Go Pro

Ten Lifestyle Group (TENG) Competitors

Ten Lifestyle Group logo
GBX 96.50 +1.00 (+1.05%)
As of 09/18/2026 12:22 PM Eastern

TENG vs. 888, FSTA, LGRS, MARS, and DPEU

Should you buy Ten Lifestyle Group stock or one of its competitors? Ten Lifestyle Group's main competitors and comparable companies include 888 (888), Fuller, Smith & Turner (FSTA), Loungers (LGRS), Marston's (MARS), and DP Eurasia (DPEU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "hotels, restaurants & leisure" industry.

How does Ten Lifestyle Group compare to 888?

888 (LON:888) and Ten Lifestyle Group (LON:TENG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Ten Lifestyle Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than 888. 888 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ten Lifestyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
888£1.71B0.00-£56.40M-£0.13N/A
Ten Lifestyle Group£71.51M1.31£5.11M£1.4068.93

Ten Lifestyle Group has a net margin of 1.95% compared to 888's net margin of -3.30%. Ten Lifestyle Group's return on equity of 5.18% beat 888's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
888-3.30% -47.18% 1.84%
Ten Lifestyle Group 1.95%5.18%3.01%

In the previous week, 888's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ten Lifestyle Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
888 Neutral
Ten Lifestyle Group Neutral

43.7% of 888 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of 888 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

888 has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ten Lifestyle Group has a beta of 0.945, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ten Lifestyle Group beats 888 on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ten Lifestyle Group compare to Fuller, Smith & Turner?

Fuller, Smith & Turner (LON:FSTA) and Ten Lifestyle Group (LON:TENG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Fuller, Smith & Turner has higher revenue and earnings than Ten Lifestyle Group. Fuller, Smith & Turner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ten Lifestyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fuller, Smith & Turner£397.80M0.91£8.38M£38.5917.93
Ten Lifestyle Group£71.51M1.31£5.11M£1.4068.93

Fuller, Smith & Turner presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,006.67, suggesting a potential upside of 45.47%. Given Fuller, Smith & Turner's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fuller, Smith & Turner is more favorable than Ten Lifestyle Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fuller, Smith & Turner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ten Lifestyle Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

20.2% of Fuller, Smith & Turner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Fuller, Smith & Turner shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fuller, Smith & Turner has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Ten Lifestyle Group's net margin of 1.95%. Ten Lifestyle Group's return on equity of 5.18% beat Fuller, Smith & Turner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fuller, Smith & Turner5.33% 5.14% 3.12%
Ten Lifestyle Group 1.95%5.18%3.01%

In the previous week, Fuller, Smith & Turner had 1 more articles in the media than Ten Lifestyle Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fuller, Smith & Turner and 0 mentions for Ten Lifestyle Group. Fuller, Smith & Turner's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ten Lifestyle Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fuller, Smith & Turner is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fuller, Smith & Turner Positive
Ten Lifestyle Group Neutral

Fuller, Smith & Turner has a beta of 0.776, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ten Lifestyle Group has a beta of 0.945, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fuller, Smith & Turner beats Ten Lifestyle Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ten Lifestyle Group compare to Loungers?

Loungers (LON:LGRS) and Ten Lifestyle Group (LON:TENG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Loungers has a net margin of 2.58% compared to Ten Lifestyle Group's net margin of 1.95%. Loungers' return on equity of 6.06% beat Ten Lifestyle Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Loungers2.58% 6.06% 3.21%
Ten Lifestyle Group 1.95%5.18%3.01%

In the previous week, Loungers' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ten Lifestyle Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Loungers Neutral
Ten Lifestyle Group Neutral

Loungers has higher revenue and earnings than Ten Lifestyle Group. Loungers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ten Lifestyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Loungers£347.93M0.00£8.98M£8.64N/A
Ten Lifestyle Group£71.51M1.31£5.11M£1.4068.93

73.7% of Loungers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.1% of Loungers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Loungers has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ten Lifestyle Group has a beta of 0.945, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Loungers beats Ten Lifestyle Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ten Lifestyle Group compare to Marston's?

Ten Lifestyle Group (LON:TENG) and Marston's (LON:MARS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

17.8% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Marston's shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Marston's shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ten Lifestyle Group has a beta of 0.945, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marston's has a beta of 0.908, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Marston's has a consensus price target of GBX 81.50, suggesting a potential upside of 78.34%. Given Marston's' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marston's is more favorable than Ten Lifestyle Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ten Lifestyle Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Marston's
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Ten Lifestyle Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Marston's'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ten Lifestyle Group Neutral
Marston's Neutral

Marston's has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Ten Lifestyle Group's net margin of 1.95%. Marston's' return on equity of 9.30% beat Ten Lifestyle Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ten Lifestyle Group1.95% 5.18% 3.01%
Marston's 8.35%9.30%3.72%

Ten Lifestyle Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marston's. Marston's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ten Lifestyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ten Lifestyle Group£71.51M1.31£5.11M£1.4068.93
Marston's£893.20M0.33-£17.06M£11.703.91

Summary

Marston's beats Ten Lifestyle Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ten Lifestyle Group compare to DP Eurasia?

Ten Lifestyle Group (LON:TENG) and DP Eurasia (LON:DPEU) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

DP Eurasia has higher revenue and earnings than Ten Lifestyle Group. DP Eurasia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ten Lifestyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ten Lifestyle Group£71.51M1.31£5.11M£1.4068.93
DP Eurasia£2.53B0.00£257.91M£0.04N/A

In the previous week, Ten Lifestyle Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DP Eurasia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ten Lifestyle Group Neutral
DP Eurasia Neutral

Ten Lifestyle Group has a net margin of 1.95% compared to DP Eurasia's net margin of -4.72%. DP Eurasia's return on equity of 196.53% beat Ten Lifestyle Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ten Lifestyle Group1.95% 5.18% 3.01%
DP Eurasia -4.72%196.53%6.29%

Ten Lifestyle Group has a beta of 0.945, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DP Eurasia has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

17.8% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of DP Eurasia shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of Ten Lifestyle Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 120.6% of DP Eurasia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

DP Eurasia beats Ten Lifestyle Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ten Lifestyle Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TENG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TENG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TENG vs. The Competition

MetricTen Lifestyle GroupHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£92.39M£7.38B£12.48B£2.89B
Dividend YieldN/A3.94%61.18%6.22%
P/E Ratio68.9320.9544.26366.66
Price / Sales1.31339.5793.5089,823.13
Price / Cash5.8121.2528.3927.89
Price / Book4.584.433.966.34
Net Income£5.11M£262.26M£445.74M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.46%-2.35%-1.62%0.07%
1 Month Performance3.76%-6.66%-5.17%0.04%
1 Year Performance66.13%-7.91%-7.83%19.18%

Ten Lifestyle Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TENG
Ten Lifestyle Group
N/AGBX 96.50
+1.0%
N/A+65.0%£92.39M£71.51M68.931,244
888
888
N/AN/AN/AN/A£383.53M£1.71BN/A11,634
FSTA
Fuller, Smith & Turner
4.2565 of 5 stars
GBX 692
-1.1%
GBX 1,006.67
+45.5%
+19.7%£361.75M£397.80M17.935,000
LGRS
Loungers
N/AN/AN/AN/A£336.83M£347.93M37.517,500
MARS
Marston's
3.0185 of 5 stars
GBX 47.55
+0.3%
GBX 81.50
+71.4%
+19.5%£302.15M£893.20M4.0610,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TENG) was last updated on 9/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners