Free Trial

Sutton Harbour Group (SUH) Competitors

Sutton Harbour Group logo
GBX 3.50 -0.50 (-12.50%)
As of 04:53 AM Eastern

SUH vs. JLG, VNET, TGP, ROL, and EAAS

Should you buy Sutton Harbour Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sutton Harbour Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sutton Harbour Group include John Laing Group (JLG), Vianet Group (VNET), Tekmar Group (TGP), Rotala (ROL), and eEnergy Group (EAAS). These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Sutton Harbour Group compare to John Laing Group?

John Laing Group (LON:JLG) and Sutton Harbour Group (LON:SUH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, John Laing Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sutton Harbour Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
John Laing Group Neutral
Sutton Harbour Group Neutral

John Laing Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sutton Harbour Group. Sutton Harbour Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than John Laing Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
John Laing Group£25M0.00N/A-£13.40N/A
Sutton Harbour Group£11.50M0.44-£3.85M-£11.51N/A

John Laing Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sutton Harbour Group's net margin of -143.16%. John Laing Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sutton Harbour Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
John Laing GroupN/A N/A N/A
Sutton Harbour Group -143.16%-47.21%-0.91%

25.2% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

John Laing Group and Sutton Harbour Group tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sutton Harbour Group compare to Vianet Group?

Sutton Harbour Group (LON:SUH) and Vianet Group (LON:VNET) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Vianet Group has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Sutton Harbour Group's net margin of -143.16%. Vianet Group's return on equity of 1.53% beat Sutton Harbour Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sutton Harbour Group-143.16% -47.21% -0.91%
Vianet Group 2.69%1.53%2.22%

Sutton Harbour Group has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vianet Group has a beta of 0.653, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

25.2% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Vianet Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of Vianet Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Vianet Group had 4 more articles in the media than Sutton Harbour Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Vianet Group and 0 mentions for Sutton Harbour Group. Vianet Group's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Sutton Harbour Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Vianet Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sutton Harbour Group Neutral
Vianet Group Positive

Vianet Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sutton Harbour Group. Sutton Harbour Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vianet Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sutton Harbour Group£11.50M0.44-£3.85M-£11.51N/A
Vianet Group£15.02M1.29£791.11K£3.5918.94

Summary

Vianet Group beats Sutton Harbour Group on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sutton Harbour Group compare to Tekmar Group?

Sutton Harbour Group (LON:SUH) and Tekmar Group (LON:TGP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Sutton Harbour Group has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tekmar Group has a beta of 1.651, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

Tekmar Group has a net margin of -13.59% compared to Sutton Harbour Group's net margin of -143.16%. Tekmar Group's return on equity of -15.78% beat Sutton Harbour Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sutton Harbour Group-143.16% -47.21% -0.91%
Tekmar Group -13.59%-15.78%-9.26%

Sutton Harbour Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tekmar Group. Tekmar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sutton Harbour Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sutton Harbour Group£11.50M0.44-£3.85M-£11.51N/A
Tekmar Group£28.75M0.71-£4.29M-£2.83N/A

25.2% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Tekmar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of Tekmar Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sutton Harbour Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tekmar Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sutton Harbour Group Neutral
Tekmar Group Neutral

Summary

Tekmar Group beats Sutton Harbour Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sutton Harbour Group compare to Rotala?

Sutton Harbour Group (LON:SUH) and Rotala (LON:ROL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Rotala has higher revenue and earnings than Sutton Harbour Group. Sutton Harbour Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rotala, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sutton Harbour Group£11.50M0.44-£3.85M-£11.51N/A
Rotala£98.52M0.00£1.17M-£0.02N/A

In the previous week, Sutton Harbour Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Rotala'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sutton Harbour Group Neutral
Rotala Neutral

25.2% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of Rotala shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.1% of Rotala shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rotala has a net margin of -0.93% compared to Sutton Harbour Group's net margin of -143.16%. Rotala's return on equity of -3.35% beat Sutton Harbour Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sutton Harbour Group-143.16% -47.21% -0.91%
Rotala -0.93%-3.35%1.24%

Sutton Harbour Group has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rotala has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Rotala beats Sutton Harbour Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sutton Harbour Group compare to eEnergy Group?

eEnergy Group (LON:EAAS) and Sutton Harbour Group (LON:SUH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

Sutton Harbour Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than eEnergy Group. eEnergy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sutton Harbour Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eEnergy Group£19.00M1.00-£4.33M-£0.88N/A
Sutton Harbour Group£11.50M0.44-£3.85M-£11.51N/A

eEnergy Group has a net margin of -17.86% compared to Sutton Harbour Group's net margin of -143.16%. Sutton Harbour Group's return on equity of -47.21% beat eEnergy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
eEnergy Group-17.86% -149.97% 3.87%
Sutton Harbour Group -143.16%-47.21%-0.91%

In the previous week, eEnergy Group had 1 more articles in the media than Sutton Harbour Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for eEnergy Group and 0 mentions for Sutton Harbour Group. eEnergy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sutton Harbour Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
eEnergy Group Neutral
Sutton Harbour Group Neutral

eEnergy Group has a beta of 1.182, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sutton Harbour Group has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

6.4% of eEnergy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.2% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.3% of eEnergy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Sutton Harbour Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

eEnergy Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 12, indicating a potential upside of 143.90%. Given eEnergy Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe eEnergy Group is more favorable than Sutton Harbour Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
eEnergy Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sutton Harbour Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

eEnergy Group beats Sutton Harbour Group on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sutton Harbour Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SUH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SUH vs. The Competition

MetricSutton Harbour GroupInfrastructure Operations IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.00M£5.00M£9.13B£2.73B
Dividend Yield5.06%4.65%3.56%6.13%
P/E Ratio-0.3010.3325.11366.48
Price / Sales0.4443.515,117.6686,600.07
Price / Cash31.4331.4327.5527.87
Price / Book0.090.094.737.62
Net Income-£3.85M-£3.85M£793.53M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-18.13%-3.98%-1.63%-1.35%
1 Month Performance-17.65%-4.69%-1.07%0.48%
1 Year Performance-46.15%11.41%23.90%69.72%

Sutton Harbour Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SUH
Sutton Harbour Group
N/AGBX 3.50
-12.5%
N/A-41.2%£5.00M£11.50MN/A30
JLG
John Laing Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.99B£25MN/A156
VNET
Vianet Group
N/AGBX 72
+5.4%
N/A-15.7%£20.47M£15.02M20.063,220
TGP
Tekmar Group
N/AGBX 14.50
-2.0%
N/A+201.4%£20.27M£28.75MN/A172
ROL
Rotala
N/AN/AN/AN/A£19.54M£98.52MN/A17,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SUH) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners