Free Trial

US Solar Fund (USF) Competitors

US Solar Fund logo
GBX 0.36 -0.01 (-3.00%)
As of 12:02 PM Eastern

USF vs. VOX, TIR, OXF, BLP, and BLU

Should you buy US Solar Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares US Solar Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with US Solar Fund include Vox Valor Capital (VOX), Tiger Royalties and Investments (TIR), Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust (OXF), Blue Planet Investment Trust (BLP), and Blue Star Capital (BLU). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does US Solar Fund compare to Vox Valor Capital?

US Solar Fund (LON:USF) and Vox Valor Capital (LON:VOX) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, US Solar Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Vox Valor Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
US Solar Fund Neutral
Vox Valor Capital Neutral

Vox Valor Capital has higher revenue and earnings than US Solar Fund. US Solar Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vox Valor Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
US Solar Fund£1.28M0.86-£3.99B-£0.02N/A
Vox Valor Capital£12.09M0.35-£15.39K-£0.04N/A

15.6% of US Solar Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of US Solar Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.1% of Vox Valor Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

US Solar Fund has a net margin of 104.45% compared to Vox Valor Capital's net margin of -8.72%. US Solar Fund's return on equity of -0.03% beat Vox Valor Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
US Solar Fund104.45% -0.03% N/A
Vox Valor Capital -8.72%-12.30%0.29%

Summary

US Solar Fund and Vox Valor Capital tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does US Solar Fund compare to Tiger Royalties and Investments?

Tiger Royalties and Investments (LON:TIR) and US Solar Fund (LON:USF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Tiger Royalties and Investments has a beta of 0.08, indicating that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, US Solar Fund has a beta of 0.42275822, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of US Solar Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.2% of Tiger Royalties and Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of US Solar Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tiger Royalties and Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than US Solar Fund. US Solar Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tiger Royalties and Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tiger Royalties and Investments£194.06K20.89-£296.64K-£1.38N/A
US Solar Fund£1.28M0.86-£3.99B-£0.02N/A

Tiger Royalties and Investments has a net margin of 661.52% compared to US Solar Fund's net margin of 104.45%. US Solar Fund's return on equity of -0.03% beat Tiger Royalties and Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tiger Royalties and Investments661.52% -47.71% -46.81%
US Solar Fund 104.45%-0.03%N/A

In the previous week, Tiger Royalties and Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled US Solar Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tiger Royalties and Investments Neutral
US Solar Fund Neutral

Summary

US Solar Fund beats Tiger Royalties and Investments on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does US Solar Fund compare to Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust?

US Solar Fund (LON:USF) and Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust (LON:OXF) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk and dividends.

Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust has higher revenue and earnings than US Solar Fund. US Solar Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
US Solar Fund£1.28M0.86-£3.99B-£0.02N/A
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust£1.62M0.00N/A£0.13N/A

15.6% of US Solar Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of US Solar Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

US Solar Fund has a net margin of 104.45% compared to Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat US Solar Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
US Solar Fund104.45% -0.03% N/A
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, US Solar Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
US Solar Fund Neutral
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust Neutral

Summary

Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust beats US Solar Fund on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does US Solar Fund compare to Blue Planet Investment Trust?

Blue Planet Investment Trust (LON:BLP) and US Solar Fund (LON:USF) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Blue Planet Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.01 per share. US Solar Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.57 per share and has a dividend yield of 720.5%. Blue Planet Investment Trust pays out 10.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. US Solar Fund pays out -12,825.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. US Solar Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Blue Planet Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than US Solar Fund. US Solar Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Planet Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Planet Investment Trust-£8.71M0.00-£10.20M£0.05N/A
US Solar Fund£1.28M0.86-£3.99B-£0.02N/A

US Solar Fund has a net margin of 104.45% compared to Blue Planet Investment Trust's net margin of 0.00%. US Solar Fund's return on equity of -0.03% beat Blue Planet Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Planet Investment TrustN/A -94.24% -39.03%
US Solar Fund 104.45%-0.03%N/A

Blue Planet Investment Trust has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, US Solar Fund has a beta of 0.42275822, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

25.1% of Blue Planet Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of US Solar Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.1% of Blue Planet Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of US Solar Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Blue Planet Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled US Solar Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Planet Investment Trust Neutral
US Solar Fund Neutral

Summary

US Solar Fund beats Blue Planet Investment Trust on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does US Solar Fund compare to Blue Star Capital?

US Solar Fund (LON:USF) and Blue Star Capital (LON:BLU) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Blue Star Capital had 1 more articles in the media than US Solar Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Blue Star Capital and 0 mentions for US Solar Fund. US Solar Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blue Star Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
US Solar Fund Neutral
Blue Star Capital Neutral

Blue Star Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than US Solar Fund. US Solar Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Star Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
US Solar Fund£1.28M0.86-£3.99B-£0.02N/A
Blue Star CapitalN/AN/A-£5.35M-£1.93N/A

US Solar Fund has a beta of 0.42275822, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Star Capital has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

15.6% of US Solar Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Blue Star Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of US Solar Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Blue Star Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

US Solar Fund has a net margin of 104.45% compared to Blue Star Capital's net margin of 0.00%. US Solar Fund's return on equity of -0.03% beat Blue Star Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
US Solar Fund104.45% -0.03% N/A
Blue Star Capital N/A -68.08%-42.27%

Summary

US Solar Fund beats Blue Star Capital on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get US Solar Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for USF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

USF vs. The Competition

MetricUS Solar FundAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.10M£2.45B£5.76B£2.78B
Dividend Yield6.13%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio-17.8025.8816.39363.21
Price / Sales0.862,119.581,122.1187,415.85
Price / CashN/A60.1591.3227.85
Price / Book0.001.386.527.70
Net Income-£3.99B£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-7.29%-0.19%0.24%0.20%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-32.88%-7.39%N/A
1 Year Performance-11.88%11.37%19.69%74.70%

US Solar Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
USF
US Solar Fund
N/AGBX 0.36
-3.0%
N/A-9.2%£1.10M£1.28MN/AN/A
VOX
Vox Valor Capital
N/AGBX 0.18
flat
N/AN/A£4.18M£12.09MN/A5
TIR
Tiger Royalties and Investments
N/AGBX 0.48
flat
N/AN/A£4.05M£194.06KN/A4
OXF
Oxford Technology 4 Venture Capital Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.92M£1.62M261.54N/A
BLP
Blue Planet Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.83M-£8.71M155.00N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:USF) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners