Do analysts prefer CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $387.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.74%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Cadence Design Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 13 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.81

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $1.06B N/A N/A N/A N/A Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 20.01 $1.11B $4.29 89.55

Does the media favor META or CDNS?

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 169 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 192 mentions for Meta Platforms and 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.69 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Meta Platforms 105 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 29 Negative mention(s) 7 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 20 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CDNS or MPWR?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 21 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 1.22 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 20 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Monolithic Power Systems 13 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CDNS or NVDA?

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 280 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 303 mentions for NVIDIA and 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.64 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 20 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NVIDIA 145 Very Positive mention(s) 43 Positive mention(s) 70 Neutral mention(s) 36 Negative mention(s) 8 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CDNS or SNPS?

In the previous week, Synopsys had 1 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Synopsys and 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Synopsys' score of 1.23 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 20 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Synopsys 17 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

$384.17 -1.78 (-0.46%)

Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$384.62 +0.44 (+0.12%)

As of 07/10/2026 07:58 PM Eastern

Compare

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, MPWR, NVDA, and SNPS

Should you buy Cadence Design Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cadence Design Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cadence Design Systems include Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), Meta Platforms (META), Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), NVIDIA (NVDA), and Synopsys (SNPS).

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 22 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 1 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	Neutral
Cadence Design Systems	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $387.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.74%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 21.18% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 28.44% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$1.06B	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.01	$1.11B	$4.29	89.55

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 169 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 192 mentions for Meta Platforms and 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.69 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Meta Platforms	105 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	29 Negative mention(s)	7 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	20 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Meta Platforms presently has a consensus target price of $838.26, indicating a potential upside of 25.26%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $387.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.74%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Meta Platforms	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	35 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Meta Platforms	$200.97B	8.42	$60.46B	$27.51	24.33
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.01	$1.11B	$4.29	89.55

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 36.93% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Meta Platforms	32.84%	36.93%	23.09%
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Cadence Design Systems on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Monolithic Power Systems?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 28.44% beat Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%
Monolithic Power Systems	22.84%	19.58%	16.50%

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.71, meaning that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Monolithic Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 21 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 1.22 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	20 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monolithic Power Systems	13 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.01	$1.11B	$4.29	89.55
Monolithic Power Systems	$2.79B	23.82	$621.48M	$13.87	97.53

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus price target of $387.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.74%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $1,599.17, suggesting a potential upside of 18.22%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Monolithic Power Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

Summary

Monolithic Power Systems beats Cadence Design Systems on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 280 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 303 mentions for NVIDIA and 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.64 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	20 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NVIDIA	145 Very Positive mention(s)	43 Positive mention(s)	70 Neutral mention(s)	36 Negative mention(s)	8 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.21, meaning that its share price is 121% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus target price of $387.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.74%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $303.84, indicating a potential upside of 44.03%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
NVIDIA	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	48 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.01	$1.11B	$4.29	89.55
NVIDIA	$215.94B	23.64	$120.07B	$6.53	32.31

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 21.18%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%
NVIDIA	62.97%	96.94%	72.16%

Summary

NVIDIA beats Cadence Design Systems on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Synopsys (NASDAQ:SNPS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Synopsys had 1 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Synopsys and 23 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Synopsys' score of 1.23 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	20 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Synopsys	17 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Synopsys shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Synopsys shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Synopsys has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus price target of $387.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.74%. Synopsys has a consensus price target of $570.06, suggesting a potential upside of 27.96%. Given Synopsys' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Synopsys is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Synopsys	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

Synopsys has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Synopsys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	20.01	$1.11B	$4.29	89.55
Synopsys	$7.05B	12.09	$1.33B	$4.32	103.13

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 21.18% compared to Synopsys' net margin of 8.91%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 28.44% beat Synopsys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	21.18%	28.44%	15.30%
Synopsys	8.91%	5.83%	3.58%

Summary

Synopsys beats Cadence Design Systems on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cadence Design Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDNS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CDNS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cadence Design Systems	COMP Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$106.45B	$130.95B	$39.06B	$12.61B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.05%	3.19%	7.83%
P/E Ratio	89.55	21.28	170.34	24.56
Price / Sales	20.01	4.62	599.76	121.71
Price / Cash	60.93	17.17	46.37	60.04
Price / Book	19.10	35.96	9.60	6.39
Net Income	$1.11B	$5.27B	$1.07B	$331.44M
7 Day Performance	2.96%	-0.07%	-0.26%	0.37%
1 Month Performance	0.11%	0.09%	0.84%	2.17%
1 Year Performance	19.83%	-23.81%	141.15%	20.90%

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CDNS Cadence Design Systems	3.6032 of 5 stars	$384.17 -0.5%	$387.00 +0.7%	+19.1%	$106.45B	$5.30B	89.55	13,800	Positive News
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$20.52 -0.5%	N/A	+13.4%	$0.00	$723.74M	N/A	N/A	Positive News
META Meta Platforms	4.9472 of 5 stars	$582.88 -4.9%	$840.64 +44.2%	-8.0%	$1.55T	$200.97B	21.19	78,865	Trending News Analyst Upgrade Insider Trade Gap Up
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems	4.9511 of 5 stars	$1,288.16 -3.3%	$1,599.17 +24.1%	+82.7%	$65.43B	$2.79B	92.87	4,501	Positive News Gap Down
NVDA NVIDIA	4.9861 of 5 stars	$194.83 -1.4%	$303.84 +56.0%	+28.6%	$4.78T	$253.49B	29.84	42,000	Trending News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CDNS) was last updated on 7/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, MPWR, NVDA, and SNPS

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Monolithic Power Systems?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, MPWR, NVDA, and SNPS

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CSQ or CDNS?

Does the media refer more to CSQ or CDNS?

Do analysts prefer CSQ or CDNS?

Is CSQ or CDNS more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CSQ or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in META or CDNS?

Does the media favor META or CDNS?

Do analysts prefer META or CDNS?

Which has more risk & volatility, META or CDNS?

Which has better earnings & valuation, META or CDNS?

Is META or CDNS more profitable?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Monolithic Power Systems?

Is CDNS or MPWR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CDNS or MPWR?

Which has more risk & volatility, CDNS or MPWR?

Does the media refer more to CDNS or MPWR?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CDNS or MPWR?

Do analysts rate CDNS or MPWR?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Does the media refer more to CDNS or NVDA?

Which has more volatility and risk, CDNS or NVDA?

Do analysts rate CDNS or NVDA?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CDNS or NVDA?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CDNS or NVDA?

Is CDNS or NVDA more profitable?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Does the media refer more to CDNS or SNPS?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CDNS or SNPS?

Which has more volatility & risk, CDNS or SNPS?

Do analysts rate CDNS or SNPS?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CDNS or SNPS?

Is CDNS or SNPS more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools