Free Trial

Symphony International (SIHL) Competitors

Symphony International logo
GBX 0.37 +0.02 (+6.32%)
As of 06/5/2026 03:14 AM Eastern

SIHL vs. TAN, RTW, IX, SVE, and DGN

Should you buy Symphony International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Symphony International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Symphony International include Tanfield Group (TAN), RTW Biotech Opportunities (RTW), i(x) Net Zero (IX), Starvest (SVE), and Asia Dragon (DGN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Symphony International compare to Tanfield Group?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Symphony International (LON:SIHL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.542, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of Symphony International shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of Symphony International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Symphony International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Tanfield Group's return on equity of -7.90% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
Symphony International N/A -23.29%0.22%

In the previous week, Symphony International had 1 more articles in the media than Tanfield Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for Tanfield Group. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tanfield Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
Symphony International Positive

Tanfield Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Symphony International. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Symphony International£2.79M0.68-£102.23M£0.371.00

Summary

Symphony International beats Tanfield Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to RTW Biotech Opportunities?

Symphony International (LON:SIHL) and RTW Biotech Opportunities (LON:RTW) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Symphony International had 1 more articles in the media than RTW Biotech Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for RTW Biotech Opportunities. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat RTW Biotech Opportunities' score of 0.00 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Symphony International Positive
RTW Biotech Opportunities Neutral

RTW Biotech Opportunities has a net margin of 95.03% compared to Symphony International's net margin of 0.00%. RTW Biotech Opportunities' return on equity of 34.38% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Symphony InternationalN/A -23.29% 0.22%
RTW Biotech Opportunities 95.03%34.38%-0.47%

RTW Biotech Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. RTW Biotech Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Symphony International£2.79M0.68-£102.23M£0.371.00
RTW Biotech Opportunities£250.89M0.03£14.09B£63.000.03

Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RTW Biotech Opportunities has a beta of 0.779, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.3% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Symphony International beats RTW Biotech Opportunities on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to i(x) Net Zero?

i(x) Net Zero (LON:IX) and Symphony International (LON:SIHL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. 45.4% of i(x) Net Zero shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

i(x) Net Zero has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. i(x) Net Zero is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
i(x) Net Zero£80.05M0.00£56.40M£0.54N/A
Symphony International£2.79M0.68-£102.23M£0.371.00

In the previous week, Symphony International had 1 more articles in the media than i(x) Net Zero. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for i(x) Net Zero. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat i(x) Net Zero's score of 0.00 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
i(x) Net Zero Neutral
Symphony International Positive

i(x) Net Zero has a net margin of 70.33% compared to Symphony International's net margin of 0.00%. i(x) Net Zero's return on equity of 60.99% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
i(x) Net Zero70.33% 60.99% 39.94%
Symphony International N/A -23.29%0.22%

i(x) Net Zero has a beta of 1.94, meaning that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

i(x) Net Zero beats Symphony International on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to Starvest?

Starvest (LON:SVE) and Symphony International (LON:SIHL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Symphony International had 1 more articles in the media than Starvest. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for Starvest. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Starvest's score of 0.00 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Starvest Neutral
Symphony International Positive

Symphony International's return on equity of -23.29% beat Starvest's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
StarvestN/A -45.33% -2.04%
Symphony International N/A -23.29%0.22%

Starvest has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

6.3% of Starvest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of Symphony International shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.3% of Starvest shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of Symphony International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Starvest has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Symphony International. Starvest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Starvest£322.74K0.00-£3.95M-£0.07N/A
Symphony International£2.79M0.68-£102.23M£0.371.00

Summary

Symphony International beats Starvest on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to Asia Dragon?

Asia Dragon (LON:DGN) and Symphony International (LON:SIHL) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Asia Dragon has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. Asia Dragon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Asia Dragon£73.02M0.00£58.92M£37.72N/A
Symphony International£2.79M0.68-£102.23M£0.371.00

In the previous week, Symphony International had 1 more articles in the media than Asia Dragon. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for Asia Dragon. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Asia Dragon's score of 0.00 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Asia Dragon Neutral
Symphony International Positive

Asia Dragon has a net margin of 80.69% compared to Symphony International's net margin of 0.00%. Asia Dragon's return on equity of 10.05% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Asia Dragon80.69% 10.05% -3.76%
Symphony International N/A -23.29%0.22%

Asia Dragon has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

74.0% of Asia Dragon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of Symphony International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Asia Dragon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of Symphony International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Asia Dragon and Symphony International tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Symphony International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SIHL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SIHL vs. The Competition

MetricSymphony InternationalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.90M£2.51B£5.14B£2.50B
Dividend Yield6.58%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio1.0025.9416.39365.23
Price / Sales0.682,079.751,110.8287,121.98
Price / Cash0.2360.1590.1227.85
Price / Book0.011.376.507.68
Net Income-£102.23M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.98%-0.87%-0.50%
1 Month Performance-9.31%-0.38%0.53%2.10%
1 Year Performance-4.64%10.33%18.78%72.87%

Symphony International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SIHL
Symphony International
N/AGBX 0.37
+6.3%
N/AN/A£1.90M£2.79M1.00N/A
TAN
Tanfield Group
N/AGBX 4.52
flat
N/A+0.0%£7.36MN/AN/A2
RTW
RTW Biotech Opportunities
N/AGBX 2.20
+1.4%
N/A+82.9%£7.13M£250.89M0.034,971
IX
i(x) Net Zero
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.99M£80.05M14.8132,200
SVE
Starvest
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.82M£322.74KN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SIHL) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners