Go Pro

Tan Delta Systems (TAND) Competitors

GBX 25 -3.00 (-10.71%)
As of 11:04 AM Eastern

TAND vs. CNEL, PFC, PRES, POS, and VLS

Should you buy Tan Delta Systems stock or one of its competitors? Tan Delta Systems's main competitors and comparable companies include China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (CNEL), Petrofac (PFC), Pressure Technologies (PRES), Plexus (POS), and Velocys (VLS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (LON:CNEL) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)N/A N/A N/A
Tan Delta Systems -129.22%-60.04%N/A

2.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)N/AN/AN/A-£97.90N/A
Tan Delta Systems£1.22M14.98-£1.33M-£2.00N/A

In the previous week, Tan Delta Systems had 1 more articles in the media than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tan Delta Systems and 0 mentions for China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Tan Delta Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) Positive
Tan Delta Systems Neutral

Summary

Tan Delta Systems beats China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to Petrofac?

Petrofac (LON:PFC) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Petrofac has a net margin of -20.23% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petrofac-20.23% 371.32% -9.55%
Tan Delta Systems -129.22%-60.04%N/A

27.4% of Petrofac shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Petrofac shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tan Delta Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Petrofac. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tan Delta Systems and 0 mentions for Petrofac. Petrofac's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tan Delta Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petrofac Neutral
Tan Delta Systems Neutral

Tan Delta Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petrofac. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petrofac, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petrofac£3.30B0.00-£714.53M-£81.55N/A
Tan Delta Systems£1.22M14.98-£1.33M-£2.00N/A

Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.635, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Petrofac beats Tan Delta Systems on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to Pressure Technologies?

Pressure Technologies (LON:PRES) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Pressure Technologies has a net margin of -16.44% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. Pressure Technologies' return on equity of -19.70% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pressure Technologies-16.44% -19.70% 0.88%
Tan Delta Systems -129.22%-60.04%N/A

Pressure Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pressure Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pressure Technologies£32.78M0.00-£500.34K-£1.35N/A
Tan Delta Systems£1.22M14.98-£1.33M-£2.00N/A

Pressure Technologies has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.635, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

65.9% of Pressure Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 5.4% of Pressure Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tan Delta Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Pressure Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tan Delta Systems and 0 mentions for Pressure Technologies. Pressure Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tan Delta Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pressure Technologies Neutral
Tan Delta Systems Neutral

Summary

Pressure Technologies beats Tan Delta Systems on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to Plexus?

Plexus (LON:POS) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

5.8% of Plexus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 84.7% of Plexus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Plexus has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plexus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plexus£2.81M1.91£2.93M-£2.68N/A
Tan Delta Systems£1.22M14.98-£1.33M-£2.00N/A

Plexus has a beta of 0.625, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.635, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Tan Delta Systems has a net margin of -129.22% compared to Plexus' net margin of -145.30%. Plexus' return on equity of -27.03% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plexus-145.30% -27.03% 0.01%
Tan Delta Systems -129.22%-60.04%N/A

In the previous week, Plexus and Plexus both had 1 articles in the media. Plexus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tan Delta Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Plexus Neutral
Tan Delta Systems Neutral

Summary

Plexus beats Tan Delta Systems on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tan Delta Systems compare to Velocys?

Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) and Velocys (LON:VLS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Velocys has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. Tan Delta Systems' return on equity of -60.04% beat Velocys' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tan Delta Systems-129.22% -60.04% N/A
Velocys N/A -90.49%-27.20%

2.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Velocys shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of Velocys shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.635, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Velocys has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tan Delta Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Velocys. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tan Delta Systems and 0 mentions for Velocys. Tan Delta Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Velocys'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tan Delta Systems Neutral
Velocys Neutral

Tan Delta Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Velocys. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Velocys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tan Delta Systems£1.22M14.98-£1.33M-£2.00N/A
Velocys£94K0.00-£17.29M-£0.01N/A

Summary

Tan Delta Systems beats Velocys on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tan Delta Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TAND and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TAND vs. The Competition

MetricTan Delta SystemsEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£18.31M£3.44B£9.69B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A13.45%10.71%6.21%
P/E Ratio-12.5041.5920.16366.04
Price / Sales14.9829.77551.8689,364.46
Price / CashN/A20.2636.9227.89
Price / Book4.172.043.976.31
Net Income-£1.33M£67.81M£4.35B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.85%-2.55%-2.08%-0.09%
1 Month Performance-16.67%-4.41%-1.48%10.91%
1 Year Performance21.36%33.94%27.93%17.58%

Tan Delta Systems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TAND
Tan Delta Systems
N/AGBX 25
-10.7%
N/A+26.6%£18.31M£1.22MN/A11
CNEL
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£33.33MN/AN/A79
PFC
Petrofac
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.88M£3.30BN/A8,600
PRES
Pressure Technologies
N/AN/AN/AN/A£12.88M£32.78MN/A207
POS
Plexus
N/AGBX 3.50
-6.6%
N/A-52.9%£6.05M£2.81MN/A38

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TAND) was last updated on 9/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners