Free Trial

Mulberry Group (MUL) Competitors

Mulberry Group logo
GBX 115 +2.50 (+2.22%)
As of 07:29 AM Eastern

MUL vs. PTD, DOCS, MMH, GYM, and DFS

Should you buy Mulberry Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mulberry Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mulberry Group include Pittards (PTD), Dr. Martens (DOCS), Marshall Motor (MMH), The Gym Group (GYM), and DFS Furniture (DFS). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Pittards?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Pittards (LON:PTD) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pittards. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mulberry Group and 0 mentions for Pittards. Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pittards'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group Neutral
Pittards Neutral

Pittards has a net margin of 1.97% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Pittards' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-18.54% 370.62% -8.70%
Pittards 1.97%3.08%2.32%

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.0% of Pittards shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 68.6% of Pittards shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pittards has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pittards, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.68-£39.32M-£32.80N/A
Pittards£20.37M0.00N/A£0.03N/A

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.603, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pittards has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pittards beats Mulberry Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Dr. Martens?

Dr. Martens (LON:DOCS) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Dr. Martens currently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,057, indicating a potential upside of 4,791.20%. Given Dr. Martens' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Dr. Martens is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dr. Martens
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Dr. Martens had 3 more articles in the media than Mulberry Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Dr. Martens and 1 mentions for Mulberry Group. Dr. Martens' average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Dr. Martens is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dr. Martens
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mulberry Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Dr. Martens has a net margin of 1.95% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Dr. Martens' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dr. Martens1.95% 4.40% 8.12%
Mulberry Group -18.54%370.62%-8.70%

32.2% of Dr. Martens shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Dr. Martens shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dr. Martens has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dr. Martens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dr. Martens£785M0.77£68.97M£1.7036.76
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.68-£39.32M-£32.80N/A

Dr. Martens has a beta of 0.241, suggesting that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.603, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dr. Martens beats Mulberry Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Marshall Motor?

Marshall Motor (LON:MMH) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 1 more articles in the media than Marshall Motor. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mulberry Group and 0 mentions for Marshall Motor. Marshall Motor's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mulberry Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marshall Motor Neutral
Mulberry Group Neutral

Marshall Motor has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Marshall Motor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marshall MotorN/A N/A N/A
Mulberry Group -18.54%370.62%-8.70%

Marshall Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshall Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marshall Motor£2.59B0.00N/A£62.20N/A
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.68-£39.32M-£32.80N/A

Summary

Marshall Motor beats Mulberry Group on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to The Gym Group?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and The Gym Group (LON:GYM) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.0% of The Gym Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of The Gym Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

The Gym Group has a net margin of 3.02% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat The Gym Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-18.54% 370.62% -8.70%
The Gym Group 3.02%5.35%2.31%

The Gym Group has a consensus target price of GBX 209, indicating a potential upside of 11.17%. Given The Gym Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe The Gym Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
The Gym Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

The Gym Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Gym Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.68-£39.32M-£32.80N/A
The Gym Group£244.90M1.34-£2.09M£4.0047.00

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.603, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Gym Group has a beta of 0.842, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group and Mulberry Group both had 1 articles in the media. The Gym Group's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that The Gym Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
The Gym Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

The Gym Group beats Mulberry Group on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to DFS Furniture?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and DFS Furniture (LON:DFS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 1 more articles in the media than DFS Furniture. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mulberry Group and 0 mentions for DFS Furniture. Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DFS Furniture'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group Neutral
DFS Furniture Neutral

DFS Furniture has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DFS Furniture, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.68-£39.32M-£32.80N/A
DFS Furniture£1.07B0.26-£4.30M£15.008.07

DFS Furniture has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat DFS Furniture's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-18.54% 370.62% -8.70%
DFS Furniture 3.27%13.23%3.00%

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.603, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.471, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of DFS Furniture shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

DFS Furniture has a consensus target price of GBX 222.50, indicating a potential upside of 83.88%. Given DFS Furniture's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
DFS Furniture
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

DFS Furniture beats Mulberry Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mulberry Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MUL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MUL vs. The Competition

MetricMulberry GroupFootwear & Accessories IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£80.69M£7.76B£4.00B£2.75B
Dividend Yield0.85%2.11%3.61%6.07%
P/E Ratio-3.5116.7577.14365.85
Price / Sales0.6836.68311.5988,036.58
Price / Cash20.9120.2830.8727.89
Price / Book6.313.533.177.68
Net Income-£39.32M£168.67M£247.50M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.09%7.16%0.41%0.34%
1 Month Performance16.28%6.42%1.09%2.10%
1 Year Performance35.29%11.19%1.64%86.82%

Mulberry Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MUL
Mulberry Group
N/AGBX 115
+2.2%
N/A+35.7%£80.69M£118.18MN/A1,300
PTD
Pittards
N/AN/AN/AN/A£772K£20.37M179.171,095
DOCS
Dr. Martens
4.064 of 5 stars
GBX 65
+0.8%
GBX 3,057
+4,603.1%
+8.3%£628.68M£785M38.24890
MMH
Marshall Motor
N/AN/AN/AN/A£322.87M£2.59B6.383,691
GYM
The Gym Group
1.498 of 5 stars
GBX 184.49
+0.8%
GBX 209
+13.3%
+30.7%£321.30M£244.90M46.121,837

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MUL) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners