Blackbaud (BLKB) Competitors

In the previous week, Dropbox had 9 more articles in the media than Blackbaud. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Dropbox and 3 mentions for Blackbaud. Blackbaud's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Dropbox's score of 0.63 indicating that Blackbaud is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Dropbox has a net margin of 18.71% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 12.41%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 176.76% beat Dropbox's return on equity.

94.8% of Dropbox shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.2% of Blackbaud shares are held by institutional investors. 35.5% of Dropbox shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Blackbaud shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dropbox has higher revenue and earnings than Blackbaud. Blackbaud is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dropbox, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dropbox has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackbaud has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Dropbox currently has a consensus target price of $27.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. Blackbaud has a consensus target price of $52.50, suggesting a potential upside of 86.20%. Given Blackbaud's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Blackbaud is more favorable than Dropbox.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 209 more articles in the media than Blackbaud. MarketBeat recorded 212 mentions for Meta Platforms and 3 mentions for Blackbaud. Meta Platforms' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Blackbaud's score of 0.64 indicating that Meta Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.2% of Blackbaud shares are held by institutional investors. 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Blackbaud shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Meta Platforms presently has a consensus price target of $840.60, suggesting a potential upside of 35.11%. Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $52.50, suggesting a potential upside of 86.20%. Given Blackbaud's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blackbaud is more favorable than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 12.41%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 176.76% beat Meta Platforms' return on equity.

Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Blackbaud pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Meta Platforms pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Blackbaud pays out 16.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Meta Platforms has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackbaud has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Blackbaud. Blackbaud is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meta Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Woodward has higher revenue and earnings than Blackbaud. Blackbaud is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Woodward had 9 more articles in the media than Blackbaud. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Woodward and 3 mentions for Blackbaud. Woodward's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Blackbaud's score of 0.64 indicating that Woodward is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Woodward pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Blackbaud pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Woodward pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Blackbaud pays out 16.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Woodward has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

81.2% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.2% of Blackbaud shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Woodward shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Blackbaud shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Woodward has a net margin of 12.85% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 12.41%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 176.76% beat Woodward's return on equity.

Woodward currently has a consensus price target of $393.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.90%. Blackbaud has a consensus price target of $52.50, suggesting a potential upside of 86.20%. Given Blackbaud's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blackbaud is more favorable than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackbaud has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Blackbaud has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arista Networks has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Arista Networks has a net margin of 38.32% compared to Blackbaud's net margin of 12.41%. Blackbaud's return on equity of 176.76% beat Arista Networks' return on equity.

Blackbaud currently has a consensus target price of $52.50, indicating a potential upside of 86.20%. Arista Networks has a consensus target price of $185.72, indicating a potential upside of 5.49%. Given Blackbaud's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blackbaud is more favorable than Arista Networks.

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Blackbaud. Blackbaud is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arista Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.2% of Blackbaud shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of Arista Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Blackbaud shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Arista Networks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Arista Networks had 52 more articles in the media than Blackbaud. MarketBeat recorded 55 mentions for Arista Networks and 3 mentions for Blackbaud. Arista Networks' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Blackbaud's score of 0.64 indicating that Arista Networks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.