Do analysts recommend CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $386.59, suggesting a potential downside of 0.21%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Cadence Design Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 14 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.82

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $723.74M N/A N/A N/A N/A Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 20.17 $1.11B $4.29 90.30

Is CDNS or KLAC more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cadence Design Systems 21.18% 28.44% 15.30% KLA 35.66% 91.89% 29.21%

Does the media prefer CDNS or KLAC?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 19 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 15 mentions for KLA. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat KLA's score of 0.71 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 28 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive KLA 6 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CDNS or META?

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 150 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 184 mentions for Meta Platforms and 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Meta Platforms' score of 1.09 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 28 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Meta Platforms 142 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 15 Neutral mention(s) 15 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor NVDA or CDNS?

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 291 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 325 mentions for NVIDIA and 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat NVIDIA's score of 1.03 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NVIDIA 222 Very Positive mention(s) 32 Positive mention(s) 43 Neutral mention(s) 24 Negative mention(s) 4 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 28 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor SNPS or CDNS?

In the previous week, Synopsys had 6 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Synopsys and 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Synopsys' score of 0.96 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Synopsys 25 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 28 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

$387.39 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 06/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$388.35 +0.96 (+0.25%)

As of 06/18/2026 07:58 PM Eastern

Compare

CDNS vs. CSQ, KLAC, META, NVDA, and SNPS

Should you buy Cadence Design Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cadence Design Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cadence Design Systems include Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), KLA (KLAC), Meta Platforms (META), NVIDIA (NVDA), and Synopsys (SNPS).

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk and earnings.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$723.74M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.17	$1.11B	$4.29	90.30

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 34 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 0 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	Neutral
Cadence Design Systems	Positive

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 21.18% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 28.44% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $386.59, suggesting a potential downside of 0.21%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to KLA?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.17	$1.11B	$4.29	90.30
KLA	$12.16B	27.89	$4.06B	$3.53	73.53

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus price target of $386.59, suggesting a potential downside of 0.21%. KLA has a consensus price target of $342.44, suggesting a potential upside of 31.93%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 19 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 15 mentions for KLA. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat KLA's score of 0.71 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
KLA	6 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%
KLA	35.66%	91.89%	29.21%

Summary

KLA beats Cadence Design Systems on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 150 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 184 mentions for Meta Platforms and 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Meta Platforms' score of 1.09 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Meta Platforms	142 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	15 Neutral mention(s)	15 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 36.93% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%
Meta Platforms	32.84%	36.93%	23.09%

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus target price of $386.59, suggesting a potential downside of 0.21%. Meta Platforms has a consensus target price of $840.60, suggesting a potential upside of 45.63%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Meta Platforms	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	35 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.17	$1.11B	$4.29	90.30
Meta Platforms	$200.97B	7.27	$60.46B	$27.51	20.98

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Cadence Design Systems on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

65.3% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 291 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 325 mentions for NVIDIA and 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat NVIDIA's score of 1.03 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NVIDIA	222 Very Positive mention(s)	32 Positive mention(s)	43 Neutral mention(s)	24 Negative mention(s)	4 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

NVIDIA presently has a consensus target price of $305.67, suggesting a potential upside of 45.08%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $386.59, suggesting a potential downside of 0.21%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NVIDIA	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	48 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NVIDIA	62.97%	96.94%	72.16%
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NVIDIA	$215.94B	23.61	$120.07B	$6.53	32.26
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.17	$1.11B	$4.29	90.30

Summary

NVIDIA beats Cadence Design Systems on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Synopsys (NASDAQ:SNPS) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Synopsys has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Synopsys presently has a consensus target price of $563.81, indicating a potential upside of 23.78%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $386.59, indicating a potential downside of 0.21%. Given Synopsys' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Synopsys is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Synopsys	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Synopsys has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Synopsys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Synopsys	$7.05B	12.36	$1.33B	$4.32	105.44
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.17	$1.11B	$4.29	90.30

In the previous week, Synopsys had 6 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Synopsys and 34 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Synopsys' score of 0.96 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Synopsys	25 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

85.5% of Synopsys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Synopsys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 21.18% compared to Synopsys' net margin of 8.91%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 28.44% beat Synopsys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Synopsys	8.91%	5.83%	3.58%
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%

Summary

Synopsys beats Cadence Design Systems on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cadence Design Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDNS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CDNS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cadence Design Systems	COMP Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$106.85B	$132.45B	$39.99B	$12.60B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.12%	3.26%	5.81%
P/E Ratio	90.30	19.67	172.40	24.44
Price / Sales	20.17	4.57	629.84	108.87
Price / Cash	61.15	16.32	48.30	55.09
Price / Book	19.26	31.54	9.76	6.58
Net Income	$1.11B	$5.27B	$1.07B	$337.17M
7 Day Performance	0.63%	-2.92%	0.26%	0.83%
1 Month Performance	8.07%	-5.48%	4.16%	2.25%
1 Year Performance	31.14%	-21.59%	162.92%	36.14%

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CDNS Cadence Design Systems	4.006 of 5 stars	$387.39 flat	$386.59 -0.2%	+31.1%	$106.85B	$5.30B	90.30	13,800	Positive News Insider Trade High Trading Volume
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$19.97 +2.3%	N/A	+18.4%	$0.00	$723.74M	N/A	N/A
KLAC KLA	4.8812 of 5 stars	$2,411.64 +12.9%	$1,897.64 -21.3%	+205.4%	$278.97B	$12.16B	68.26	15,200	Analyst Forecast Gap Down
META Meta Platforms	4.9743 of 5 stars	$568.43 -0.4%	$840.60 +47.9%	-15.4%	$1.44T	$200.97B	20.66	78,865	Trending News Insider Trade
NVDA NVIDIA	4.9951 of 5 stars	$204.87 +2.2%	$305.67 +49.2%	+46.5%	$4.85T	$215.94B	31.37	42,000	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CDNS) was last updated on 6/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, KLAC, META, NVDA, and SNPS

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to KLA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, KLAC, META, NVDA, and SNPS

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CSQ or CDNS?

Does the media favor CSQ or CDNS?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CSQ or CDNS?

Is CSQ or CDNS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend CSQ or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to KLA?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CDNS or KLAC?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CDNS or KLAC?

Do analysts recommend CDNS or KLAC?

Does the media prefer CDNS or KLAC?

Which has more volatility & risk, CDNS or KLAC?

Is CDNS or KLAC more profitable?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Does the media prefer CDNS or META?

Is CDNS or META more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CDNS or META?

Which has more risk and volatility, CDNS or META?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CDNS or META?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CDNS or META?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NVDA or CDNS?

Does the media favor NVDA or CDNS?

Do analysts rate NVDA or CDNS?

Which has more volatility and risk, NVDA or CDNS?

Is NVDA or CDNS more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NVDA or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Which has more risk & volatility, SNPS or CDNS?

Do analysts recommend SNPS or CDNS?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, SNPS or CDNS?

Does the media favor SNPS or CDNS?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SNPS or CDNS?

Is SNPS or CDNS more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools