Go Pro

Malvern International (MLVN) Competitors

Malvern International logo
GBX 21.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/11/2026

MLVN vs. OBOR, PVG, GFHG, CODE, and ASIA

Should you buy Malvern International stock or one of its competitors? Malvern International's main competitors and comparable companies include Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) (OBOR), Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) (PVG), Grand Fortune High Grade (GFHG), Northcoders Group (CODE), and Asia Strategic (ASIA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified consumer services" industry.

How does Malvern International compare to Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) (LON:OBOR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Malvern International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) N/A N/A N/A

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Malvern International. Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.40-£245.04K£0.3856.58
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)N/AN/AN/A-£547.70N/A

5.0% of Malvern International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Malvern International beats Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) (LON:PVG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Malvern International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Positive
Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) Neutral

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Malvern International. Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.40-£245.04K£0.3856.58
Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)£3.96M0.00N/A-£16.50N/A

Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Malvern International beats Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L) on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Grand Fortune High Grade?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Grand Fortune High Grade (LON:GFHG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Malvern International has a beta of 0.351, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grand Fortune High Grade has a beta of -0.24, indicating that its share price is 124% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Grand Fortune High Grade's score of 0.00 indicating that Malvern International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Positive
Grand Fortune High Grade Neutral

Grand Fortune High Grade has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Malvern International.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.40-£245.04K£0.3856.58
Grand Fortune High Grade£26.000.00N/AN/AN/A

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.2% of Grand Fortune High Grade shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Grand Fortune High Grade has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Malvern International's net margin of -8.50%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Grand Fortune High Grade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Grand Fortune High Grade N/A -40.85%-24.81%

Summary

Malvern International beats Grand Fortune High Grade on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Northcoders Group?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Northcoders Group (LON:CODE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Malvern International has a net margin of -8.50% compared to Northcoders Group's net margin of -61.19%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Northcoders Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Northcoders Group -61.19%-78.38%-0.89%

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of Northcoders Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.8% of Northcoders Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Malvern International has higher revenue and earnings than Northcoders Group. Northcoders Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.40-£245.04K£0.3856.58
Northcoders Group£4.95M0.32-£641.29K-£37.80N/A

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Northcoders Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Malvern International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Positive
Northcoders Group Neutral

Malvern International has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northcoders Group has a beta of -0.5, meaning that its stock price is 150% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Malvern International beats Northcoders Group on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Malvern International compare to Asia Strategic?

Malvern International (LON:MLVN) and Asia Strategic (LON:ASIA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Malvern International has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Asia Strategic has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

5.0% of Malvern International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Malvern International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 42.2% of Asia Strategic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Malvern International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Asia Strategic. Asia Strategic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Malvern International£17.79M0.40-£245.04K£0.3856.58
Asia Strategic£32.10M0.00-£5.63M-£208.00N/A

Malvern International has a net margin of -8.50% compared to Asia Strategic's net margin of -20.83%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Asia Strategic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Malvern International-8.50% 39.68% N/A
Asia Strategic -20.83%N/A -8.22%

In the previous week, Malvern International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Asia Strategic's score of 0.00 indicating that Malvern International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Malvern International Positive
Asia Strategic Neutral

Summary

Malvern International beats Asia Strategic on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Malvern International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MLVN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MLVN vs. The Competition

MetricMalvern InternationalDiversified Consumer Services IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.20M£4.28B£12.71B£2.51B
Dividend Yield2.96%2.87%58.24%6.23%
P/E Ratio56.589.9445.78366.83
Price / Sales0.4035.6593.5783,599.68
Price / Cash2.9313.6928.5627.89
Price / Book-1.453.114.086.33
Net Income-£245.04K£241.15M£445.67M£5.89B
7 Day Performance11.40%-1.95%-2.31%-0.69%
1 Month Performance7.50%-3.20%-3.96%0.18%
1 Year Performance21.74%-6.70%-6.12%20.03%

Malvern International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MLVN
Malvern International
N/AGBX 21.50
flat
N/A+21.7%£7.20M£17.79M56.58153
OBOR
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£10.89MN/AN/AN/A
PVG
Premier Veterinary Group plc (PVG.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.30M£3.96MN/A112
GFHG
Grand Fortune High Grade
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.40M£26.00N/AN/A
CODE
Northcoders Group
N/AGBX 20
+2.6%
N/A-47.6%£1.60M£4.95MN/A128

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MLVN) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners