Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AT or HTG?

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Ashtead Technology. Ashtead Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ashtead Technology £139.68M 2.50 £24.26M £30.98 14.22 Hunting £1.02B 0.68 £154.42M £24.60 19.37

Does the media favor AT or HTG?

In the previous week, Hunting had 1 more articles in the media than Ashtead Technology. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hunting and 1 mentions for Ashtead Technology. Ashtead Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Hunting's score of 0.77 indicating that Ashtead Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ashtead Technology 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Hunting 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate GMS or HTG?

Hunting has a consensus price target of GBX 536, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Gulf Marine Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gulf Marine Services 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GMS or HTG?

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Marine Services. Gulf Marine Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gulf Marine Services £188.12M 1.10 £48.19M £1.64 10.94 Hunting £1.02B 0.68 £154.42M £24.60 19.37

Do analysts rate HTG or CNEL?

Hunting currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80 China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer PFC or HTG?

Hunting has a consensus price target of GBX 536, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Petrofac. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Petrofac 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Which has better valuation & earnings, PFC or HTG?

Hunting has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petrofac. Petrofac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Petrofac £3.30B 0.00 -£714.53M -£81.55 N/A Hunting £1.02B 0.68 £154.42M £24.60 19.37

Is PFC or HTG more profitable?

Hunting has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Petrofac's net margin of -20.23%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Hunting's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Petrofac -20.23% 371.32% -9.55% Hunting 4.11% 3.49% 4.21%

Do analysts prefer TAND or HTG?

Hunting has a consensus target price of GBX 536, indicating a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Tan Delta Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Tan Delta Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TAND or HTG?

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Tan Delta Systems £1.08M 20.27 -£1.33M -£2.00 N/A Hunting £1.02B 0.68 £154.42M £24.60 19.37

Hunting (HTG) Competitors

GBX 476.50 +6.00 (+1.28%)

As of 12:32 PM Eastern

Compare

HTG vs. AT, GMS, CNEL, PFC, and TAND

Should you buy Hunting stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hunting with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hunting include Ashtead Technology (AT), Gulf Marine Services (GMS), China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (CNEL), Petrofac (PFC), and Tan Delta Systems (TAND). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Hunting compare to Ashtead Technology?

Ashtead Technology (LON:AT) and Hunting (LON:HTG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Ashtead Technology. Ashtead Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ashtead Technology	£139.68M	2.50	£24.26M	£30.98	14.22
Hunting	£1.02B	0.68	£154.42M	£24.60	19.37

Ashtead Technology has a beta of 0.427, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 0.713, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Ashtead Technology presently has a consensus target price of GBX 637, suggesting a potential upside of 44.61%. Hunting has a consensus target price of GBX 536, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Ashtead Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Ashtead Technology is more favorable than Hunting.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ashtead Technology	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

75.9% of Ashtead Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Ashtead Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Hunting shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hunting had 1 more articles in the media than Ashtead Technology. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hunting and 1 mentions for Ashtead Technology. Ashtead Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Hunting's score of 0.77 indicating that Ashtead Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ashtead Technology	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Hunting	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ashtead Technology has a net margin of 15.85% compared to Hunting's net margin of 4.11%. Ashtead Technology's return on equity of 21.84% beat Hunting's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ashtead Technology	15.85%	21.84%	13.14%
Hunting	4.11%	3.49%	4.21%

Ashtead Technology pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Hunting pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Ashtead Technology pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hunting pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Ashtead Technology beats Hunting on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Gulf Marine Services?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Hunting (LON:HTG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Hunting has a consensus price target of GBX 536, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Gulf Marine Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gulf Marine Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

In the previous week, Hunting had 2 more articles in the media than Gulf Marine Services. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Gulf Marine Services. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Gulf Marine Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services	Neutral
Hunting	Positive

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Marine Services. Gulf Marine Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services	£188.12M	1.10	£48.19M	£1.64	10.94
Hunting	£1.02B	0.68	£154.42M	£24.60	19.37

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Hunting's net margin of 4.11%. Gulf Marine Services' return on equity of 4.61% beat Hunting's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services	10.06%	4.61%	5.32%
Hunting	4.11%	3.49%	4.21%

8.3% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Hunting shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.732, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 0.713, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hunting beats Gulf Marine Services on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

Hunting (LON:HTG) and China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (LON:CNEL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Hunting currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Hunting had 2 more articles in the media than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hunting	Positive
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	Neutral

61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Hunting shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hunting	£1.02B	0.68	£154.42M	£24.60	19.37
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A	-£97.90	N/A

Hunting has a net margin of 4.11% compared to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Hunting's return on equity of 3.49% beat China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hunting	4.11%	3.49%	4.21%
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Hunting beats China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Petrofac?

Petrofac (LON:PFC) and Hunting (LON:HTG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Hunting had 2 more articles in the media than Petrofac. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Petrofac. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Petrofac's score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Petrofac	Neutral
Hunting	Positive

27.4% of Petrofac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Petrofac shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Hunting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petrofac pays an annual dividend of GBX 30 per share. Hunting pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Petrofac pays out -36.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hunting pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 0.713, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Hunting has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Petrofac's net margin of -20.23%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Hunting's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Petrofac	-20.23%	371.32%	-9.55%
Hunting	4.11%	3.49%	4.21%

Hunting has a consensus price target of GBX 536, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Petrofac.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Petrofac	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Hunting has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petrofac. Petrofac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Petrofac	£3.30B	0.00	-£714.53M	-£81.55	N/A
Hunting	£1.02B	0.68	£154.42M	£24.60	19.37

Summary

Hunting beats Petrofac on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Tan Delta Systems?

Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) and Hunting (LON:HTG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

Hunting has a consensus target price of GBX 536, indicating a potential upside of 12.49%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Tan Delta Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tan Delta Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tan Delta Systems	£1.08M	20.27	-£1.33M	-£2.00	N/A
Hunting	£1.02B	0.68	£154.42M	£24.60	19.37

In the previous week, Hunting had 2 more articles in the media than Tan Delta Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Tan Delta Systems. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Tan Delta Systems' score of -0.95 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Tan Delta Systems	Negative
Hunting	Positive

4.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Hunting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.716, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 0.713, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Hunting has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. Hunting's return on equity of 3.49% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tan Delta Systems	-129.22%	-60.04%	N/A
Hunting	4.11%	3.49%	4.21%

Summary

Hunting beats Tan Delta Systems on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hunting News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HTG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HTG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hunting	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£696.26M	£541.35M	£10.10B	£2.73B
Dividend Yield	2.10%	19.58%	10.42%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	19.37	13.35	20.13	366.48
Price / Sales	0.68	122.46	776.34	86,600.07
Price / Cash	5.56	26.69	37.19	27.87
Price / Book	0.83	2.13	4.27	7.62
Net Income	£154.42M	£38.57M	£4.23B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	2.25%	-2.01%	-3.07%	-1.34%
1 Month Performance	-3.50%	2.29%	-2.13%	0.48%
1 Year Performance	77.47%	35.68%	39.78%	69.73%

Hunting Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HTG Hunting	3.8026 of 5 stars	GBX 476.50 +1.3%	GBX 536 +12.5%	+76.0%	£696.26M	£1.02B	19.37	2,341	Gap Down
AT Ashtead Technology	4.3205 of 5 stars	GBX 416.50 +3.2%	GBX 637 +52.9%	+0.3%	£330.31M	£139.68M	13.45	559	Positive News Gap Down High Trading Volume
GMS Gulf Marine Services	N/A	GBX 19.24 flat	N/A	-15.9%	£221.68M	£188.12M	11.73	5,480
CNEL China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£33.33M	N/A	N/A	79	Gap Down
PFC Petrofac	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£26.88M	£3.30B	N/A	8,600	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HTG) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hunting (HTG) Competitors

HTG vs. AT, GMS, CNEL, PFC, and TAND

How does Hunting compare to Ashtead Technology?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Gulf Marine Services?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Petrofac?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Tan Delta Systems?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HTG vs. The Competition

Hunting Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hunting (HTG) Competitors

HTG vs. AT, GMS, CNEL, PFC, and TAND

How does Hunting compare to Ashtead Technology?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AT or HTG?

Which has more risk and volatility, AT or HTG?

Do analysts recommend AT or HTG?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AT or HTG?

Does the media favor AT or HTG?

Is AT or HTG more profitable?

Is AT or HTG a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Gulf Marine Services?

Do analysts rate GMS or HTG?

Does the media prefer GMS or HTG?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GMS or HTG?

Is GMS or HTG more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of GMS or HTG?

Which has more volatility and risk, GMS or HTG?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

Do analysts rate HTG or CNEL?

Does the media favor HTG or CNEL?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HTG or CNEL?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, HTG or CNEL?

Is HTG or CNEL more profitable?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Petrofac?

Does the media refer more to PFC or HTG?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PFC or HTG?

Is PFC or HTG a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, PFC or HTG?

Is PFC or HTG more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PFC or HTG?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PFC or HTG?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Tan Delta Systems?

Do analysts prefer TAND or HTG?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TAND or HTG?

Does the media favor TAND or HTG?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TAND or HTG?

Which has more volatility and risk, TAND or HTG?

Is TAND or HTG more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HTG vs. The Competition

Hunting Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools