Free Trial

Mulberry Group (MUL) Competitors

Mulberry Group logo
GBX 125 +2.50 (+2.04%)
As of 11:45 AM Eastern

MUL vs. PTD, DOCS, MER, LGRS, and BOO

Should you buy Mulberry Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mulberry Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mulberry Group include Pittards (PTD), Dr. Martens (DOCS), Mears Group (MER), Loungers (LGRS), and boohoo group (BOO). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Pittards?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Pittards (LON:PTD) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Pittards has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pittards, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.74-£39.32M-£32.80N/A
Pittards£20.37M0.00N/A£0.03N/A

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.601, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pittards has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.0% of Pittards shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 68.6% of Pittards shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pittards'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group Neutral
Pittards Neutral

Pittards has a net margin of 1.97% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Pittards' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-18.54% 370.62% -8.70%
Pittards 1.97%3.08%2.32%

Summary

Pittards beats Mulberry Group on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Dr. Martens?

Dr. Martens (LON:DOCS) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Dr. Martens has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Dr. Martens' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dr. Martens3.11% 6.89% 8.12%
Mulberry Group -18.54%370.62%-8.70%

Dr. Martens has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dr. Martens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dr. Martens£764.90M0.90£68.97M£2.4029.63
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.74-£39.32M-£32.80N/A

Dr. Martens has a beta of 0.224, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.601, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Dr. Martens presently has a consensus target price of GBX 105, suggesting a potential upside of 47.68%. Given Dr. Martens' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Dr. Martens is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dr. Martens
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Dr. Martens had 4 more articles in the media than Mulberry Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Dr. Martens and 0 mentions for Mulberry Group. Dr. Martens' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Dr. Martens is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dr. Martens Positive
Mulberry Group Neutral

32.2% of Dr. Martens shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Dr. Martens shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Dr. Martens beats Mulberry Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Mears Group?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Mears Group (LON:MER) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Mears Group has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Mears Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-18.54% 370.62% -8.70%
Mears Group 4.07%23.94%5.86%

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.601, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mears Group has a beta of 0.462, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of Mears Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Mears Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mears Group had 3 more articles in the media than Mulberry Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mears Group and 0 mentions for Mulberry Group. Mears Group's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Mears Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group Neutral
Mears Group Neutral

Mears Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mears Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.74-£39.32M-£32.80N/A
Mears Group£1.14B0.28£39.43M£53.867.32

Mears Group has a consensus target price of GBX 506, suggesting a potential upside of 28.26%. Given Mears Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mears Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Mears Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Mears Group beats Mulberry Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Loungers?

Loungers (LON:LGRS) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Loungers has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loungers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Loungers£347.93M0.00£8.98M£8.64N/A
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.74-£39.32M-£32.80N/A

In the previous week, Loungers' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mulberry Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Loungers Neutral
Mulberry Group Neutral

Loungers has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.601, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

73.7% of Loungers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Loungers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Loungers has a net margin of 2.58% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Loungers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Loungers2.58% 6.06% 3.21%
Mulberry Group -18.54%370.62%-8.70%

Summary

Loungers beats Mulberry Group on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to boohoo group?

boohoo group (LON:BOO) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Mulberry Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than boohoo group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than boohoo group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
boohoo group£1.57B0.00-£148.38M-£11.50N/A
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.74-£39.32M-£32.80N/A

boohoo group has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.601, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

boohoo group has a net margin of -9.43% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat boohoo group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
boohoo group-9.43% -40.55% -2.38%
Mulberry Group -18.54%370.62%-8.70%

In the previous week, boohoo group had 3 more articles in the media than Mulberry Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for boohoo group and 0 mentions for Mulberry Group. boohoo group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mulberry Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
boohoo group Neutral
Mulberry Group Neutral

33.9% of boohoo group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. 56.6% of boohoo group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

boohoo group beats Mulberry Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mulberry Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MUL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MUL vs. The Competition

MetricMulberry GroupFootwear & Accessories IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£87.70M£8.48B£4.01B£2.78B
Dividend Yield0.85%2.01%3.48%6.12%
P/E Ratio-3.8118.7876.63364.34
Price / Sales0.7441.47325.8887,480.01
Price / Cash20.9120.2830.8727.85
Price / Book6.863.843.237.74
Net Income-£39.32M£168.67M£247.47M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-1.84%-0.31%0.21%
1 Year Performance17.10%14.43%1.39%74.70%

Mulberry Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MUL
Mulberry Group
N/AGBX 125
+2.0%
N/A+16.1%£87.70M£118.18MN/A1,300
PTD
Pittards
N/AN/AN/AN/A£772K£20.37M179.171,095
DOCS
Dr. Martens
4.1468 of 5 stars
GBX 74
+0.7%
GBX 110
+48.6%
+20.1%£715.72M£764.90M43.53890
MER
Mears Group
4.6885 of 5 stars
GBX 415
-0.2%
GBX 506
+21.9%
-4.2%£339.97M£1.14B7.715,000
LGRS
Loungers
N/AN/AN/AN/A£336.83M£347.93M37.517,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MUL) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners