Go Pro
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free RCN Stock Alerts

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

Redcentric logo
GBX 99.40 +0.20 (+0.20%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:38 PM Eastern
Compare

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

Should you buy Redcentric stock or one of its competitors? Redcentric's main competitors and comparable companies include FD Technologies (FDP), Kin and Carta (KCT), Eckoh (ECK), FDM Group (FDM), and iEnergizer (IBPO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it services" industry.

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and FD Technologies (LON:FDP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than FD Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for FD Technologies. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat FD Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Positive
FD Technologies Neutral

Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FD Technologies has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FD Technologies. FD Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£132.66M0.77-£3.37M£1.5066.27
FD Technologies£196.89M2.77-£32.27M-£144.37N/A

2.5% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of FD Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 48.2% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of FD Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FD Technologies has a net margin of 203.17% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FD Technologies' return on equity of 96.98% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric2.14% 4.57% 1.10%
FD Technologies 203.17%96.98%0.25%

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. FD Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FD Technologies pays out -19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Redcentric beats FD Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Kin and Carta (LON:KCT) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to Kin and Carta's net margin of -9.77%. Redcentric's return on equity of 4.57% beat Kin and Carta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kin and Carta-9.77% -18.78% 2.70%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than Kin and Carta. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Kin and Carta. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Kin and Carta's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kin and Carta Neutral
Redcentric Positive

Kin and Carta pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Kin and Carta pays out -1,818.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Redcentric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kin and Carta. Kin and Carta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kin and Carta£192.01M0.00-£18.77M-£0.11N/A
Redcentric£132.66M0.77-£3.37M£1.5066.27

97.1% of Kin and Carta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Kin and Carta shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.2% of Redcentric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kin and Carta has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Redcentric beats Kin and Carta on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Eckoh (LON:ECK) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. Eckoh's return on equity of 10.44% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eckoh12.21% 10.44% 5.18%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than Eckoh. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Eckoh. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Eckoh's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eckoh Neutral
Redcentric Positive

Eckoh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Redcentric. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eckoh£37.97M0.00£2.04M£0.65N/A
Redcentric£132.66M0.77-£3.37M£1.5066.27

Eckoh pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Eckoh pays out 153.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

61.2% of Eckoh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Eckoh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.2% of Redcentric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Eckoh has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Eckoh and Redcentric tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and FDM Group (LON:FDM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to FDM Group's net margin of 1.57%. FDM Group's return on equity of 4.84% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric2.14% 4.57% 1.10%
FDM Group 1.57%4.84%21.43%

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FDM Group pays out 434.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

2.5% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.3% of FDM Group shares are held by institutional investors. 48.2% of Redcentric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of FDM Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FDM Group has a beta of 1.114, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. FDM Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£132.66M0.77-£3.37M£1.5066.27
FDM Group£159.06M0.69£30.43M£2.3043.69

FDM Group has a consensus price target of GBX 142.50, indicating a potential upside of 41.81%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Redcentric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than FDM Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for FDM Group. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat FDM Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Positive
FDM Group Neutral

Summary

FDM Group beats Redcentric on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iEnergizer28.23% 159.59% 22.71%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

iEnergizer pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. iEnergizer pays out 8,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

iEnergizer has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iEnergizer£288.19M0.00£81.37M£0.30N/A
Redcentric£132.66M0.77-£3.37M£1.5066.27

In the previous week, Redcentric had 3 more articles in the media than iEnergizer. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for iEnergizer. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat iEnergizer's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iEnergizer Neutral
Redcentric Positive

15.1% of iEnergizer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 82.7% of iEnergizer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.2% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

iEnergizer beats Redcentric on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Redcentric News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RCN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RCN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricRedcentricIT Services IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£101.60M£10.50B£30.11B£2.51B
Dividend Yield3.04%2.83%2.74%6.25%
P/E Ratio66.2714.0476.78366.83
Price / Sales0.7765.11593.4689,753.13
Price / Cash68.5344.2447.9127.89
Price / Book2.908.167.706.33
Net Income-£3.37M£271.17M£704.99M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.50%-1.64%-1.08%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-4.42%-4.91%-4.27%0.00%
1 Year Performance-25.82%23.07%180.50%19.96%

Redcentric Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RCN
Redcentric
N/AGBX 99.40
+0.2%		N/A-25.8%£101.60M£132.66M66.27638
FDP
FD Technologies
N/AGBX 2,450
flat		N/A+0.0%£544.43M£196.89MN/A40,100
KCT
Kin and Carta
N/AN/AN/AN/A£224.56M£192.01MN/A1,822
ECK
Eckoh
N/AN/AN/AN/A£168.40M£37.97M82.48188
FDM
FDM Group
3.1096 of 5 stars		GBX 104.60
-4.7%		GBX 142.50
+36.2%		-18.3%£114.37M£159.06M45.485,637

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:RCN) was last updated on 9/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel