Asset Entities (ASST) Competitors

Asset Entities (NASDAQ:ASST) and Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Do analysts rate ASST or SANG?

Sangoma Technologies has a consensus target price of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 89.98%. Given Sangoma Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sangoma Technologies is more favorable than Asset Entities.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Asset Entities	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Sangoma Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ASST or SANG?

Asset Entities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Asset Entities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Asset Entities	$759.69K	94.05	-$6.39M	-$1.94	-2.34
Sangoma Technologies	$247.28M	0.78	-$8.66M	-$0.21	-27.57

Which has more risk and volatility, ASST or SANG?

Asset Entities has a beta of 17.31, indicating that its share price is 1,631% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ASST or SANG?

5.5% of Asset Entities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 56.5% of Asset Entities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Does the media refer more to ASST or SANG?

In the previous week, Asset Entities had 2 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Asset Entities and 2 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Asset Entities' score of 0.53 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Asset Entities	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sangoma Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Is ASST or SANG more profitable?

Sangoma Technologies has a net margin of -2.91% compared to Asset Entities' net margin of -996.98%. Sangoma Technologies' return on equity of -2.61% beat Asset Entities' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Asset Entities	-996.98%	-246.95%	-215.86%
Sangoma Technologies	-2.91%	-2.61%	-1.76%

Summary

Sangoma Technologies beats Asset Entities on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.