Which has better earnings and valuation, RCN or ECK?

Eckoh has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Redcentric. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Redcentric £132.66M 1.24 -£3.37M £1.50 68.67 Eckoh £37.97M 0.00 £2.04M £0.65 N/A

Is RCN or ECK more profitable?

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. Eckoh's return on equity of 10.44% beat Redcentric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Redcentric 2.14% 4.57% 1.10% Eckoh 12.21% 10.44% 5.18%

Do analysts rate FDM or RCN?

FDM Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 142.50, suggesting a potential upside of 29.55%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FDM Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Redcentric 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FDM or RCN?

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. FDM Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FDM Group £159.06M 0.76 £30.43M £2.30 47.83 Redcentric £132.66M 1.24 -£3.37M £1.50 68.67

Is FDM or RCN more profitable?

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to FDM Group's net margin of 1.57%. FDM Group's return on equity of 4.84% beat Redcentric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FDM Group 1.57% 4.84% 21.43% Redcentric 2.14% 4.57% 1.10%

Does the media favor FDM or RCN?

In the previous week, Redcentric had 1 more articles in the media than FDM Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 2 mentions for FDM Group. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat FDM Group's score of 0.30 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FDM Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Redcentric 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, RCN or IBPO?

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Redcentric £132.66M 1.24 -£3.37M £1.50 68.67 iEnergizer £288.19M 0.00 £81.37M £0.30 N/A

Is RCN or IBPO more profitable?

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Redcentric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Redcentric 2.14% 4.57% 1.10% iEnergizer 28.23% 159.59% 22.71%

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

GBX 103 +0.80 (+0.78%)

As of 08/28/2026 12:42 PM Eastern

Compare

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

Should you buy Redcentric stock or one of its competitors? Redcentric's main competitors and comparable companies include FD Technologies (FDP), Kin and Carta (KCT), Eckoh (ECK), FDM Group (FDM), and iEnergizer (IBPO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it services" industry.

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and FD Technologies (LON:FDP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FD Technologies. FD Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.24	-£3.37M	£1.50	68.67
FD Technologies	£196.89M	2.77	-£32.27M	-£144.37	N/A

FD Technologies has a net margin of 203.17% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FD Technologies' return on equity of 96.98% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%
FD Technologies	203.17%	96.98%	0.25%

14.4% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of FD Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of FD Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.204, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FD Technologies has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than FD Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for FD Technologies. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat FD Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Redcentric	Positive
FD Technologies	Neutral

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. FD Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FD Technologies pays out -19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Redcentric beats FD Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and Kin and Carta (LON:KCT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Kin and Carta pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kin and Carta pays out -1,818.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kin and Carta. Kin and Carta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.24	-£3.37M	£1.50	68.67
Kin and Carta	£192.01M	0.00	-£18.77M	-£0.11	N/A

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to Kin and Carta's net margin of -9.77%. Redcentric's return on equity of 4.57% beat Kin and Carta's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%
Kin and Carta	-9.77%	-18.78%	2.70%

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than Kin and Carta. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Kin and Carta. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Kin and Carta's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Redcentric	Positive
Kin and Carta	Neutral

Redcentric has a beta of 0.204, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kin and Carta has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

14.4% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Kin and Carta shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Kin and Carta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Redcentric beats Kin and Carta on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and Eckoh (LON:ECK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

Eckoh has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Redcentric. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.24	-£3.37M	£1.50	68.67
Eckoh	£37.97M	0.00	£2.04M	£0.65	N/A

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. Eckoh's return on equity of 10.44% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%
Eckoh	12.21%	10.44%	5.18%

14.4% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Eckoh shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Eckoh shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Eckoh pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Eckoh pays out 153.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.204, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eckoh has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than Eckoh. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Eckoh. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Eckoh's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Redcentric	Positive
Eckoh	Neutral

Summary

Redcentric and Eckoh tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

FDM Group (LON:FDM) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

FDM Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 142.50, suggesting a potential upside of 29.55%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FDM Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Redcentric	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to FDM Group's net margin of 1.57%. FDM Group's return on equity of 4.84% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FDM Group	1.57%	4.84%	21.43%
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%

FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. FDM Group pays out 434.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

FDM Group has a beta of 1.114, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.204, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. FDM Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FDM Group	£159.06M	0.76	£30.43M	£2.30	47.83
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.24	-£3.37M	£1.50	68.67

In the previous week, Redcentric had 1 more articles in the media than FDM Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 2 mentions for FDM Group. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat FDM Group's score of 0.30 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FDM Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Redcentric	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

42.6% of FDM Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.8% of FDM Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FDM Group beats Redcentric on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. iEnergizer pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. iEnergizer pays out 8,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.204, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iEnergizer has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.24	-£3.37M	£1.50	68.67
iEnergizer	£288.19M	0.00	£81.37M	£0.30	N/A

14.4% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of iEnergizer shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 82.7% of iEnergizer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%
iEnergizer	28.23%	159.59%	22.71%

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than iEnergizer. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for iEnergizer. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat iEnergizer's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Redcentric	Positive
iEnergizer	Neutral

Summary

iEnergizer beats Redcentric on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Redcentric News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RCN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RCN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Redcentric	IT Services Industry	Technology Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£164.10M	£11.11B	£29.71B	£2.91B
Dividend Yield	3.04%	2.77%	2.74%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	68.67	14.33	75.82	367.33
Price / Sales	1.24	58.67	590.52	83,334.32
Price / Cash	68.53	42.61	49.29	27.89
Price / Book	3.01	25.12	9.31	6.99
Net Income	-£3.37M	£271.39M	£678.22M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-4.19%	-0.21%	-0.07%	0.75%
1 Month Performance	1.98%	3.46%	4.19%	3.41%
1 Year Performance	-25.09%	29.58%	187.24%	22.85%

Redcentric Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
RCN Redcentric	N/A	GBX 103 +0.8%	N/A	-25.1%	£164.10M	£132.66M	68.67	638	Positive News
FDP FD Technologies	N/A	GBX 2,450 flat	N/A	+0.0%	£544.43M	£196.89M	N/A	40,100
KCT Kin and Carta	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£224.56M	£192.01M	N/A	1,822
ECK Eckoh	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£168.40M	£37.97M	82.48	188
FDM FDM Group	3.8966 of 5 stars	GBX 114 +0.4%	GBX 142.50 +25.0%	-13.5%	£124.65M	£159.06M	49.57	5,637	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:RCN) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RCN vs. The Competition

Redcentric Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, RCN or FDP?

Is RCN or FDP more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in RCN or FDP?

Which has more risk and volatility, RCN or FDP?

Does the media favor RCN or FDP?

Is RCN or FDP a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Is RCN or KCT a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, RCN or KCT?

Is RCN or KCT more profitable?

Does the media favor RCN or KCT?

Which has more risk and volatility, RCN or KCT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in RCN or KCT?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Which has better earnings and valuation, RCN or ECK?

Is RCN or ECK more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in RCN or ECK?

Is RCN or ECK a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, RCN or ECK?

Does the media favor RCN or ECK?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

Do analysts rate FDM or RCN?

Is FDM or RCN more profitable?

Is FDM or RCN a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, FDM or RCN?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FDM or RCN?

Does the media favor FDM or RCN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FDM or RCN?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

Is RCN or IBPO a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, RCN or IBPO?

Which has better earnings & valuation, RCN or IBPO?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of RCN or IBPO?

Is RCN or IBPO more profitable?

Does the media prefer RCN or IBPO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RCN vs. The Competition

Redcentric Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools