralNic Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

3.4% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of CentralNic Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of CentralNic Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CentralNic Group has a net margin of 0.05% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat CentralNic Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
CentralNic Group 0.05%0.26%3.89%

Summary

CentralNic Group beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos (LON:SST) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

3.4% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos has a net margin of -30.11% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos -30.11%-3.55%8.03%

In the previous week, CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral
Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos Neutral

Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.97£8.67M£127.752.90
Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos-£11.48M-26.31£60.88M-£12.03N/A

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.2420248, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos has a beta of 0.34391055, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos pays out -24.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income beats Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to Sylvania Platinum?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and Sylvania Platinum (LON:SLP) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sylvania Platinum. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sylvania Platinum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.97£8.67M£127.752.90
Sylvania Platinum£156.52M1.67£8.54M£13.937.24

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Sylvania Platinum pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sylvania Platinum pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Sylvania Platinum has a consensus target price of GBX 169, indicating a potential upside of 67.64%. Given Sylvania Platinum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sylvania Platinum is more favorable than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Sylvania Platinum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.2420248, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sylvania Platinum has a beta of 1.7701, suggesting that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

3.4% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.1% of Sylvania Platinum shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Sylvania Platinum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sylvania Platinum has a net margin of 23.16% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat Sylvania Platinum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
Sylvania Platinum 23.16%14.10%1.69%

In the previous week, Sylvania Platinum had 2 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sylvania Platinum and 0 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. Sylvania Platinum's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Sylvania Platinum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral
Sylvania Platinum Positive

Summary

Sylvania Platinum beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income compare to YouGov?

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income (LON:CYN) and YouGov (LON:YOU) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. YouGov pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. YouGov pays out 88.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

YouGov has a net margin of 3.11% compared to CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's net margin of -974.80%. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's return on equity of 51.26% beat YouGov's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income-974.80% 51.26% -4.86%
YouGov 3.11%6.46%4.89%

In the previous week, YouGov had 1 more articles in the media than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for YouGov and 0 mentions for CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat YouGov's score of -0.35 indicating that CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Neutral
YouGov Neutral

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has a beta of 1.2420248, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, YouGov has a beta of 1.432, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

3.4% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of YouGov shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of YouGov shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than YouGov. CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than YouGov, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income£68.45M1.97£8.67M£127.752.90
YouGov£392M0.62-£2.30M£10.4019.90

YouGov has a consensus price target of GBX 411, indicating a potential upside of 98.56%. Given YouGov's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe YouGov is more favorable than CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
YouGov
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

YouGov beats CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CYN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CYN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CYN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCQS Natural Resources Growth and IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£134.77M£2.35B£5.83B£2.79B
Dividend Yield6.45%5.97%5.25%6.16%
P/E Ratio2.9025.2615.88365.60
Price / Sales1.971,999.691,259.6987,567.35
Price / Cash21.8760.1791.7827.89
Price / Book1.771.366.587.63
Net Income£8.67M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-9.07%-0.34%-0.01%-0.02%
1 Month Performance-12.71%1.47%1.27%1.06%
1 Year Performance94.24%12.31%18.99%85.15%

CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CYN
CQS Natural Resources Growth and Income
N/AGBX 371
-1.9%		N/A+101.6%£134.77M£68.45M2.9040
WIX
Wickes Group
4.735 of 5 stars		GBX 170.80
-1.7%		GBX 249.17
+45.9%		-21.7%£379.39M£1.64B10.415,930
CNIC
CentralNic Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£339.82M£790.04MN/A100
SST
Scottish Oriental Smaller Cos
N/AGBX 276
-0.4%		N/A-8.5%£310.68M-£11.48MN/A320
SLP
Sylvania Platinum
4.6373 of 5 stars		GBX 105
-1.9%		GBX 169
+61.0%		+94.0%£271.77M£156.52M7.54160

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CYN) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
A little-known stock pick with money-doubling potential over the next year is revealed for free in the first t...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why this tiny stock may move before the SpaceX IPO drops
The projected SpaceX and xAI S-1 filing hits the SEC on June 1st - and analyst Dylan Jovine says $1.75 trillio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel