Go Pro

Mulberry Group (MUL) Competitors

Mulberry Group logo
GBX 139 +3.00 (+2.21%)
As of 07/10/2026 10:29 AM Eastern

MUL vs. PTD, DOCS, PINE, MER, and LGRS

Should you buy Mulberry Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mulberry Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mulberry Group include Pittards (PTD), Dr. Martens (DOCS), Pinewood Technologies Group (PINE), Mears Group (MER), and Loungers (LGRS). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Pittards?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Pittards (LON:PTD) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pittards. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mulberry Group and 0 mentions for Pittards. Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pittards'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group Neutral
Pittards Neutral

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.0% of Pittards shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 68.6% of Pittards shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pittards has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pittards, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.83-£39.32M-£32.80N/A
Pittards£20.37M0.00N/A£0.03N/A

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pittards has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Pittards has a net margin of 1.97% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Pittards' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-18.54% 370.62% -8.70%
Pittards 1.97%3.08%2.32%

Summary

Pittards beats Mulberry Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Dr. Martens?

Dr. Martens (LON:DOCS) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Dr. Martens presently has a consensus price target of GBX 105, indicating a potential upside of 46.25%. Given Dr. Martens' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Dr. Martens is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dr. Martens
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

19.1% of Dr. Martens shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Dr. Martens shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dr. Martens has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dr. Martens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dr. Martens£764.90M0.90£68.97M£2.4029.92
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.83-£39.32M-£32.80N/A

Dr. Martens has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Dr. Martens' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dr. Martens3.11% 6.89% 8.12%
Mulberry Group -18.54%370.62%-8.70%

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 1 more articles in the media than Dr. Martens. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mulberry Group and 0 mentions for Dr. Martens. Dr. Martens' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mulberry Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dr. Martens Neutral
Mulberry Group Neutral

Dr. Martens has a beta of 0.245, meaning that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dr. Martens beats Mulberry Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Pinewood Technologies Group?

Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) and Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Pinewood Technologies Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinewood Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.83-£39.32M-£32.80N/A
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M8.67£45.24M£48.006.35

0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mulberry Group-18.54% 370.62% -8.70%
Pinewood Technologies Group 124.20%35.39%4.17%

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pinewood Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mulberry Group and 0 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group. Mulberry Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pinewood Technologies Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mulberry Group Neutral
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral

Pinewood Technologies Group has a consensus target price of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 91.83%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Mulberry Group on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Mears Group?

Mears Group (LON:MER) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Mears Group has a beta of 0.477, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Mears Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mears Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mears Group£1.14B0.30£39.43M£53.867.84
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.83-£39.32M-£32.80N/A

48.9% of Mears Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Mears Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mears Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 506, suggesting a potential upside of 19.91%. Given Mears Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Mears Group is more favorable than Mulberry Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mears Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mulberry Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Mears Group has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Mears Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mears Group4.07% 23.94% 5.86%
Mulberry Group -18.54%370.62%-8.70%

In the previous week, Mears Group and Mears Group both had 1 articles in the media. Mears Group's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Mulberry Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Mears Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mears Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mulberry Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Mears Group beats Mulberry Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mulberry Group compare to Loungers?

Loungers (LON:LGRS) and Mulberry Group (LON:MUL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

73.7% of Loungers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Loungers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Mulberry Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Loungers has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mulberry Group has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mulberry Group had 1 more articles in the media than Loungers. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mulberry Group and 0 mentions for Loungers. Loungers' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mulberry Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Loungers Neutral
Mulberry Group Neutral

Loungers has a net margin of 2.58% compared to Mulberry Group's net margin of -18.54%. Mulberry Group's return on equity of 370.62% beat Loungers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Loungers2.58% 6.06% 3.21%
Mulberry Group -18.54%370.62%-8.70%

Loungers has higher revenue and earnings than Mulberry Group. Mulberry Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loungers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Loungers£347.93M0.00£8.98M£8.64N/A
Mulberry Group£118.18M0.83-£39.32M-£32.80N/A

Summary

Loungers beats Mulberry Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mulberry Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MUL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MUL vs. The Competition

MetricMulberry GroupFootwear & Accessories IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£95.42M£9.36B£4.21B£3.02B
Dividend Yield0.85%1.99%3.49%6.17%
P/E Ratio-4.2420.3977.38368.17
Price / Sales0.8343.56337.4884,564.79
Price / Cash20.9120.2830.8227.87
Price / Book7.634.213.567.68
Net Income-£39.32M£168.67M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.30%0.70%0.17%-0.68%
1 Month Performance12.46%1.34%5.78%-1.01%
1 Year Performance40.05%11.62%3.20%61.81%

Mulberry Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MUL
Mulberry Group
N/AGBX 139
+2.2%
N/A+40.1%£95.42M£118.18MN/A1,300
PTD
Pittards
N/AN/AN/AN/A£772K£20.37M179.171,095
DOCS
Dr. Martens
3.6525 of 5 stars
GBX 71.70
flat
GBX 105
+46.4%
-9.1%£686.23M£764.90M29.88890
PINE
Pinewood Technologies Group
2.6341 of 5 stars
GBX 304.50
+1.3%
GBX 585
+92.1%
-36.6%£350.47M£40.50M6.345,334
MER
Mears Group
4.6227 of 5 stars
GBX 432.50
+2.2%
GBX 506
+17.0%
+11.3%£348.66M£1.14B8.035,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MUL) was last updated on 7/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners