Go Pro

Roth CH Acquisition IV (ROCG) Competitors

$1.22 -0.04 (-3.17%)
As of 08/14/2026

ROCG vs. CBAT, STI, WBX, SPWR, and FTCI

Should you buy Roth CH Acquisition IV stock or one of its competitors? Roth CH Acquisition IV's main competitors and comparable companies include China BAK Battery (CBAT), Solidion Technology (STI), Wallbox (WBX), CSLM Acquisition (SPWR), and FTC Solar (FTCI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electrical components & equipment" industry.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to China BAK Battery?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 4 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's score of 0.00 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery Positive
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to China BAK Battery's net margin of -7.43%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China BAK Battery-7.43% -15.32% -4.23%
Roth CH Acquisition IV N/A -6,449.52%-0.66%

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China BAK Battery.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.33-$9.38M-$0.18N/A
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

Summary

China BAK Battery beats Roth CH Acquisition IV on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to Solidion Technology?

Solidion Technology (NASDAQ:STI) and Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Solidion Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solidion TechnologyN/A N/A -119.29%
Roth CH Acquisition IV N/A -6,449.52%-0.66%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solidion Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Solidion Technology has a beta of -0.03, meaning that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solidion Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solidion Technology$219.69K277.84-$41M-$12.85N/A
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

In the previous week, Solidion Technology had 1 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Solidion Technology and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. Solidion Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's score of 0.00 indicating that Solidion Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solidion Technology Very Positive
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral

67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Solidion Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Solidion Technology and Roth CH Acquisition IV tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to Wallbox?

Wallbox (NYSE:WBX) and Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Wallbox's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Roth CH Acquisition IV'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wallbox Neutral
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral

Wallbox has a beta of 2.02, indicating that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Wallbox presently has a consensus target price of $4.33, indicating a potential upside of 36.91%. Given Wallbox's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Wallbox is more favorable than Roth CH Acquisition IV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wallbox
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Wallbox's net margin of -70.12%. Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity of -6,449.52% beat Wallbox's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wallbox-70.12% -6,451.74% -55.57%
Roth CH Acquisition IV N/A -6,449.52%-0.66%

Roth CH Acquisition IV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Wallbox.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wallbox$164.15M0.33-$115.14MN/AN/A
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

36.9% of Wallbox shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.3% of Wallbox shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Wallbox beats Roth CH Acquisition IV on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to CSLM Acquisition?

CSLM Acquisition (NASDAQ:SPWR) and Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CSLM Acquisition's net margin of -14.34%. CSLM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CSLM Acquisition-14.34% N/A -19.80%
Roth CH Acquisition IV N/A -6,449.52%-0.66%

47.4% of CSLM Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by institutional investors. 42.6% of CSLM Acquisition shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CSLM Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CSLM Acquisition$300M0.16-$45.35M-$0.47N/A
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

In the previous week, CSLM Acquisition had 1 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CSLM Acquisition and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. CSLM Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's score of 0.00 indicating that CSLM Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CSLM Acquisition Very Positive
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral

CSLM Acquisition currently has a consensus target price of $5.40, suggesting a potential upside of 2,348.98%. Given CSLM Acquisition's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe CSLM Acquisition is more favorable than Roth CH Acquisition IV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CSLM Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

CSLM Acquisition has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CSLM Acquisition beats Roth CH Acquisition IV on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to FTC Solar?

FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) and Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. FTC Solar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FTC Solar-51.02% N/A -37.99%
Roth CH Acquisition IV N/A -6,449.52%-0.66%

45.4% of FTC Solar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by institutional investors. 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, FTC Solar had 3 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for FTC Solar and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. FTC Solar's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's score of 0.00 indicating that FTC Solar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FTC Solar Neutral
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral

FTC Solar has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

FTC Solar presently has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 348.72%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Roth CH Acquisition IV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Roth CH Acquisition IV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FTC Solar.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTC Solar$99.69M0.39-$79.58M-$6.25N/A
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

Summary

FTC Solar beats Roth CH Acquisition IV on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Roth CH Acquisition IV News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ROCG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ROCG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ROCG vs. The Competition

MetricRoth CH Acquisition IVElectrical Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$18.10M$11.35B$10.95B$13.06B
Dividend YieldN/A2.31%97.10%10.44%
P/E RatioN/A46.6327.8625.28
Price / SalesN/A1,584.95333.3475.26
Price / CashN/A31.3724.9550.90
Price / Book-20.336.744.786.24
Net Income-$180K$139.38M$609.43M$347.60M
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.00%0.78%1.06%
1 Month Performance-35.79%-1.86%3.00%0.81%
1 Year Performance-3.94%23.32%14.45%20.90%

Roth CH Acquisition IV Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ROCG
Roth CH Acquisition IV
N/A$1.22
-3.2%
N/A-3.1%$18.10MN/AN/A126
CBAT
China BAK Battery
0.8046 of 5 stars
$0.77
+18.5%
N/A-26.8%$68.52M$195.19MN/A1,739
STI
Solidion Technology
1.0412 of 5 stars
$8.45
+17.2%
N/A+147.8%$65.49M$10KN/AN/A
WBX
Wallbox
4.695 of 5 stars
$3.34
-1.3%
$4.33
+29.9%
-28.9%$57.16M$164.15MN/A1,108
SPWR
CSLM Acquisition
2.3105 of 5 stars
$0.25
-7.9%
$5.40
+2,090.7%
-86.0%$53.16M$300MN/A151

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ROCG) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners