Go Pro

Roth CH Acquisition IV (ROCG) Competitors

$1.26 +0.04 (+3.28%)
As of 08/13/2026

ROCG vs. CBAT, STI, WBX, SPWR, and FTCI

Should you buy Roth CH Acquisition IV stock or one of its competitors? Roth CH Acquisition IV's main competitors and comparable companies include China BAK Battery (CBAT), Solidion Technology (STI), Wallbox (WBX), CSLM Acquisition (SPWR), and FTC Solar (FTCI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electrical components & equipment" industry.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to China BAK Battery?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China BAK Battery.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.33-$9.38M-$0.18N/A
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, China BAK Battery had 4 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China BAK Battery and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's score of 0.00 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery Positive
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to China BAK Battery's net margin of -7.43%. China BAK Battery's return on equity of -15.32% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China BAK Battery-7.43% -15.32% -4.23%
Roth CH Acquisition IV N/A -6,449.52%-0.66%

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, suggesting that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China BAK Battery beats Roth CH Acquisition IV on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to Solidion Technology?

Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) and Solidion Technology (NASDAQ:STI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Solidion Technology had 1 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Solidion Technology and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. Solidion Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's score of 0.00 indicating that Solidion Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral
Solidion Technology Very Positive

Solidion Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/A -6,449.52% -0.66%
Solidion Technology N/A N/A -119.29%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Solidion Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Solidion Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Solidion Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A
Solidion Technology$219.69K277.84-$41M-$12.85N/A

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solidion Technology has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Roth CH Acquisition IV and Solidion Technology tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to Wallbox?

Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) and Wallbox (NYSE:WBX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Wallbox has a consensus target price of $4.33, suggesting a potential upside of 36.91%. Given Wallbox's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Wallbox is more favorable than Roth CH Acquisition IV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Wallbox
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, Roth CH Acquisition IV's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wallbox'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral
Wallbox Neutral

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Wallbox's net margin of -70.12%. Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity of -6,449.52% beat Wallbox's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/A -6,449.52% -0.66%
Wallbox -70.12%-6,451.74%-55.57%

Roth CH Acquisition IV has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Wallbox.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A
Wallbox$164.15M0.33-$115.14MN/AN/A

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, meaning that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wallbox has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its share price is 102% more volatile than the broader market.

67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.9% of Wallbox shares are held by institutional investors. 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 33.3% of Wallbox shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Wallbox beats Roth CH Acquisition IV on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to CSLM Acquisition?

Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) and CSLM Acquisition (NASDAQ:SPWR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, CSLM Acquisition had 1 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CSLM Acquisition and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. CSLM Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's score of 0.00 indicating that CSLM Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral
CSLM Acquisition Very Positive

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CSLM Acquisition's net margin of -14.34%. CSLM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/A -6,449.52% -0.66%
CSLM Acquisition -14.34%N/A -19.80%

CSLM Acquisition has a consensus price target of $5.40, indicating a potential upside of 2,348.98%. Given CSLM Acquisition's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CSLM Acquisition is more favorable than Roth CH Acquisition IV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CSLM Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, suggesting that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CSLM Acquisition has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.4% of CSLM Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.6% of CSLM Acquisition shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CSLM Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A
CSLM Acquisition$300M0.16-$45.35M-$0.47N/A

Summary

CSLM Acquisition beats Roth CH Acquisition IV on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roth CH Acquisition IV compare to FTC Solar?

Roth CH Acquisition IV (NASDAQ:ROCG) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a net margin of 0.00% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. FTC Solar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/A -6,449.52% -0.66%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

Roth CH Acquisition IV has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its share price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FTC Solar had 3 more articles in the media than Roth CH Acquisition IV. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for FTC Solar and 0 mentions for Roth CH Acquisition IV. FTC Solar's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Roth CH Acquisition IV's score of 0.00 indicating that FTC Solar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Roth CH Acquisition IV Neutral
FTC Solar Neutral

Roth CH Acquisition IV has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FTC Solar.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Roth CH Acquisition IVN/AN/A-$180KN/AN/A
FTC Solar$99.69M0.39-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 348.72%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Roth CH Acquisition IV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Roth CH Acquisition IV
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

67.1% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.6% of Roth CH Acquisition IV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FTC Solar beats Roth CH Acquisition IV on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Roth CH Acquisition IV News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ROCG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ROCG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ROCG vs. The Competition

MetricRoth CH Acquisition IVElectrical Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$18.70M$11.35B$10.95B$13.06B
Dividend YieldN/A2.31%97.10%10.45%
P/E RatioN/A46.6327.8625.28
Price / SalesN/A1,584.96333.3576.27
Price / CashN/A31.3724.9550.90
Price / Book-21.006.744.786.24
Net Income-$180K$139.38M$609.43M$347.60M
7 Day Performance3.28%1.00%0.78%1.06%
1 Month Performance-33.68%-1.86%3.00%0.81%
1 Year Performance-0.79%23.32%14.45%20.90%

Roth CH Acquisition IV Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ROCG
Roth CH Acquisition IV
N/A$1.26
+3.3%
N/A-3.1%$18.70MN/AN/A126
CBAT
China BAK Battery
0.8046 of 5 stars
$0.77
+18.5%
N/A-26.8%$68.52M$195.19MN/A1,739
STI
Solidion Technology
1.0412 of 5 stars
$8.45
+17.2%
N/A+147.8%$65.49M$10KN/AN/A
WBX
Wallbox
4.695 of 5 stars
$3.34
-1.3%
$4.33
+29.9%
-28.9%$57.16M$164.15MN/A1,108
SPWR
CSLM Acquisition
2.3062 of 5 stars
$0.25
-7.9%
$5.40
+2,090.7%
-86.0%$53.16M$300MN/A151

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ROCG) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners