Hunting (HTG) Competitors

Hunting has a beta of 0.713, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.732, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hunting had 1 more articles in the media than Gulf Marine Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Gulf Marine Services. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Gulf Marine Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hunting currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536, indicating a potential upside of 10.63%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Gulf Marine Services.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Marine Services. Gulf Marine Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Hunting's net margin of 4.11%. Gulf Marine Services' return on equity of 4.61% beat Hunting's return on equity.

61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Hunting shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hunting had 1 more articles in the media than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). Hunting's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Hunting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hunting has a net margin of 4.11% compared to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Hunting's return on equity of 3.49% beat China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s return on equity.

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 536, indicating a potential upside of 10.63%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L).

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Petrofac pays an annual dividend of GBX 30 per share. Hunting pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Petrofac pays out -36.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hunting pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

27.4% of Petrofac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Petrofac shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Hunting shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hunting has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Petrofac's net margin of -20.23%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Hunting's return on equity.

Hunting has a consensus target price of GBX 536, indicating a potential upside of 10.63%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Petrofac.

Hunting has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petrofac. Petrofac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 0.713, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hunting had 1 more articles in the media than Petrofac. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Petrofac. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Petrofac's score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Hunting shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hunting has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -131.41%. Hunting's return on equity of 3.49% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Hunting currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536, suggesting a potential upside of 10.63%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Tan Delta Systems.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Hunting had 1 more articles in the media than Tan Delta Systems. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Tan Delta Systems. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Tan Delta Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hunting has a beta of 0.713, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.716, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.