Do analysts rate OPY or CD?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Oppenheimer 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Chindata Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts recommend CD or TIGR?

UP Fintech has a consensus target price of $8.16, indicating a potential upside of 63.15%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than Chindata Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chindata Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 UP Fintech 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has better earnings and valuation, CD or TIGR?

UP Fintech has higher revenue and earnings than Chindata Group. Chindata Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Fintech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Chindata Group $1.87M 206.47 -$5.10M -$0.03 N/A UP Fintech $612.07M 1.55 $170.90M $0.59 8.47

Do analysts recommend LCLN or CD?

Lincoln International presently has a consensus price target of $27.36, indicating a potential upside of 1.73%. Given Lincoln International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Lincoln International is more favorable than Chindata Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lincoln International 1 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40 Chindata Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LCLN or CD?

Lincoln International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chindata Group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lincoln International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Chindata Group $1.87M 206.47 -$5.10M -$0.03 N/A

Is LCLN or CD more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lincoln International N/A N/A N/A Chindata Group N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate CD or RILY?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chindata Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 B. Riley Financial 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Chindata Group (CD) Competitors

$3.51 -0.56 (-13.76%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CD vs. PWP, OPY, TIGR, LCLN, and RILY

Should you buy Chindata Group stock or one of its competitors? Chindata Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP), Oppenheimer (OPY), UP Fintech (TIGR), Lincoln International (LCLN), and B. Riley Financial (RILY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "investment banking & brokerage" industry.

How does Chindata Group compare to Perella Weinberg Partners?

Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ:PWP) and Chindata Group (NASDAQ:CD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

41.1% of Perella Weinberg Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Chindata Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.1% of Perella Weinberg Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 62.8% of Chindata Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Perella Weinberg Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Chindata Group. Chindata Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perella Weinberg Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Perella Weinberg Partners	$750.90M	2.08	$35.48M	$0.26	63.77
Chindata Group	$1.87M	206.47	-$5.10M	-$0.03	N/A

Perella Weinberg Partners has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Chindata Group's net margin of 0.00%. Chindata Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Perella Weinberg Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Perella Weinberg Partners	3.19%	-35.84%	8.40%
Chindata Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Perella Weinberg Partners has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chindata Group has a beta of 5.23, meaning that its share price is 423% more volatile than the broader market.

Perella Weinberg Partners currently has a consensus target price of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.69%. Given Perella Weinberg Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Perella Weinberg Partners is more favorable than Chindata Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Perella Weinberg Partners	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Chindata Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Perella Weinberg Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Chindata Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Perella Weinberg Partners and 0 mentions for Chindata Group. Perella Weinberg Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Chindata Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Perella Weinberg Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Perella Weinberg Partners	Positive
Chindata Group	Neutral

Summary

Perella Weinberg Partners beats Chindata Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chindata Group compare to Oppenheimer?

Oppenheimer (NYSE:OPY) and Chindata Group (NASDAQ:CD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Oppenheimer has a net margin of 5.72% compared to Chindata Group's net margin of 0.00%. Oppenheimer's return on equity of 19.51% beat Chindata Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oppenheimer	5.72%	19.51%	4.86%
Chindata Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oppenheimer	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Chindata Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Oppenheimer has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chindata Group has a beta of 5.23, indicating that its stock price is 423% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Oppenheimer had 2 more articles in the media than Chindata Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Oppenheimer and 0 mentions for Chindata Group. Oppenheimer's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Chindata Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Oppenheimer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Oppenheimer	Neutral
Chindata Group	Neutral

32.3% of Oppenheimer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Chindata Group shares are held by institutional investors. 34.9% of Oppenheimer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 62.8% of Chindata Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Oppenheimer has higher revenue and earnings than Chindata Group. Chindata Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oppenheimer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oppenheimer	$1.64B	0.81	$148.40M	$8.86	13.91
Chindata Group	$1.87M	206.47	-$5.10M	-$0.03	N/A

Summary

Oppenheimer beats Chindata Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chindata Group compare to UP Fintech?

Chindata Group (NASDAQ:CD) and UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

UP Fintech has a consensus target price of $8.16, indicating a potential upside of 63.15%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than Chindata Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chindata Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
UP Fintech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Chindata Group has a beta of 5.23, suggesting that its stock price is 423% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Fintech has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

30.8% of Chindata Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.0% of UP Fintech shares are held by institutional investors. 62.8% of Chindata Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

UP Fintech has a net margin of 16.22% compared to Chindata Group's net margin of 0.00%. UP Fintech's return on equity of 13.11% beat Chindata Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chindata Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
UP Fintech	16.22%	13.11%	1.23%

In the previous week, UP Fintech had 3 more articles in the media than Chindata Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for UP Fintech and 0 mentions for Chindata Group. Chindata Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat UP Fintech's score of -0.11 indicating that Chindata Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chindata Group	Neutral
UP Fintech	Neutral

UP Fintech has higher revenue and earnings than Chindata Group. Chindata Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Fintech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chindata Group	$1.87M	206.47	-$5.10M	-$0.03	N/A
UP Fintech	$612.07M	1.55	$170.90M	$0.59	8.47

Summary

UP Fintech beats Chindata Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chindata Group compare to Lincoln International?

Lincoln International (NYSE:LCLN) and Chindata Group (NASDAQ:CD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lincoln International	N/A	N/A	N/A
Chindata Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

30.8% of Chindata Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.8% of Chindata Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lincoln International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chindata Group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lincoln International	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Chindata Group	$1.87M	206.47	-$5.10M	-$0.03	N/A

Lincoln International presently has a consensus price target of $27.36, indicating a potential upside of 1.73%. Given Lincoln International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Lincoln International is more favorable than Chindata Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lincoln International	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Chindata Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Lincoln International had 3 more articles in the media than Chindata Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lincoln International and 0 mentions for Chindata Group. Lincoln International's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Chindata Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Lincoln International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Lincoln International	Positive
Chindata Group	Neutral

Summary

Lincoln International beats Chindata Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chindata Group compare to B. Riley Financial?

Chindata Group (NASDAQ:CD) and B. Riley Financial (NASDAQ:RILY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.

B. Riley Financial has a net margin of 35.88% compared to Chindata Group's net margin of 0.00%. B. Riley Financial's return on equity of 39,260.09% beat Chindata Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chindata Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
B. Riley Financial	35.88%	39,260.09%	22.99%

30.8% of Chindata Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of B. Riley Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.8% of Chindata Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.8% of B. Riley Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chindata Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled B. Riley Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chindata Group	Neutral
B. Riley Financial	Neutral

Chindata Group has a beta of 5.23, suggesting that its share price is 423% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B. Riley Financial has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

B. Riley Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Chindata Group. Chindata Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B. Riley Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chindata Group	$1.87M	206.47	-$5.10M	-$0.03	N/A
B. Riley Financial	$1.13B	0.25	$307.42M	$12.70	0.55

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chindata Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
B. Riley Financial	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

B. Riley Financial beats Chindata Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chindata Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Chindata Group	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$386.10M	$5.62B	$14.06B	$12.86B
Dividend Yield	N/A	7.41%	5.89%	9.14%
P/E Ratio	-117.00	31.27	26.04	25.39
Price / Sales	206.47	1,172.55	504.94	87.25
Price / Cash	N/A	48.07	30.84	35.62
Price / Book	5.48	3.58	2.77	6.41
Net Income	-$5.10M	$419.48M	$1.32B	$358.18M
7 Day Performance	15.84%	7.71%	4.18%	0.73%
1 Month Performance	32.45%	-0.20%	1.03%	-0.74%
1 Year Performance	N/A	6.62%	11.21%	13.39%

Chindata Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CD Chindata Group	0.0405 of 5 stars	$3.51 -13.8%	N/A	N/A	$386.10M	$1.87M	N/A	1,450	Gap Down
PWP Perella Weinberg Partners	2.5281 of 5 stars	$16.93 +3.3%	$22.00 +29.9%	-22.7%	$1.59B	$689.25M	65.12	600	Positive News
OPY Oppenheimer	1.9384 of 5 stars	$124.67 +6.2%	N/A	+69.0%	$1.34B	$1.64B	14.07	2,947	High Trading Volume
TIGR UP Fintech	3.2179 of 5 stars	$5.07 +5.8%	$8.16 +60.9%	-58.7%	$961.78M	$612.07M	8.59	1,346
LCLN Lincoln International	3.3834 of 5 stars	$26.82 +3.4%	$27.36 +2.0%	N/A	$934.68M	N/A	N/A	1,453	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CD) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chindata Group (CD) Competitors

CD vs. PWP, OPY, TIGR, LCLN, and RILY

How does Chindata Group compare to Perella Weinberg Partners?

Summary

How does Chindata Group compare to Oppenheimer?

Summary

How does Chindata Group compare to UP Fintech?

Summary

How does Chindata Group compare to Lincoln International?

Summary

How does Chindata Group compare to B. Riley Financial?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CD vs. The Competition

Chindata Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Chindata Group (CD) Competitors

CD vs. PWP, OPY, TIGR, LCLN, and RILY

How does Chindata Group compare to Perella Weinberg Partners?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PWP or CD?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PWP or CD?

Is PWP or CD more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, PWP or CD?

Do analysts rate PWP or CD?

Does the media refer more to PWP or CD?

Summary

How does Chindata Group compare to Oppenheimer?

Is OPY or CD more profitable?

Do analysts rate OPY or CD?

Which has more risk and volatility, OPY or CD?

Does the media favor OPY or CD?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in OPY or CD?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, OPY or CD?

Summary

How does Chindata Group compare to UP Fintech?

Do analysts recommend CD or TIGR?

Which has more volatility & risk, CD or TIGR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CD or TIGR?

Is CD or TIGR more profitable?

Does the media prefer CD or TIGR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CD or TIGR?

Summary

How does Chindata Group compare to Lincoln International?

Is LCLN or CD more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LCLN or CD?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LCLN or CD?

Do analysts recommend LCLN or CD?

Does the media favor LCLN or CD?

Summary

How does Chindata Group compare to B. Riley Financial?

Is CD or RILY more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CD or RILY?

Does the media refer more to CD or RILY?

Which has more volatility and risk, CD or RILY?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CD or RILY?

Do analysts rate CD or RILY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CD vs. The Competition

Chindata Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools