Go Pro
→ 'How Much Can I Actually Spend Each Year With $2.5M Saved?' (From SmartAsset) (Ad)tc pixel Free SMIN Stock Alerts

Smiths Group (SMIN) Competitors

Smiths Group logo
GBX 2,816 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/25/2026 12:05 PM Eastern
Compare

SMIN vs. IMI, WEIR, MRO, SPX, and ROR

Should you buy Smiths Group stock or one of its competitors? Smiths Group's main competitors and comparable companies include IMI (IMI), The Weir Group (WEIR), Melrose Industries (MRO), Spirax-Sarco Engineering (SPX), and Rotork (ROR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Smiths Group compare to IMI?

Smiths Group (LON:SMIN) and IMI (LON:IMI) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Smiths Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,910, suggesting a potential upside of 3.34%. IMI has a consensus target price of GBX 3,171.67, suggesting a potential upside of 1.66%. Given Smiths Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Smiths Group is more favorable than IMI.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smiths Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
IMI
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

IMI has higher revenue and earnings than Smiths Group. IMI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smiths Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smiths Group£1.94B4.18£245.01M£76.8036.67
IMI£2.37B3.11£246.00M£135.7022.99

In the previous week, Smiths Group had 10 more articles in the media than IMI. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Smiths Group and 5 mentions for IMI. IMI's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Smiths Group's score of 0.66 indicating that IMI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Smiths Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
IMI
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Smiths Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. IMI pays an annual dividend of GBX 34.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Smiths Group pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. IMI pays out 25.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Smiths Group has a beta of 0.738, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IMI has a beta of 1.044, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

83.3% of Smiths Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of IMI shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Smiths Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of IMI shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Smiths Group has a net margin of 101.70% compared to IMI's net margin of 14.09%. Smiths Group's return on equity of 92.97% beat IMI's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smiths Group101.70% 92.97% 6.47%
IMI 14.09%32.41%9.55%

Summary

IMI beats Smiths Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smiths Group compare to The Weir Group?

Smiths Group (LON:SMIN) and The Weir Group (LON:WEIR) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Smiths Group had 12 more articles in the media than The Weir Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Smiths Group and 3 mentions for The Weir Group. Smiths Group's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat The Weir Group's score of 0.32 indicating that Smiths Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Smiths Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
The Weir Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Smiths Group has a beta of 0.738, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Weir Group has a beta of 1.085, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Smiths Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. The Weir Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 41.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Smiths Group pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Weir Group pays out 41.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Smiths Group has a net margin of 101.70% compared to The Weir Group's net margin of 9.97%. Smiths Group's return on equity of 92.97% beat The Weir Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smiths Group101.70% 92.97% 6.47%
The Weir Group 9.97%13.45%5.84%

83.3% of Smiths Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of The Weir Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Smiths Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of The Weir Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Smiths Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,910, suggesting a potential upside of 3.34%. The Weir Group has a consensus price target of GBX 3,408.33, suggesting a potential upside of 29.50%. Given The Weir Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Weir Group is more favorable than Smiths Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smiths Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
The Weir Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89

Smiths Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Weir Group. The Weir Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smiths Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smiths Group£1.94B4.18£245.01M£76.8036.67
The Weir Group£2.64B2.59£218.85M£101.8025.85

Summary

Smiths Group beats The Weir Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smiths Group compare to Melrose Industries?

Melrose Industries (LON:MRO) and Smiths Group (LON:SMIN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Melrose Industries currently has a consensus target price of GBX 708.33, indicating a potential upside of 49.44%. Smiths Group has a consensus target price of GBX 2,910, indicating a potential upside of 3.34%. Given Melrose Industries' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Melrose Industries is more favorable than Smiths Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Melrose Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Smiths Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Melrose Industries has a beta of 0.852, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smiths Group has a beta of 0.738, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Melrose Industries pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Smiths Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Melrose Industries pays out 56.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Smiths Group pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Smiths Group had 15 more articles in the media than Melrose Industries. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Smiths Group and 0 mentions for Melrose Industries. Smiths Group's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Melrose Industries' score of 0.00 indicating that Smiths Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Melrose Industries Neutral
Smiths Group Positive

78.7% of Melrose Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.3% of Smiths Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Melrose Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Smiths Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Smiths Group has a net margin of 101.70% compared to Melrose Industries' net margin of 4.28%. Smiths Group's return on equity of 92.97% beat Melrose Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Melrose Industries4.28% 5.63% 0.11%
Smiths Group 101.70%92.97%6.47%

Smiths Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Melrose Industries. Smiths Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Melrose Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Melrose Industries£3.74B1.58-£38.41M£12.8037.03
Smiths Group£1.94B4.18£245.01M£76.8036.67

Summary

Smiths Group beats Melrose Industries on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smiths Group compare to Spirax-Sarco Engineering?

Smiths Group (LON:SMIN) and Spirax-Sarco Engineering (LON:SPX) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Smiths Group has a beta of 0.738, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spirax-Sarco Engineering has a beta of 1.144, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Smiths Group had 13 more articles in the media than Spirax-Sarco Engineering. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Smiths Group and 2 mentions for Spirax-Sarco Engineering. Smiths Group's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Spirax-Sarco Engineering's score of 0.28 indicating that Smiths Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Smiths Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Spirax-Sarco Engineering
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Smiths Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,910, indicating a potential upside of 3.34%. Spirax-Sarco Engineering has a consensus price target of GBX 8,155, indicating a potential upside of 15.67%. Given Spirax-Sarco Engineering's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Spirax-Sarco Engineering is more favorable than Smiths Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smiths Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Spirax-Sarco Engineering
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

83.3% of Smiths Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.7% of Spirax-Sarco Engineering shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Smiths Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Spirax-Sarco Engineering shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Smiths Group has a net margin of 101.70% compared to Spirax-Sarco Engineering's net margin of 11.36%. Smiths Group's return on equity of 92.97% beat Spirax-Sarco Engineering's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smiths Group101.70% 92.97% 6.47%
Spirax-Sarco Engineering 11.36%16.03%6.93%

Smiths Group has higher revenue and earnings than Spirax-Sarco Engineering. Spirax-Sarco Engineering is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smiths Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smiths Group£1.94B4.18£245.01M£76.8036.67
Spirax-Sarco Engineering£1.74B2.98£192.00M£268.4026.27

Smiths Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Spirax-Sarco Engineering pays an annual dividend of GBX 170 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Smiths Group pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Spirax-Sarco Engineering pays out 63.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Smiths Group beats Spirax-Sarco Engineering on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smiths Group compare to Rotork?

Rotork (LON:ROR) and Smiths Group (LON:SMIN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Rotork has a beta of 1.053, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smiths Group has a beta of 0.738, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Smiths Group had 14 more articles in the media than Rotork. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Smiths Group and 1 mentions for Rotork. Smiths Group's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Rotork's score of 0.37 indicating that Smiths Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rotork
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Smiths Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Rotork pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Smiths Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Rotork pays out 56.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Smiths Group pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rotork is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Rotork presently has a consensus price target of GBX 433.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.73%. Smiths Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,910, indicating a potential upside of 3.34%. Given Smiths Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Smiths Group is more favorable than Rotork.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rotork
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Smiths Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Smiths Group has higher revenue and earnings than Rotork. Rotork is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smiths Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rotork£777.20M5.09£117.29M£14.8032.81
Smiths Group£1.94B4.18£245.01M£76.8036.67

Smiths Group has a net margin of 101.70% compared to Rotork's net margin of 15.75%. Smiths Group's return on equity of 92.97% beat Rotork's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rotork15.75% 21.48% 14.75%
Smiths Group 101.70%92.97%6.47%

59.2% of Rotork shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.3% of Smiths Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Rotork shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Smiths Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Smiths Group beats Rotork on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Smiths Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMIN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSmiths GroupMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£8.10B£11.31B£10.33B£2.90B
Dividend Yield1.74%2.28%96.84%6.19%
P/E Ratio36.6720.8325.32366.48
Price / Sales4.1862.64278.5389,848.90
Price / Cash5.5023.1623.9627.89
Price / Book4.354.294.876.35
Net Income£245.01M£380.78M£616.59M£5.89B
7 Day Performance8.73%0.17%-0.21%-0.13%
1 Month Performance7.81%-2.70%-2.05%5.24%
1 Year Performance22.68%6.82%4.25%18.75%

Smiths Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMIN
Smiths Group
3.0977 of 5 stars		GBX 2,816
flat		GBX 2,910
+3.3%		+22.7%£8.10B£1.94B36.6715,156
IMI
IMI
2.8826 of 5 stars		GBX 3,086
-0.7%		GBX 3,171.67
+2.8%		+38.1%£7.29B£2.37B22.7410,000
WEIR
The Weir Group
4.2798 of 5 stars		GBX 2,682
-1.1%		GBX 3,408.33
+27.1%		-2.8%£6.96B£2.64B26.3512,391
MRO
Melrose Industries
3.0022 of 5 stars		GBX 470.60
-3.5%		GBX 708.33
+50.5%		-19.9%£5.86B£3.74B36.771,570
SPX
Spirax-Sarco Engineering
2.7034 of 5 stars		GBX 7,135
-1.9%		GBX 8,155
+14.3%		+3.8%£5.27B£1.74B26.5810,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SMIN) was last updated on 9/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
"How Much Can I Actually Spend Each Year With $2.5M Saved?"
Having $2.5 million saved puts you ahead of most Americans, but how long it lasts depends on the decisions you...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk says UBI is coming. I say it's already here.
Elon Musk says AI could make money irrelevant by 2036. One income program already exists today, funded not by ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
This AI Stock Reminds One Analyst of Early Nvidia
Jeff Brown picked Nvidia in 2016, before shares surged 37,800 percent. Now he's identified another AI company ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ignore oil - This is the Energy Story of the century…
A drilling crew in Utah punched through three miles of granite in 16 days, a job the Department of Energy said...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel