Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Is Waiting! Get MarketBeat All Access Today
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Lock In $149
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Shimmick (SHIM) Competitors

Shimmick logo
$3.70 -0.33 (-8.19%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.72 +0.01 (+0.41%)
As of 05/22/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SHIM vs. SDHC, BBCP, MAGH, JFB, and SLND

Should you buy Shimmick stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Shimmick with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Shimmick include Smith Douglas Homes (SDHC), Concrete Pumping (BBCP), Magnitude International (MAGH), JFB Construction (JFB), and Southland (SLND). These companies are all part of the "construction" industry.

How does Shimmick compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) and Smith Douglas Homes (NYSE:SDHC) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

6.9% of Shimmick shares are held by institutional investors. 67.1% of Shimmick shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 82.7% of Smith Douglas Homes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Smith Douglas Homes has a net margin of 0.90% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -4.44%. Shimmick's return on equity of 0.00% beat Smith Douglas Homes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shimmick-4.44% N/A -6.63%
Smith Douglas Homes 0.90%-0.78%-0.58%

Smith Douglas Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Shimmick. Shimmick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith Douglas Homes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shimmick$492.84M0.28-$25.58M-$0.58N/A
Smith Douglas Homes$971.12M0.61$10.69M$0.9512.29

In the previous week, Smith Douglas Homes had 2 more articles in the media than Shimmick. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Smith Douglas Homes and 4 mentions for Shimmick. Shimmick's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Smith Douglas Homes' score of 0.24 indicating that Shimmick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shimmick
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Smith Douglas Homes
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Shimmick presently has a consensus target price of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 48.65%. Smith Douglas Homes has a consensus target price of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 19.01%. Given Shimmick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Shimmick is more favorable than Smith Douglas Homes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Smith Douglas Homes
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.90

Shimmick has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith Douglas Homes has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Smith Douglas Homes beats Shimmick on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shimmick compare to Concrete Pumping?

Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) and Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Shimmick had 2 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Shimmick and 2 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Shimmick's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.37 indicating that Shimmick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Concrete Pumping
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Shimmick
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Concrete Pumping has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Shimmick. Shimmick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concrete Pumping$392.87M0.98$6.37M$0.0984.56
Shimmick$492.84M0.28-$25.58M-$0.58N/A

Concrete Pumping currently has a consensus price target of $8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.41%. Shimmick has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 48.65%. Given Shimmick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Shimmick is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Concrete Pumping
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shimmick has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Shimmick shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 67.1% of Shimmick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -4.44%. Concrete Pumping's return on equity of 2.50% beat Shimmick's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Concrete Pumping1.65% 2.50% 0.74%
Shimmick -4.44%N/A -6.63%

Summary

Concrete Pumping and Shimmick tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shimmick compare to Magnitude International?

Magnitude International (NASDAQ:MAGH) and Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

6.9% of Shimmick shares are held by institutional investors. 67.1% of Shimmick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Shimmick had 3 more articles in the media than Magnitude International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Shimmick and 1 mentions for Magnitude International. Shimmick's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Magnitude International's score of 0.00 indicating that Shimmick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magnitude International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Shimmick
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Magnitude International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Shimmick.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnitude International$11.77M20.10$30KN/AN/A
Shimmick$492.84M0.28-$25.58M-$0.58N/A

Magnitude International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -4.44%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magnitude InternationalN/A N/A N/A
Shimmick -4.44%N/A -6.63%

Shimmick has a consensus target price of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 48.65%. Given Shimmick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Shimmick is more favorable than Magnitude International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magnitude International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Shimmick beats Magnitude International on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shimmick compare to JFB Construction?

Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) and JFB Construction (NASDAQ:JFB) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Shimmick has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JFB Construction has a beta of 3.18, suggesting that its share price is 218% more volatile than the broader market.

JFB Construction has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Shimmick. JFB Construction is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shimmick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shimmick$492.84M0.28-$25.58M-$0.58N/A
JFB Construction$30.54M2.77-$5.27M-$0.44N/A

Shimmick presently has a consensus price target of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.65%. Given Shimmick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Shimmick is more favorable than JFB Construction.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
JFB Construction
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Shimmick and Shimmick both had 4 articles in the media. Shimmick's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat JFB Construction's score of 0.21 indicating that Shimmick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shimmick
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
JFB Construction
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

6.9% of Shimmick shares are held by institutional investors. 67.1% of Shimmick shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Shimmick has a net margin of -4.44% compared to JFB Construction's net margin of -24.39%. Shimmick's return on equity of 0.00% beat JFB Construction's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shimmick-4.44% N/A -6.63%
JFB Construction -24.39%-32.35%-28.37%

Summary

Shimmick beats JFB Construction on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shimmick compare to Southland?

Shimmick (NASDAQ:SHIM) and Southland (NASDAQ:SLND) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Shimmick has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Southland's net margin of -10.38%. Shimmick's return on equity of 0.00% beat Southland's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shimmick-4.44% N/A -6.63%
Southland -10.38%-47.71%-8.75%

Shimmick currently has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.65%. Southland has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 244.83%. Given Southland's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Southland is more favorable than Shimmick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shimmick
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Southland
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

6.9% of Shimmick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.8% of Southland shares are held by institutional investors. 67.1% of Shimmick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 76.8% of Southland shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Shimmick has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Southland has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Southland has higher revenue and earnings than Shimmick. Shimmick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Southland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shimmick$492.84M0.28-$25.58M-$0.58N/A
Southland$705.09M0.09-$19.25M-$6.10N/A

In the previous week, Southland had 4 more articles in the media than Shimmick. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Southland and 4 mentions for Shimmick. Shimmick's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Southland's score of -0.98 indicating that Shimmick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shimmick
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Southland
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

Shimmick beats Southland on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Shimmick News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SHIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SHIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SHIM vs. The Competition

MetricShimmickWaste Removal Svcs IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$147.89M$9.89B$6.64B$12.31B
Dividend YieldN/A1.10%3.02%5.31%
P/E Ratio-6.3872.2730.5025.66
Price / Sales0.2819.25422.9383.76
Price / CashN/A12.9024.1356.72
Price / Book-2.2413.886.787.14
Net Income-$25.58M$387.83M$204.61M$335.72M
7 Day Performance-25.55%-3.30%1.41%3.02%
1 Month Performance-34.63%-8.03%-1.76%2.88%
1 Year Performance128.40%-3.89%33.31%35.20%

Shimmick Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SHIM
Shimmick
3.3512 of 5 stars
$3.70
-8.2%
$5.50
+48.6%
+137.2%$147.89M$492.84MN/A1,200
SDHC
Smith Douglas Homes
4.5824 of 5 stars
$10.88
-3.6%
$13.90
+27.8%
-30.7%$573.34M$971.12M11.45364
BBCP
Concrete Pumping
1.8358 of 5 stars
$7.25
-0.7%
$8.25
+13.8%
+5.7%$368.73M$392.87M80.561,530
MAGH
Magnitude International
N/A$6.76
+9.2%
N/AN/A$236.60M$11.77MN/A65
JFB
JFB Construction
0.7121 of 5 stars
$5.13
-1.5%
N/AN/A$79.87M$30.54MN/A19

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SHIM) was last updated on 5/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners