Go Pro

Shimmick (SHIM) Competitors

Shimmick logo
$3.70 -0.03 (-0.80%)
As of 01:25 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SHIM vs. BBCP, BWMN, ORN, MTRX, and MAGH

Should you buy Shimmick stock or one of its competitors? Shimmick's main competitors and comparable companies include Concrete Pumping (BBCP), Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN), Orion Group (ORN), Matrix Service (MTRX), and Magnitude International (MAGH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Shimmick compare to Concrete Pumping?

Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Shimmick had 10 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Shimmick and 1 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Concrete Pumping's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Shimmick's score of 0.20 indicating that Concrete Pumping is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shimmick Neutral
Concrete Pumping Very Positive

Shimmick has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -3.81%. Concrete Pumping's return on equity of 3.47% beat Shimmick's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shimmick-3.81% N/A -4.40%
Concrete Pumping 2.23%3.47%1.03%

Concrete Pumping has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Shimmick. Shimmick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shimmick$492.84M0.31-$25.58M-$0.45N/A
Concrete Pumping$392.87M1.22$6.37M$0.1468.04

6.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Shimmick currently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.65%. Concrete Pumping has a consensus target price of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.61%. Given Shimmick's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Shimmick is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Concrete Pumping
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Summary

Concrete Pumping beats Shimmick on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shimmick compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 20 more articles in the media than Shimmick. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 11 mentions for Shimmick. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Shimmick's score of 0.20 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shimmick
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Bowman Consulting Group
11 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 1.30% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -3.81%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 2.67% beat Shimmick's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shimmick-3.81% N/A -4.40%
Bowman Consulting Group 1.30%2.67%1.23%

6.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Shimmick presently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.65%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $44.29, indicating a potential upside of 5.06%. Given Shimmick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Shimmick is more favorable than Bowman Consulting Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Bowman Consulting Group
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Bowman Consulting Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Shimmick. Shimmick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shimmick$492.84M0.31-$25.58M-$0.45N/A
Bowman Consulting Group$490.02M1.49$12.85M$0.40105.39

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Shimmick on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shimmick compare to Orion Group?

Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) and Orion Group (NYSE:ORN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Shimmick currently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.65%. Orion Group has a consensus target price of $17.20, indicating a potential upside of 72.26%. Given Orion Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Orion Group is more favorable than Shimmick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Orion Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

In the previous week, Shimmick had 10 more articles in the media than Orion Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Shimmick and 1 mentions for Orion Group. Orion Group's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Shimmick's score of 0.20 indicating that Orion Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shimmick
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Orion Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Shimmick has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orion Group has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Orion Group has a net margin of 0.40% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -3.81%. Orion Group's return on equity of 3.07% beat Shimmick's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shimmick-3.81% N/A -4.40%
Orion Group 0.40%3.07%1.10%

Orion Group has higher revenue and earnings than Shimmick. Shimmick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orion Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shimmick$492.84M0.31-$25.58M-$0.45N/A
Orion Group$852.26M0.47$2.49M$0.09110.94

6.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Orion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Orion Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Orion Group beats Shimmick on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shimmick compare to Matrix Service?

Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) and Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Shimmick had 9 more articles in the media than Matrix Service. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Shimmick and 2 mentions for Matrix Service. Matrix Service's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Shimmick's score of 0.20 indicating that Matrix Service is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Matrix Service
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Shimmick
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Matrix Service has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Shimmick has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Matrix Service has a net margin of -1.77% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -3.81%. Shimmick's return on equity of 0.00% beat Matrix Service's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matrix Service-1.77% -3.60% -0.81%
Shimmick -3.81%N/A -4.40%

78.4% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Matrix Service shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 62.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Matrix Service presently has a consensus price target of $20.50, suggesting a potential upside of 72.20%. Shimmick has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 48.65%. Given Matrix Service's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matrix Service is more favorable than Shimmick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matrix Service
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Shimmick has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Matrix Service. Matrix Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shimmick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matrix Service$769.29M0.44-$29.46M-$0.53N/A
Shimmick$492.84M0.31-$25.58M-$0.45N/A

Summary

Matrix Service beats Shimmick on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shimmick compare to Magnitude International?

Magnitude International (NASDAQ:MAGH) and Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Magnitude International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Shimmick.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnitude International$15.03M15.74$30KN/AN/A
Shimmick$492.84M0.31-$25.58M-$0.45N/A

6.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Shimmick had 9 more articles in the media than Magnitude International. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Shimmick and 2 mentions for Magnitude International. Magnitude International's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Shimmick's score of 0.20 indicating that Magnitude International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magnitude International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Shimmick
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Shimmick has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.65%. Given Shimmick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Shimmick is more favorable than Magnitude International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magnitude International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Magnitude International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -3.81%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magnitude InternationalN/A N/A N/A
Shimmick -3.81%N/A -4.40%

Summary

Shimmick beats Magnitude International on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Shimmick News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SHIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SHIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SHIM vs. The Competition

MetricShimmickConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$153.04M$8.76B$10.95B$13.02B
Dividend YieldN/A2.63%96.89%10.72%
P/E Ratio-8.2324.4827.9425.25
Price / Sales0.3160.40342.08101.05
Price / CashN/A19.1424.9050.75
Price / Book-2.344.804.586.33
Net Income-$25.58M$487.35M$609.43M$347.81M
7 Day Performance-16.29%-0.23%0.70%0.90%
1 Month Performance-0.27%-0.61%3.16%0.89%
1 Year Performance75.36%26.38%14.17%20.36%

Shimmick Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SHIM
Shimmick
3.3329 of 5 stars
$3.70
-0.8%
$5.50
+48.6%
+70.3%$153.04M$492.84MN/A1,200
BBCP
Concrete Pumping
3.006 of 5 stars
$9.87
-0.2%
$10.25
+3.9%
+30.1%$498.39M$392.87M70.501,530
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group
2.0407 of 5 stars
$27.74
+1.2%
$47.50
+71.2%
+6.2%$479.89M$490.02M46.232,300
ORN
Orion Group
4.4759 of 5 stars
$10.22
+2.3%
$17.20
+68.2%
+40.7%$404.55M$852.26M113.612,076
MTRX
Matrix Service
4.3021 of 5 stars
$12.18
+1.8%
$20.50
+68.3%
-23.1%$336.48M$769.29MN/A2,239

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SHIM) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners