Do analysts rate CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $410.05, indicating a potential upside of 23.02%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Cadence Design Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 18 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.91

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CSQ or CDNS?

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $1.06B N/A N/A N/A N/A Cadence Design Systems $5.30B 17.27 $1.11B $5.03 66.27

Does the media prefer CDNS or META?

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 117 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 135 mentions for Meta Platforms and 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.92 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Meta Platforms 97 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 15 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CDNS or NVDA?

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 401 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 419 mentions for NVIDIA and 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat NVIDIA's score of -0.04 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NVIDIA 58 Very Positive mention(s) 30 Positive mention(s) 103 Neutral mention(s) 186 Negative mention(s) 23 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor SNPS or CDNS?

In the previous week, Synopsys had 4 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Synopsys and 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Synopsys' score of 0.89 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Synopsys 14 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cadence Design Systems 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer CDNS or WWD?

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 14 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 4 mentions for Woodward. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Woodward's score of 0.55 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadence Design Systems 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Woodward 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

$323.01 -10.31 (-3.09%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$319.50 -3.51 (-1.09%)

As of 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, SNPS, and WWD

Should you buy Cadence Design Systems stock or one of its competitors? Cadence Design Systems's main competitors and comparable companies include Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), Meta Platforms (META), NVIDIA (NVDA), Synopsys (SNPS), and Woodward (WWD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 22.51% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 26.56% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	22.51%	26.56%	14.70%

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$1.06B	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.27	$1.11B	$5.03	66.27

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $410.05, indicating a potential upside of 23.02%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 15 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 3 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Cadence Design Systems' score of 0.92 indicating that Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 117 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 135 mentions for Meta Platforms and 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.92 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Meta Platforms	97 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	15 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus price target of $410.05, suggesting a potential upside of 23.02%. Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $833.12, suggesting a potential upside of 33.60%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Meta Platforms	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	47 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of Meta Platforms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.27	$1.11B	$5.03	66.27
Meta Platforms	$241.61B	6.60	$60.46B	$29.33	21.26

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 31.15% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 22.51%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 30.73% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	22.51%	26.56%	14.70%
Meta Platforms	31.15%	30.73%	18.08%

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Cadence Design Systems on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.27	$1.11B	$5.03	66.27
NVIDIA	$215.94B	18.55	$120.07B	$7.91	21.01

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the broader market.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 63.66% compared to Cadence Design Systems' net margin of 22.51%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.04% beat Cadence Design Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	22.51%	26.56%	14.70%
NVIDIA	63.66%	96.04%	71.00%

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus price target of $410.05, suggesting a potential upside of 23.02%. NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $283.63, suggesting a potential upside of 70.67%. Given NVIDIA's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
NVIDIA	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	39 Buy rating(s)	5 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 401 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 419 mentions for NVIDIA and 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat NVIDIA's score of -0.04 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NVIDIA	58 Very Positive mention(s)	30 Positive mention(s)	103 Neutral mention(s)	186 Negative mention(s)	23 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

NVIDIA beats Cadence Design Systems on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Synopsys (NASDAQ:SNPS) and Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Synopsys presently has a consensus target price of $575.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.27%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $410.05, suggesting a potential upside of 23.02%. Given Synopsys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Synopsys is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Synopsys	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	22 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

Synopsys has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Synopsys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Synopsys	$7.05B	12.57	$1.33B	$5.66	81.75
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.27	$1.11B	$5.03	66.27

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 22.51% compared to Synopsys' net margin of 11.43%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 26.56% beat Synopsys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Synopsys	11.43%	6.24%	3.95%
Cadence Design Systems	22.51%	26.56%	14.70%

85.5% of Synopsys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Synopsys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Synopsys has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Synopsys had 4 more articles in the media than Cadence Design Systems. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Synopsys and 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Synopsys' score of 0.89 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Synopsys	14 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cadence Design Systems	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Synopsys beats Cadence Design Systems on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Woodward?

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 14 more articles in the media than Woodward. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 4 mentions for Woodward. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Woodward's score of 0.55 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadence Design Systems	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Woodward	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cadence Design Systems currently has a consensus price target of $410.05, suggesting a potential upside of 23.02%. Woodward has a consensus price target of $413.82, suggesting a potential upside of 24.68%. Given Woodward's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Woodward is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadence Design Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Woodward	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Woodward shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Woodward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 22.51% compared to Woodward's net margin of 13.17%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 26.56% beat Woodward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadence Design Systems	22.51%	26.56%	14.70%
Woodward	13.17%	21.89%	11.38%

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Woodward. Woodward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadence Design Systems	$5.30B	17.27	$1.11B	$5.03	66.27
Woodward	$3.57B	5.49	$442.11M	$8.99	36.92

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Woodward on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cadence Design Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDNS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CDNS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cadence Design Systems	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$91.46B	$15.76B	$27.40B	$12.20B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.38%	2.95%	4.52%
P/E Ratio	53.42	42.56	40.39	27.45
Price / Sales	16.73	6.42	5.78	5.84
Price / Cash	52.62	27.95	27.52	22.49
Price / Book	12.89	6.26	5.34	3.76
Net Income	$1.11B	$424.69M	$787.50M	$390.55M
7 Day Performance	0.97%	0.26%	1.62%	-0.30%
1 Month Performance	-3.35%	-3.85%	-7.75%	-6.64%
1 Year Performance	2.22%	-10.27%	2.29%	-5.77%

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CDNS Cadence Design Systems	4.3598 of 5 stars	$323.01 -3.1%	$410.05 +26.9%	+5.7%	$91.46B	$5.30B	53.42	13,800	Insider Trade
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$18.89 -5.0%	N/A	+1.6%	$0.00	$1.06B	N/A	N/A	Short Interest Decrease High Trading Volume
META Meta Platforms	4.8496 of 5 stars	$605.08 -4.0%	$833.12 +37.7%	+2.4%	$1.61T	$200.97B	20.63	78,865	Trending News Insider Trade Short Interest Increase
NVDA NVIDIA	4.9282 of 5 stars	$181.60 -9.3%	$318.85 +75.6%	-14.2%	$4.82T	$302.97B	22.96	42,000	Trending News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast Gap Up High Trading Volume
SNPS Synopsys	4.5841 of 5 stars	$440.31 -4.9%	$575.00 +30.6%	+16.0%	$88.72B	$7.05B	77.79	28,000	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CDNS) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, SNPS, and WWD

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Woodward?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) Competitors

CDNS vs. CSQ, META, NVDA, SNPS, and WWD

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Is CSQ or CDNS more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CSQ or CDNS?

Do analysts rate CSQ or CDNS?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CSQ or CDNS?

Does the media favor CSQ or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Meta Platforms?

Does the media prefer CDNS or META?

Do analysts rate CDNS or META?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CDNS or META?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CDNS or META?

Which has more risk & volatility, CDNS or META?

Is CDNS or META more profitable?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to NVIDIA?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CDNS or NVDA?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CDNS or NVDA?

Which has more volatility and risk, CDNS or NVDA?

Is CDNS or NVDA more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CDNS or NVDA?

Does the media prefer CDNS or NVDA?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Synopsys?

Do analysts rate SNPS or CDNS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, SNPS or CDNS?

Is SNPS or CDNS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SNPS or CDNS?

Which has more risk and volatility, SNPS or CDNS?

Does the media favor SNPS or CDNS?

Summary

How does Cadence Design Systems compare to Woodward?

Which has more volatility & risk, CDNS or WWD?

Does the media prefer CDNS or WWD?

Do analysts rate CDNS or WWD?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CDNS or WWD?

Is CDNS or WWD more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CDNS or WWD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CDNS vs. The Competition

Cadence Design Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools