Beam Global (EVSI) Competitors

In the previous week, Beam Global had 1 more articles in the media than Freedom Acquisition I. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Beam Global and 0 mentions for Freedom Acquisition I. Freedom Acquisition I's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Beam Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Freedom Acquisition I has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -74.75%. Freedom Acquisition I's return on equity of -31.14% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Freedom Acquisition I has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Beam Global has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Freedom Acquisition I has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Beam Global.

55.8% of Freedom Acquisition I shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Freedom Acquisition I shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Beam Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

11.1% of Beam Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by institutional investors. 6.4% of Beam Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Beam Global has a beta of 0.1, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its share price is 97% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Beam Global had 1 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Beam Global and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. Beam Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Roth CH Acquisition IV'saverage media sentiment score.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -74.75%. Beam Global's return on equity of -66.50% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Beam Global.

Beam Global has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) has a beta of -0.46, suggesting that its share price is 146% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -74.75%. Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)'s return on equity of -56.49% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Beam Global. Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

11.1% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.4% of Beam Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) had 1 more articles in the media than Beam Global. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) and 1 mentions for Beam Global. Beam Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)'saverage media sentiment score.

Beam Global has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Energy has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Beam Global has a net margin of -74.75% compared to U.S. Energy's net margin of -195.49%. U.S. Energy's return on equity of -51.91% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Beam Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Energy. U.S. Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

U.S. Energy has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 215.32%. Given U.S. Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe U.S. Energy is more favorable than Beam Global.

11.1% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of U.S. Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.4% of Beam Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.3% of U.S. Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, U.S. Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Beam Global. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for U.S. Energy and 1 mentions for Beam Global. U.S. Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Beam Global's score of 0.00 indicating that U.S. Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.