Go Pro
→ Do this before December or regret it (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free SIHL Stock Alerts

Symphony International (SIHL) Competitors

Symphony International logo
GBX 0.40 +0.03 (+7.03%)
As of 06/26/2026 12:19 PM Eastern
Compare

SIHL vs. MILA, AAM, RTW, IX, and SVE

Should you buy Symphony International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Symphony International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Symphony International include Mila Resources (MILA), Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L) (AAM), RTW Biotech Opportunities (RTW), i(x) Net Zero (IX), and Starvest (SVE). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Symphony International compare to Mila Resources?

Symphony International (LON:SIHL) and Mila Resources (LON:MILA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Mila Resources' return on equity of -9.96% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Symphony InternationalN/A -23.29% 0.22%
Mila Resources N/A -9.96%-5.89%

Mila Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Symphony International. Mila Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Symphony International£2.79M0.73-£102.23M£0.371.07
Mila ResourcesN/AN/A-£364.80K-£0.12N/A

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Mila Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Mila Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mila Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Symphony International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Mila Resources and 1 mentions for Symphony International. Mila Resources' average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Symphony International's score of 0.00 indicating that Mila Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Symphony International Neutral
Mila Resources Very Positive

Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mila Resources has a beta of 0.262, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Symphony International beats Mila Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L)?

Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L) (LON:AAM) and Symphony International (LON:SIHL) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Symphony International had 1 more articles in the media than Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L). Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Symphony International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L) Neutral
Symphony International Neutral

Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Symphony International. Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L)-£5.14M0.00N/A-£11.00N/A
Symphony International£2.79M0.73-£102.23M£0.371.07

Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L)N/A N/A N/A
Symphony International N/A -23.29%0.22%

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Symphony International beats Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L) on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to RTW Biotech Opportunities?

Symphony International (LON:SIHL) and RTW Biotech Opportunities (LON:RTW) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

RTW Biotech Opportunities has a net margin of 158.61% compared to Symphony International's net margin of 0.00%. RTW Biotech Opportunities' return on equity of 36.01% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Symphony InternationalN/A -23.29% 0.22%
RTW Biotech Opportunities 158.61%36.01%-0.47%

In the previous week, RTW Biotech Opportunities had 1 more articles in the media than Symphony International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for RTW Biotech Opportunities and 1 mentions for Symphony International. RTW Biotech Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Symphony International's score of 0.00 indicating that RTW Biotech Opportunities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Symphony International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
RTW Biotech Opportunities
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RTW Biotech Opportunities has a beta of 1.238194, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

RTW Biotech Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. RTW Biotech Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Symphony International£2.79M0.73-£102.23M£0.371.07
RTW Biotech Opportunities£250.89M0.03£14.09B£63.000.04

Summary

RTW Biotech Opportunities beats Symphony International on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to i(x) Net Zero?

Symphony International (LON:SIHL) and i(x) Net Zero (LON:IX) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

i(x) Net Zero has a net margin of 70.33% compared to Symphony International's net margin of 0.00%. i(x) Net Zero's return on equity of 60.99% beat Symphony International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Symphony InternationalN/A -23.29% 0.22%
i(x) Net Zero 70.33%60.99%39.94%

i(x) Net Zero has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony International. i(x) Net Zero is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Symphony International£2.79M0.73-£102.23M£0.371.07
i(x) Net Zero£80.05M0.00£56.40M£0.54N/A

In the previous week, Symphony International had 1 more articles in the media than i(x) Net Zero. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for i(x) Net Zero. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled i(x) Net Zero'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Symphony International Neutral
i(x) Net Zero Neutral

Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, i(x) Net Zero has a beta of 1.94, suggesting that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market.

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 45.4% of i(x) Net Zero shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

i(x) Net Zero beats Symphony International on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Symphony International compare to Starvest?

Symphony International (LON:SIHL) and Starvest (LON:SVE) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Starvest has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Symphony International. Starvest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Symphony International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Symphony International£2.79M0.73-£102.23M£0.371.07
Starvest£322.74K0.00-£3.95M-£0.07N/A

In the previous week, Symphony International had 1 more articles in the media than Starvest. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Symphony International and 0 mentions for Starvest. Symphony International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Starvest'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Symphony International Neutral
Starvest Neutral

15.9% of Symphony International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Starvest shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of Symphony International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.3% of Starvest shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Symphony International's return on equity of -23.29% beat Starvest's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Symphony InternationalN/A -23.29% 0.22%
Starvest N/A -45.33%-2.04%

Symphony International has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Starvest has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Symphony International beats Starvest on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Symphony International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SIHL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SIHL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSymphony InternationalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£203.29M£2.54B£5.43B£2.74B
Dividend Yield6.58%6.01%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio1.0760.2429.21366.65
Price / Sales0.732,055.661,107.3886,088.64
Price / Cash0.2360.3348.6027.87
Price / Book0.011.386.687.79
Net Income-£102.23M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.21%-0.36%-0.35%-0.58%
1 Month Performance12.82%-0.61%0.36%-1.02%
1 Year Performance5.88%8.61%18.17%65.87%

Symphony International Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SIHL
Symphony International
N/AGBX 0.40
+7.0%		N/A+5.9%£203.29M£2.79M1.07N/A
MILA
Mila Resources
N/AGBX 1.10
+2.3%		N/A+30.5%£8.11MN/AN/A4
AAM
Artemis VCT PLC Fund O Inc (AAM.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£7.87M-£5.14MN/AN/A
RTW
RTW Biotech Opportunities
N/AGBX 2.33
-0.4%		N/A+93.8%£7.54M£250.89M0.044,971
IX
i(x) Net Zero
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.99M£80.05M14.8132,200

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SIHL) was last updated on 6/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold to $4,900—Here’s the Real Play
Gold is hitting new highs, fueled by tariffs and record central bank demand - 710 tonnes per quarter. JPMorgan...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $700 billion problem Elon, Zuck, and Pichai can't fix
Elon Musk warned that AI will demand more electricity than the grid can supply. Morgan Stanley backs him up - ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Musk, Larry Fink & Brian Armstrong are ALL Piling into This
Elon Musk, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong are all quietly investing in the same te...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel