Do analysts rate CBAT or EAF?

GrafTech International has a consensus target price of $10.67, suggesting a potential upside of 53.83%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 GrafTech International 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Does the media prefer CBAT or EAF?

In the previous week, GrafTech International had 4 more articles in the media than China BAK Battery. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for GrafTech International and 2 mentions for China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat GrafTech International's score of 0.41 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive GrafTech International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CBAT or SKYX?

SKYX Platforms has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 323.73%. Given SKYX Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SKYX Platforms is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 SKYX Platforms 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Does the media refer more to CBAT or SKYX?

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 1 more articles in the media than SKYX Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 1 mentions for SKYX Platforms. SKYX Platforms' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.63 indicating that SKYX Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SKYX Platforms 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate BYRN or CBAT?

Byrna Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $7.88, suggesting a potential upside of 135.78%. Given Byrna Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Byrna Technologies is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Byrna Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor BYRN or CBAT?

In the previous week, Byrna Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than China BAK Battery. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Byrna Technologies and 2 mentions for China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Byrna Technologies' score of -0.07 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Byrna Technologies 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate CBAT or NEOV?

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 350.24%. Given NeoVolta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NeoVolta is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 NeoVolta 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.20

Does the media prefer CBAT or NEOV?

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 1 more articles in the media than NeoVolta. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 1 mentions for NeoVolta. NeoVolta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.63 indicating that NeoVolta is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NeoVolta 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate ULBI or CBAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ultralife 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media prefer ULBI or CBAT?

In the previous week, Ultralife had 1 more articles in the media than China BAK Battery. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ultralife and 2 mentions for China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Ultralife's score of 0.17 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ultralife 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

China BAK Battery (CBAT) Competitors

$0.54 +0.01 (+1.94%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$0.53 -0.01 (-2.65%)

As of 07:17 PM Eastern

Compare

CBAT vs. EAF, SKYX, BYRN, NEOV, and ULBI

Should you buy China BAK Battery stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares China BAK Battery with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with China BAK Battery include GrafTech International (EAF), SKYX Platforms (SKYX), Byrna Technologies (BYRN), NeoVolta (NEOV), and Ultralife (ULBI). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment" industry.

How does China BAK Battery compare to GrafTech International?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GrafTech International has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

China BAK Battery has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GrafTech International. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GrafTech International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.25	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A
GrafTech International	$504.13M	0.36	-$219.84M	-$8.66	N/A

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of GrafTech International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of GrafTech International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to GrafTech International's net margin of -43.25%. GrafTech International's return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%
GrafTech International	-43.25%	N/A	-17.57%

GrafTech International has a consensus target price of $10.67, suggesting a potential upside of 53.83%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
GrafTech International	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

In the previous week, GrafTech International had 4 more articles in the media than China BAK Battery. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for GrafTech International and 2 mentions for China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat GrafTech International's score of 0.41 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
GrafTech International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

GrafTech International beats China BAK Battery on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to SKYX Platforms?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and SKYX Platforms (NASDAQ:SKYX) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

SKYX Platforms has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 323.73%. Given SKYX Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SKYX Platforms is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
SKYX Platforms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SKYX Platforms has a beta of -3527.1, meaning that its share price is 352,810% less volatile than the broader market.

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to SKYX Platforms' net margin of -35.79%. SKYX Platforms' return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%
SKYX Platforms	-35.79%	N/A	-52.05%

China BAK Battery has higher revenue and earnings than SKYX Platforms. SKYX Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China BAK Battery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.25	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A
SKYX Platforms	$92.01M	1.72	-$33.42M	-$0.29	N/A

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.8% of SKYX Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of SKYX Platforms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 1 more articles in the media than SKYX Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 1 mentions for SKYX Platforms. SKYX Platforms' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.63 indicating that SKYX Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SKYX Platforms	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

SKYX Platforms beats China BAK Battery on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to Byrna Technologies?

Byrna Technologies (NASDAQ:BYRN) and China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Byrna Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China BAK Battery. Byrna Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China BAK Battery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Byrna Technologies	$118.12M	0.64	$9.69M	-$0.18	N/A
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.25	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A

In the previous week, Byrna Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than China BAK Battery. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Byrna Technologies and 2 mentions for China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Byrna Technologies' score of -0.07 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Byrna Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

25.5% of Byrna Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Byrna Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Byrna Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $7.88, suggesting a potential upside of 135.78%. Given Byrna Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Byrna Technologies is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Byrna Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Byrna Technologies has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Byrna Technologies has a net margin of -3.39% compared to China BAK Battery's net margin of -7.43%. Byrna Technologies' return on equity of -5.85% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Byrna Technologies	-3.39%	-5.85%	-4.74%
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%

Summary

Byrna Technologies beats China BAK Battery on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to NeoVolta?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and NeoVolta (NASDAQ:NEOV) are both small-cap electrical equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of NeoVolta shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of NeoVolta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -63.35%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat NeoVolta's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%
NeoVolta	-63.35%	-141.89%	-89.61%

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 350.24%. Given NeoVolta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NeoVolta is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
NeoVolta	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NeoVolta has a beta of -1.09, indicating that its share price is 209% less volatile than the broader market.

NeoVolta has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China BAK Battery. NeoVolta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China BAK Battery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.25	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A
NeoVolta	$8.43M	10.69	-$5.03M	-$0.33	N/A

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 1 more articles in the media than NeoVolta. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China BAK Battery and 1 mentions for NeoVolta. NeoVolta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.63 indicating that NeoVolta is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NeoVolta	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

China BAK Battery and NeoVolta tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to Ultralife?

Ultralife (NASDAQ:ULBI) and China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Ultralife has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China BAK Battery. Ultralife is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China BAK Battery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ultralife	$191.16M	0.48	-$5.90M	-$0.50	N/A
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.25	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A

In the previous week, Ultralife had 1 more articles in the media than China BAK Battery. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ultralife and 2 mentions for China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Ultralife's score of 0.17 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ultralife	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ultralife has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ultralife	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

30.7% of Ultralife shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.9% of Ultralife shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ultralife has a net margin of -4.37% compared to China BAK Battery's net margin of -7.43%. Ultralife's return on equity of 1.15% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ultralife	-4.37%	1.15%	0.70%
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%

Summary

Ultralife beats China BAK Battery on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China BAK Battery News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CBAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CBAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	China BAK Battery	ELEC POWER Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$47.17M	$7.41B	$38.28B	$12.43B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.83%	3.14%	9.36%
P/E Ratio	-3.01	5.01	161.33	21.47
Price / Sales	0.25	16.41	594.49	91.08
Price / Cash	39.37	25.14	44.79	60.07
Price / Book	0.44	1.54	9.29	6.18
Net Income	-$9.38M	$209.88M	$1.07B	$331.73M
7 Day Performance	6.94%	-4.94%	-2.64%	-2.29%
1 Month Performance	-18.81%	-11.85%	-2.27%	-1.62%
1 Year Performance	-52.00%	137.97%	135.68%	16.81%

China BAK Battery Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CBAT China BAK Battery	0.7665 of 5 stars	$0.54 +1.9%	N/A	-48.3%	$47.17M	$195.19M	N/A	1,739	News Coverage Gap Down
EAF GrafTech International	2.5762 of 5 stars	$5.43 -6.5%	$10.67 +96.4%	-33.1%	$141.45M	$504.13M	N/A	1,071	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings Analyst Upgrade Short Interest Increase Gap Down
SKYX SKYX Platforms	3.5025 of 5 stars	$1.04 -4.2%	$5.00 +383.1%	+13.5%	$139.19M	$92.01M	N/A	30	News Coverage Positive News Short Interest Decrease
BYRN Byrna Technologies	3.0586 of 5 stars	$6.12 -13.6%	$12.13 +98.3%	-85.1%	$138.75M	$118.12M	16.99	150	Analyst Downgrade High Trading Volume
NEOV NeoVolta	3.5516 of 5 stars	$2.41 -11.6%	$9.50 +295.0%	-53.5%	$103.15M	$18.07M	N/A	5	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CBAT) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

China BAK Battery (CBAT) Competitors

CBAT vs. EAF, SKYX, BYRN, NEOV, and ULBI

How does China BAK Battery compare to GrafTech International?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to SKYX Platforms?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to Byrna Technologies?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to NeoVolta?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to Ultralife?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CBAT vs. The Competition

China BAK Battery Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

China BAK Battery (CBAT) Competitors

CBAT vs. EAF, SKYX, BYRN, NEOV, and ULBI

How does China BAK Battery compare to GrafTech International?

Which has more risk & volatility, CBAT or EAF?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CBAT or EAF?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CBAT or EAF?

Is CBAT or EAF more profitable?

Do analysts rate CBAT or EAF?

Does the media prefer CBAT or EAF?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to SKYX Platforms?

Do analysts prefer CBAT or SKYX?

Which has more volatility and risk, CBAT or SKYX?

Is CBAT or SKYX more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CBAT or SKYX?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CBAT or SKYX?

Does the media refer more to CBAT or SKYX?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to Byrna Technologies?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BYRN or CBAT?

Does the media favor BYRN or CBAT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BYRN or CBAT?

Do analysts rate BYRN or CBAT?

Which has more risk and volatility, BYRN or CBAT?

Is BYRN or CBAT more profitable?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to NeoVolta?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CBAT or NEOV?

Is CBAT or NEOV more profitable?

Do analysts rate CBAT or NEOV?

Which has more risk & volatility, CBAT or NEOV?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CBAT or NEOV?

Does the media prefer CBAT or NEOV?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to Ultralife?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ULBI or CBAT?

Does the media prefer ULBI or CBAT?

Which has more volatility & risk, ULBI or CBAT?

Do analysts rate ULBI or CBAT?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of ULBI or CBAT?

Is ULBI or CBAT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CBAT vs. The Competition

China BAK Battery Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools