Do analysts rate CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 21.89%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Cadence Design Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 13 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.81

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $1.06B N/A N/A N/A N/A Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 17.33 $1.11B $5.03 66.17

Does the media refer more to CDNS or META?

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 229 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 292 mentions for Meta Platforms and 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.62 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 29 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Meta Platforms 164 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 45 Neutral mention(s) 48 Negative mention(s) 3 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CDNS or NVDA?

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 297 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 360 mentions for NVIDIA and 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.70 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 29 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NVIDIA 202 Very Positive mention(s) 43 Positive mention(s) 59 Neutral mention(s) 45 Negative mention(s) 8 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor RMBS or CDNS?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 33 more articles in the media than Rambus. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 30 mentions for Rambus. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Rambus' score of 0.87 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Rambus 15 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 29 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CDNS or SNPS?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 14 more articles in the media than Synopsys. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 49 mentions for Synopsys. Synopsys' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Cadence Design Systems' score of 0.92 indicating that Synopsys is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 29 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Synopsys 33 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

$332.82 +0.06 (+0.02%)

Closing price 07/30/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$332.60 -0.22 (-0.07%)

As of 07:13 AM Eastern

Compare

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, RMBS, and SNPS

Should you buy Cadence Design Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cadence Design Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cadence Design Systems include Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), Meta Platforms (META), NVIDIA (NVDA), Rambus (RMBS), and Synopsys (SNPS).

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 23.60% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$1.06B	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.33	$1.11B	$5.03	66.17

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 62 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 1 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Cadence Design Systems' score of 0.92 indicating that Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	Very Positive
Cadence Design Systems	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, indicating a potential upside of 21.89%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 229 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 292 mentions for Meta Platforms and 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.62 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	29 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Meta Platforms	164 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	45 Neutral mention(s)	48 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.33	$1.11B	$5.03	66.17
Meta Platforms	$200.97B	6.78	$60.46B	$27.51	19.59

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus target price of $405.69, suggesting a potential upside of 21.89%. Meta Platforms has a consensus target price of $789.95, suggesting a potential upside of 46.55%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Meta Platforms	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	36 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 29.83% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 23.60%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 34.81% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%
Meta Platforms	29.83%	34.81%	21.41%

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Cadence Design Systems on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.33	$1.11B	$5.03	66.17
NVIDIA	$253.49B	18.62	$120.07B	$6.53	29.87

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 297 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 360 mentions for NVIDIA and 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.70 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	29 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NVIDIA	202 Very Positive mention(s)	43 Positive mention(s)	59 Neutral mention(s)	45 Negative mention(s)	8 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.21, indicating that its share price is 121% more volatile than the broader market.

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 23.60%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%
NVIDIA	62.97%	96.94%	72.16%

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus target price of $405.69, suggesting a potential upside of 21.89%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $304.26, suggesting a potential upside of 56.00%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
NVIDIA	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	48 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.02

Summary

NVIDIA beats Cadence Design Systems on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Rambus?

Rambus (NASDAQ:RMBS) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 33 more articles in the media than Rambus. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 30 mentions for Rambus. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Rambus' score of 0.87 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Rambus	15 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	29 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Rambus presently has a consensus target price of $139.78, suggesting a potential upside of 56.04%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $405.69, suggesting a potential upside of 21.89%. Given Rambus' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rambus is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Rambus	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Rambus has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Rambus. Rambus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rambus	$707.63M	13.73	$230.46M	$2.18	41.09
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.33	$1.11B	$5.03	66.17

88.5% of Rambus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Rambus shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Rambus has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 23.60%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Rambus' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rambus	31.69%	17.89%	16.21%
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Rambus on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Synopsys (NASDAQ:SNPS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus price target of $405.69, suggesting a potential upside of 21.89%. Synopsys has a consensus price target of $570.06, suggesting a potential upside of 53.11%. Given Synopsys' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Synopsys is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Synopsys	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 23.60% compared to Synopsys' net margin of 8.91%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 27.98% beat Synopsys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	23.60%	27.98%	15.35%
Synopsys	8.91%	5.83%	3.58%

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Synopsys shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Synopsys shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Synopsys has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Synopsys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.33	$1.11B	$5.03	66.17
Synopsys	$7.05B	10.11	$1.33B	$4.32	86.19

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 14 more articles in the media than Synopsys. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 49 mentions for Synopsys. Synopsys' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Cadence Design Systems' score of 0.92 indicating that Synopsys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	29 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Synopsys	33 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Synopsys has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Synopsys beats Cadence Design Systems on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cadence Design Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDNS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CDNS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cadence Design Systems	COMP Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$91.78B	$132.28B	$36.25B	$12.05B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.91%	3.17%	10.11%
P/E Ratio	66.17	21.70	75.98	23.57
Price / Sales	17.33	4.60	592.55	77.17
Price / Cash	52.53	17.51	41.20	58.30
Price / Book	13.39	10.43	8.43	5.85
Net Income	$1.11B	$5.27B	$1.08B	$336.53M
7 Day Performance	2.02%	5.53%	0.57%	0.35%
1 Month Performance	-11.32%	6.34%	-2.68%	-4.99%
1 Year Performance	-8.71%	-21.16%	135.51%	17.95%

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CDNS Cadence Design Systems	4.3799 of 5 stars	$332.82 +0.0%	$405.69 +21.9%	-10.3%	$91.78B	$5.30B	66.17	13,800	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$20.13 -1.7%	N/A	+9.0%	$0.00	$1.06B	N/A	N/A	Positive News
META Meta Platforms	4.9492 of 5 stars	$606.10 -3.4%	$835.64 +37.9%	-22.5%	$1.59T	$200.97B	22.03	78,865	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Analyst Revision Gap Down
NVDA NVIDIA	4.9759 of 5 stars	$208.76 -1.6%	$304.26 +45.7%	+8.8%	$5.13T	$215.94B	31.97	42,000	Trending News Analyst Revision
RMBS Rambus	4.6648 of 5 stars	$103.19 -0.6%	$134.75 +30.6%	+19.3%	$11.23B	$707.63M	49.14	760	Analyst Forecast Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CDNS) was last updated on 7/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, RMBS, and SNPS

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Rambus?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, RMBS, and SNPS

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Is CSQ or CDNS more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CSQ or CDNS?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CSQ or CDNS?

Does the media favor CSQ or CDNS?

Do analysts rate CSQ or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Does the media refer more to CDNS or META?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CDNS or META?

Do analysts prefer CDNS or META?

Is CDNS or META more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CDNS or META?

Which has more volatility & risk, CDNS or META?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CDNS or NVDA?

Does the media refer more to CDNS or NVDA?

Which has more volatility & risk, CDNS or NVDA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CDNS or NVDA?

Is CDNS or NVDA more profitable?

Do analysts recommend CDNS or NVDA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Rambus?

Does the media favor RMBS or CDNS?

Do analysts recommend RMBS or CDNS?

Which has more volatility and risk, RMBS or CDNS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, RMBS or CDNS?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of RMBS or CDNS?

Is RMBS or CDNS more profitable?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Do analysts prefer CDNS or SNPS?

Is CDNS or SNPS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CDNS or SNPS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CDNS or SNPS?

Does the media prefer CDNS or SNPS?

Which has more risk and volatility, CDNS or SNPS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools