Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free MLVN Stock Alerts

Malvern International (MLVN) Competitors

Malvern International logo
GBX 20.10 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/10/2026 07:32 AM Eastern
Compare

MLVN vs. OBOR, GFHG, CODE, ASIA, and WIL

Should you buy Malvern International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Malvern International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Malvern International include Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) (OBOR), Grand Fortune High Grade (GFHG), Northcoders Group (CODE), Asia Strategic (ASIA), and Wilmington (WIL). These companies are all part of the "education & training services" industry.

How does Malvern International compare to Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) (LON:OBOR) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Neutral
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) Neutral

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Malvern International. Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.89
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)N/AN/AN/A-£547.70N/A

5.0% of Malvern International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Malvern International beats Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Grand Fortune High Grade?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Grand Fortune High Grade (LON:GFHG) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

5.0% of Malvern International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.2% of Grand Fortune High Grade shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Malvern International has a beta of 0.359, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grand Fortune High Grade has a beta of -0.24, indicating that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Grand Fortune High Grade'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Neutral
Grand Fortune High Grade Neutral

Grand Fortune High Grade has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Grand Fortune High Grade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Grand Fortune High Grade N/A -40.85%-24.81%

Grand Fortune High Grade has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Malvern International.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.89
Grand Fortune High Grade£26.000.00N/AN/AN/A

Summary

Malvern International beats Grand Fortune High Grade on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Northcoders Group?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Northcoders Group (LON:CODE) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Malvern International has a beta of 0.359, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northcoders Group has a beta of -0.5, suggesting that its share price is 150% less volatile than the broader market.

5.0% of Malvern International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Northcoders Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.8% of Northcoders Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Northcoders Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Neutral
Northcoders Group Neutral

Malvern International has a net margin of -8.50% compared to Northcoders Group's net margin of -61.19%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Northcoders Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Northcoders Group -61.19%-78.38%-0.89%

Malvern International has higher revenue and earnings than Northcoders Group. Northcoders Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.89
Northcoders Group£4.95M0.31-£641.29K-£37.80N/A

Summary

Malvern International beats Northcoders Group on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Asia Strategic?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Asia Strategic (LON:ASIA) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Malvern International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Asia Strategic. Asia Strategic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.89
Asia Strategic£32.10M0.00-£5.63M-£208.00N/A

Malvern International has a beta of 0.359, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Asia Strategic has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.2% of Asia Strategic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Asia Strategic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Neutral
Asia Strategic Neutral

Malvern International has a net margin of -8.50% compared to Asia Strategic's net margin of -20.83%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Asia Strategic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Asia Strategic -20.83%N/A -8.22%

Summary

Malvern International beats Asia Strategic on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Wilmington?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Wilmington (LON:WIL) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Malvern International has a beta of 0.359, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wilmington has a beta of 0.322, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

5.0% of Malvern International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of Wilmington shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Wilmington shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Wilmington had 22 more articles in the media than Malvern International. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Wilmington and 0 mentions for Malvern International. Wilmington's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Malvern International's score of 0.00 indicating that Wilmington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Neutral
Wilmington Neutral

Wilmington has a net margin of 10.68% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Wilmington's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Wilmington 10.68%9.96%7.72%

Wilmington has a consensus price target of GBX 451.67, suggesting a potential upside of 56.83%. Given Wilmington's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Wilmington is more favorable than Malvern International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Malvern International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Wilmington
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Wilmington has higher revenue and earnings than Malvern International. Wilmington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.89
Wilmington£106.60M2.42£18.57M£12.0223.96

Summary

Wilmington beats Malvern International on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Malvern International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MLVN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MLVN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMalvern InternationalEducation & Training Services IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.73M£38.79M£8.36B£2.84B
Dividend Yield2.96%3.29%3.16%6.17%
P/E Ratio52.896.08888.51368.18
Price / Sales0.3851.88992,149.5884,612.72
Price / Cash2.936.17140.9027.87
Price / Book-1.361.489.737.49
Net Income-£245.04K£3.33M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.50%-1.51%-0.28%-0.48%
1 Month Performance-10.27%-2.48%-0.29%-1.00%
1 Year PerformanceN/A28.77%244.15%61.74%

Malvern International Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MLVN
Malvern International
N/AGBX 20.10
flat		N/AN/A£6.73M£17.79M52.89153
OBOR
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£10.89MN/AN/AN/A
GFHG
Grand Fortune High Grade
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.40M£26.00N/AN/A
CODE
Northcoders Group
N/AGBX 26
+2.0%		N/A-47.1%£2.08M£4.95MN/A128
ASIA
Asia Strategic
N/AGBX 4.75
flat		N/A+58.3%£144K£32.10MN/A2,231

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MLVN) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead.
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel