Do analysts prefer CDNS or CSQ?

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus target price of $384.41, suggesting a potential upside of 2.53%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cadence Design Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 14 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.82 Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CDNS or CSQ?

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 19.52 $1.11B $4.29 87.40 Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $723.74M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CDNS or KLAC?

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 19.52 $1.11B $4.29 87.40 KLA $12.16B 20.65 $4.06B $35.33 54.39

Is CDNS or KLAC more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cadence Design Systems 21.18% 28.44% 15.30% KLA 35.66% 91.89% 29.21%

Does the media refer more to CDNS or KLAC?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 19 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 16 mentions for KLA. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat KLA's score of 0.82 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 25 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive KLA 7 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CDNS or META?

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 156 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 191 mentions for Meta Platforms and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.97 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 25 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Meta Platforms 129 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 25 Neutral mention(s) 17 Negative mention(s) 5 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MPWR or CDNS?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 34 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 1.06 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monolithic Power Systems 22 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 25 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NVDA or CDNS?

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NVIDIA $215.94B 23.66 $120.07B $6.53 32.33 Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 19.52 $1.11B $4.29 87.40

Does the media favor NVDA or CDNS?

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 309 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 344 mentions for NVIDIA and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.94 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NVIDIA 222 Very Positive mention(s) 34 Positive mention(s) 46 Neutral mention(s) 28 Negative mention(s) 10 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 25 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

$374.93 +1.08 (+0.29%)

Closing price 05/29/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$373.43 -1.50 (-0.40%)

As of 05/29/2026 07:36 PM Eastern

Compare

CDNS vs. CSQ, KLAC, META, MPWR, and NVDA

Should you buy Cadence Design Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cadence Design Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cadence Design Systems include Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), KLA (KLAC), Meta Platforms (META), Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), and NVIDIA (NVDA).

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) are related companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 21.18% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 28.44% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	19.52	$1.11B	$4.29	87.40
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$723.74M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus target price of $384.41, suggesting a potential upside of 2.53%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 32 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 3 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.96 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	25 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to KLA?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%
KLA	35.66%	91.89%	29.21%

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus target price of $384.41, suggesting a potential upside of 2.53%. KLA has a consensus target price of $1,842.19, suggesting a potential downside of 4.14%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than KLA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	19.52	$1.11B	$4.29	87.40
KLA	$12.16B	20.65	$4.06B	$35.33	54.39

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 19 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 16 mentions for KLA. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat KLA's score of 0.82 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	25 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
KLA	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

KLA beats Cadence Design Systems on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus price target of $384.41, indicating a potential upside of 2.53%. Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $840.19, indicating a potential upside of 32.83%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Meta Platforms	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	34 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 156 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 191 mentions for Meta Platforms and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.97 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	25 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Meta Platforms	129 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	25 Neutral mention(s)	17 Negative mention(s)	5 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	19.52	$1.11B	$4.29	87.40
Meta Platforms	$200.97B	7.96	$60.46B	$27.51	22.99

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 36.93% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%
Meta Platforms	32.84%	36.93%	23.09%

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Cadence Design Systems on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Monolithic Power Systems?

Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Monolithic Power Systems currently has a consensus price target of $1,599.17, suggesting a potential upside of 2.10%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $384.41, suggesting a potential upside of 2.53%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Monolithic Power Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Monolithic Power Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Monolithic Power Systems	$2.79B	27.58	$621.48M	$13.87	112.92
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	19.52	$1.11B	$4.29	87.40

Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 28.44% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Monolithic Power Systems	22.84%	19.58%	16.50%
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.69, indicating that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 34 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 1.06 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Monolithic Power Systems	22 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	25 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Monolithic Power Systems and Cadence Design Systems tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NVIDIA	62.97%	96.94%	72.16%
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

NVIDIA currently has a consensus price target of $305.38, indicating a potential upside of 44.63%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $384.41, indicating a potential upside of 2.53%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NVIDIA	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	47 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NVIDIA	$215.94B	23.66	$120.07B	$6.53	32.33
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	19.52	$1.11B	$4.29	87.40

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 309 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 344 mentions for NVIDIA and 35 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.94 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NVIDIA	222 Very Positive mention(s)	34 Positive mention(s)	46 Neutral mention(s)	28 Negative mention(s)	10 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	25 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

NVIDIA beats Cadence Design Systems on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cadence Design Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDNS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CDNS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cadence Design Systems	COMP Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$103.41B	$157.15B	$40.86B	$12.59B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.91%	3.14%	5.31%
P/E Ratio	87.40	21.16	162.93	23.45
Price / Sales	19.52	5.21	625.68	114.93
Price / Cash	59.19	18.05	49.02	37.60
Price / Book	18.64	30.40	10.00	6.86
Net Income	$1.11B	$5.11B	$1.07B	$337.26M
7 Day Performance	0.36%	3.09%	4.01%	3.58%
1 Month Performance	13.76%	5.61%	11.18%	5.71%
1 Year Performance	31.73%	-16.37%	172.00%	39.70%

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CDNS Cadence Design Systems	4.1559 of 5 stars	$374.93 +0.3%	$384.41 +2.5%	+31.7%	$103.41B	$5.30B	87.40	13,800	Trending News Analyst Forecast Insider Trade
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$20.20 +0.5%	N/A	+20.5%	$0.00	$723.74M	N/A	N/A	Short Interest Decrease
KLAC KLA	4.0071 of 5 stars	$1,842.18 +0.7%	$1,842.19 +0.0%	+156.5%	$238.98B	$13.10B	52.14	15,200	Trending News
META Meta Platforms	4.9479 of 5 stars	$607.38 +0.4%	$840.19 +38.3%	-1.5%	$1.53T	$200.97B	22.08	78,865	Trending News Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Options Volume
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems	4.2408 of 5 stars	$1,561.25 +0.5%	$1,599.17 +2.4%	+138.9%	$76.31B	$2.79B	112.56	4,501	Trending News Analyst Downgrade Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CDNS) was last updated on 5/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, KLAC, META, MPWR, and NVDA

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to KLA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Monolithic Power Systems?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, KLAC, META, MPWR, and NVDA

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Is CDNS or CSQ more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CDNS or CSQ?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CDNS or CSQ?

Do analysts prefer CDNS or CSQ?

Does the media favor CDNS or CSQ?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to KLA?

Is CDNS or KLAC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CDNS or KLAC?

Do analysts rate CDNS or KLAC?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CDNS or KLAC?

Does the media refer more to CDNS or KLAC?

Which has more risk & volatility, CDNS or KLAC?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Which has more risk and volatility, CDNS or META?

Do analysts rate CDNS or META?

Does the media prefer CDNS or META?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CDNS or META?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CDNS or META?

Is CDNS or META more profitable?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Monolithic Power Systems?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in MPWR or CDNS?

Do analysts recommend MPWR or CDNS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MPWR or CDNS?

Is MPWR or CDNS more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPWR or CDNS?

Does the media refer more to MPWR or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in NVDA or CDNS?

Is NVDA or CDNS more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, NVDA or CDNS?

Do analysts rate NVDA or CDNS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NVDA or CDNS?

Does the media favor NVDA or CDNS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools