Go Pro

Concrete Pumping (BBCP) Competitors

Concrete Pumping logo
$9.01 -0.02 (-0.22%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

BBCP vs. ITG, GLDD, AMRC, BWMN, and LMB

Should you buy Concrete Pumping stock or one of its competitors? Concrete Pumping's main competitors and comparable companies include ITG (ITG), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (GLDD), Ameresco (AMRC), Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN), and Limbach (LMB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to ITG?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and ITG (NASDAQ:ITG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus price target of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 13.76%. ITG has a consensus price target of $17.56, indicating a potential upside of 46.42%. Given ITG's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ITG is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Concrete Pumping
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
ITG
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 2.23% compared to ITG's net margin of 0.00%. Concrete Pumping's return on equity of 3.47% beat ITG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping2.23% 3.47% 1.03%
ITG N/A N/A N/A

Concrete Pumping has higher revenue and earnings than ITG.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping$392.87M1.16$6.37M$0.1464.36
ITGN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Concrete Pumping had 4 more articles in the media than ITG. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Concrete Pumping and 4 mentions for ITG. ITG's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.46 indicating that ITG is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ITG
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Concrete Pumping beats ITG on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock?

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 2.23%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 16.46% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock8.27% 16.46% 6.48%
Concrete Pumping 2.23%3.47%1.03%

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$888.28M1.28$73.47M$1.0715.89
Concrete Pumping$392.87M1.16$6.37M$0.1464.36

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock presently has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Concrete Pumping has a consensus target price of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 13.76%. Given Concrete Pumping's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Concrete Pumping is more favorable than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Concrete Pumping
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

In the previous week, Concrete Pumping had 6 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Concrete Pumping and 2 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.46 indicating that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Concrete Pumping
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock beats Concrete Pumping on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Ameresco?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Ameresco shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 45.1% of Ameresco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ameresco had 19 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Ameresco and 8 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Ameresco's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.46 indicating that Ameresco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ameresco
14 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ameresco has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Ameresco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping$392.87M1.16$6.37M$0.1464.36
Ameresco$1.93B0.62$44.28M$0.5243.42

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus price target of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 13.76%. Ameresco has a consensus price target of $41.89, indicating a potential upside of 85.51%. Given Ameresco's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ameresco is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Concrete Pumping
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Ameresco
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Ameresco's net margin of 1.40%. Concrete Pumping's return on equity of 3.47% beat Ameresco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping2.23% 3.47% 1.03%
Ameresco 1.40%2.82%0.72%

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ameresco has a beta of 2.62, indicating that its share price is 162% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ameresco beats Concrete Pumping on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Concrete Pumping had 2 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Concrete Pumping and 6 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.46 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Concrete Pumping
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Bowman Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.94%. Concrete Pumping has a consensus target price of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 13.76%. Given Concrete Pumping's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Concrete Pumping is more favorable than Bowman Consulting Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88
Concrete Pumping
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Concrete Pumping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group$490.02M1.51$12.85M$0.40106.50
Concrete Pumping$392.87M1.16$6.37M$0.1464.36

Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Bowman Consulting Group's net margin of 1.30%. Concrete Pumping's return on equity of 3.47% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group1.30% 2.67% 1.20%
Concrete Pumping 2.23%3.47%1.03%

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Concrete Pumping on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Limbach?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of Limbach shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Limbach shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 2.23%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping2.23% 3.47% 1.03%
Limbach 4.42%23.22%11.48%

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Limbach has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Concrete Pumping presently has a consensus price target of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 13.76%. Limbach has a consensus price target of $62.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.42%. Given Limbach's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Limbach is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Concrete Pumping
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Limbach
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping$392.87M1.16$6.37M$0.1464.36
Limbach$646.80M0.83$39.06M$2.5017.92

In the previous week, Limbach had 4 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Limbach and 8 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.46 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Limbach
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Limbach beats Concrete Pumping on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Concrete Pumping News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BBCP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BBCP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BBCP vs. The Competition

MetricConcrete PumpingConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$454.01M$8.08B$10.34B$12.69B
Dividend YieldN/A2.65%97.04%10.96%
P/E Ratio64.3621.6425.9925.07
Price / Sales1.1659.16377.3697.76
Price / Cash7.5317.1424.2136.03
Price / Book1.754.444.916.25
Net Income$6.37M$487.14M$611.46M$348.99M
7 Day Performance-4.96%-1.87%-2.04%-2.41%
1 Month Performance-7.40%-4.75%0.32%2.95%
1 Year Performance29.45%43.91%9.40%13.70%

Concrete Pumping Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BBCP
Concrete Pumping
3.3235 of 5 stars
$9.01
-0.2%
$10.25
+13.8%
+29.7%$454.01M$392.87M64.361,530
ITG
ITG
4.5808 of 5 stars
$12.09
+4.2%
$17.56
+45.2%
N/A$1.44BN/AN/A2,900
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1.9842 of 5 stars
$17.00
flat
$17.00
N/A$1.14B$888.28M15.89430
AMRC
Ameresco
4.624 of 5 stars
$22.07
+5.2%
$42.89
+94.4%
-13.1%$1.11B$1.93B42.441,601
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group
3.0846 of 5 stars
$42.53
flat
$44.71
+5.1%
-0.3%$737.28M$490.02M106.332,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BBCP) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners