CBAK Energy Technology Competitors

CAE (NYSE:CAE) and CBAK Energy Technology (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both aerospace companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for CAE and CBAK Energy Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

CAE presently has a consensus price target of $39.6667, indicating a potential upside of 33.92%. Given CAE's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe CAE is more favorable than CBAK Energy Technology.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CAE and CBAK Energy Technology's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CAE has higher revenue and earnings than CBAK Energy Technology.

Profitability

This table compares CAE and CBAK Energy Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.3% of CAE shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of CAE shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

CAE has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

CAE beats CBAK Energy Technology on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

CBAK Energy Technology (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Novanta (NASDAQ:NOVT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for CBAK Energy Technology and Novanta, as reported by MarketBeat.

Novanta has a consensus target price of $99.50, indicating a potential downside of 26.64%. Given Novanta's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Novanta is more favorable than CBAK Energy Technology.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Novanta's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Novanta has higher revenue and earnings than CBAK Energy Technology.

Profitability

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Novanta's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.5% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.2% of Novanta shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.8% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Novanta shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 3.6, meaning that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Novanta has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Novanta beats CBAK Energy Technology on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

CBAK Energy Technology (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Spectrum Brands (NYSE:SPB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Spectrum Brands' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Spectrum Brands has higher revenue and earnings than CBAK Energy Technology.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CBAK Energy Technology and Spectrum Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Spectrum Brands has a consensus target price of $82.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.99%. Given Spectrum Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Spectrum Brands is more favorable than CBAK Energy Technology.

Profitability

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Spectrum Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.5% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Spectrum Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Spectrum Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 3.6, meaning that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Spectrum Brands has a beta of 1.94, meaning that its share price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Spectrum Brands beats CBAK Energy Technology on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

CBAK Energy Technology (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Atkore (NYSE:ATKR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Atkore's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Atkore has higher revenue and earnings than CBAK Energy Technology.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CBAK Energy Technology and Atkore, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Atkore has a consensus target price of $61.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.39%. Given Atkore's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Atkore is more favorable than CBAK Energy Technology.

Profitability

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Atkore's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.5% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Atkore shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Atkore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 3.6, meaning that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Atkore has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its share price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Atkore beats CBAK Energy Technology on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

CBAK Energy Technology (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Energizer (NYSE:ENR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.5% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Energizer shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Energizer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Energizer's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CBAK Energy Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energizer.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CBAK Energy Technology and Energizer, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Energizer has a consensus target price of $50.6667, indicating a potential upside of 0.31%. Given Energizer's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energizer is more favorable than CBAK Energy Technology.

Profitability

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Energizer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 3.6, meaning that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energizer has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Energizer beats CBAK Energy Technology on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

CBAK Energy Technology (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Integer (NYSE:ITGR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Risk and Volatility

CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 3.6, meaning that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Integer has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Integer's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Integer has higher revenue and earnings than CBAK Energy Technology.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.5% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Integer shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of CBAK Energy Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Integer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares CBAK Energy Technology and Integer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for CBAK Energy Technology and Integer, as reported by MarketBeat.

Integer has a consensus target price of $99.3333, indicating a potential upside of 7.02%. Given Integer's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Integer is more favorable than CBAK Energy Technology.

Summary

Integer beats CBAK Energy Technology on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.