Concrete Pumping (BBCP) Competitors

$7.44 +0.16 (+2.20%)

Closing price 05/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$7.40 -0.04 (-0.54%)

As of 07:11 AM Eastern

BBCP vs. DFH, LGIH, LMB, SDHC, and MAGH

Should you buy Concrete Pumping stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Concrete Pumping with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Concrete Pumping include Dream Finders Homes (DFH), LGI Homes (LGIH), Limbach (LMB), Smith Douglas Homes (SDHC), and Magnitude International (MAGH). These companies are all part of the "construction" industry.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Dream Finders Homes?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and Dream Finders Homes (NYSE:DFH) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Concrete Pumping had 2 more articles in the media than Dream Finders Homes. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Concrete Pumping and 1 mentions for Dream Finders Homes. Dream Finders Homes' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.25 indicating that Dream Finders Homes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Dream Finders Homes	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dream Finders Homes has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Dream Finders Homes has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 1.65%. Dream Finders Homes' return on equity of 12.65% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping	1.65%	2.50%	0.74%
Dream Finders Homes	4.16%	12.65%	4.62%

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus target price of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 10.89%. Dream Finders Homes has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 77.35%. Given Dream Finders Homes' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dream Finders Homes is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Dream Finders Homes	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Dream Finders Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Dream Finders Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	0.96	$6.37M	$0.09	82.67
Dream Finders Homes	$4.32B	0.31	$217.20M	$1.72	8.52

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of Dream Finders Homes shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 69.1% of Dream Finders Homes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dream Finders Homes beats Concrete Pumping on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to LGI Homes?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of LGI Homes shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.6% of LGI Homes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus target price of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 10.89%. LGI Homes has a consensus target price of $72.75, indicating a potential upside of 57.37%. Given LGI Homes' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe LGI Homes is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
LGI Homes	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, LGI Homes had 3 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for LGI Homes and 3 mentions for Concrete Pumping. LGI Homes' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.25 indicating that LGI Homes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
LGI Homes	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

LGI Homes has a net margin of 4.22% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 1.65%. LGI Homes' return on equity of 3.80% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping	1.65%	2.50%	0.74%
LGI Homes	4.22%	3.80%	1.98%

LGI Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. LGI Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	0.96	$6.37M	$0.09	82.67
LGI Homes	$1.71B	0.63	$72.55M	$3.05	15.16

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LGI Homes has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

LGI Homes beats Concrete Pumping on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Limbach?

Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Limbach presently has a consensus target price of $116.67, suggesting a potential upside of 63.22%. Concrete Pumping has a consensus target price of $8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 10.89%. Given Limbach's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Limbach is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Limbach	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

55.9% of Limbach shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of Limbach shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Limbach had 2 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Limbach and 3 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.25 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Limbach	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Concrete Pumping	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Limbach has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Limbach	$646.80M	1.32	$39.06M	$2.75	25.99
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	0.96	$6.37M	$0.09	82.67

Limbach has a net margin of 5.09% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 1.65%. Limbach's return on equity of 26.17% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Limbach	5.09%	26.17%	12.90%
Concrete Pumping	1.65%	2.50%	0.74%

Summary

Limbach beats Concrete Pumping on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Smith Douglas Homes (NYSE:SDHC) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Smith Douglas Homes had 2 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Smith Douglas Homes and 3 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Concrete Pumping's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Smith Douglas Homes' score of -0.25 indicating that Concrete Pumping is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Smith Douglas Homes	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Concrete Pumping	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Smith Douglas Homes' net margin of 0.90%. Concrete Pumping's return on equity of 2.50% beat Smith Douglas Homes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Smith Douglas Homes	0.90%	-0.78%	-0.58%
Concrete Pumping	1.65%	2.50%	0.74%

Smith Douglas Homes currently has a consensus price target of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 19.62%. Concrete Pumping has a consensus price target of $8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 10.89%. Given Smith Douglas Homes' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Smith Douglas Homes is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Smith Douglas Homes	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.90
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Smith Douglas Homes has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. 82.7% of Smith Douglas Homes shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Smith Douglas Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Smith Douglas Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Smith Douglas Homes	$952.84M	0.62	$10.69M	$0.95	12.23
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	0.96	$6.37M	$0.09	82.67

Summary

Concrete Pumping beats Smith Douglas Homes on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Magnitude International?

Magnitude International (NASDAQ:MAGH) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Concrete Pumping has higher revenue and earnings than Magnitude International.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Magnitude International	$15.03M	15.74	$30K	N/A	N/A
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	0.96	$6.37M	$0.09	82.67

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Concrete Pumping had 2 more articles in the media than Magnitude International. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Concrete Pumping and 1 mentions for Magnitude International. Concrete Pumping's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Magnitude International's score of 0.00 indicating that Concrete Pumping is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Magnitude International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Concrete Pumping	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Concrete Pumping has a consensus target price of $8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 10.89%. Given Concrete Pumping's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Concrete Pumping is more favorable than Magnitude International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Magnitude International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Magnitude International's net margin of 0.00%. Concrete Pumping's return on equity of 2.50% beat Magnitude International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Magnitude International	N/A	N/A	N/A
Concrete Pumping	1.65%	2.50%	0.74%

Summary

Concrete Pumping beats Magnitude International on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Concrete Pumping News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BBCP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BBCP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Concrete Pumping	Waste Removal Svcs Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$367.72M	$9.98B	$6.49B	$12.29B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.10%	3.04%	5.34%
P/E Ratio	82.67	68.35	29.70	25.52
Price / Sales	0.96	34.12	398.08	84.39
Price / Cash	5.95	12.93	23.52	56.16
Price / Book	1.44	13.88	6.78	7.01
Net Income	$6.37M	$387.83M	$205.15M	$335.27M
7 Day Performance	2.34%	-3.16%	0.93%	1.16%
1 Month Performance	-2.36%	-6.71%	-3.58%	0.09%
1 Year Performance	3.33%	-3.11%	34.28%	34.54%

Concrete Pumping Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BBCP Concrete Pumping	2.0786 of 5 stars	$7.44 +2.2%	$8.25 +10.9%	+4.2%	$367.72M	$392.87M	82.67	1,530	News Coverage
DFH Dream Finders Homes	2.887 of 5 stars	$12.99 -13.6%	$26.00 +100.2%	N/A	$1.19B	$4.32B	7.55	1,911	High Trading Volume
LGIH LGI Homes	3.9603 of 5 stars	$45.60 -3.6%	$72.75 +59.5%	-12.0%	$1.06B	$1.71B	14.95	1,056
LMB Limbach	3.0511 of 5 stars	$72.32 -4.8%	$116.67 +61.3%	-43.7%	$862.05M	$646.80M	26.30	1,500
SDHC Smith Douglas Homes	4.441 of 5 stars	$11.91 -5.5%	$14.58 +22.4%	-30.2%	$604.79M	$971.12M	12.54	364

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BBCP) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Concrete Pumping (BBCP) Competitors

BBCP vs. DFH, LGIH, LMB, SDHC, and MAGH

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Dream Finders Homes?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to LGI Homes?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Limbach?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Magnitude International?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BBCP vs. The Competition

Concrete Pumping Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Concrete Pumping (BBCP) Competitors

BBCP vs. DFH, LGIH, LMB, SDHC, and MAGH

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Dream Finders Homes?

Does the media favor BBCP or DFH?

Which has more risk and volatility, BBCP or DFH?

Is BBCP or DFH more profitable?

Do analysts rate BBCP or DFH?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, BBCP or DFH?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of BBCP or DFH?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to LGI Homes?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in BBCP or LGIH?

Do analysts recommend BBCP or LGIH?

Does the media refer more to BBCP or LGIH?

Is BBCP or LGIH more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, BBCP or LGIH?

Which has more volatility & risk, BBCP or LGIH?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Limbach?

Do analysts prefer LMB or BBCP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LMB or BBCP?

Does the media prefer LMB or BBCP?

Which has more volatility and risk, LMB or BBCP?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, LMB or BBCP?

Is LMB or BBCP more profitable?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Does the media prefer SDHC or BBCP?

Is SDHC or BBCP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer SDHC or BBCP?

Which has more volatility & risk, SDHC or BBCP?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SDHC or BBCP?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SDHC or BBCP?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Magnitude International?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MAGH or BBCP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MAGH or BBCP?

Does the media prefer MAGH or BBCP?

Do analysts recommend MAGH or BBCP?

Is MAGH or BBCP more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BBCP vs. The Competition

Concrete Pumping Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools