Which has higher earnings & valuation, BBCP or LMB?

Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Concrete Pumping $392.87M 1.39 $6.37M $0.14 77.29 Limbach $646.80M 1.39 $39.06M $2.75 27.43

Concrete Pumping (BBCP) Competitors

$10.82 +0.36 (+3.44%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$10.82 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

BBCP vs. CCS, DFH, LGIH, LMB, and SDHC

Should you buy Concrete Pumping stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Concrete Pumping with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Concrete Pumping include Century Communities (CCS), Dream Finders Homes (DFH), LGI Homes (LGIH), Limbach (LMB), and Smith Douglas Homes (SDHC). These companies are all part of the "construction" industry.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Century Communities?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and Century Communities (NYSE:CCS) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Century Communities has a net margin of 3.31% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 2.23%. Century Communities' return on equity of 6.24% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping	2.23%	3.47%	1.03%
Century Communities	3.31%	6.24%	3.52%

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.5% of Century Communities shares are held by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of Century Communities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus price target of $10.25, suggesting a potential downside of 5.27%. Century Communities has a consensus price target of $67.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.64%. Given Century Communities' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Century Communities is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Century Communities	3 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86

In the previous week, Century Communities had 9 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Century Communities and 0 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Concrete Pumping's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Century Communities' score of 0.71 indicating that Concrete Pumping is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping	Positive
Century Communities	Positive

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Century Communities has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Century Communities has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Century Communities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	1.39	$6.37M	$0.14	77.29
Century Communities	$4.12B	0.45	$147.60M	$4.44	14.56

Summary

Century Communities beats Concrete Pumping on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Dream Finders Homes?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and Dream Finders Homes (NYSE:DFH) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Dream Finders Homes has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 2.23%. Dream Finders Homes' return on equity of 12.65% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping	2.23%	3.47%	1.03%
Dream Finders Homes	4.16%	12.65%	4.62%

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of Dream Finders Homes shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 69.1% of Dream Finders Homes shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dream Finders Homes has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dream Finders Homes had 3 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Dream Finders Homes and 0 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Concrete Pumping's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Dream Finders Homes' score of 0.97 indicating that Concrete Pumping is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping	Positive
Dream Finders Homes	Positive

Dream Finders Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Dream Finders Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	1.39	$6.37M	$0.14	77.29
Dream Finders Homes	$4.32B	0.32	$217.20M	$1.72	8.89

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus target price of $10.25, suggesting a potential downside of 5.27%. Dream Finders Homes has a consensus target price of $26.00, suggesting a potential upside of 70.05%. Given Dream Finders Homes' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dream Finders Homes is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Dream Finders Homes	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Dream Finders Homes beats Concrete Pumping on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to LGI Homes?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

LGI Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. LGI Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	1.39	$6.37M	$0.14	77.29
LGI Homes	$1.71B	0.79	$72.55M	$3.05	18.95

Concrete Pumping presently has a consensus price target of $10.25, suggesting a potential downside of 5.27%. LGI Homes has a consensus price target of $72.75, suggesting a potential upside of 25.84%. Given LGI Homes' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe LGI Homes is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
LGI Homes	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of LGI Homes shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.6% of LGI Homes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LGI Homes has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

LGI Homes has a net margin of 4.22% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 2.23%. LGI Homes' return on equity of 3.80% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping	2.23%	3.47%	1.03%
LGI Homes	4.22%	3.80%	1.98%

In the previous week, LGI Homes had 3 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for LGI Homes and 0 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Concrete Pumping's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat LGI Homes' score of 0.00 indicating that Concrete Pumping is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping	Positive
LGI Homes	Neutral

Summary

LGI Homes beats Concrete Pumping on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Limbach?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Limbach had 1 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Limbach and 0 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 1.00 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping	Positive
Limbach	Very Positive

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Limbach shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	1.39	$6.37M	$0.14	77.29
Limbach	$646.80M	1.39	$39.06M	$2.75	27.43

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Limbach has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus target price of $10.25, suggesting a potential downside of 5.27%. Limbach has a consensus target price of $97.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.60%. Given Limbach's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Limbach is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Limbach	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Limbach has a net margin of 5.09% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 2.23%. Limbach's return on equity of 26.17% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping	2.23%	3.47%	1.03%
Limbach	5.09%	26.17%	12.90%

Summary

Limbach beats Concrete Pumping on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and Smith Douglas Homes (NYSE:SDHC) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 84.2% of Smith Douglas Homes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Smith Douglas Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Smith Douglas Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping	$392.87M	1.39	$6.37M	$0.14	77.29
Smith Douglas Homes	$971.12M	0.77	$10.69M	$0.95	15.49

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus price target of $10.25, indicating a potential downside of 5.27%. Smith Douglas Homes has a consensus price target of $13.90, indicating a potential downside of 5.57%. Given Concrete Pumping's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Concrete Pumping is more favorable than Smith Douglas Homes.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Concrete Pumping	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Smith Douglas Homes	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.90

Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Smith Douglas Homes' net margin of 0.90%. Concrete Pumping's return on equity of 3.47% beat Smith Douglas Homes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping	2.23%	3.47%	1.03%
Smith Douglas Homes	0.90%	-0.78%	-0.58%

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith Douglas Homes has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Smith Douglas Homes had 2 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Smith Douglas Homes and 0 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Concrete Pumping's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Smith Douglas Homes' score of 0.58 indicating that Concrete Pumping is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping	Positive
Smith Douglas Homes	Positive

Summary

Concrete Pumping beats Smith Douglas Homes on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Concrete Pumping News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BBCP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BBCP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Concrete Pumping	Waste Removal Svcs Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$527.11M	$10.30B	$6.84B	$12.68B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.08%	3.06%	9.42%
P/E Ratio	77.29	73.94	28.59	23.95
Price / Sales	1.39	24.01	339.34	93.75
Price / Cash	8.55	13.56	23.29	60.45
Price / Book	2.10	4.47	5.55	6.16
Net Income	$6.37M	$387.83M	$204.26M	$331.73M
7 Day Performance	2.85%	-5.04%	-2.29%	-1.96%
1 Month Performance	-3.91%	-7.55%	-3.20%	-2.49%
1 Year Performance	55.68%	-8.36%	8.51%	17.21%

Concrete Pumping Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BBCP Concrete Pumping	2.4545 of 5 stars	$10.82 +3.4%	$10.25 -5.3%	+52.7%	$527.11M	$392.87M	77.29	1,530	Positive News Gap Up
CCS Century Communities	3.3136 of 5 stars	$65.33 +1.6%	$67.00 +2.6%	+8.9%	$1.85B	$4.12B	14.71	1,660	News Coverage Earnings Report
DFH Dream Finders Homes	3.8353 of 5 stars	$15.77 +1.5%	$26.00 +64.9%	-39.9%	$1.42B	$4.22B	9.17	1,911
LGIH LGI Homes	2.7043 of 5 stars	$58.84 +1.9%	$72.75 +23.6%	+10.0%	$1.34B	$1.71B	19.29	1,056
LMB Limbach	2.8115 of 5 stars	$74.70 +2.1%	$97.00 +29.9%	-40.4%	$871.91M	$646.80M	27.16	1,500	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BBCP) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Concrete Pumping (BBCP) Competitors

BBCP vs. CCS, DFH, LGIH, LMB, and SDHC

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Century Communities?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Dream Finders Homes?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to LGI Homes?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Limbach?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BBCP vs. The Competition

Concrete Pumping Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Concrete Pumping (BBCP) Competitors

BBCP vs. CCS, DFH, LGIH, LMB, and SDHC

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Century Communities?

Is BBCP or CCS more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BBCP or CCS?

Do analysts prefer BBCP or CCS?

Does the media refer more to BBCP or CCS?

Which has more volatility and risk, BBCP or CCS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BBCP or CCS?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Dream Finders Homes?

Is BBCP or DFH more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of BBCP or DFH?

Which has more volatility and risk, BBCP or DFH?

Does the media refer more to BBCP or DFH?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BBCP or DFH?

Do analysts recommend BBCP or DFH?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to LGI Homes?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BBCP or LGIH?

Do analysts rate BBCP or LGIH?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BBCP or LGIH?

Which has more volatility and risk, BBCP or LGIH?

Is BBCP or LGIH more profitable?

Does the media favor BBCP or LGIH?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Limbach?

Does the media refer more to BBCP or LMB?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BBCP or LMB?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, BBCP or LMB?

Which has more risk and volatility, BBCP or LMB?

Do analysts recommend BBCP or LMB?

Is BBCP or LMB more profitable?

Summary

How does Concrete Pumping compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in BBCP or SDHC?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, BBCP or SDHC?

Do analysts recommend BBCP or SDHC?

Is BBCP or SDHC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, BBCP or SDHC?

Does the media prefer BBCP or SDHC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BBCP vs. The Competition

Concrete Pumping Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools