Free Trial

CryoPort (CYRX) Competitors

CryoPort logo
$16.95 +0.11 (+0.65%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$16.95 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CYRX vs. ALMR, MRVI, FTRE, BLFS, and AZTA

Should you buy CryoPort stock or one of its competitors? CryoPort's main competitors and comparable companies include Alamar Biosciences (ALMR), Maravai LifeSciences (MRVI), Fortrea (FTRE), BioLife Solutions (BLFS), and Azenta (AZTA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "life sciences tools & services" industry.

How does CryoPort compare to Alamar Biosciences?

CryoPort (NASDAQ:CYRX) and Alamar Biosciences (NASDAQ:ALMR) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Alamar Biosciences has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CryoPort's net margin of -20.05%. Alamar Biosciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat CryoPort's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CryoPort-20.05% -7.20% -4.30%
Alamar Biosciences N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Alamar Biosciences had 4 more articles in the media than CryoPort. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Alamar Biosciences and 4 mentions for CryoPort. CryoPort's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Alamar Biosciences' score of 0.41 indicating that CryoPort is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CryoPort
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alamar Biosciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

92.9% of CryoPort shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of CryoPort shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CryoPort has higher revenue and earnings than Alamar Biosciences. CryoPort is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamar Biosciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CryoPort$176.18M4.84$78.30M-$0.90N/A
Alamar Biosciences$74.21M22.67-$29.82M-$1.96N/A

CryoPort currently has a consensus target price of $18.38, indicating a potential upside of 9.12%. Alamar Biosciences has a consensus target price of $31.80, indicating a potential upside of 31.19%. Given Alamar Biosciences' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alamar Biosciences is more favorable than CryoPort.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CryoPort
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Alamar Biosciences
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

CryoPort beats Alamar Biosciences on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CryoPort compare to Maravai LifeSciences?

CryoPort (NASDAQ:CYRX) and Maravai LifeSciences (NASDAQ:MRVI) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

CryoPort has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Maravai LifeSciences. CryoPort is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maravai LifeSciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CryoPort$176.18M4.84$78.30M-$0.90N/A
Maravai LifeSciences$185.74M9.87-$130.77M-$0.52N/A

CryoPort has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maravai LifeSciences has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

CryoPort has a net margin of -20.05% compared to Maravai LifeSciences' net margin of -37.07%. CryoPort's return on equity of -7.20% beat Maravai LifeSciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CryoPort-20.05% -7.20% -4.30%
Maravai LifeSciences -37.07%-15.70%-8.17%

CryoPort presently has a consensus price target of $18.38, indicating a potential upside of 9.12%. Maravai LifeSciences has a consensus price target of $7.38, indicating a potential upside of 4.46%. Given CryoPort's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CryoPort is more favorable than Maravai LifeSciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CryoPort
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Maravai LifeSciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

In the previous week, CryoPort and CryoPort both had 4 articles in the media. Maravai LifeSciences' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat CryoPort's score of 0.53 indicating that Maravai LifeSciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CryoPort
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Maravai LifeSciences
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.9% of CryoPort shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.3% of Maravai LifeSciences shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of CryoPort shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Maravai LifeSciences shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CryoPort beats Maravai LifeSciences on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CryoPort compare to Fortrea?

Fortrea (NASDAQ:FTRE) and CryoPort (NASDAQ:CYRX) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Fortrea had 3 more articles in the media than CryoPort. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fortrea and 4 mentions for CryoPort. CryoPort's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Fortrea's score of 0.36 indicating that CryoPort is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortrea
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CryoPort
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.9% of CryoPort shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fortrea shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of CryoPort shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortrea has a beta of 1.93, indicating that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CryoPort has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortrea currently has a consensus price target of $22.10, suggesting a potential upside of 5.24%. CryoPort has a consensus price target of $18.38, suggesting a potential upside of 9.12%. Given CryoPort's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CryoPort is more favorable than Fortrea.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortrea
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
CryoPort
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

CryoPort has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fortrea. Fortrea is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CryoPort, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortrea$2.72B0.73-$986.20M-$0.91N/A
CryoPort$176.18M4.84$78.30M-$0.90N/A

Fortrea has a net margin of -3.18% compared to CryoPort's net margin of -20.05%. Fortrea's return on equity of 10.72% beat CryoPort's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortrea-3.18% 10.72% 2.17%
CryoPort -20.05%-7.20%-4.30%

Summary

CryoPort beats Fortrea on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CryoPort compare to BioLife Solutions?

CryoPort (NASDAQ:CYRX) and BioLife Solutions (NASDAQ:BLFS) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, BioLife Solutions had 1 more articles in the media than CryoPort. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for BioLife Solutions and 4 mentions for CryoPort. BioLife Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat CryoPort's score of 0.53 indicating that BioLife Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CryoPort
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BioLife Solutions
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.9% of CryoPort shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of BioLife Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of CryoPort shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of BioLife Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CryoPort has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioLife Solutions has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

CryoPort currently has a consensus target price of $18.38, indicating a potential upside of 9.12%. BioLife Solutions has a consensus target price of $31.38, indicating a potential downside of 18.74%. Given CryoPort's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe CryoPort is more favorable than BioLife Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CryoPort
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
BioLife Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

CryoPort has higher revenue and earnings than BioLife Solutions. CryoPort is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BioLife Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CryoPort$176.18M4.84$78.30M-$0.90N/A
BioLife Solutions$106.69M17.71-$4.59M$1.1633.28

BioLife Solutions has a net margin of 53.29% compared to CryoPort's net margin of -20.05%. BioLife Solutions' return on equity of 2.70% beat CryoPort's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CryoPort-20.05% -7.20% -4.30%
BioLife Solutions 53.29%2.70%2.49%

Summary

BioLife Solutions beats CryoPort on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CryoPort compare to Azenta?

CryoPort (NASDAQ:CYRX) and Azenta (NASDAQ:AZTA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

92.9% of CryoPort shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.1% of Azenta shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of CryoPort shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Azenta shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CryoPort has a net margin of -20.05% compared to Azenta's net margin of -20.63%. Azenta's return on equity of 1.18% beat CryoPort's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CryoPort-20.05% -7.20% -4.30%
Azenta -20.63%1.18%0.97%

In the previous week, Azenta had 7 more articles in the media than CryoPort. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Azenta and 4 mentions for CryoPort. CryoPort's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Azenta's score of 0.33 indicating that CryoPort is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CryoPort
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Azenta
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CryoPort has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Azenta. CryoPort is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Azenta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CryoPort$176.18M4.84$78.30M-$0.90N/A
Azenta$613.81M2.70-$55.76M-$2.76N/A

CryoPort has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Azenta has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market.

CryoPort presently has a consensus price target of $18.38, suggesting a potential upside of 9.12%. Azenta has a consensus price target of $41.20, suggesting a potential upside of 9.08%. Given CryoPort's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CryoPort is more favorable than Azenta.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CryoPort
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Azenta
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

CryoPort beats Azenta on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CryoPort News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CYRX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CYRX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CYRX vs. The Competition

MetricCryoPortLife Sciences Tools & Services IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$852.93M$10.59B$7.15B$13.16B
Dividend YieldN/A1.45%2.52%20.73%
P/E Ratio-18.8332.45275.9725.79
Price / Sales4.87105.29615.58101.51
Price / CashN/A27.2827.3036.12
Price / Book1.846.1410.686.03
Net Income$78.30M$56.67B$3.50B$380.34M
7 Day Performance-4.78%-3.00%-3.18%-3.04%
1 Month Performance9.00%5.41%-6.61%-5.16%
1 Year Performance80.32%25.91%3.69%-2.48%

CryoPort Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CYRX
CryoPort
3.2318 of 5 stars
$16.95
+0.7%
$19.33
+14.1%
+81.1%$852.93M$176.18MN/A738
ALMR
Alamar Biosciences
3.3934 of 5 stars
$27.77
-13.9%
$31.80
+14.5%
N/A$2.24B$74.21MN/A222
MRVI
Maravai LifeSciences
1.6384 of 5 stars
$7.43
-5.4%
$7.38
-0.7%
+121.3%$2.04B$185.74MN/A415
FTRE
Fortrea
2.6714 of 5 stars
$20.56
-1.1%
$22.10
+7.5%
+116.9%$1.98B$2.72BN/A14,300
BLFS
BioLife Solutions
1.873 of 5 stars
$38.61
flat
$31.38
-18.7%
N/A$1.89B$96.21M33.28155

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CYRX) was last updated on 10/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners