Gattaca (GATC) Competitors

Gattaca has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Robert Walters' net margin of -3.04%. Gattaca's return on equity of 11.07% beat Robert Walters' return on equity.

Robert Walters has higher revenue and earnings than Gattaca. Robert Walters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gattaca, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

4.1% of Gattaca shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.0% of Robert Walters shares are held by institutional investors. 41.6% of Gattaca shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Robert Walters shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Robert Walters has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential downside of 28.83%. Given Robert Walters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Robert Walters is more favorable than Gattaca.

Gattaca has a beta of 0.926, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Robert Walters has a beta of 0.795, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Robert Walters had 2 more articles in the media than Gattaca. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Robert Walters and 0 mentions for Gattaca. Robert Walters' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Gattaca's score of 0.00 indicating that Robert Walters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gattaca has a beta of 0.926, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Staffline Group has a beta of 0.515, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Gattaca has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Staffline Group. Staffline Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gattaca, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Gattaca's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Staffline Group'saverage media sentiment score.

4.1% of Gattaca shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.8% of Staffline Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.6% of Gattaca shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 36.4% of Staffline Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gattaca has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Staffline Group's net margin of 0.56%. Staffline Group's return on equity of 17.30% beat Gattaca's return on equity.

Gattaca has a net margin of 0.79% compared to MJ Hudson Group's net margin of -12.31%. Gattaca's return on equity of 11.07% beat MJ Hudson Group's return on equity.

Gattaca has higher revenue and earnings than MJ Hudson Group. MJ Hudson Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gattaca, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

28.1% of MJ Hudson Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gattaca shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.7% of MJ Hudson Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.6% of Gattaca shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, MJ Hudson Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gattaca'saverage media sentiment score.

MJ Hudson Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share. Gattaca pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. MJ Hudson Group pays out -4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gattaca pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

MJ Hudson Group has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gattaca has a beta of 0.926, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Gattaca has higher revenue and earnings than SEC Newgate. SEC Newgate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gattaca, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

4.1% of Gattaca shares are held by institutional investors. 41.6% of Gattaca shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gattaca's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SEC Newgate'saverage media sentiment score.

Gattaca pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. SEC Newgate pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.01 per share. Gattaca pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SEC Newgate pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gattaca has a net margin of 0.79% compared to SEC Newgate's net margin of 0.00%. Gattaca's return on equity of 11.07% beat SEC Newgate's return on equity.