Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Trump’s Currency Coup Exposed (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free FEML Stock Alerts

Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEML) Competitors

Fidelity Emerging Markets logo
GBX 1,540 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/25/2026 12:44 PM Eastern
Compare

FEML vs. MYI, N91, BPT, FEV, and RAT

Should you buy Fidelity Emerging Markets stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fidelity Emerging Markets with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fidelity Emerging Markets include Murray International (MYI), Ninety One Group (N91), Bridgepoint Group (BPT), Fidelity European Trust (FEV), and Rathbones Group (RAT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Fidelity Emerging Markets compare to Murray International?

Fidelity Emerging Markets (LON:FEML) and Murray International (LON:MYI) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Murray International has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Emerging Markets. Fidelity Emerging Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murray International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Emerging Markets£323.44M1.94£130.04M£494.003.12
Murray International£358.82M5.96£178.39M£58.706.12

Fidelity Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 26.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Murray International pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Fidelity Emerging Markets pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murray International pays out 20.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.713, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murray International has a beta of 0.536, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

11.2% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Murray International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Murray International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fidelity Emerging Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Murray International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Emerging Markets Neutral
Murray International Neutral

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a net margin of 251.82% compared to Murray International's net margin of 94.44%. Murray International's return on equity of 19.22% beat Fidelity Emerging Markets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Emerging Markets251.82% 17.35% 2.59%
Murray International 94.44%19.22%6.89%

Summary

Murray International beats Fidelity Emerging Markets on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Emerging Markets compare to Ninety One Group?

Fidelity Emerging Markets (LON:FEML) and Ninety One Group (LON:N91) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Fidelity Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 26.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Ninety One Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Fidelity Emerging Markets pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ninety One Group pays out 74.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Ninety One Group has a consensus target price of GBX 206, indicating a potential downside of 2.00%. Given Ninety One Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ninety One Group is more favorable than Fidelity Emerging Markets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity Emerging Markets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ninety One Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

11.2% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of Ninety One Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Ninety One Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ninety One Group had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity Emerging Markets. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ninety One Group and 0 mentions for Fidelity Emerging Markets. Fidelity Emerging Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ninety One Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Emerging Markets Neutral
Ninety One Group Neutral

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a net margin of 251.82% compared to Ninety One Group's net margin of 19.63%. Ninety One Group's return on equity of 28.08% beat Fidelity Emerging Markets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Emerging Markets251.82% 17.35% 2.59%
Ninety One Group 19.63%28.08%1.15%

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.713, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ninety One Group has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Ninety One Group has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Emerging Markets. Fidelity Emerging Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ninety One Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Emerging Markets£323.44M1.94£130.04M£494.003.12
Ninety One Group£763.30M2.66£154.01M£17.1012.29

Summary

Ninety One Group beats Fidelity Emerging Markets on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Emerging Markets compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (LON:FEML) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Fidelity Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 26.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Bridgepoint Group pays out 189.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelity Emerging Markets pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

26.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity Emerging Markets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bridgepoint Group. Fidelity Emerging Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£476M4.27£45.58M£4.9047.39
Fidelity Emerging Markets£323.44M1.94£130.04M£494.003.12

Bridgepoint Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 385, indicating a potential upside of 65.81%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Fidelity Emerging Markets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Fidelity Emerging Markets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Emerging Markets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group Neutral
Fidelity Emerging Markets Neutral

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.367, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.713, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a net margin of 251.82% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 7.68%. Fidelity Emerging Markets' return on equity of 17.35% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group7.68% 4.25% 3.47%
Fidelity Emerging Markets 251.82%17.35%2.59%

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Fidelity Emerging Markets on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Emerging Markets compare to Fidelity European Trust?

Fidelity European Trust (LON:FEV) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (LON:FEML) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Fidelity European Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Fidelity Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 26.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fidelity European Trust pays out 15.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Emerging Markets pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fidelity European Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fidelity Emerging Markets. Fidelity Emerging Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity European Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity European Trust£276.56M7.75£208.32M£62.806.85
Fidelity Emerging Markets£323.44M1.94£130.04M£494.003.12

In the previous week, Fidelity European Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity Emerging Markets. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity European Trust and 0 mentions for Fidelity Emerging Markets. Fidelity European Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Fidelity Emerging Markets' score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity European Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity European Trust Positive
Fidelity Emerging Markets Neutral

7.7% of Fidelity European Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity European Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a net margin of 251.82% compared to Fidelity European Trust's net margin of 93.61%. Fidelity Emerging Markets' return on equity of 17.35% beat Fidelity European Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity European Trust93.61% 13.99% 10.56%
Fidelity Emerging Markets 251.82%17.35%2.59%

Fidelity European Trust has a beta of 1.2133243, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.713, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity European Trust beats Fidelity Emerging Markets on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Emerging Markets compare to Rathbones Group?

Fidelity Emerging Markets (LON:FEML) and Rathbones Group (LON:RAT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Rathbones Group had 4 more articles in the media than Fidelity Emerging Markets. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Rathbones Group and 0 mentions for Fidelity Emerging Markets. Rathbones Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Fidelity Emerging Markets' score of 0.00 indicating that Rathbones Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Emerging Markets Neutral
Rathbones Group Positive

11.2% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Rathbones Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Fidelity Emerging Markets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Rathbones Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a net margin of 251.82% compared to Rathbones Group's net margin of 10.85%. Fidelity Emerging Markets' return on equity of 17.35% beat Rathbones Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Emerging Markets251.82% 17.35% 2.59%
Rathbones Group 10.85%8.33%3.57%

Rathbones Group has a consensus target price of GBX 1,982.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.44%. Given Rathbones Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rathbones Group is more favorable than Fidelity Emerging Markets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity Emerging Markets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Rathbones Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Fidelity Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 26.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Rathbones Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 94 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Fidelity Emerging Markets pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rathbones Group pays out 89.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Fidelity Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.713, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rathbones Group has a beta of 0.709, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Emerging Markets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rathbones Group. Fidelity Emerging Markets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rathbones Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Emerging Markets£323.44M1.94£130.04M£494.003.12
Rathbones Group£923.30M1.80£63.46M£104.7015.34

Summary

Rathbones Group beats Fidelity Emerging Markets on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fidelity Emerging Markets News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FEML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FEML vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFidelity Emerging MarketsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£627.47M£2.42B£6.05B£2.95B
Dividend Yield1.30%6.02%5.26%6.16%
P/E Ratio3.1259.7229.09366.69
Price / Sales1.942,072.001,090.3586,035.73
Price / CashN/A60.3384.9827.87
Price / Book1.691.386.677.67
Net Income£130.04M£265.27M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.48%-0.48%-0.58%-0.71%
1 Month Performance6.80%-0.50%0.16%-1.18%
1 Year Performance96.68%9.01%18.38%66.26%

Fidelity Emerging Markets Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FEML
Fidelity Emerging Markets
N/AGBX 1,540
flat		N/A+96.4%£627.47M£323.44M3.12N/A
MYI
Murray International
N/AGBX 362.50
+1.4%		N/A+31.2%£2.13B£358.82M6.18N/A
N91
Ninety One Group
1.1317 of 5 stars		GBX 219.40
+2.4%		GBX 206
-6.1%		+17.5%£2.12B£763.30M12.831,180
BPT
Bridgepoint Group
N/AGBX 245
+2.6%		GBX 385
+57.1%		-22.7%£2.09B£476M50.00391
FEV
Fidelity European Trust
N/AGBX 420.69
+1.9%		N/A+7.9%£2.05B£276.56M6.70N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FEML) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX IPO “cancelled”?
SpaceX is approaching what could be a $1.6 trillion IPO - potentially the largest in history. But Louis Navell...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
The EPA just put a kill switch on Elon’s empire
A federal EPA permit expires January 2, 2027 - and if Elon Musk's Colossus supercomputer loses power that day,...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Quick favor to ask you
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book at no charge - the same book that sells for $...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire trader who went 13-for-13 on Trump in 2025 now turns his attention to Elon.
Hedge fund trader Larry Benedict went 13-for-13 in Q1 2025 - not a single losing trade - and finished the year...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel