Free Trial
→ Ticker Revealed: Pre-IPO Access to 'Next Elon Musk' Company (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free SIHL Stock Alerts

Symphony International (SIHL) Competitors

Symphony International logo
GBX 0.40 +0.03 (+8.11%)
As of 06:53 AM Eastern
Compare

SIHL vs. RTW, TEK, IX, TAN, and SVE

Should you buy Symphony International stock or one of its competitors? Symphony International's main competitors and comparable companies include RTW Biotech Opportunities (RTW), Tekcapital (TEK), i(x) Net Zero (IX), Tanfield Group (TAN), and Starvest (SVE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Symphony International compare to RTW Biotech Opportunities?

Symphony International (LON:SIHL) and RTW Biotech Opportunities (LON:RTW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

RTW Biotech Opportunities has a net margin of 249.72% compared to Symphony International's net margin of 0.00%. RTW Biotech Opportunities' return on equity of 52.83% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Symphony InternationalN/A -23.29% 0.22%
RTW Biotech Opportunities 249.72%52.83%-0.47%

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.8% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Symphony International had 5 more articles in the media than RTW Biotech Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for RTW Biotech Opportunities. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat RTW Biotech Opportunities' score of 0.00 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Symphony International Positive
RTW Biotech Opportunities Neutral

RTW Biotech Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. Symphony International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RTW Biotech Opportunities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Symphony International-£21.32M-0.09-£102.23M-£4.60N/A
RTW Biotech Opportunities£250.89M0.03£14.09B£63.000.04

Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RTW Biotech Opportunities has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RTW Biotech Opportunities beats Symphony International on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to Tekcapital?

Symphony International (LON:SIHL) and Tekcapital (LON:TEK) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Tekcapital has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. Symphony International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tekcapital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Symphony International-£21.32M-0.09-£102.23M-£4.60N/A
Tekcapital£281.86K24.64£19.73M£44.000.06

Tekcapital has a net margin of 43,011.88% compared to Symphony International's net margin of 0.00%. Tekcapital's return on equity of 93.86% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Symphony InternationalN/A -23.29% 0.22%
Tekcapital 43,011.88%93.86%14.01%

Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tekcapital has a beta of 0.821, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

15.9% of Symphony International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Tekcapital shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Tekcapital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Symphony International had 4 more articles in the media than Tekcapital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Symphony International and 1 mentions for Tekcapital. Tekcapital's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Symphony International's score of 0.53 indicating that Tekcapital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Symphony International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tekcapital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Tekcapital beats Symphony International on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to i(x) Net Zero?

Symphony International (LON:SIHL) and i(x) Net Zero (LON:IX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, i(x) Net Zero has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market.

i(x) Net Zero has a net margin of 70.33% compared to Symphony International's net margin of 0.00%. i(x) Net Zero's return on equity of 60.99% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Symphony InternationalN/A -23.29% 0.22%
i(x) Net Zero 70.33%60.99%39.94%

i(x) Net Zero has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. Symphony International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than i(x) Net Zero, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Symphony International-£21.32M-0.09-£102.23M-£4.60N/A
i(x) Net Zero£80.05M0.00£56.40M£0.54N/A

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of i(x) Net Zero shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Symphony International had 5 more articles in the media than i(x) Net Zero. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for i(x) Net Zero. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat i(x) Net Zero's score of 0.00 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Symphony International Positive
i(x) Net Zero Neutral

Summary

i(x) Net Zero beats Symphony International on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to Tanfield Group?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Symphony International (LON:SIHL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Symphony International had 3 more articles in the media than Tanfield Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Symphony International and 2 mentions for Tanfield Group. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Tanfield Group's score of -0.32 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Symphony International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Tanfield Group has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Symphony International-£21.32M-0.09-£102.23M-£4.60N/A

Symphony International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -25,628.57%. Tanfield Group's return on equity of -8.84% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-25,628.57% -8.84% -1.19%
Symphony International N/A -23.29%0.22%

Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.227, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of Symphony International shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of Symphony International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Symphony International beats Tanfield Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to Starvest?

Starvest (LON:SVE) and Symphony International (LON:SIHL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

6.3% of Starvest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of Symphony International shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.3% of Starvest shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of Symphony International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Symphony International had 5 more articles in the media than Starvest. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for Starvest. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Starvest's score of 0.00 indicating that Symphony International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Starvest Neutral
Symphony International Positive

Starvest has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. Symphony International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starvest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Starvest£322.74K0.00-£3.95M-£0.07N/A
Symphony International-£21.32M-0.09-£102.23M-£4.60N/A

Starvest has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Symphony International's return on equity of -23.29% beat Starvest's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
StarvestN/A -45.33% -2.04%
Symphony International N/A -23.29%0.22%

Summary

Symphony International beats Starvest on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Symphony International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SIHL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SIHL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSymphony InternationalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.05M£5.13B£13.31B£2.82B
Dividend Yield6.58%7.57%6.04%6.26%
P/E Ratio-0.0929.4224.39366.31
Price / Sales-0.101,260.43509.1489,066.18
Price / Cash0.2347.6729.4627.89
Price / Book0.013.482.706.90
Net Income-£102.23M£415.67M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.25%-0.11%-0.46%-0.68%
1 Month Performance12.36%-2.71%-3.21%-1.07%
1 Year Performance2.56%9.01%10.48%22.92%

Symphony International Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SIHL
Symphony International
N/AGBX 0.40
+8.1%		N/A-5.1%£2.05M-£21.32MN/AN/A
RTW
RTW Biotech Opportunities
N/AGBX 2.36
+0.9%		N/A+51.6%£7.62M£250.89M0.044,971
TEK
Tekcapital
N/AGBX 2.95
-1.7%		N/A-73.3%£7.58M£281.86K0.075
IX
i(x) Net Zero
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.99M£80.05M14.8132,200
TAN
Tanfield Group
N/AGBX 4.25
flat		N/A-16.7%£6.92MN/AN/A2

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SIHL) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
DOJ Admits It In Court—Your Cash Can Be Seized Without Warning
The Department of Justice recently argued in court that cash may not be legally your property - raising concer...
Priority Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel