Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free MUL Stock Alerts

Mulberry Group (MUL) Competitors

Mulberry Group logo
GBX 210 +5.00 (+2.44%)
As of 06:04 AM Eastern
Compare

MUL vs. PTD, NBU, BRBY, WOSG, and COA

Should you buy Mulberry Group stock or one of its competitors? Mulberry Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Pittards (PTD), Naibu Global International (NBU), Burberry Group (BRBY), Watches of Switzerland Group (WOSG), and Coats Group (COA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "textiles, apparel & luxury goods" industry.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Pittards?

Pittards (LON:PTD) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Pittards' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mulberry Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pittards Neutral
Mulberry Group Neutral

Pittards has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.628, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

30.0% of Pittards shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. 68.6% of Pittards shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pittards has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mulberry Group. Pittards is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mulberry Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pittards£20.37M0.00N/A£0.03N/A
Mulberry Group£125.47M1.17-£39.32M£13.0016.15

Pittards has a net margin of 1.97% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -6.72%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 78.71% beat Pittards' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pittards1.97% 3.08% 2.32%
Mulberry Group -6.72%78.71%-8.70%

Summary

Pittards beats Mulberry Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Naibu Global International?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Naibu Global International (LON:NBU) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Naibu Global International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -6.72%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 78.71% beat Naibu Global International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-6.72% 78.71% -8.70%
Naibu Global International N/A N/A N/A

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Naibu Global International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mulberry Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£125.47M1.17-£39.32M£13.0016.15
Naibu Global InternationalN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Naibu Global International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group Neutral
Naibu Global International Neutral

Summary

Mulberry Group beats Naibu Global International on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Burberry Group?

Burberry Group (LON:BRBY) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Burberry Group had 4 more articles in the media than Mulberry Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Burberry Group and 0 mentions for Mulberry Group. Burberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Burberry Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Burberry Group Neutral
Mulberry Group Neutral

57.6% of Burberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Burberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Burberry Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,316.67, indicating a potential upside of 16.42%. Given Burberry Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Burberry Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Burberry Group
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Burberry Group has a net margin of 0.87% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -6.72%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 78.71% beat Burberry Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Burberry Group0.87% 2.29% 7.41%
Mulberry Group -6.72%78.71%-8.70%

Burberry Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Burberry Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Burberry Group£2.42B1.67£270.36M£5.90191.69
Mulberry Group£125.47M1.17-£39.32M£13.0016.15

Burberry Group has a beta of 0.699, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.628, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Burberry Group beats Mulberry Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Watches of Switzerland Group?

Watches of Switzerland Group (LON:WOSG) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Watches of Switzerland Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 596.67, indicating a potential downside of 19.26%. Given Watches of Switzerland Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Watches of Switzerland Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Watches of Switzerland Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Watches of Switzerland Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mulberry Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Watches of Switzerland Group Neutral
Mulberry Group Neutral

Watches of Switzerland Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watches of Switzerland Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Watches of Switzerland Group£1.83B0.94£60.02M£42.6017.35
Mulberry Group£125.47M1.17-£39.32M£13.0016.15

Watches of Switzerland Group has a beta of 1.868, meaning that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.628, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Watches of Switzerland Group has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -6.72%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 78.71% beat Watches of Switzerland Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Watches of Switzerland Group5.42% 16.31% 7.41%
Mulberry Group -6.72%78.71%-8.70%

54.1% of Watches of Switzerland Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Watches of Switzerland Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Watches of Switzerland Group beats Mulberry Group on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Coats Group?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Coats Group (LON:COA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Coats Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Coats Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mulberry Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£125.47M1.17-£39.32M£13.0016.15
Coats Group£1.60B1.01£75.12M£5.3915.67

Coats Group has a consensus price target of GBX 121.20, suggesting a potential upside of 43.52%. Given Coats Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Coats Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Coats Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Coats Group has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -6.72%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 78.71% beat Coats Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-6.72% 78.71% -8.70%
Coats Group 6.60%14.43%8.48%

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.8% of Coats Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Coats Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.628, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coats Group has a beta of 1.264, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Coats Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group Neutral
Coats Group Neutral

Summary

Coats Group beats Mulberry Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mulberry Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MUL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MUL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMulberry GroupTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£147.34M£12.16B£13.38B£2.89B
Dividend Yield0.85%2.72%55.49%6.09%
P/E Ratio16.1526.0646.59368.55
Price / Sales1.1710.2390.6783,653.78
Price / Cash20.91153.7926.2927.89
Price / Book11.523.914.507.23
Net Income-£39.32M£459.60M£443.65M£5.89B
7 Day Performance20.76%-1.13%0.10%1.19%
1 Month Performance50.00%0.42%1.73%2.67%
1 Year Performance100.00%24.78%0.31%69.88%

Mulberry Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MUL
Mulberry Group
N/AGBX 210
+2.4%		N/A+100.0%£147.34M£125.47M16.151,300
PTD
Pittards
N/AN/AN/AN/A£772K£20.37M179.171,095
NBU
Naibu Global International
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/A147,000
BRBY
Burberry Group
2.9023 of 5 stars		GBX 1,204
+0.8%		GBX 1,322.22
+9.8%		-0.4%£4.32B£2.42B204.079,201
WOSG
Watches of Switzerland Group
N/AGBX 729.50
-1.9%		GBX 596.67
-18.2%		+115.8%£1.65B£1.83B24.652,553

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MUL) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel