Do analysts recommend CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, suggesting a potential upside of 28.88%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Cadence Design Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 13 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.81

Which has better valuation & earnings, CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $1.06B N/A N/A N/A N/A Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 16.37 $1.11B $5.03 62.58

Does the media favor CDNS or META?

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 123 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 158 mentions for Meta Platforms and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.53 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 28 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Meta Platforms 84 Very Positive mention(s) 14 Positive mention(s) 18 Neutral mention(s) 32 Negative mention(s) 9 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation & earnings, NVDA or CDNS?

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NVIDIA $215.94B 24.34 $120.07B $6.53 33.26 Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 16.37 $1.11B $5.03 62.58

Does the media favor NVDA or CDNS?

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 286 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 321 mentions for NVIDIA and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.70 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NVIDIA 169 Very Positive mention(s) 51 Positive mention(s) 65 Neutral mention(s) 29 Negative mention(s) 6 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 28 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor SNPS or CDNS?

In the previous week, Synopsys had 12 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Synopsys and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Synopsys' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Cadence Design Systems' score of 1.19 indicating that Synopsys is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Synopsys 39 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 28 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor CDNS or WWD?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 19 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 16 mentions for Woodward. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Woodward's score of 0.86 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 28 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Woodward 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

$314.79 -0.19 (-0.06%)

As of 10:26 AM Eastern

Compare

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, SNPS, and WWD

Should you buy Cadence Design Systems stock or one of its competitors? Cadence Design Systems's main competitors and comparable companies include Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), Meta Platforms (META), NVIDIA (NVDA), Synopsys (SNPS), and Woodward (WWD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$1.06B	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	16.37	$1.11B	$5.03	62.58

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, suggesting a potential upside of 28.88%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 23.60% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 34 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 1 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	16.37	$1.11B	$5.03	62.58
Meta Platforms	$228.25B	6.08	$60.46B	$26.55	20.50

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 123 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 158 mentions for Meta Platforms and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.53 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Meta Platforms	84 Very Positive mention(s)	14 Positive mention(s)	18 Neutral mention(s)	32 Negative mention(s)	9 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus price target of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 28.88%. Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $785.32, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Meta Platforms	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	35 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 29.83% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 23.60%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 33.18% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%
Meta Platforms	29.83%	33.18%	20.07%

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Cadence Design Systems on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 286 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 321 mentions for NVIDIA and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.70 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NVIDIA	169 Very Positive mention(s)	51 Positive mention(s)	65 Neutral mention(s)	29 Negative mention(s)	6 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 23.60%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NVIDIA	62.97%	96.94%	72.16%
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%

NVIDIA presently has a consensus target price of $306.58, indicating a potential upside of 41.14%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 28.88%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NVIDIA	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	49 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.02
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NVIDIA	$215.94B	24.34	$120.07B	$6.53	33.26
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	16.37	$1.11B	$5.03	62.58

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.23, suggesting that its stock price is 123% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

NVIDIA beats Cadence Design Systems on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Synopsys (NASDAQ:SNPS) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Synopsys has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Synopsys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Synopsys	$7.05B	10.78	$1.33B	$4.32	91.96
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	16.37	$1.11B	$5.03	62.58

In the previous week, Synopsys had 12 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Synopsys and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Synopsys' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Cadence Design Systems' score of 1.19 indicating that Synopsys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Synopsys	39 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Synopsys has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 23.60% compared to Synopsys' net margin of 8.91%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Synopsys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Synopsys	8.91%	5.83%	3.58%
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%

85.5% of Synopsys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Synopsys shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Synopsys presently has a consensus price target of $563.59, indicating a potential upside of 41.87%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 28.88%. Given Synopsys' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Synopsys is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Synopsys	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Summary

Synopsys beats Cadence Design Systems on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Woodward?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Woodward. Woodward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	16.37	$1.11B	$5.03	62.58
Woodward	$4.19B	4.96	$442.11M	$8.99	39.17

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 19 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 16 mentions for Woodward. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Woodward's score of 0.86 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	28 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Woodward	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 23.60% compared to Woodward's net margin of 13.17%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Woodward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%
Woodward	13.17%	21.89%	11.38%

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus target price of $405.69, suggesting a potential upside of 28.88%. Woodward has a consensus target price of $419.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.99%. Given Cadence Design Systems' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Woodward.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Woodward	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Woodward on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cadence Design Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDNS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CDNS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cadence Design Systems	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$86.62B	$15.46B	$29.34B	$12.79B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.43%	2.74%	10.29%
P/E Ratio	62.53	127.17	72.78	24.15
Price / Sales	16.37	1,300.99	597.60	98.81
Price / Cash	49.97	47.58	51.05	52.73
Price / Book	12.64	7.52	9.50	6.23
Net Income	$1.11B	$434.63M	$677.89M	$347.82M
7 Day Performance	-2.77%	0.11%	-2.12%	-0.33%
1 Month Performance	-4.59%	4.15%	2.94%	2.46%
1 Year Performance	-8.88%	7.37%	192.82%	20.51%

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CDNS Cadence Design Systems	4.7394 of 5 stars	$314.79 -0.1%	$405.69 +28.9%	-9.2%	$86.62B	$5.30B	62.53	13,800	Positive News Insider Trade
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$21.03 +0.8%	N/A	+13.2%	$0.00	$1.06B	N/A	N/A
META Meta Platforms	4.9947 of 5 stars	$594.97 +2.8%	$785.32 +32.0%	-27.3%	$1.47T	$228.25B	22.41	78,865	Trending News Insider Trade
NVDA NVIDIA	4.994 of 5 stars	$225.30 +0.5%	$305.94 +35.8%	+23.9%	$5.42T	$215.94B	34.50	42,000	Trending News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
SNPS Synopsys	4.762 of 5 stars	$411.75 -0.1%	$565.06 +37.2%	-34.5%	$78.95B	$7.05B	95.31	28,000	Positive News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CDNS) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, SNPS, and WWD

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Woodward?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, SNPS, and WWD

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CSQ or CDNS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CSQ or CDNS?

Do analysts recommend CSQ or CDNS?

Is CSQ or CDNS more profitable?

Does the media prefer CSQ or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CDNS or META?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CDNS or META?

Which has more volatility & risk, CDNS or META?

Does the media favor CDNS or META?

Do analysts recommend CDNS or META?

Is CDNS or META more profitable?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Does the media favor NVDA or CDNS?

Is NVDA or CDNS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend NVDA or CDNS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, NVDA or CDNS?

Which has more risk and volatility, NVDA or CDNS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NVDA or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SNPS or CDNS?

Does the media favor SNPS or CDNS?

Which has more risk and volatility, SNPS or CDNS?

Is SNPS or CDNS more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SNPS or CDNS?

Do analysts rate SNPS or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Woodward?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CDNS or WWD?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CDNS or WWD?

Does the media favor CDNS or WWD?

Which has more volatility and risk, CDNS or WWD?

Is CDNS or WWD more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CDNS or WWD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools