Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free MLVN Stock Alerts

Malvern International (MLVN) Competitors

Malvern International logo
GBX 20 -0.50 (-2.44%)
As of 08/21/2026 08:23 AM Eastern
Compare

MLVN vs. OBOR, PVG, GFHG, CODE, and ASIA

Should you buy Malvern International stock or one of its competitors? Malvern International's main competitors and comparable companies include Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) (OBOR), Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) (PVG), Grand Fortune High Grade (GFHG), Northcoders Group (CODE), and Asia Strategic (ASIA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified consumer services" industry.

How does Malvern International compare to Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)?

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) (LON:OBOR) and Malvern International (LON:MLVN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Malvern International. Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)N/AN/AN/A-£547.70N/A
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.63

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)N/A N/A N/A
Malvern International -8.50%39.68%N/A

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Malvern International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) Neutral
Malvern International Neutral

Summary

Malvern International beats Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)?

Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) (LON:PVG) and Malvern International (LON:MLVN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Malvern International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) Neutral
Malvern International Neutral

Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Malvern International. Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)£3.96M0.00N/A-£16.50N/A
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.63

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)N/A N/A N/A
Malvern International -8.50%39.68%N/A

Summary

Malvern International beats Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Grand Fortune High Grade?

Grand Fortune High Grade (LON:GFHG) and Malvern International (LON:MLVN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Grand Fortune High Grade has a beta of -0.24, meaning that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Malvern International has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Grand Fortune High Grade's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Malvern International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Grand Fortune High Grade Neutral
Malvern International Neutral

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.2% of Grand Fortune High Grade shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Grand Fortune High Grade has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Grand Fortune High Grade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Grand Fortune High GradeN/A -40.85% -24.81%
Malvern International -8.50%39.68%N/A

Grand Fortune High Grade has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Malvern International.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grand Fortune High Grade£26.000.00N/AN/AN/A
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.63

Summary

Malvern International beats Grand Fortune High Grade on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Northcoders Group?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Northcoders Group (LON:CODE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Malvern International has a net margin of -8.50% compared to Northcoders Group's net margin of -61.19%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Northcoders Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Northcoders Group -61.19%-78.38%-0.89%

Malvern International has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northcoders Group has a beta of -0.5, meaning that its share price is 150% less volatile than the broader market.

Malvern International has higher revenue and earnings than Northcoders Group. Northcoders Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.63
Northcoders Group£4.95M0.32-£641.29K-£37.80N/A

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Northcoders Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Neutral
Northcoders Group Neutral

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Northcoders Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.8% of Northcoders Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Malvern International beats Northcoders Group on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Asia Strategic?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Asia Strategic (LON:ASIA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Malvern International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Asia Strategic. Asia Strategic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.38-£245.04K£0.3852.63
Asia Strategic£32.10M0.00-£5.63M-£208.00N/A

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Asia Strategic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Neutral
Asia Strategic Neutral

Malvern International has a beta of 0.351, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Asia Strategic has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Malvern International has a net margin of -8.50% compared to Asia Strategic's net margin of -20.83%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Asia Strategic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Asia Strategic -20.83%N/A -8.22%

5.0% of Malvern International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 42.2% of Asia Strategic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Malvern International beats Asia Strategic on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Malvern International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MLVN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MLVN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMalvern InternationalDiversified Consumer Services IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.86M£4.36B£13.21B£2.54B
Dividend Yield2.96%2.80%56.57%6.17%
P/E Ratio52.6310.3446.96367.57
Price / Sales0.3837.3088.6683,481.74
Price / Cash2.9314.4429.1327.89
Price / Book-1.353.193.937.19
Net Income-£245.04K£242.43M£445.72M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.23%-0.18%-0.26%0.30%
1 Month Performance-3.85%0.07%2.74%3.31%
1 Year Performance23.08%-4.79%-1.57%22.13%

Malvern International Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MLVN
Malvern International
N/AGBX 20
-2.4%		N/A+23.1%£6.86M£17.79M52.63153
OBOR
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£10.89MN/AN/AN/A
PVG
Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.30M£3.96MN/A112
GFHG
Grand Fortune High Grade
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.40M£26.00N/AN/A
CODE
Northcoders Group
N/AGBX 20
+2.6%		N/A-41.2%£1.60M£4.95MN/A128

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MLVN) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel