Free Trial

China BAK Battery (CBAT) Competitors

China BAK Battery logo
$0.72 -0.03 (-4.06%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.74 +0.02 (+3.33%)
As of 06:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CBAT vs. EAF, RONI, NVX, SKYX, and BYRN

Should you buy China BAK Battery stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares China BAK Battery with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with China BAK Battery include GrafTech International (EAF), Rice Acquisition Corp. II (RONI), NOVONIX (NVX), SKYX Platforms (SKYX), and Byrna Technologies (BYRN). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment" industry.

How does China BAK Battery compare to GrafTech International?

GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) and China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to GrafTech International's net margin of -43.25%. GrafTech International's return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GrafTech International-43.25% N/A -17.57%
China BAK Battery -7.43%-15.32%-4.23%

China BAK Battery has lower revenue, but higher earnings than GrafTech International. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GrafTech International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GrafTech International$504.13M0.45-$219.84M-$8.66N/A
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.33-$9.38M-$0.18N/A

GrafTech International has a beta of 1.77, suggesting that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

92.8% of GrafTech International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of GrafTech International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 2 more articles in the media than GrafTech International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 0 mentions for GrafTech International. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat GrafTech International's score of 0.00 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GrafTech International Neutral
China BAK Battery Neutral

GrafTech International currently has a consensus price target of $10.67, suggesting a potential upside of 22.63%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GrafTech International
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

GrafTech International beats China BAK Battery on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to Rice Acquisition Corp. II?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Rice Acquisition Corp. II (NYSE:RONI) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 2 more articles in the media than Rice Acquisition Corp. II. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 0 mentions for Rice Acquisition Corp. II. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Rice Acquisition Corp. II's score of 0.00 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery Neutral
Rice Acquisition Corp. II Neutral

Rice Acquisition Corp. II has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China BAK Battery.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.33-$9.38M-$0.18N/A
Rice Acquisition Corp. IIN/AN/A$4.07MN/AN/A

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rice Acquisition Corp. II has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Rice Acquisition Corp. II
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Rice Acquisition Corp. II has a net margin of 0.00% compared to China BAK Battery's net margin of -7.43%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat Rice Acquisition Corp. II's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China BAK Battery-7.43% -15.32% -4.23%
Rice Acquisition Corp. II N/A -17.93%-4.49%

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.5% of Rice Acquisition Corp. II shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Rice Acquisition Corp. II shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China BAK Battery beats Rice Acquisition Corp. II on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to NOVONIX?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and NOVONIX (NASDAQ:NVX) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
NOVONIX
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NOVONIX has a beta of 2.5, indicating that its share price is 150% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 1 more articles in the media than NOVONIX. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 1 mentions for NOVONIX. NOVONIX's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.27 indicating that NOVONIX is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
NOVONIX
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of NOVONIX shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of NOVONIX shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NOVONIX has a net margin of 0.00% compared to China BAK Battery's net margin of -7.43%. NOVONIX's return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China BAK Battery-7.43% -15.32% -4.23%
NOVONIX N/A N/A N/A

China BAK Battery has higher revenue and earnings than NOVONIX.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.33-$9.38M-$0.18N/A
NOVONIX$5.62M23.18-$92.72MN/AN/A

Summary

NOVONIX beats China BAK Battery on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to SKYX Platforms?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and SKYX Platforms (NASDAQ:SKYX) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk and valuation.

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to SKYX Platforms' net margin of -35.79%. SKYX Platforms' return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China BAK Battery-7.43% -15.32% -4.23%
SKYX Platforms -35.79%N/A -52.05%

SKYX Platforms has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 367.29%. Given SKYX Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SKYX Platforms is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
SKYX Platforms
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.8% of SKYX Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of SKYX Platforms shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 2 more articles in the media than SKYX Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 0 mentions for SKYX Platforms. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat SKYX Platforms' score of 0.00 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery Neutral
SKYX Platforms Neutral

China BAK Battery has higher revenue and earnings than SKYX Platforms. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SKYX Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.33-$9.38M-$0.18N/A
SKYX Platforms$92.01M1.56-$33.42M-$0.29N/A

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SKYX Platforms has a beta of -3583.04, suggesting that its share price is 358,404% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SKYX Platforms beats China BAK Battery on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to Byrna Technologies?

Byrna Technologies (NASDAQ:BYRN) and China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Byrna Technologies has a beta of 1.81, indicating that its share price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 2 more articles in the media than Byrna Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 0 mentions for Byrna Technologies. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Byrna Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Byrna Technologies Neutral
China BAK Battery Neutral

Byrna Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $12.13, indicating a potential upside of 104.81%. Given Byrna Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Byrna Technologies is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Byrna Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.14
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

25.5% of Byrna Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Byrna Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Byrna Technologies has a net margin of 7.30% compared to China BAK Battery's net margin of -7.43%. Byrna Technologies' return on equity of 14.14% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Byrna Technologies7.30% 14.14% 11.21%
China BAK Battery -7.43%-15.32%-4.23%

Byrna Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Byrna Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Byrna Technologies$118.12M1.14$9.69M$0.3616.44
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.33-$9.38M-$0.18N/A

Summary

Byrna Technologies beats China BAK Battery on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China BAK Battery News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CBAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CBAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CBAT vs. The Competition

MetricChina BAK BatteryELEC POWER IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$66.53M$7.77B$40.82B$12.46B
Dividend YieldN/A1.76%3.10%5.34%
P/E Ratio-4.007.26171.2123.64
Price / Sales0.3321.99639.54112.52
Price / Cash55.5332.7452.1657.17
Price / Book0.581.999.806.37
Net Income-$9.38M$193.59M$1.06B$337.36M
7 Day Performance-10.00%-5.87%-1.86%-3.07%
1 Month Performance-9.34%3.69%5.65%0.37%
1 Year Performance-32.08%178.75%159.66%27.87%

China BAK Battery Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CBAT
China BAK Battery
0.9118 of 5 stars
$0.72
-4.1%
N/A-30.5%$66.53M$195.19MN/A1,739
EAF
GrafTech International
3.012 of 5 stars
$9.03
-0.8%
$10.67
+18.1%
-5.0%$235.23M$504.13MN/A1,071
RONI
Rice Acquisition Corp. II
N/A$1.93
+2.7%
N/A-31.2%$233.05MN/AN/A24
NVX
NOVONIX
0.6417 of 5 stars
$0.70
+1.0%
N/A-37.9%$150.17M$5.62MN/AN/A
SKYX
SKYX Platforms
2.2018 of 5 stars
$1.11
-1.7%
$5.00
+350.0%
-12.1%$149.41M$92.01MN/A30

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CBAT) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners