Go Pro

Bon Natural Life (BON) Competitors

Bon Natural Life logo
$1.18 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 03:51 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.19 +0.01 (+0.85%)
As of 07/2/2026 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BON vs. ADXS, GRML, ALGS, SNTI, and ZYBT

Should you buy Bon Natural Life stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Bon Natural Life with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Bon Natural Life include Ayala Pharmaceuticals (ADXS), Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock (GRML), Aligos Therapeutics (ALGS), Senti Biosciences (SNTI), and Zhengye Biotechnology (ZYBT). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does Bon Natural Life compare to Ayala Pharmaceuticals?

Bon Natural Life (NASDAQ:BON) and Ayala Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ADXS) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Bon Natural Life has a beta of -0.17, meaning that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ayala Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Bon Natural Life has higher revenue and earnings than Ayala Pharmaceuticals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bon Natural Life$18.67M0.51-$2MN/AN/A
Ayala Pharmaceuticals$3.24M11.05-$48.07M-$5.02N/A

0.6% of Bon Natural Life shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of Ayala Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.5% of Bon Natural Life shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ayala Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bon Natural LifeN/A N/A N/A
Ayala Pharmaceuticals N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bon Natural Life
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Ayala Pharmaceuticals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Ayala Pharmaceuticals had 1 more articles in the media than Bon Natural Life. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ayala Pharmaceuticals and 0 mentions for Bon Natural Life. Bon Natural Life's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ayala Pharmaceuticals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bon Natural Life Neutral
Ayala Pharmaceuticals Neutral

Summary

Bon Natural Life and Ayala Pharmaceuticals tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bon Natural Life compare to Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock?

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock (NASDAQ:GRML) and Bon Natural Life (NASDAQ:BON) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Bon Natural Life
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock has a beta of 7.05, indicating that its stock price is 605% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bon Natural Life has a beta of -0.17, indicating that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

Bon Natural Life has higher revenue and earnings than Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common StockN/AN/A-$10.55M-$0.32N/A
Bon Natural Life$18.67M0.51-$2MN/AN/A

Bon Natural Life's return on equity of 0.00% beat Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common StockN/A -109.40% -98.80%
Bon Natural Life N/A N/A N/A

20.1% of Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bon Natural Life shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.3% of Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Bon Natural Life shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock had 2 more articles in the media than Bon Natural Life. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock and 0 mentions for Bon Natural Life. Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Bon Natural Life's score of 0.00 indicating that Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock Neutral
Bon Natural Life Neutral

Summary

Bon Natural Life beats Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bon Natural Life compare to Aligos Therapeutics?

Bon Natural Life (NASDAQ:BON) and Aligos Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ALGS) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Bon Natural Life has higher revenue and earnings than Aligos Therapeutics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bon Natural Life$18.67M0.51-$2MN/AN/A
Aligos Therapeutics$2.19M15.80-$24.19M-$8.69N/A

Bon Natural Life has a beta of -0.17, indicating that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aligos Therapeutics has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its share price is 126% more volatile than the broader market.

Bon Natural Life has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aligos Therapeutics' net margin of -1,919.68%. Bon Natural Life's return on equity of 0.00% beat Aligos Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bon Natural LifeN/A N/A N/A
Aligos Therapeutics -1,919.68%-139.47%-90.88%

In the previous week, Aligos Therapeutics had 1 more articles in the media than Bon Natural Life. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Aligos Therapeutics and 0 mentions for Bon Natural Life. Bon Natural Life's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aligos Therapeutics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bon Natural Life Neutral
Aligos Therapeutics Neutral

Aligos Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $38.50, suggesting a potential upside of 588.73%. Given Aligos Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aligos Therapeutics is more favorable than Bon Natural Life.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bon Natural Life
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Aligos Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

0.6% of Bon Natural Life shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.4% of Aligos Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Bon Natural Life shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of Aligos Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aligos Therapeutics beats Bon Natural Life on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bon Natural Life compare to Senti Biosciences?

Senti Biosciences (NASDAQ:SNTI) and Bon Natural Life (NASDAQ:BON) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Bon Natural Life's return on equity of 0.00% beat Senti Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Senti BiosciencesN/A -532.05% -103.35%
Bon Natural Life N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Senti Biosciences had 1 more articles in the media than Bon Natural Life. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Senti Biosciences and 0 mentions for Bon Natural Life. Senti Biosciences' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Bon Natural Life's score of 0.00 indicating that Senti Biosciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Senti Biosciences Positive
Bon Natural Life Neutral

25.7% of Senti Biosciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bon Natural Life shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Senti Biosciences shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Bon Natural Life shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Senti Biosciences has a beta of 2.04, suggesting that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bon Natural Life has a beta of -0.17, suggesting that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

Senti Biosciences currently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 834.58%. Given Senti Biosciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Senti Biosciences is more favorable than Bon Natural Life.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Senti Biosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Bon Natural Life
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Bon Natural Life has higher revenue and earnings than Senti Biosciences.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Senti Biosciences$20K1,666.53-$61.44M-$1.92N/A
Bon Natural Life$18.67M0.51-$2MN/AN/A

Summary

Senti Biosciences beats Bon Natural Life on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bon Natural Life compare to Zhengye Biotechnology?

Zhengye Biotechnology (NASDAQ:ZYBT) and Bon Natural Life (NASDAQ:BON) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Zhengye Biotechnology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bon Natural Life'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zhengye Biotechnology Neutral
Bon Natural Life Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zhengye Biotechnology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Bon Natural Life
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zhengye BiotechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Bon Natural Life N/A N/A N/A

0.6% of Bon Natural Life shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.5% of Bon Natural Life shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Zhengye Biotechnology has a beta of -2.18, indicating that its share price is 318% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bon Natural Life has a beta of -0.17, indicating that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

Bon Natural Life has higher revenue and earnings than Zhengye Biotechnology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zhengye Biotechnology$16.64M1.84-$9.98MN/AN/A
Bon Natural Life$18.67M0.51-$2MN/AN/A

Summary

Bon Natural Life beats Zhengye Biotechnology on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bon Natural Life News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BON and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BON and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BON vs. The Competition

MetricBon Natural LifeCONSM PD IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$9.58M$1.52B$7.36B$12.48B
Dividend YieldN/A4.84%3.03%6.52%
P/E RatioN/A9.1120.7024.70
Price / Sales0.513.284.2099.42
Price / CashN/A16.9215.5557.09
Price / Book0.171.463.846.46
Net Income-$2M$61.01M$247.92M$337.01M
7 Day Performance4.34%1.18%0.46%1.69%
1 Month Performance-5.68%9.07%2.55%3.81%
1 Year Performance-21.40%0.25%0.53%23.90%

Bon Natural Life Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BON
Bon Natural Life
0.8697 of 5 stars
$1.18
flat
N/A-21.4%$9.58M$18.67MN/A100
ADXS
Ayala Pharmaceuticals
N/A$0.60
flat
N/AN/A$35.79M$3.24MN/A20
GRML
Greenland Mines Ltd. Common Stock
0.6351 of 5 stars
$0.26
flat
N/A-79.6%$35.35MN/AN/A5
ALGS
Aligos Therapeutics
2.3362 of 5 stars
$5.57
flat
$38.50
+591.2%
-29.7%$34.48M$2.19MN/A90
SNTI
Senti Biosciences
2.6938 of 5 stars
$1.09
flat
$10.00
+817.4%
-52.8%$33.95M$20KN/A4

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BON) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners