Go Pro
→ The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free HSW Stock Alerts

Hostelworld Group (HSW) Competitors

Hostelworld Group logo
GBX 115 +3.50 (+3.14%)
As of 08/14/2026 12:28 PM Eastern
Compare

HSW vs. RNK, YNGN, 888, FSTA, and LGRS

Should you buy Hostelworld Group stock or one of its competitors? Hostelworld Group's main competitors and comparable companies include The Rank Group (RNK), Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. (YNGN), 888 (888), Fuller, Smith & Turner (FSTA), and Loungers (LGRS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "hotels, restaurants & leisure" industry.

How does Hostelworld Group compare to The Rank Group?

Hostelworld Group (LON:HSW) and The Rank Group (LON:RNK) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Hostelworld Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Rank Group. The Rank Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hostelworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hostelworld Group£99.30M1.43£17.72M£5.0023.00
The Rank Group£813.60M0.61£12.32M£8.2012.85

In the previous week, The Rank Group had 4 more articles in the media than Hostelworld Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for The Rank Group and 4 mentions for Hostelworld Group. The Rank Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Hostelworld Group's score of 0.41 indicating that The Rank Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hostelworld Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
The Rank Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

48.3% of Hostelworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of The Rank Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Hostelworld Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Rank Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hostelworld Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. The Rank Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Hostelworld Group pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Rank Group pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Rank Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hostelworld Group has a beta of 0.901, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Rank Group has a beta of 1.576, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Hostelworld Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 193.50, indicating a potential upside of 68.26%. The Rank Group has a consensus price target of GBX 147, indicating a potential upside of 39.47%. Given Hostelworld Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Hostelworld Group is more favorable than The Rank Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hostelworld Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
The Rank Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Hostelworld Group has a net margin of 6.41% compared to The Rank Group's net margin of 4.20%. The Rank Group's return on equity of 9.03% beat Hostelworld Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hostelworld Group6.41% 8.85% 7.30%
The Rank Group 4.20%9.03%3.38%

Summary

Hostelworld Group beats The Rank Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hostelworld Group compare to Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.?

Hostelworld Group (LON:HSW) and Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. (LON:YNGN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Hostelworld Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.. Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hostelworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hostelworld Group£99.30M1.43£17.72M£5.0023.00
Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.£508.20M0.90£14.03M£45.1516.74

Hostelworld Group has a net margin of 6.41% compared to Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.'s net margin of 5.51%. Hostelworld Group's return on equity of 8.85% beat Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hostelworld Group6.41% 8.85% 7.30%
Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. 5.51%3.55%2.99%

Hostelworld Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. pays an annual dividend of GBX 23.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Hostelworld Group pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. pays out 52.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

48.3% of Hostelworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.2% of Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Hostelworld Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hostelworld Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 193.50, suggesting a potential upside of 68.26%. Given Hostelworld Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hostelworld Group is more favorable than Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hostelworld Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Hostelworld Group had 4 more articles in the media than Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hostelworld Group and 0 mentions for Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.. Hostelworld Group's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.'s score of 0.00 indicating that Hostelworld Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hostelworld Group Neutral
Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. Neutral

Hostelworld Group has a beta of 0.901, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. has a beta of 0.925, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hostelworld Group beats Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C. on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hostelworld Group compare to 888?

888 (LON:888) and Hostelworld Group (LON:HSW) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Hostelworld Group has a consensus price target of GBX 193.50, suggesting a potential upside of 68.26%. Given Hostelworld Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hostelworld Group is more favorable than 888.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
888
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Hostelworld Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Hostelworld Group had 4 more articles in the media than 888. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hostelworld Group and 0 mentions for 888. Hostelworld Group's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat 888's score of 0.00 indicating that Hostelworld Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
888 Neutral
Hostelworld Group Neutral

43.7% of 888 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.3% of Hostelworld Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of 888 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Hostelworld Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

888 has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hostelworld Group has a beta of 0.901, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Hostelworld Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than 888. 888 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hostelworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
888£1.71B0.00-£56.40M-£0.13N/A
Hostelworld Group£99.30M1.43£17.72M£5.0023.00

Hostelworld Group has a net margin of 6.41% compared to 888's net margin of -3.30%. Hostelworld Group's return on equity of 8.85% beat 888's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
888-3.30% -47.18% 1.84%
Hostelworld Group 6.41%8.85%7.30%

888 pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share. Hostelworld Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. 888 pays out -8,461.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hostelworld Group pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Hostelworld Group beats 888 on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hostelworld Group compare to Fuller, Smith & Turner?

Fuller, Smith & Turner (LON:FSTA) and Hostelworld Group (LON:HSW) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Hostelworld Group has a net margin of 6.41% compared to Fuller, Smith & Turner's net margin of 5.33%. Hostelworld Group's return on equity of 8.85% beat Fuller, Smith & Turner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fuller, Smith & Turner5.33% 5.14% 3.12%
Hostelworld Group 6.41%8.85%7.30%

Fuller, Smith & Turner pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Hostelworld Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Fuller, Smith & Turner pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hostelworld Group pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fuller, Smith & Turner currently has a consensus price target of GBX 770, indicating a potential upside of 2.67%. Hostelworld Group has a consensus price target of GBX 193.50, indicating a potential upside of 68.26%. Given Hostelworld Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hostelworld Group is more favorable than Fuller, Smith & Turner.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fuller, Smith & Turner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hostelworld Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Fuller, Smith & Turner had 3 more articles in the media than Hostelworld Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fuller, Smith & Turner and 4 mentions for Hostelworld Group. Hostelworld Group's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Fuller, Smith & Turner's score of 0.15 indicating that Hostelworld Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fuller, Smith & Turner
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hostelworld Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hostelworld Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fuller, Smith & Turner. Fuller, Smith & Turner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hostelworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fuller, Smith & Turner£397.80M0.99£8.38M£38.5919.44
Hostelworld Group£99.30M1.43£17.72M£5.0023.00

20.2% of Fuller, Smith & Turner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.3% of Hostelworld Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Fuller, Smith & Turner shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Hostelworld Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fuller, Smith & Turner has a beta of 0.772, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hostelworld Group has a beta of 0.901, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hostelworld Group beats Fuller, Smith & Turner on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hostelworld Group compare to Loungers?

Hostelworld Group (LON:HSW) and Loungers (LON:LGRS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Hostelworld Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 193.50, suggesting a potential upside of 68.26%. Given Hostelworld Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Hostelworld Group is more favorable than Loungers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hostelworld Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Loungers
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Hostelworld Group has a net margin of 6.41% compared to Loungers' net margin of 2.58%. Hostelworld Group's return on equity of 8.85% beat Loungers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hostelworld Group6.41% 8.85% 7.30%
Loungers 2.58%6.06%3.21%

48.3% of Hostelworld Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.7% of Loungers shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Hostelworld Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Loungers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hostelworld Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Loungers. Loungers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hostelworld Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hostelworld Group£99.30M1.43£17.72M£5.0023.00
Loungers£347.93M0.00£8.98M£8.64N/A

In the previous week, Hostelworld Group had 4 more articles in the media than Loungers. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hostelworld Group and 0 mentions for Loungers. Hostelworld Group's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Loungers' score of 0.00 indicating that Hostelworld Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hostelworld Group Neutral
Loungers Neutral

Hostelworld Group has a beta of 0.901, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loungers has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hostelworld Group beats Loungers on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hostelworld Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HSW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HSW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HSW vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHostelworld GroupHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£141.78M£8.29B£13.22B£2.88B
Dividend Yield1.82%3.74%54.81%6.11%
P/E Ratio23.0023.0546.76368.69
Price / Sales1.43338.7591.0583,338.11
Price / Cash5.5122.3426.4027.89
Price / Book2.364.984.337.18
Net Income£17.72M£260.07M£443.58M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.98%1.19%-0.42%0.87%
1 Month Performance7.98%1.94%1.54%2.91%
1 Year Performance1.77%-1.48%0.71%64.28%

Hostelworld Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HSW
Hostelworld Group
3.7704 of 5 stars		GBX 115
+3.1%		GBX 193.50
+68.3%		+2.7%£141.78M£99.30M23.00223
RNK
The Rank Group
3.7519 of 5 stars		GBX 102.80
+2.4%		GBX 140.50
+36.7%		-24.5%£470.30M£813.60M12.547,300
YNGN
Young & Co.'s Brewery, P.L.C.
N/AGBX 730
+1.4%		N/A+29.5%£439.53M£508.20M16.177,172
888
888
N/AN/AN/AN/A£383.53M£1.71BN/A11,634
FSTA
Fuller, Smith & Turner
1.6483 of 5 stars		GBX 728
+0.3%		GBX 770
+5.8%		+36.9%£381.06M£397.80M18.865,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HSW) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel