Do analysts prefer MUL or DOCS?

Dr. Martens has a consensus price target of GBX 105, indicating a potential upside of 38.89%. Given Dr. Martens' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Dr. Martens is more favorable than Mulberry Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mulberry Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Dr. Martens 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has better valuation & earnings, MUL or DOCS?

Dr. Martens has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dr. Martens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mulberry Group £118.18M 0.86 -£39.32M -£32.80 N/A Dr. Martens £764.90M 0.95 £68.97M £2.40 31.50

Does the media refer more to MUL or DOCS?

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 2 more articles in the media than Dr. Martens. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mulberry Group and 2 mentions for Dr. Martens. Dr. Martens' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Dr. Martens is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mulberry Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Dr. Martens 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend MUL or AML?

Aston Martin Lagonda Global has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 75.74%. Given Aston Martin Lagonda Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aston Martin Lagonda Global is more favorable than Mulberry Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mulberry Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Aston Martin Lagonda Global 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to MUL or AML?

In the previous week, Aston Martin Lagonda Global had 2 more articles in the media than Mulberry Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Aston Martin Lagonda Global and 4 mentions for Mulberry Group. Aston Martin Lagonda Global's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Aston Martin Lagonda Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mulberry Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Aston Martin Lagonda Global 0 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend MUL or FSTA?

Fuller, Smith & Turner has a consensus target price of GBX 770, indicating a potential upside of 4.05%. Given Fuller, Smith & Turner's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fuller, Smith & Turner is more favorable than Mulberry Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mulberry Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Fuller, Smith & Turner 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor MUL or FSTA?

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 2 more articles in the media than Fuller, Smith & Turner. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mulberry Group and 2 mentions for Fuller, Smith & Turner. Fuller, Smith & Turner's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fuller, Smith & Turner is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mulberry Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fuller, Smith & Turner 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend MUL or GYM?

The Gym Group has a consensus price target of GBX 229, indicating a potential upside of 14.50%. Given The Gym Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe The Gym Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mulberry Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 The Gym Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, MUL or GYM?

The Gym Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Gym Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mulberry Group £118.18M 0.86 -£39.32M -£32.80 N/A The Gym Group £244.90M 1.42 -£2.09M £4.00 50.00

Does the media prefer MUL or GYM?

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 3 more articles in the media than The Gym Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mulberry Group and 1 mentions for The Gym Group. Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The Gym Group'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mulberry Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral The Gym Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Mulberry Group (MUL) Competitors

GBX 145 +8.00 (+5.84%)

As of 10:01 AM Eastern

Compare

MUL vs. PTD, DOCS, AML, FSTA, and GYM

Should you buy Mulberry Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mulberry Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mulberry Group include Pittards (PTD), Dr. Martens (DOCS), Aston Martin Lagonda Global (AML), Fuller, Smith & Turner (FSTA), and The Gym Group (GYM). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Pittards?

Pittards (LON:PTD) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Pittards has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Pittards has a net margin of 1.97% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Pittards' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pittards	1.97%	3.08%	2.32%
Mulberry Group	-18.54%	370.62%	-8.70%

Pittards has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pittards, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pittards	£20.37M	0.00	N/A	£0.03	N/A
Mulberry Group	£118.18M	0.86	-£39.32M	-£32.80	N/A

30.0% of Pittards shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 68.6% of Pittards shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 4 more articles in the media than Pittards. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mulberry Group and 0 mentions for Pittards. Pittards' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mulberry Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pittards	Neutral
Mulberry Group	Neutral

Summary

Pittards beats Mulberry Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Dr. Martens?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Dr. Martens (LON:DOCS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dr. Martens has a beta of 0.245, meaning that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Dr. Martens shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Dr. Martens shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dr. Martens has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Dr. Martens' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mulberry Group	-18.54%	370.62%	-8.70%
Dr. Martens	3.11%	6.89%	8.12%

Dr. Martens has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dr. Martens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group	£118.18M	0.86	-£39.32M	-£32.80	N/A
Dr. Martens	£764.90M	0.95	£68.97M	£2.40	31.50

Dr. Martens has a consensus price target of GBX 105, indicating a potential upside of 38.89%. Given Dr. Martens' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Dr. Martens is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mulberry Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Dr. Martens	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 2 more articles in the media than Dr. Martens. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mulberry Group and 2 mentions for Dr. Martens. Dr. Martens' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Dr. Martens is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Dr. Martens	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Dr. Martens beats Mulberry Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Aston Martin Lagonda Global?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Aston Martin Lagonda Global (LON:AML) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Aston Martin Lagonda Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.0% of Aston Martin Lagonda Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mulberry Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aston Martin Lagonda Global. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aston Martin Lagonda Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group	£118.18M	0.86	-£39.32M	-£32.80	N/A
Aston Martin Lagonda Global	£1.29B	0.28	-£471.78M	-£47.88	N/A

In the previous week, Aston Martin Lagonda Global had 2 more articles in the media than Mulberry Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Aston Martin Lagonda Global and 4 mentions for Mulberry Group. Aston Martin Lagonda Global's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Aston Martin Lagonda Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Aston Martin Lagonda Global	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Mulberry Group has a net margin of -18.54% compared to Aston Martin Lagonda Global's net margin of -38.50%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Aston Martin Lagonda Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mulberry Group	-18.54%	370.62%	-8.70%
Aston Martin Lagonda Global	-38.50%	-121.47%	-1.99%

Aston Martin Lagonda Global has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 75.74%. Given Aston Martin Lagonda Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aston Martin Lagonda Global is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mulberry Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Aston Martin Lagonda Global	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aston Martin Lagonda Global has a beta of 1.983, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Aston Martin Lagonda Global beats Mulberry Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Fuller, Smith & Turner?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Fuller, Smith & Turner (LON:FSTA) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Fuller, Smith & Turner has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fuller, Smith & Turner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group	£118.18M	0.86	-£39.32M	-£32.80	N/A
Fuller, Smith & Turner	£397.80M	0.98	£8.38M	£38.59	19.18

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fuller, Smith & Turner has a beta of 0.768, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Fuller, Smith & Turner has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Fuller, Smith & Turner's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mulberry Group	-18.54%	370.62%	-8.70%
Fuller, Smith & Turner	5.33%	5.14%	3.12%

Fuller, Smith & Turner has a consensus target price of GBX 770, indicating a potential upside of 4.05%. Given Fuller, Smith & Turner's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fuller, Smith & Turner is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mulberry Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Fuller, Smith & Turner	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 2 more articles in the media than Fuller, Smith & Turner. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mulberry Group and 2 mentions for Fuller, Smith & Turner. Fuller, Smith & Turner's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fuller, Smith & Turner is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fuller, Smith & Turner	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Fuller, Smith & Turner shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Fuller, Smith & Turner shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fuller, Smith & Turner beats Mulberry Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to The Gym Group?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and The Gym Group (LON:GYM) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

The Gym Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Gym Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group	£118.18M	0.86	-£39.32M	-£32.80	N/A
The Gym Group	£244.90M	1.42	-£2.09M	£4.00	50.00

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Gym Group has a beta of 0.847, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 3 more articles in the media than The Gym Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Mulberry Group and 1 mentions for The Gym Group. Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The Gym Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
The Gym Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of The Gym Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of The Gym Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

The Gym Group has a consensus price target of GBX 229, indicating a potential upside of 14.50%. Given The Gym Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe The Gym Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mulberry Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
The Gym Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

The Gym Group has a net margin of 3.02% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat The Gym Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mulberry Group	-18.54%	370.62%	-8.70%
The Gym Group	3.02%	5.35%	2.31%

Summary

The Gym Group beats Mulberry Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mulberry Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MUL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Mulberry Group	Footwear & Accessories Industry	Cyclical Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£101.73M	£9.38B	£3.92B	£2.82B
Dividend Yield	0.85%	1.98%	3.46%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	-4.42	20.40	77.38	368.27
Price / Sales	0.86	45.65	343.41	84,379.71
Price / Cash	20.91	20.28	30.84	27.89
Price / Book	7.96	4.31	3.57	7.63
Net Income	-£39.32M	£168.67M	£249.12M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.57%	0.51%	0.13%	0.39%
1 Month Performance	7.41%	2.04%	6.61%	-0.64%
1 Year Performance	65.15%	15.20%	3.83%	62.99%

Mulberry Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MUL Mulberry Group	N/A	GBX 145 +5.8%	N/A	+43.1%	£101.73M	£118.18M	N/A	1,300	News Coverage Earnings Report Gap Down High Trading Volume
PTD Pittards	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£772K	£20.37M	179.17	1,095
DOCS Dr. Martens	4.0798 of 5 stars	GBX 71.80 -0.8%	GBX 105 +46.2%	-5.9%	£687.17M	£764.90M	29.92	890
AML Aston Martin Lagonda Global	2.9661 of 5 stars	GBX 36.74 +0.7%	GBX 62 +68.8%	-52.9%	£372.04M	£1.29B	N/A	2,740	News Coverage
FSTA Fuller, Smith & Turner	1.6079 of 5 stars	GBX 710 +1.4%	GBX 770 +8.5%	+34.4%	£367.34M	£397.80M	18.40	5,000	News Coverage Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MUL) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mulberry Group (MUL) Competitors

MUL vs. PTD, DOCS, AML, FSTA, and GYM

How does Mulberry Group compare to Pittards?

Summary

How does Mulberry Group compare to Dr. Martens?

Summary

How does Mulberry Group compare to Aston Martin Lagonda Global?

Summary

How does Mulberry Group compare to Fuller, Smith & Turner?

Summary

How does Mulberry Group compare to The Gym Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUL vs. The Competition

Mulberry Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Mulberry Group (MUL) Competitors

MUL vs. PTD, DOCS, AML, FSTA, and GYM

How does Mulberry Group compare to Pittards?

Which has more volatility & risk, PTD or MUL?

Is PTD or MUL more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PTD or MUL?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PTD or MUL?

Does the media prefer PTD or MUL?

Summary

How does Mulberry Group compare to Dr. Martens?

Which has more risk and volatility, MUL or DOCS?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MUL or DOCS?

Is MUL or DOCS more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MUL or DOCS?

Do analysts prefer MUL or DOCS?

Does the media refer more to MUL or DOCS?

Summary

How does Mulberry Group compare to Aston Martin Lagonda Global?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MUL or AML?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MUL or AML?

Does the media refer more to MUL or AML?

Is MUL or AML more profitable?

Do analysts recommend MUL or AML?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUL or AML?

Summary

How does Mulberry Group compare to Fuller, Smith & Turner?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MUL or FSTA?

Which has more risk & volatility, MUL or FSTA?

Is MUL or FSTA more profitable?

Do analysts recommend MUL or FSTA?

Does the media favor MUL or FSTA?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MUL or FSTA?

Summary

How does Mulberry Group compare to The Gym Group?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MUL or GYM?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUL or GYM?

Does the media prefer MUL or GYM?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MUL or GYM?

Do analysts recommend MUL or GYM?

Is MUL or GYM more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MUL vs. The Competition

Mulberry Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools