Which has better valuation & earnings, CDNS or CSQ?

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cadence Design Systems $5.84B 13.53 $1.11B $5.03 57.01 Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $1.06B N/A N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to META or CDNS?

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 124 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 148 mentions for Meta Platforms and 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Meta Platforms' score of 1.14 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Meta Platforms 112 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 18 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CDNS or NVDA?

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 328 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 352 mentions for NVIDIA and 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.81 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NVIDIA 213 Very Positive mention(s) 52 Positive mention(s) 47 Neutral mention(s) 31 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to RMBS or CDNS?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 17 more articles in the media than Rambus. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 7 mentions for Rambus. Rambus' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Cadence Design Systems' score of 1.27 indicating that Rambus is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Rambus 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to SNPS or CDNS?

In the previous week, Synopsys had 1 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Synopsys and 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Synopsys' score of 0.78 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Synopsys 15 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

$286.77 +2.66 (+0.94%)

As of 01:33 PM Eastern

Compare

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, RMBS, and SNPS

Should you buy Cadence Design Systems stock or one of its competitors? Cadence Design Systems's main competitors and comparable companies include Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), Meta Platforms (META), NVIDIA (NVDA), Rambus (RMBS), and Synopsys (SNPS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.84B	13.53	$1.11B	$5.03	57.01
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$1.06B	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 23.60% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 24 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 0 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.56 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	Positive
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	Positive

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus price target of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 41.47%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

84.8% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Meta Platforms	$200.97B	8.29	$60.46B	$26.55	24.63
Cadence Design Systems	$5.84B	13.53	$1.11B	$5.03	57.01

Meta Platforms presently has a consensus target price of $785.22, indicating a potential upside of 20.10%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 41.47%. Given Cadence Design Systems' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Meta Platforms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Meta Platforms	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	34 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 29.83% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 23.60%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 33.18% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Meta Platforms	29.83%	33.18%	20.07%
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 124 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 148 mentions for Meta Platforms and 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Meta Platforms' score of 1.14 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Meta Platforms	112 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	18 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Cadence Design Systems on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

84.8% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 63.66% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 23.60%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.04% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%
NVIDIA	63.66%	96.04%	71.00%

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 328 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 352 mentions for NVIDIA and 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.81 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NVIDIA	213 Very Positive mention(s)	52 Positive mention(s)	47 Neutral mention(s)	31 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.84B	13.53	$1.11B	$5.03	57.01
NVIDIA	$302.97B	17.83	$120.07B	$7.91	28.33

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus target price of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 41.47%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $324.83, indicating a potential upside of 44.96%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
NVIDIA	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	50 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.98

Summary

NVIDIA beats Cadence Design Systems on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Rambus?

Rambus (NASDAQ:RMBS) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Rambus has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 17 more articles in the media than Rambus. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 7 mentions for Rambus. Rambus' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Cadence Design Systems' score of 1.27 indicating that Rambus is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Rambus	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Rambus has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 23.60%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Rambus' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rambus	31.69%	17.89%	16.21%
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%

88.5% of Rambus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Rambus shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Rambus. Rambus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rambus	$756.33M	12.48	$230.46M	$2.18	39.93
Cadence Design Systems	$5.84B	13.53	$1.11B	$5.03	57.01

Rambus currently has a consensus target price of $145.88, indicating a potential upside of 67.60%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 41.47%. Given Rambus' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Rambus is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Rambus	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Rambus on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Synopsys (NASDAQ:SNPS) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

85.5% of Synopsys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Synopsys shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Synopsys has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Synopsys had 1 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Synopsys and 24 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Synopsys' score of 0.78 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Synopsys	15 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 23.60% compared to Synopsys' net margin of 11.43%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Synopsys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Synopsys	11.43%	6.24%	3.95%
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%

Synopsys has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Synopsys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Synopsys	$9.42B	8.06	$1.33B	$5.66	70.01
Cadence Design Systems	$5.84B	13.53	$1.11B	$5.03	57.01

Synopsys currently has a consensus target price of $561.28, suggesting a potential upside of 41.64%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, suggesting a potential upside of 41.47%. Given Synopsys' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Synopsys is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Synopsys	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Summary

Synopsys beats Cadence Design Systems on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cadence Design Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDNS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CDNS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cadence Design Systems	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$79.01B	$15.55B	$29.94B	$12.78B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.42%	2.72%	9.15%
P/E Ratio	57.04	138.35	76.19	25.30
Price / Sales	13.53	1,282.22	588.22	108.13
Price / Cash	46.21	46.19	48.15	52.39
Price / Book	14.26	8.38	7.78	6.36
Net Income	$1.11B	$434.52M	$703.71M	$358.07M
7 Day Performance	-6.49%	-1.48%	2.18%	-0.05%
1 Month Performance	-15.47%	-1.50%	-0.60%	-0.94%
1 Year Performance	-20.73%	1.05%	183.66%	11.95%

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CDNS Cadence Design Systems	4.8171 of 5 stars	$286.77 +0.9%	$405.69 +41.5%	-21.2%	$79.01B	$5.84B	57.04	13,800	Positive News
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$21.06 +0.8%	N/A	+11.8%	$0.00	$1.06B	N/A	N/A
META Meta Platforms	4.8851 of 5 stars	$610.68 +3.0%	$785.22 +28.6%	-18.5%	$1.51T	$228.25B	23.00	78,865	Trending News Insider Trade Gap Up
NVDA NVIDIA	4.9055 of 5 stars	$228.45 +1.8%	$324.23 +41.9%	+34.1%	$5.41T	$215.94B	28.88	42,000	Trending News Insider Trade
RMBS Rambus	3.9688 of 5 stars	$84.34 -0.4%	$145.88 +73.0%	+18.6%	$9.19B	$707.63M	38.69	760	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CDNS) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, RMBS, and SNPS

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Rambus?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, RMBS, and SNPS

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CDNS or CSQ?

Is CDNS or CSQ more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CDNS or CSQ?

Do analysts recommend CDNS or CSQ?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CDNS or CSQ?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, META or CDNS?

Do analysts recommend META or CDNS?

Is META or CDNS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to META or CDNS?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in META or CDNS?

Which has more volatility and risk, META or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CDNS or NVDA?

Is CDNS or NVDA more profitable?

Does the media prefer CDNS or NVDA?

Which has more risk & volatility, CDNS or NVDA?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CDNS or NVDA?

Do analysts prefer CDNS or NVDA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Rambus?

Which has more volatility & risk, RMBS or CDNS?

Does the media refer more to RMBS or CDNS?

Is RMBS or CDNS more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in RMBS or CDNS?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, RMBS or CDNS?

Do analysts rate RMBS or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SNPS or CDNS?

Which has more volatility and risk, SNPS or CDNS?

Does the media refer more to SNPS or CDNS?

Is SNPS or CDNS more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SNPS or CDNS?

Do analysts rate SNPS or CDNS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools