Do analysts recommend CBAT or SES?

SES AI has a consensus price target of $2.55, suggesting a potential upside of 373.01%. Given SES AI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SES AI is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 SES AI 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts prefer CBAT or EAF?

GrafTech International has a consensus target price of $10.67, suggesting a potential upside of 52.82%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 GrafTech International 3 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Do analysts prefer SKYX or CBAT?

SKYX Platforms currently has a consensus price target of $4.67, suggesting a potential upside of 273.33%. Given SKYX Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe SKYX Platforms is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score SKYX Platforms 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor SKYX or CBAT?

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 2 more articles in the media than SKYX Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 2 mentions for SKYX Platforms. SKYX Platforms' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.22 indicating that SKYX Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SKYX Platforms 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate NEOV or CBAT?

NeoVolta currently has a consensus target price of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 172.99%. Given NeoVolta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NeoVolta is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NeoVolta 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor NEOV or CBAT?

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 2 more articles in the media than NeoVolta. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 2 mentions for NeoVolta. NeoVolta's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.22 indicating that NeoVolta is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NeoVolta 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CBAT or CHPT?

ChargePoint has a consensus target price of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 39.94%. Given ChargePoint's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ChargePoint is more favorable than China BAK Battery. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China BAK Battery 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 ChargePoint 3 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80

Does the media refer more to CBAT or CHPT?

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 1 more articles in the media than ChargePoint. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 3 mentions for ChargePoint. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat ChargePoint's score of -0.06 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China BAK Battery 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ChargePoint 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

China BAK Battery (CBAT) Competitors

$0.93 -0.02 (-2.20%)

Closing price 08/26/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$0.89 -0.04 (-4.21%)

As of 06:21 AM Eastern

Compare

CBAT vs. SES, EAF, SKYX, NEOV, and CHPT

Should you buy China BAK Battery stock or one of its competitors? China BAK Battery's main competitors and comparable companies include SES AI (SES), GrafTech International (EAF), SKYX Platforms (SKYX), NeoVolta (NEOV), and ChargePoint (CHPT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electrical components & equipment" industry.

How does China BAK Battery compare to SES AI?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and SES AI (NYSE:SES) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $2.55, suggesting a potential upside of 373.01%. Given SES AI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SES AI is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
SES AI	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 4 more articles in the media than SES AI. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 0 mentions for SES AI. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat SES AI's score of 0.00 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery	Neutral
SES AI	Neutral

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.8% of SES AI shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of SES AI shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to SES AI's net margin of -289.64%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat SES AI's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%
SES AI	-289.64%	-26.21%	-20.78%

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SES AI has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

China BAK Battery has higher revenue and earnings than SES AI. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SES AI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.42	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A
SES AI	$21M	9.53	-$73.04M	-$0.20	N/A

Summary

China BAK Battery beats SES AI on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to GrafTech International?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of GrafTech International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of GrafTech International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GrafTech International has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market.

China BAK Battery has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GrafTech International. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GrafTech International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.42	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A
GrafTech International	$512.92M	0.36	-$219.84M	-$6.80	N/A

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 4 more articles in the media than GrafTech International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 0 mentions for GrafTech International. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat GrafTech International's score of 0.00 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery	Neutral
GrafTech International	Neutral

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to GrafTech International's net margin of -34.58%. GrafTech International's return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%
GrafTech International	-34.58%	N/A	-17.50%

GrafTech International has a consensus target price of $10.67, suggesting a potential upside of 52.82%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
GrafTech International	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Summary

GrafTech International beats China BAK Battery on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to SKYX Platforms?

SKYX Platforms (NASDAQ:SKYX) and China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 2 more articles in the media than SKYX Platforms. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 2 mentions for SKYX Platforms. SKYX Platforms' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.22 indicating that SKYX Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SKYX Platforms	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

11.8% of SKYX Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. 24.2% of SKYX Platforms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SKYX Platforms currently has a consensus price target of $4.67, suggesting a potential upside of 273.33%. Given SKYX Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe SKYX Platforms is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SKYX Platforms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to SKYX Platforms' net margin of -34.34%. SKYX Platforms' return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SKYX Platforms	-34.34%	N/A	-49.28%
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%

SKYX Platforms has a beta of -3492.86, suggesting that its share price is 349,386% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

China BAK Battery has higher revenue and earnings than SKYX Platforms. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SKYX Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SKYX Platforms	$92.01M	1.84	-$33.42M	-$0.27	N/A
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.42	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A

Summary

SKYX Platforms beats China BAK Battery on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to NeoVolta?

NeoVolta (NASDAQ:NEOV) and China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 2 more articles in the media than NeoVolta. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 2 mentions for NeoVolta. NeoVolta's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat China BAK Battery's score of 0.22 indicating that NeoVolta is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NeoVolta	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

NeoVolta has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China BAK Battery. NeoVolta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China BAK Battery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NeoVolta	$8.43M	23.37	-$5.03M	-$0.33	N/A
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.42	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A

NeoVolta currently has a consensus target price of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 172.99%. Given NeoVolta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NeoVolta is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NeoVolta	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

5.1% of NeoVolta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of NeoVolta shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NeoVolta has a beta of -1.02, indicating that its stock price is 202% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -63.35%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat NeoVolta's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NeoVolta	-63.35%	-141.89%	-89.61%
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%

Summary

NeoVolta and China BAK Battery tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China BAK Battery compare to ChargePoint?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and ChargePoint (NYSE:CHPT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

ChargePoint has a consensus target price of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 39.94%. Given ChargePoint's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ChargePoint is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China BAK Battery	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
ChargePoint	3 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ChargePoint has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to ChargePoint's net margin of -49.66%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat ChargePoint's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China BAK Battery	-7.43%	-15.32%	-4.23%
ChargePoint	-49.66%	-504.42%	-18.93%

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of ChargePoint shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of ChargePoint shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 1 more articles in the media than ChargePoint. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 3 mentions for ChargePoint. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat ChargePoint's score of -0.06 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ChargePoint	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

China BAK Battery has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ChargePoint. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ChargePoint, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery	$195.19M	0.42	-$9.38M	-$0.18	N/A
ChargePoint	$411.22M	0.35	-$220.20M	-$8.68	N/A

Summary

China BAK Battery and ChargePoint tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China BAK Battery News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CBAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CBAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	China BAK Battery	Electrical Equipment Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$84.21M	$10.42B	$10.66B	$12.81B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.33%	97.24%	11.02%
P/E Ratio	-5.16	45.27	26.56	24.11
Price / Sales	0.42	1,690.83	365.51	96.38
Price / Cash	70.29	30.18	24.47	53.65
Price / Book	0.75	6.19	4.48	6.20
Net Income	-$9.38M	$139.36M	$611.08M	$348.07M
7 Day Performance	13.28%	0.12%	0.15%	1.02%
1 Month Performance	81.43%	0.59%	1.92%	4.20%
1 Year Performance	1.00%	15.04%	10.79%	16.46%

China BAK Battery Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CBAT China BAK Battery	0.7835 of 5 stars	$0.93 -2.2%	N/A	+3.2%	$84.21M	$195.19M	N/A	1,739	Short Interest Increase Gap Down
SES SES AI	1.9749 of 5 stars	$0.56 -2.5%	$2.55 +359.5%	-51.2%	$202.74M	$23.46M	N/A	130
EAF GrafTech International	1.4368 of 5 stars	$6.99 -5.0%	$10.67 +52.6%	-30.5%	$183.04M	$512.92M	N/A	1,071
SKYX SKYX Platforms	3.1739 of 5 stars	$1.16 +1.3%	$4.67 +304.0%	+3.3%	$156.67M	$92.01M	N/A	30
NEOV NeoVolta	2.4305 of 5 stars	$3.41 -6.3%	$9.50 +178.6%	-7.7%	$144.57M	$8.43M	N/A	5

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CBAT) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

China BAK Battery (CBAT) Competitors

CBAT vs. SES, EAF, SKYX, NEOV, and CHPT

How does China BAK Battery compare to SES AI?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to GrafTech International?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to SKYX Platforms?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to NeoVolta?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to ChargePoint?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CBAT vs. The Competition

China BAK Battery Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

China BAK Battery (CBAT) Competitors

CBAT vs. SES, EAF, SKYX, NEOV, and CHPT

How does China BAK Battery compare to SES AI?

Do analysts recommend CBAT or SES?

Does the media prefer CBAT or SES?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CBAT or SES?

Is CBAT or SES more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, CBAT or SES?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CBAT or SES?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to GrafTech International?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CBAT or EAF?

Which has more risk and volatility, CBAT or EAF?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CBAT or EAF?

Does the media prefer CBAT or EAF?

Is CBAT or EAF more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CBAT or EAF?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to SKYX Platforms?

Does the media favor SKYX or CBAT?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of SKYX or CBAT?

Do analysts prefer SKYX or CBAT?

Is SKYX or CBAT more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, SKYX or CBAT?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, SKYX or CBAT?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to NeoVolta?

Does the media favor NEOV or CBAT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, NEOV or CBAT?

Do analysts rate NEOV or CBAT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NEOV or CBAT?

Which has more volatility & risk, NEOV or CBAT?

Is NEOV or CBAT more profitable?

Summary

How does China BAK Battery compare to ChargePoint?

Do analysts prefer CBAT or CHPT?

Which has more risk and volatility, CBAT or CHPT?

Is CBAT or CHPT more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CBAT or CHPT?

Does the media refer more to CBAT or CHPT?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CBAT or CHPT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CBAT vs. The Competition

China BAK Battery Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools