Taylor Wimpey (TW) Competitors

Taylor Wimpey (LON:TW) and Land Securities Group (LON:LAND) are both mid-cap trading companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TW or LAND?

Taylor Wimpey has higher revenue and earnings than Land Securities Group. Taylor Wimpey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Land Securities Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Taylor Wimpey	£3.45B	1.10	£250.27M	£6.85	15.33
Land Securities Group	£832M	5.26	-£318.80M	£0.53	1,108.49

Is TW or LAND more profitable?

Taylor Wimpey has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Land Securities Group's net margin of -38.71%. Taylor Wimpey's return on equity of 5.50% beat Land Securities Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Taylor Wimpey	7.25%	5.50%	4.08%
Land Securities Group	-38.71%	-4.88%	2.40%

Is TW or LAND a better dividend stock?

Taylor Wimpey pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Land Securities Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Taylor Wimpey pays out 145.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Land Securities Group pays out 75.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Do analysts rate TW or LAND?

Taylor Wimpey presently has a consensus price target of GBX 138.14, indicating a potential upside of 31.44%. Land Securities Group has a consensus price target of GBX 693.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.00%. Given Taylor Wimpey's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Taylor Wimpey is more favorable than Land Securities Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Taylor Wimpey	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
Land Securities Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TW or LAND?

68.7% of Taylor Wimpey shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.3% of Land Securities Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Taylor Wimpey shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Land Securities Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Which has more risk and volatility, TW or LAND?

Taylor Wimpey has a beta of 1.81, meaning that its share price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Land Securities Group has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the media refer more to TW or LAND?

In the previous week, Taylor Wimpey had 7 more articles in the media than Land Securities Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Taylor Wimpey and 6 mentions for Land Securities Group. Land Securities Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Taylor Wimpey's score of 0.43 indicating that Land Securities Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Taylor Wimpey	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Land Securities Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Taylor Wimpey beats Land Securities Group on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.