Severn Trent (SVT) Competitors

Severn Trent has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Mining. Acacia Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Severn Trent has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Acacia Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Severn Trent's return on equity of 17.64% beat Acacia Mining's return on equity.

76.2% of Severn Trent shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Severn Trent presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,978.17, suggesting a potential downside of 5.36%. Given Acacia Mining's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acacia Mining is more favorable than Severn Trent.

In the previous week, Severn Trent had 1 more articles in the media than Acacia Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Severn Trent and 0 mentions for Acacia Mining. Severn Trent's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Acacia Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Severn Trent is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Severn Trent pays an annual dividend of GBX 121.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 131.6%. Severn Trent pays out 116.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, CRH had 3 more articles in the media than Severn Trent. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for CRH and 1 mentions for Severn Trent. Severn Trent's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat CRH's score of -0.09 indicating that Severn Trent is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Severn Trent has a beta of 0.558, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.241, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

76.2% of Severn Trent shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.2% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CRH shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Severn Trent currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,978.17, indicating a potential downside of 5.36%. CRH has a consensus price target of £105.22, indicating a potential upside of 9,252.89%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CRH is more favorable than Severn Trent.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Severn Trent. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Severn Trent has a net margin of 11.92% compared to CRH's net margin of 9.69%. CRH's return on equity of 20.14% beat Severn Trent's return on equity.

Severn Trent has higher revenue and earnings than Intercede Group. Intercede Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Severn Trent has a consensus price target of GBX 2,978.17, indicating a potential downside of 5.36%. Given Severn Trent's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Severn Trent is more favorable than Intercede Group.

Intercede Group has a net margin of 20.89% compared to Severn Trent's net margin of 11.92%. Intercede Group's return on equity of 21.69% beat Severn Trent's return on equity.

14.1% of Intercede Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.2% of Severn Trent shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.8% of Intercede Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intercede Group has a beta of 1.465, meaning that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Severn Trent has a beta of 0.558, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Intercede Group and Intercede Group both had 1 articles in the media. Severn Trent's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Intercede Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Severn Trent is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Severn Trent and Severn Trent both had 1 articles in the media. NWF Group's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Severn Trent's score of 0.10 indicating that NWF Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Severn Trent has higher revenue and earnings than NWF Group. NWF Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Severn Trent has a beta of 0.558, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NWF Group has a beta of 0.235, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Severn Trent pays an annual dividend of GBX 121.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. NWF Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Severn Trent pays out 116.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NWF Group pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NWF Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Severn Trent has a net margin of 11.92% compared to NWF Group's net margin of 0.60%. Severn Trent's return on equity of 17.64% beat NWF Group's return on equity.

Severn Trent presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,978.17, indicating a potential downside of 5.36%. NWF Group has a consensus target price of GBX 283, indicating a potential upside of 121.09%. Given NWF Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NWF Group is more favorable than Severn Trent.

76.2% of Severn Trent shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.5% of NWF Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of NWF Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.