Free Trial
Earnings Season Is Here. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

Redcentric logo
GBX 85 -1.60 (-1.85%)
As of 10/23/2026 12:07 PM Eastern

RCN vs. KCT, ECK, FDM, IBPO, and TPX

Should you buy Redcentric stock or one of its competitors? Redcentric's main competitors and comparable companies include Kin and Carta (KCT), Eckoh (ECK), FDM Group (FDM), iEnergizer (IBPO), and TPXimpact (TPX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it services" industry.

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and Kin and Carta (LON:KCT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kin and Carta has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

2.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Kin and Carta shares are held by institutional investors. 48.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Kin and Carta shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kin and Carta. Kin and Carta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£131.99M0.65-£3.37M£7.3811.52
Kin and Carta£192.01M0.00-£18.77M-£0.11N/A

In the previous week, Redcentric had 2 more articles in the media than Kin and Carta. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Kin and Carta. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Kin and Carta's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Positive
Kin and Carta Neutral

Redcentric has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Kin and Carta's net margin of -9.77%. Redcentric's return on equity of 20.35% beat Kin and Carta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric9.18% 20.35% 1.10%
Kin and Carta -9.77%-18.78%2.70%

Summary

Redcentric beats Kin and Carta on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Eckoh (LON:ECK) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Redcentric had 2 more articles in the media than Eckoh. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Eckoh. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Eckoh's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eckoh Neutral
Redcentric Positive

Eckoh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Redcentric. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eckoh£37.97M0.00£2.04M£0.65N/A
Redcentric£131.99M0.65-£3.37M£7.3811.52

Eckoh has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 9.18%. Redcentric's return on equity of 20.35% beat Eckoh's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eckoh12.21% 10.44% 5.18%
Redcentric 9.18%20.35%1.10%

61.2% of Eckoh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Eckoh shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 48.7% of Redcentric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Redcentric beats Eckoh on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and FDM Group (LON:FDM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. Redcentric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FDM Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£131.99M0.65-£3.37M£7.3811.52
FDM Group£159.06M0.71£30.43M£2.3044.96

In the previous week, Redcentric had 2 more articles in the media than FDM Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for FDM Group. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat FDM Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Positive
FDM Group Neutral

2.6% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.1% of FDM Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of FDM Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FDM Group has a consensus target price of GBX 142.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.81%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Redcentric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FDM Group has a beta of 1.126, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Redcentric has a net margin of 9.18% compared to FDM Group's net margin of 1.57%. Redcentric's return on equity of 20.35% beat FDM Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric9.18% 20.35% 1.10%
FDM Group 1.57%4.84%21.43%

Summary

FDM Group beats Redcentric on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

15.1% of iEnergizer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 82.7% of iEnergizer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 9.18%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iEnergizer28.23% 159.59% 22.71%
Redcentric 9.18%20.35%1.10%

iEnergizer has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, meaning that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iEnergizer£288.19M0.00£81.37M£0.30N/A
Redcentric£131.99M0.65-£3.37M£7.3811.52

In the previous week, Redcentric had 2 more articles in the media than iEnergizer. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for iEnergizer. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat iEnergizer's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iEnergizer Neutral
Redcentric Positive

Summary

iEnergizer beats Redcentric on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to TPXimpact?

TPXimpact (LON:TPX) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

5.5% of TPXimpact shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.2% of TPXimpact shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Redcentric had 2 more articles in the media than TPXimpact. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for TPXimpact. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat TPXimpact's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TPXimpact Neutral
Redcentric Positive

TPXimpact has a beta of 1.291, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.21, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Redcentric has higher revenue and earnings than TPXimpact. TPXimpact is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TPXimpact£78.10M1.17-£20.46M-£0.60N/A
Redcentric£131.99M0.65-£3.37M£7.3811.52

Redcentric has a net margin of 9.18% compared to TPXimpact's net margin of -0.73%. Redcentric's return on equity of 20.35% beat TPXimpact's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TPXimpact-0.73% -1.49% -4.19%
Redcentric 9.18%20.35%1.10%

Summary

Redcentric beats TPXimpact on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Redcentric News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RCN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RCN vs. The Competition

MetricRedcentricIT Services IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£86.32M£11.71B£29.32B£2.45B
Dividend Yield3.04%3.54%2.86%6.26%
P/E Ratio11.5214.2178.43366.15
Price / Sales0.6549.96575.2988,718.42
Price / Cash68.5342.0046.0527.83
Price / Book2.489.487.716.98
Net Income-£3.37M£277.89M£766.52M£5.88B
7 Day Performance-1.73%-0.07%-0.05%-1.54%
1 Month Performance-11.46%-7.52%-5.56%-2.16%
1 Year Performance-32.00%13.69%158.55%20.77%

Redcentric Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RCN
Redcentric
N/AGBX 85
-1.8%
N/A-32.0%£86.32M£131.99M11.52638
KCT
Kin and Carta
N/AN/AN/AN/A£224.56M£192.01MN/A1,822
ECK
Eckoh
N/AN/AN/AN/A£168.40M£37.97M82.48188
FDM
FDM Group
2.3484 of 5 stars
GBX 106.80
-0.4%
GBX 142.50
+33.4%
-20.4%£116.78M£159.06M46.435,637
IBPO
iEnergizer
N/AN/AN/AN/A£113.70M£288.19M199.33N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:RCN) was last updated on 10/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners