Which has higher earnings and valuation, ECK or RCN?

Eckoh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Redcentric. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Eckoh £37.97M 0.00 £2.04M £0.65 N/A Redcentric £132.66M 1.48 -£3.37M £1.50 82.00

Is ECK or RCN more profitable?

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. Eckoh's return on equity of 10.44% beat Redcentric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Eckoh 12.21% 10.44% 5.18% Redcentric 2.14% 4.57% 1.10%

Do analysts rate RCN or FDM?

FDM Group has a consensus price target of GBX 145, indicating a potential upside of 38.10%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Redcentric 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 FDM Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has better earnings & valuation, RCN or FDM?

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. FDM Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Redcentric £132.66M 1.48 -£3.37M £1.50 82.00 FDM Group £177.73M 0.65 £30.43M £5.20 20.19

Is RCN or FDM more profitable?

FDM Group has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FDM Group's return on equity of 10.20% beat Redcentric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Redcentric 2.14% 4.57% 1.10% FDM Group 3.19% 10.20% 21.43%

Which has better earnings & valuation, IBPO or RCN?

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio iEnergizer £288.19M 0.00 £81.37M £0.30 N/A Redcentric £132.66M 1.48 -£3.37M £1.50 82.00

Is IBPO or RCN more profitable?

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Redcentric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets iEnergizer 28.23% 159.59% 22.71% Redcentric 2.14% 4.57% 1.10%

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

GBX 123 -2.00 (-1.60%)

As of 07/3/2026 12:22 PM Eastern

Compare

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

Should you buy Redcentric stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Redcentric with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Redcentric include FD Technologies (FDP), Kin and Carta (KCT), Eckoh (ECK), FDM Group (FDM), and iEnergizer (IBPO). These companies are all part of the "information technology services" industry.

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and FD Technologies (LON:FDP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.224, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FD Technologies has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

FD Technologies has a net margin of 203.17% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FD Technologies' return on equity of 96.98% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%
FD Technologies	203.17%	96.98%	0.25%

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. FD Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FD Technologies pays out -19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

14.4% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of FD Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of FD Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FD Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Redcentric	Neutral
FD Technologies	Neutral

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FD Technologies. FD Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.48	-£3.37M	£1.50	82.00
FD Technologies	£196.89M	2.77	-£32.27M	-£144.37	N/A

Summary

FD Technologies beats Redcentric on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and Kin and Carta (LON:KCT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kin and Carta. Kin and Carta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.48	-£3.37M	£1.50	82.00
Kin and Carta	£192.01M	0.00	-£18.77M	-£0.11	N/A

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to Kin and Carta's net margin of -9.77%. Redcentric's return on equity of 4.57% beat Kin and Carta's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%
Kin and Carta	-9.77%	-18.78%	2.70%

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Kin and Carta pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kin and Carta pays out -1,818.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

14.4% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Kin and Carta shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Kin and Carta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.224, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kin and Carta has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kin and Carta'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Redcentric	Neutral
Kin and Carta	Neutral

Summary

Redcentric beats Kin and Carta on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Eckoh (LON:ECK) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Eckoh's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Redcentric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Eckoh	Neutral
Redcentric	Neutral

61.2% of Eckoh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Eckoh shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Eckoh has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.224, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Eckoh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Redcentric. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eckoh	£37.97M	0.00	£2.04M	£0.65	N/A
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.48	-£3.37M	£1.50	82.00

Eckoh pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Eckoh pays out 153.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. Eckoh's return on equity of 10.44% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eckoh	12.21%	10.44%	5.18%
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%

Summary

Eckoh beats Redcentric on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and FDM Group (LON:FDM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, FDM Group had 2 more articles in the media than Redcentric. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for FDM Group and 0 mentions for Redcentric. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Redcentric's score of 0.00 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Redcentric	Neutral
FDM Group	Positive

Redcentric has a beta of 0.224, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FDM Group has a beta of 1.101, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. FDM Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.48	-£3.37M	£1.50	82.00
FDM Group	£177.73M	0.65	£30.43M	£5.20	20.19

14.4% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.8% of FDM Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of FDM Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FDM Group has a consensus price target of GBX 145, indicating a potential upside of 38.10%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Redcentric	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
FDM Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

FDM Group has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FDM Group's return on equity of 10.20% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%
FDM Group	3.19%	10.20%	21.43%

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.6%. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FDM Group pays out 355.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

FDM Group beats Redcentric on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap information technology services industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

iEnergizer has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.224, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

iEnergizer pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. iEnergizer pays out 8,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
iEnergizer	28.23%	159.59%	22.71%
Redcentric	2.14%	4.57%	1.10%

15.1% of iEnergizer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 82.7% of iEnergizer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, iEnergizer's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Redcentric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
iEnergizer	Neutral
Redcentric	Neutral

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
iEnergizer	£288.19M	0.00	£81.37M	£0.30	N/A
Redcentric	£132.66M	1.48	-£3.37M	£1.50	82.00

Summary

iEnergizer beats Redcentric on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Redcentric News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RCN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RCN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Redcentric	Information Technology Services Industry	Computer Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£199.15M	£1.82B	£38.42B	£2.74B
Dividend Yield	3.04%	3.59%	3.17%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	82.00	8.02	78.93	368.96
Price / Sales	1.48	87.40	599.33	85,974.71
Price / Cash	68.53	21.23	45.62	27.87
Price / Book	3.59	3.72	9.55	7.75
Net Income	-£3.37M	£112.05M	£1.07B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-2.02%	2.69%	0.97%	0.55%
1 Month Performance	0.11%	0.77%	0.23%	-0.34%
1 Year Performance	-0.81%	5.25%	143.56%	70.53%

Redcentric Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count
RCN Redcentric	N/A	GBX 123 -1.6%	N/A	+0.0%	£199.15M	£132.66M	82.00	638
FDP FD Technologies	N/A	GBX 2,450 flat	N/A	+0.4%	£544.43M	£196.89M	N/A	40,100
KCT Kin and Carta	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£224.56M	£192.01M	N/A	1,822
ECK Eckoh	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£168.40M	£37.97M	82.48	188
FDM FDM Group	4.3912 of 5 stars	GBX 105 -1.5%	GBX 145 +38.1%	-52.4%	£114.81M	£177.73M	20.19	5,637

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:RCN) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RCN vs. The Competition

Redcentric Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Which has more risk and volatility, RCN or FDP?

Is RCN or FDP more profitable?

Is RCN or FDP a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in RCN or FDP?

Does the media favor RCN or FDP?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, RCN or FDP?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, RCN or KCT?

Is RCN or KCT more profitable?

Is RCN or KCT a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in RCN or KCT?

Which has more volatility & risk, RCN or KCT?

Does the media favor RCN or KCT?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Does the media favor ECK or RCN?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ECK or RCN?

Which has more volatility & risk, ECK or RCN?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ECK or RCN?

Is ECK or RCN a better dividend stock?

Is ECK or RCN more profitable?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

Does the media prefer RCN or FDM?

Which has more risk and volatility, RCN or FDM?

Which has better earnings & valuation, RCN or FDM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in RCN or FDM?

Do analysts rate RCN or FDM?

Is RCN or FDM more profitable?

Is RCN or FDM a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

Which has more volatility & risk, IBPO or RCN?

Is IBPO or RCN a better dividend stock?

Is IBPO or RCN more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in IBPO or RCN?

Does the media prefer IBPO or RCN?

Which has better earnings & valuation, IBPO or RCN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RCN vs. The Competition

Redcentric Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools