Tan Delta Systems (TAND) Competitors

GBX 30 +2.00 (+7.14%)
As of 03:19 AM Eastern

TAND vs. CNEL, PFC, PRES, POS, and ADES

Should you buy Tan Delta Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tan Delta Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tan Delta Systems include China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (CNEL), Petrofac (PFC), Pressure Technologies (PRES), Plexus (POS), and ADES International (ADES). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (LON:CNEL) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

4.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) had 1 more articles in the media than Tan Delta Systems. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) and 0 mentions for Tan Delta Systems. China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Tan Delta Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) Positive
Tan Delta Systems Neutral

China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)N/AN/AN/A-£97.90N/A
Tan Delta Systems£1.08M20.27-£1.33M-£2.00N/A

China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)N/A N/A N/A
Tan Delta Systems -129.22%-60.04%N/A

Summary

China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) beats Tan Delta Systems on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to Petrofac?

Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) and Petrofac (LON:PFC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Tan Delta Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petrofac'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tan Delta Systems Neutral
Petrofac Neutral

Tan Delta Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petrofac. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petrofac, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tan Delta Systems£1.08M20.27-£1.33M-£2.00N/A
Petrofac£3.30B0.00-£714.53M-£81.55N/A

4.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Petrofac shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Petrofac shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Petrofac has a net margin of -20.23% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tan Delta Systems-129.22% -60.04% N/A
Petrofac -20.23%371.32%-9.55%

Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.597, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Petrofac beats Tan Delta Systems on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to Pressure Technologies?

Pressure Technologies (LON:PRES) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

Pressure Technologies has a net margin of -16.44% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. Pressure Technologies' return on equity of -19.70% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pressure Technologies-16.44% -19.70% 0.88%
Tan Delta Systems -129.22%-60.04%N/A

Pressure Technologies has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.597, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pressure Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tan Delta Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pressure Technologies Neutral
Tan Delta Systems Neutral

65.9% of Pressure Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 5.4% of Pressure Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pressure Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pressure Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pressure Technologies£32.78M0.00-£500.34K-£1.35N/A
Tan Delta Systems£1.08M20.27-£1.33M-£2.00N/A

Summary

Pressure Technologies beats Tan Delta Systems on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to Plexus?

Plexus (LON:POS) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Plexus had 1 more articles in the media than Tan Delta Systems. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Plexus and 0 mentions for Tan Delta Systems. Plexus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tan Delta Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Plexus Neutral
Tan Delta Systems Neutral

Plexus has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.597, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

2.7% of Plexus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 84.7% of Plexus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plexus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plexus£2.81M1.87£2.93M-£2.68N/A
Tan Delta Systems£1.08M20.27-£1.33M-£2.00N/A

Tan Delta Systems has a net margin of -129.22% compared to Plexus' net margin of -145.30%. Plexus' return on equity of -27.03% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plexus-145.30% -27.03% 0.01%
Tan Delta Systems -129.22%-60.04%N/A

Summary

Plexus beats Tan Delta Systems on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to ADES International?

Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) and ADES International (LON:ADES) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

4.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ADES International has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ADES International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tan Delta Systems£1.08M20.27-£1.33M-£2.00N/A
ADES International£452.11M0.00N/A£0.46N/A

ADES International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. ADES International's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tan Delta Systems-129.22% -60.04% N/A
ADES International N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Tan Delta Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ADES International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tan Delta Systems Neutral
ADES International Neutral

Summary

ADES International beats Tan Delta Systems on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tan Delta Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TAND and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TAND and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TAND vs. The Competition

MetricTan Delta SystemsOil & Gas Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£21.97M£526.69M£9.55B£2.76B
Dividend YieldN/A19.60%10.55%6.16%
P/E Ratio-15.0013.1518.58366.50
Price / Sales20.27122.98750.6686,068.87
Price / CashN/A26.6937.7527.87
Price / Book5.002.114.077.67
Net Income-£1.33M£38.57M£4.24B£5.89B
7 Day Performance7.14%-1.56%-2.35%-1.10%
1 Month Performance-11.08%-2.48%-8.17%-1.57%
1 Year Performance42.86%25.76%29.79%65.64%

Tan Delta Systems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TAND
Tan Delta Systems
N/AGBX 30
+7.1%
N/A+43.0%£21.97M£1.08MN/A11
CNEL
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£33.33MN/AN/A79
PFC
Petrofac
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.88M£3.30BN/A8,600
PRES
Pressure Technologies
N/AN/AN/AN/A£12.88M£32.78MN/A207
POS
Plexus
N/AGBX 3.10
+6.9%
N/A-61.9%£5.35M£2.81MN/A38

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TAND) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners