GrafTech International Competitors

GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) and Tenaris (NYSE:TS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for GrafTech International and Tenaris, as provided by MarketBeat.

Tenaris has a consensus price target of $21.25, suggesting a potential downside of 9.15%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than Tenaris.

Volatility and Risk

GrafTech International has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tenaris has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

GrafTech International pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Tenaris pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. GrafTech International pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tenaris pays out 22.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. GrafTech International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares GrafTech International and Tenaris' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.4% of GrafTech International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of Tenaris shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of GrafTech International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Tenaris shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GrafTech International and Tenaris' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

GrafTech International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tenaris. GrafTech International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tenaris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

GrafTech International beats Tenaris on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Graco (NYSE:GGG) and GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Graco and GrafTech International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Graco and GrafTech International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Graco presently has a consensus target price of $76.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.52%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than Graco.

Dividends

Graco pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. GrafTech International pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Graco pays out 39.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GrafTech International pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Graco has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and GrafTech International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

84.1% of Graco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of GrafTech International shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Graco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of GrafTech International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Graco and GrafTech International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GrafTech International has higher revenue and earnings than Graco. GrafTech International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Graco has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GrafTech International has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

GrafTech International beats Graco on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) and Allegion (NYSE:ALLE) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for GrafTech International and Allegion, as reported by MarketBeat.

Allegion has a consensus target price of $123.50, suggesting a potential downside of 11.29%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than Allegion.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.4% of GrafTech International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Allegion shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of GrafTech International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Allegion shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares GrafTech International and Allegion's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GrafTech International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Allegion. GrafTech International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allegion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares GrafTech International and Allegion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

GrafTech International pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Allegion pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. GrafTech International pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allegion pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. GrafTech International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Allegion has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

GrafTech International has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Allegion has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Allegion beats GrafTech International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) and Nordson (NASDAQ:NDSN) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.4% of GrafTech International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Nordson shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of GrafTech International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Nordson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares GrafTech International and Nordson's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

GrafTech International pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Nordson pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. GrafTech International pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nordson pays out 28.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. GrafTech International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Nordson has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Nordson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

GrafTech International has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nordson has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for GrafTech International and Nordson, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Nordson has a consensus price target of $221.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.70%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than Nordson.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares GrafTech International and Nordson's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

GrafTech International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nordson. GrafTech International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nordson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nordson beats GrafTech International on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) and A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Dividends

GrafTech International pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. GrafTech International pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. GrafTech International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and A. O. Smith has raised its dividend for 29 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.4% of GrafTech International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of GrafTech International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

GrafTech International has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares GrafTech International and A. O. Smith's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GrafTech International and A. O. Smith's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GrafTech International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than A. O. Smith. GrafTech International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for GrafTech International and A. O. Smith, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A. O. Smith has a consensus price target of $60.2857, indicating a potential downside of 15.16%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Pentair (NYSE:PNR) and GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.3% of Pentair shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of GrafTech International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Pentair shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of GrafTech International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pentair and GrafTech International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

GrafTech International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pentair. GrafTech International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pentair, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Pentair and GrafTech International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Pentair currently has a consensus target price of $58.6429, suggesting a potential downside of 13.15%. Given GrafTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than Pentair.

Volatility and Risk

Pentair has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GrafTech International has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Pentair pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. GrafTech International pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Pentair pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GrafTech International pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pentair has raised its dividend for 45 consecutive years and GrafTech International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Pentair is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Pentair and GrafTech International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Pentair beats GrafTech International on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.